HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-2038 - Claims processing under Initiative 164 (Special)CITY OF MARYSVILLE
Marysville, Washington
ORDINANCE NO.2038
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA TO PROCESS
AND EVALUATE CLAIMS UNDER INITIATIVE 164,INCLUDING PROVIDING FOR
ADJUSTMENT TO PROVISIONS OF CITY REGULATIONS AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY TO EXIST.
WHEREAS,the City Council finds that the 1995 Legislature
enacted into law Initiative 164,the Private Property Regulatory
Fairness Act (Chapter 98,Laws of 1995 Regular Session);and
WHEREAS,the City Council finds that the Initiative will
become law on July 23,1995,90 days after the close of the regular
session unless a sufficient referendum petition (Referendum 48)is
filed by that date to bring the Initiative before the voters in
November;and
WHEREAS,the City Council finds that the action of the
Legislature in adopting the Initiative provided the City with
insufficient time to properly plan and revise the City's regulatory
framework to respond to the Initiative;and
WHEREAS,the City Council finds that because of the vague and
uncertain language used in the Initiative,that its scope and
meaning is in question thereby placing the City at risk;and
WHEREAS,the City Council finds that the City needs to adopt
interim procedures to act as a stop-gap measure to provide the City
with a framework to operate under while the uncertainties
associated with the Initiative are resolved;and
WHEREAS,the City Council finds that an emergency exists;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE,WASHINGTON,DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.Purpose.
A.This is an interim regulation.The purpose of this
ordinance is to provide a procedure for processing and evaluating
claims under the Initiative and thereby provide the City with the
opportunity to make adjustments to or provide relief from City
Codes in circumstances where Initiative 164 compensation may be
required.
B.Any person making a claim relating to the plan review
procedure or other land-use regulatory actions of the city shall do
ORDINANCE -1
/rrrv/164.ord
so in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance.Failure to
do so shall bar recovery of compensation.
Section 2.Definitions.
A."Code"means the Marysville Municipal Code
including any ordinances of the City.
(MMC)
B."Claim"means a claim for compensation under the
Initiative.
C."Initiative"means Initiative 164 or Chapter 98,Laws of
1995 Regular Session,State of Washington.
D."Owner"means the property owner,or anyone beneficially
interested in the property,or the owner's representative,or
applicant for any City permit.
E."Public Nuisance"means a nuisance defined in Chapter
7.48 RCW,or as otherwise defined by law.
F."Restraint"or "restraint of land use"means any action,
requirement or regulation by the City,other than actions to limit
or abate public nuisances,that limits the use or development of
private property.
G."Project Review Team"means a committee composed of a
representative from the City Administration,Planning Department
and Public Works Department.
Section 3.Claim for Compensation.
A.Any owner who claims or seeks compensation from the City
pursuant to the Initiative must present the claim in writing along
with supporting documentation to the City Clerk.The claim filing
fee is $350.00.
B.The claim must be filed prior to acceptance of a permit,
final approval of an application,or performance of any acts in
compliance with City Codes or actions for which a restraint by the
City may be claimed.Failure to do so shall bar recovery of
compensation under the Initiative.
C. No claim shall be considered until the owner has filed a
complete application with the City concerning the owner's
development or use.An application is complete when it meets the
procedural submission requirements of the City and is sufficient
for continued processing even though additional information may be
required or project may be undertaken subsequently.
ORDINANCE -2
/mV/164.0rd
Section 4.Administrative Procedure.
A.Recommendation.Upon presentation of
Proj ect Review Team shall review the claim
recommendation to City Council that:
a claim,the
and make a
1.There is a probable likelihood of compensation under
the Initiative if the Code were applied,but that relief from
the Code may be granted to avoid compensation and still
protect the public interest;or
2.There is a probable likelihood that compensation may
exist under the Initiative if the Code were applied,and
relief from the Code cannot be granted and still protect the
public interest;or
3.The claim is probably not compensable under the
Initiative.
B.Criteria.In making a recommendation,the Project Review
Team shall undertake a risk assessment of the claim.The
recommendation should include but not be limited to the following
factors:
1.Whether the use or development will constitute a
public nuisance;
2.Whether relief is necessary to avoid subjecting the
City to an unreasonable burden or risk of compensation under
the Initiative;
3.The public interest served by the regulation(s)at
issue,and the effect on the public interest if the relief
from the regulation is granted;and
4.Any relief granted shall be the smallest reasonable
deviation from the Code that still protects the public
interest and avoids payment of compensation.
C.Relief from Code.In providing any relief from the Code,
the Project Review Team's recommendation may include but not be
limited to:
1.An adjustment of development or permit
other provisions controlling the development
property;
standards or
or use of
2.Increases or modifications in the density,intensity
or use of areas of development or use of property;
3.The transfer of development rights;
4.Property exchanges;
ORDINANCE - 3
/mv/164.0rd
5.Adjustments in mitigation;
6.Compensation or purchase of the property,or an
interest therein.
7.Issuance of the permit with change,exception or
other relief to the application of City Codes as they would
otherwise apply to the property;however,if another portion
of the Code is applicable (e.g.variance,conditional use,
PRD) ,the Project Review Team may recommend utilization of
those procedures and nothing herein shall be construed to
affect an owner's use of those procedures.
D.Content of Recommendation.
issue a written recommendation to
substantially all of the following:
The Project Review Team shall
City Council which contains
1.Name of the owner,and if applicable,the project
name;
2.The street address of the subject property and a
description in non-legal terms sufficient to identify its
location;
3.A brief description of the action,permit or
approval requested in the application;
4.A description of the Proj ect Review Team's
recommendation including a brief description of relief to be
granted from applicable Codes.
Section 5.City Council's Decision.
A.Effect Where City Council Decision is No Compensable
Claim or There is a Probable Claim With No Relief From the Code.
If the City Council's decision is that the claim is probably not
compensable under the Initiative or that there is a probable
likelihood that compensation may exist under the Initiative if the
Code were applied and relief for the Code cannot be granted and
still protect the public interest,the City Council's decision is
the final decision of the City.
B.Effect Where City Council Considers Providing Relief From
the Code.If the Proj ect Review Team recommends that there is
probable likelihood of compensation under the Initiative if the
Code were applied,but that relief from the Code may be granted to
avoid compensation and still protect the public interest,the City
Council shall hold a public hearing to consider the recommendation.
C.Council Review.
1.The City Council shall consider the following when
reviewing the recommendation of the Project Review Team:
ORDINANCE - 4
/mv/164.ord
a.Application,proposed development,or use;
b.Recommendation of the Project Review Team;
c.Criteria set forth in the Code under which the
application was made;
d.Criteria set forth in Section 4 of this
Ordinance;
e.The recommendation's financial implications on
the City;
f.Any other relevant information;
2.When reviewing the recommendation of the Project
Review Team,Council shall:
a.Approve
recommendation;
the Project Review Team's
b.Approve the Project Review Team's
recommendation with modifications including
additional/different conditions.
c.Remand the matter to the Project Review Team;
or
d.Take such other action as the Council deems
appropriate.
Section 6.Relief or Adjustments to Code.Notwithstanding
any provision in any Code,the City Council is authorized,when
acting pursuant to this Ordinance,to waive or modify any City Code
or portion thereof that is the basis for a claim.
Section 7.Notice.
A. When Code Not Contravened.If the City Council
determines that the claim is probably not compensable under the
Initiative or that there is a probable likelihood that compensation
may exist under the Initiative if the relief from the Code cannot
be granted and still protect the public interest,notice of council
action and decision is only required to be given to the owner.
B.Notice When Relief From the Code.If the Project Review
Team recommends or the City Council determines that there is a
probable likelihood of compensation under the Initiative if the
Code were applied,but that relief from the Code may be granted to
avoid compensation and still protect the public interest,the
following notice of the public hearing shall be published in the
official newspaper of the City,shall be mailed to the owners of
all property within three hundred (300)feet of the subject
ORDINANCE - 5
/mv/164.ord
property at least ten (10)days prior to the date of the public
hearing,and shall be posted in two places on the subject property,
at City Hall and at the Post Office.The notice shall contain the
following:
1.Name of the owner,and if applicable,the project
name;
2.Street address of the subject property;
3.A brief description of the action,permit or
approval requested in the application;
4.A brief description of the Project Review Team's
recommendation;
5.Date,time and place of the hearing;
6.A statement that only those persons who participate
in the hearing process may appeal the decision of the Council.
C.Substantial Compliance.The notice requirements herein
shall be satisfied by substantial compliance with this Section.
D.Distribution of Decision.Within seven (7)days,the
City Clerk shall distribute a letter notifying any person who
participated in the public hearing of the final decision of the
City Council.
Section 8.Court Review.
A.Council's final decision may be appealed by the owner or
any aggrieved person (s)who participated in the public hearing
process before Council.
B.A person filing an
Superior Court no more than
effective date of the Council
barred.
appeal must
twenty-one
decision or
make application to the
(21)days following the
any appeal is thereafter
C. A person filing an
Superior Court for a writ
authorized by law.
appeal must make application to the
of certiorari or other procedure
Section 9.Commencement of Activities.The owner may
commence activity or obtain other required approvals thirty (30)
days following the effective date of the City Council decision.
The City may waive this requirement if the owner and all parties
who participated in the hearing(s)agree in writing to waive the
appeal period.Activity commenced prior to the expiration of the
full appeal period is at the sole risk of the owner.
ORDINANCE - 6
/mv/164.0rd
Section 10.Conflict..In the event of a conflict between any
provision of this Ordinance and the City Code,the provisions of
this Ordinance shall control.
Section 11.Rules.
to promulgate rules for
this Ordinance.
The Mayor or his designee is authorized
the implementation and administration of
Section 12.Public Nuisance.Although the City Council may
take such legal action as it deems appropriate,a finding by the
City Council of a public nuisance related to a claim shall not be
interpreted to require the City to commence proceedings.The
City's decision regarding a public nuisance shall not bar other
private or public nuisance proceedings.
Section 13.Effective Date -Emergency.The City Council
finds that (1)due to the difficulties in implementing the
Initiative because of its vague and unclear provisions,the
uncertainty of its effective date considering current efforts at a
referendum,together with the short amount of time provided by the
Legislature to respond to its adoption;and (2)the potentially
dire consequences the Initiative could have on the City's treasury
and existing regulations,that an emergency is hereby declared and
this Ordinance shall become effective on July 23,1995.
Section 14.Severability.Should any section,subsection,
paragraph,sentence,clause or phrase set forth in this Ordinance
or its application to any person or situation be declared
unconstitutional or invalid for any reason,such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or
its application to any person or situation.The City Council of
the City hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance
and each section,subsection,sentence,clause,phrase,or portion
thereof irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections,
subsections,sentences,clauses,phrases or portions be declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 15.Liability.It is expressly the purpose of this
Ordinance to provide for and promote the health,safety and welfare
of the general public and not to create or otherwise establish or
designate any particular class or group of persons who will or
should be especially protected or benefitted by the terms of this
ordinance.
It is the specific intent of this Ordinance that no provisions
nor any term used in this Ordinance is intended to impose any duty
whatsoever upon the City or any of it officers or employees.
Nothing contained in this Ordinance is intended nor shall be
construed to create or form the basis of any liability on the part
of the City,or its officers,employees or agents,for any injury
or damage resulting from any action or inaction on the part of the
City,its officers,employees or agents.
ORDINANCE - 7
/mv/164.ord
,PASSED by the
/7""0/1 day of ~~
City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this
,1995.
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
Mayor
At test :..-_~
Approved as to form:
City Clerk
BY~W~
i>City Attorney
Date of Publication:"1 L9-l,19")'
ORDINANCE - 8
/mv/164.0rd