HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-2954 - Approves and confirms assessments, LID No. 71 (Special)CITY OF MARYSVILLE, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 1\~~~
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Marysville, Washington, relating to
Local Improvement District No. 71; approving and confirming certain
assessments and a portion of the assessment roll of Local Improvement District
No. 71 to provide for the construction of an Interstate 5 overpass at 156th Street
NE, as provided by Ordinance No. 2827; and levying and assessing a part of the
cost and expense thereof against several lots, tracts, parcels of land and other
property shown on the roll.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Findings and Determinations. The City Council of the City of Marysville,
Washington (the "City") makes the following findings and determinations.
(a) The assessment roll levying the special assessments against the property
located in Local Improvement District No. 71 ("LID 71 ") in the City has been filed with the City
Clerk as provided by law.
(b) On December 9, 2013, the City Council approved the professional services
agreement appointing Mr. Wayne Tanaka with Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLCC, as LID Hearing
Examiner pursuant to RCW 35.44.070 and Marysville City Code 3.60.220 to conduct the hearing
on the final assessment roll for LID 71 .
(c) By Resolution No. 2352, the City Council fixed the time and place for the
hearing on the final assessment roll for January 9, 2014, at 6 p.m., local time, in the Council
Chambers in the C ity Hall, Marysville, Washington, and directed that notice by both mailing and
publication should be given as required by law.
(d) Notice of the time and place of hearing on the fi nal assessment roll and
making objections and protests to thereon was duly published at and for the time and in the
manner provided by law and the Engineering Services Manager of the City caused further notice
thereof to be mailed to each property owner shown on the roll.
(e) At the time and place fixed and designated in the notice, the hearing was
held before the LID Hearing Examiner, all written protests received were considered and all
persons appearing at the hearing who wished to be heard were heard, for the purpose of
considering the roll and the special benefits to be received by each lot, parcel and tract of land
shown upon such roll, including the increase and enhancement of the fair market value of each
such parcel of land by reason of the improvement, determined to modify certain of the
assessments appearing on such roll and overruled all other protests.
(f) On February 3, 2014, the Hearing Examiner delivered to the City a
detailed report for the LID consisting of "Findings and Conclusions and Recommendations of
Hearing Examiner Regarding LID 71 City of Marysville, Washington" to the City Council (the
"Hearing Examiner's Report"), a true and complete copy of which is attached and made a part
hereof marked Exhibit A.
(g) Within five days of receiving the Hearing Examiner's Report, the City
Clerk mailed notice that the report had been filed to all persons who filed a request for special
notice of the report or written protest at or prior to the public hearing on the assessment roll.
(h) Property owners of parcel nos. 31052700300700, 31052700300200,
31052700300400, 31052700400300, 31052700100300, 31052700300900, 31052700300500,
31052700300800 (the "Appellant Properties") have appealed the assessments against the
Appellant Properties as set forth in the Hearing Examiner's Report and those assessments against
the Appellant Properties cannot be confirmed until the City Council rules on the appeals.
(i) All properties are unique and the special benefits received by one property
are not materially related to the special benefits received by another property. The hearing on
the final assessments includes hearings on individual properties. Approving and confirming the
assessments against properties with LID 71 that have not been appealed to the City Council will
not affect the City Council's review of assessments against the Appellant Properties.
Section 2. Aooroval of Hearing Examiner's Findings. Conclusions and
Recommendations. The City Council hereby accepts and adopts the Hearing Examiner's Report
as set forth in Exhibit A except for those findings and recommendations influencing the proposed
assessments against the Appellant Property, including but not limited to, Section II.B.8 and
Section III.B.4.
Section 3. Confirmation of Assessment. As recommended in the Hearing
Examiner's Report, each of the lots, tracts, parcels of land and other property shown upon the
assessment roll (except for the Appellant Properties) is determined and declared by the City
Council, sitting and acting as a Board of Equalization, to be specially benefited by this
improvement in at least the amount charged against the same, and the assessment appearing
against the same is in proportion to the several assessments appearing upon the roll. There is
hereby levied, confirmed and assessed against each lot, tract, parcel of land and other property
appearing upon the Final Assessment Roll (defined below) (except for the Appellant Properties)
the amount finally charged against the same thereon. The assessments and assessment roll of
LID 71 (except for the assessments against the Appellant Properties) attached hereto as Exhibit B
and incorporated herein by reference (the "Final Assessment Roll), to provide for the
construction of an Interstate 5 overpass at 1561h Street NE, as provided by Ordinance No. 2827,
are hereby approved and confirmed in the total amount of$8,093,213.
Section 4. Filing of the Final Assessment Roll for Collection. The assessment roll
approved and confirmed (except assessments against the Appellant Properties) shall be filed with
the Finance Director of the City (the "Finance Director") for collection and the Finance Director
is authorized and directed to publish notice as required by law stating that the roll is in her hands
for collection and that payment of any assessment thereon or any p011ion of such assessment can
be made at any time within thirty days from the date of first publication of such notice without
penalty, interest or cost, and that thereafter the sum remaining unpaid may be paid in 20 equal
annual installments of principal and interest. The estimated interest rate is stated to be 6.0% per
annum, with the exact interest rate to be fixed in the ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale
of the local improvement bonds for LID 71. The first installment of assessments on the
assessment roll shall become due and payable during the thirty-day period succeeding the date
one year after the date of first publication by the Finance Director of notice that the assessment
roll is in her hands for collection and annually thereafter each succeeding installment shall
become due and payable in like manner. If the whole or any portion of the assessment remains
unpaid after the first thirty-day period, interest upon the whole unpaid sum shall be charged at
the rate as determined above, and each year thereafter one of the installments of principal and
interest shall be collected. Any installment not paid prior to the expiration of the thirty-day
period during which such installment is due and payable shall thereupon become delinquent. In
accordance.with Marysville City Code 3.60.115, each delinquent installment shall be subject, at
the time of delinquency, to a charge of 8% penalty levied on both principal and interest due upon
that installment, and all delinquent installments also shall be charged interest at the rate as
determined above. The collection of such delinquent installments, including any accelerated
obligation to pays the entire amount of remaining assessment installments, will be enforced in
the manner provided by law.
Section 5. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate
and severable. If a court of competent jurisdiction, after all appeals having been exhausted or all
appeal periods having run, finds any provision of this ordinance to be invalid or unenforceable as
to any person or circumstance, such offending provision shall, if feasible, be deemed to be
modified to be within the limits of enforceability or validity. However, if the offending provision
cannot be so modified, it shall be null and void with respect to the particular person or
circumstance, and all other provisions of this ordinance in all other respects, and the offending
provision with respect to all other persons and all other circumstances, shall remain valid and
enforceable.
Section 6. Effective Date of Ordinance. This ordinance shall take effect and be in
force from and after its passage and five days fo ll owing its publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Marysville,
Washington, at a regular open public meeting thereof, this 24111 day of February, 2014.
AITEST:
4#c0&~ Deput CitYCierk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~~~
-4-
51348775.4
EXHIBIT A
THE HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF HEARING EXAMINER REGARDING LID 71
CITY OF MARYSVILLE, WASHING TON
I. INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held on January 9, 2014, at the Marysville City Hall in
Marysville, Washington, for the purpose of considering protests to the final assessments for LID
71. Wayne Tanaka was the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to appointment by the City Council on
December 9, 2013. The City was represented by Mr. Thom Graafstra, City Attorney. The
hearing was transcribed by comi reporter, Tara L. Cunha. An audio recording of the hearing was
also made. A complete list of exhibits is attached to this repo1t as Exhibit A.
II. FINDINGS OF FACT
A. GENERAL FINDINGS.
I. LID 71 was formed by the City Council on September 20, 2010 by passage of
Ordinance 2827. The LID was created to construct an Interstate 5 overpass at
l 56th Street with road transitions at each end to connect to existing streets (the
Project).1 Approximately 50% of the estimated $16,000,000 total project cost was
to be paid by the owners of property specially benefited.
2. Tl1e Project began in July 2011 ru1d was open to 1he public in l~ovember, 2011.
The Project was accepted as substantially complete on March 19, 2013.
3. Total construction costs were $14,902,000. Fifty percent of these costs were
allocated to the LID. Adding bond costs, interim interest and other costs,
including payments to the LID Guarantee Fund brought the total amount to be
assessed to $8,425,623.2
4. The Hearing Examiner took a short tour around the City and LID area to view the
properties just prior to the hearing.
5. At the start of the hearing, the Hearing Examiner explained his role and the
procedures that would be followed at the public hearing. All who intended to
testify were sworn.
1 Exhibit 6. Exhibits may be examined at the City Clerk's offi{;e.
2 Exhibit 19.
{WDT1136011.DOC:1/13102.000001/}
6. The City presented ce11ain preliminary testimony from Ms. Langdon, the City
Finance Director, Mr. Smith, Engineering Services Manager, Mr. Gruenhagen,
the Project Manager and Mr. Robert Macaulay, the appraiser. The City also
submitted Exhibits 1 through 22. The City witnesses noted that there were three
amendments to the final assessment roll and that Amendment 3, Exhibit 18A
contains the assessments that the City is asking to be confirmed. The city's
testimony and exhibits provided the background for the LID, explained the
financing and costs, described the general condition of the area both before and
after the project and explained how the cost of the project were in line with
estimates. Mr. Macaulay provided an explanation of his methodology and, in
general, how he arrived at the recommended special benefits and assessments. He
also made some corrections to his Special Benefit Study, Exhibit 15. On page
two of the cover letter to Mr. Smith, the Estimated Final Special Benefit is
$17,347,700. The cost/benefit ratio is 0.4857. Each parcel would receive $1 of
special benefit for every $0.49 of LID assessment.
7. There were 9 written protests filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing. One
protest, the Morales property, was received at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner
has reviewed each written protest and reviewed the transcript of the hearing, plus
his handwritten notes.
B. FINDINGS AS TO SPECIFIC PROPERTIES.3
I. Dennis and Sandra Quinn, Parcel 352.4 Neither property owner appeared or
testified. In the written protest, the Quinns state they were never notified by the
City regarding the LID and believe there needs to be a vote of the property
owners before the assessments can be enforced. Examination of Exhibit 3, page
3-28, last column shows that notice of the formation hearing was mailed to the
Quinns.
2. Teny Smith, Stephen Miller C. Bonnie Ronan, Parcels 263, 161 and 183. No one
appeared or testified. In their written protest, the owner's representatives stated
that the property was undeveloped and there are no cunent plans for
redevelopment. The owner's representative stated that the LID only benefited
properties to the west ofI-5.
3. Dallas Bower, Parcel 131. No one appeared or testified. In the written protest
Mr. Bower asse11s that the only properties that benefited were on the west side of
the freeway. The Project was designed to relieve congestion on the 172nd
overpass which is used by people to get to the west side businesses. Mr. Bower
3 The findings are not meant to summarize every aspect of the testimony, only that portion that the Hearing
Examiner believes is relevant. Thus, for instance, testimony regarding the personal financial situation of the
property owner is generally left out. Further, any finding more properly denominated a conclusion should be
considered as such.
4 Each of the properties is addressed in order of protest. The Parcel number refers to the lot number as reflected in
the final assessment roll spreadsheet contained in the Final Special Benefit Study, Exhibit 15.
{WDT113601 l.DOC;l/13102.000001/ }
indicates that the assessed value of the property has gone down since 2010 but
taxes have increased.
4. Michael Gitschlag and Brenda Geis, Parcel 312. No one appeared or testified.
The protest letter indicated that all residents of Marysville should pay for the
Project.
5. Kevan "Butch" Kvamme Parcels 71 and 72. Mr. Macaulay indicated that he had
recalculated the special benefit and assessment based on the square footage
supplied by Mr. Kvamme in his protest letter. These revised assessments are
reflected in Amendment 3, Exhibit 18A. Mr. Kvan1me accepted these changes.
Mr. Kvamme questioned the methodology used by the City's appraiser and
believes that a more fair way to apportion the Project's cost would be on frontage
basis. Mr. Kvamme's property has a relatively narrow frontage on Smokey Point
Boulevard and a longer "frontage" on what would be the extension of l 56th east
of the present intersection. He thinks that after the first 600 feet east of the
intersection, his property should be assessed at 12 cents per square foot, not 61
cents to correspond with property located to the south of his property (Parcel
172). Mr. Macaulay indicated that his benefit analysis did not rely strictly on
frontage, but included the total estimated benefits to the property as a whole. Mr.
Kvamme also raised an issue with access to Smokey Point Boulevard. He
testified that his access onto the Boulevard was within 300 feet of the stoplight at
l 56th, and that the City would not al!ow access due to the proximity of the
intersection. Rather, he testified, the City would require access off of l 56th,
which is currently unimproved and which he had previously dedicated to the City.
Mr. Smith for the City testified that the City had not looked closely at Mr.
Kvanune's situation, but that generally the distance from the intersection to a curb
cut might be too close. However, Mr. Smith indicated that access onto the
Boulevard might be allowed at a point on the northerly po1tion of Mr. Kvamme's
property.
6. Lona K. Nakken, Parcel 313. No one appeared or testified. In the protest letter,
the owner states that it is unfair for property owners to pay for the Project while
City owned properties are exempt.
7. Ken Copenhaver. Parcel 137. Mr. Copenhaver has lived at the property for a
number of years. He states that the only notice he received was of the petition
and this hearing. Exhibit 3, page 20 shows that Mr. Copenhaver was sent notice
of the fomrntion hearing. Mr. Copenhaver's protest letter indicated that his
property has decreased in valuation since 2011. Other propetties nearby have
increased in value according to the information that he provided.
8. Mary Steiner. Parcels 58, 73, 76, 92, 93, 314, 315, 317. Mrs. Steiner was present
and represented by attorney Matthew Link. The Steiner Property consists of the
aforementioned contiguous parcels totaling 183 .5 acres. The prope11y is in the
extreme north east corner of the LID.
{WDTl 136011.DOC;l/13102.000001/}
The property was originally acquired by Mary Steiner's parents in 1958. For
many years the Steiners operated the prope1ty as a dairy fa1m. The herd was sold
in 1987. Use of the property subsequent to 1987 is not clear other than it is
currently being farmed for silage and hay by a Mr. Bartleheimer who pays no
money consideration to the owner. Mrs. Steiner testified that the property ceased
being used as a dairy farm in 2005. She stated that she did not get notice of the
LID formation, but that the notice was sent to the contract purchaser. Exhibit 3
appears to confirm that notice was sent to the contract purchaser.
Mr. Link, attorney for the property owner, submitted two valuations of the
property done by R. Neil Danard a real estate broker and general contractor. Mr.
Danard is not a certified appraiser. The first opinion of value was as of October
13, 2011 and was done for estate purposes. At that time the opinion of value was
$5,000 an acre or $917,500. This is approximately $0.11 a square foot. The
second opinion was as of January 1, 2014. Mr. Danard's opinion of value was the
same as some three years earlier, namely $917, 500. Mr. Danard opined that "the
best use for the property is its current agricultural use," and not some use that
would be allowed by the Light Industrial zoning.
Mr. Macaulay testified that in 2006 the property was sold for $14 million dollars.
This would amount to approximately $1. 7 5 per square foot. Mrs. Steiner
confirmed this real estate contract sale. She stated that her parents received $3.5
million dollars down, the balance to be paid. The buyer soon went into default on
the note and the property was reconveyed to her parents' estate. Macaulay's fair
market valuation of the property in the before situation is $1.75 and in the after
situation, $1.80.
Mrs. Steiner contends that the project does not benefit the property because:
a)
b)
c)
Access to I-5 is more direct using 172nd both for agricultural
operations and normal vehicle traffic.
The Steiners do not derive monetary compensation from current
farming of the property.
The 156th overpass may decrease the property's value if its use
results in more traffic around the farm. 5
Macaulay's Special Benefit Analysis apparently analyzed the property as separate
lots and did not deduct the land area on account of any Wetland Buffer Areas. 6
However, Mrs. Steiner presented testimony and evidence that Edgecomb creek
flows through the property from n01th to south. Mr. Danard states that the creek
is 4360 feet in length. He states that according to City plans in order to develop
the property the existing creek will have to be relocated along the Northern
5 Testin1ony and Item 21, Exhibit H55
6 See spreadsheet charts on pages 10, 11 and 19 of Exhibit 15.
{WDT1136011.DOC;l/13102.000001/}
Pacific railroad bed which runs in a north easterly diagonal along the east
boundary of the property.7 With setbacks, Mr. Danard states that 30 acres of land
will not be subject to development. 8
9. Catherine Morales. Parcel 136. Ms. Morales testified that their property values
had decreased over the years. She agreed with the testimony of Mr. Copenhaver,
her neighbor.
10. Jesse Allen. Parcel 51. Mr. Allen's property is located at the northwest corner of
the LID. It is improved with a residential duplex, but the remainder of the lot is
not developed. The residential use is a preexisting non-conforming use. Mr.
Allen does not believe the overpass benefits any properties located east of the
freeway. He believes the only beneficiaries are those retail and commercial
properties located west of the freeway.
III. CONCLUSIONS
A. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS.
l. Any conclusion deemed to be a finding shall be so considered.
2. Special benefits are measurable increases in the value of real property in excess of
any enhancement to the general area. It is measured as the difference between the
market value of the prope1iy without the LID Project and the market value with
the LID Project assumed completed at the same date.
3. Initially, the City is favored with certain presumptions: that the improvements are
a benefit to the property within the LID, the assessment is no greater than the
benefit, the assessment is equal or ratable to the assessments upon other properties
eolmiL:i:rly s1"tuar""r1 a:nrl (hP aooeeoeomPnt is f:a1·r 9 TJ.u,, nrri.pprty O'Uni:>r ha~ +"he b11rr1P.n ._,_.._.__._................. .._._.~~ L.U-'-'-" .u ..... '-'" -..,~...__....._ .... _. .. ..L • i.u..., !-'._'-' """ nu..,,_ u,,..,_, .. ._._ ,,..._....,.....,._
of producing evidence to rebut these presumptions. If the property owner
presents sufficient evidence to rebut the presumptions (generally through
appraisal testimony or other evidence of property value with and without the
Project improvements), the City has the ultimate burden of showing special
benefits. 10
4. Mr. Macaulay's qualifications and expeiience are set forth in his study.11 No
evidence was presented to challenge his qualifications. The Hearing Examiner
concludes that Mr. Macaulay and his associates qualify as experts in the areas
testified.
7 Item 21, Exhibit Hl5. Reference is to the "S1nokey Point Master Plan".
8 Item 21, Exhibit Hl6
9 ln Re Indian Trail Trunk Sewer, 35 Wash. App. 840 (1983). 10 Bellevue Plaza v. Bellevue. 121 Wn.2d 397 (1993).
11 Exhibit 15, beginning at page 61.
{WOT! 136011.DOC;l/13102.000001/}
5. The special benefit analysis performed by the City more fairly reflects the special
benefits to the properties within the LID than the zone and termini or other
method.12
6. The City Council has delegated certain limited authority to the Hearing Examiner
for this hearing. As provided in Chapter Section 3.60.220 MMC, the Hearing
Examiner is authorized to conduct the final assessment roll hearing and to make
certain recommendations to the Council. The City Council may correct, revise,
lower, change or modify the roll or any part thereof, or set aside the roll in order
for the assessments to be made de novo, or that the City Council adopt or correct
the roll or take other action on the roll as appropriate, including confirmation of
the roll without change.
7. The Hearing Examiner does not believe he has the authority to rule on the validity
of the creation of the LID or on jurisdictional issues.
B. CONCLUSIONS AS TO SPECIFIC PROPERTIES.
I. Certain of the property owners have failed to overcome the presumptions in favor
of the City, chiefly by not electing to present relevant testimony to overcome the
presumption of validity either at the hearing on in their protest documents or
presenting any evidence that would cotmter the City's appraisal testimony and
exhibits. Therefore the protests should be denied. These property owners are:
a) Protest I, Quinn
b) Protest 2, Smith, et al
c) Protest 3, Bower
d) Protest 4, Gitschlag
e) Protest 6, Nakken
f) Protest 9, tv1orales
2. Kvamme, Protest 5. The City has made adjustments to the assessments based on
the revised information on the size of Mr. Kvamme's property. While Mr.
Kvarnrne's concerns about the difference in the amount of assessment based on
the frontage of his property versus his neighbors' properties are valid, the City did
not choose to evaluate benefit only on a front foot basis. Mr. Macauley's
methodology is reasonable and Mr. Kvamme has presented no evidence that the
methodology is flawed or based on inaccurate factual assumptions.
3. Copenhaver, Protest 7. The decrease in Mr. Copenhaver's property value does
not address the issue of special benefits from the Project. In addition, the
valuation of his property as compared with neighboring properties does not
address the issue of special benefits.
12 See Exhibit 15, page 25.
{WDT1136011.DOC;l/13102.000001/}
4. Steiner, Protest 8. While Mr. Danard is qualified to sell real estate and is
knowledgeable of the real estate market, he is not a qualified appraiser. His
estimate of $5,000 an acre for the property is not backed up with any sales data or
explanation of how he arrived at that figure. Mr. Danard's analysis does not
purp01t to be a special benefit analysis of the before and after values of the
property with and without the influence of the Project. Rather, his analysis
appears to be an estimate of the fair market value of the property in its current
use. Fair market value determinations must consider the "highest and best use" of
the property. While Mr. Danard and Mrs. Steiner both indicate that they believe
the prope1ty will continue to be used as a fam1 in the future, the test is not the
cunent use, but rather the highest and best use. Mr. Danard explains that there are
other "permit ready" properties closer to the freeway that would likely develop
first. However, this does not mean that a suitable time value discount could not
be given to the property valued not as a farm, but for Light Industrial uses. No
information was presented to the Hearing Examiner on this point.
The arguments that the Project does not convey any benefits to the Steiner
property do not appear to be well taken. Even if access from the property to the
freeway and beyond is by way of I 72nd, there is ample testimony that the new
overpass will reduce congestion at 172nd thereby increasing mobility and hence
property values. People traveling to and from the property do not have to
physically use the overpass in order to benefit from it.
In short, the Hearing Examiner concludes that the Macaulay estimate of benefits
to the property and the per square foot valuation before and after the Project are
more credible than what is asse1ted by the prope1ty owner.
Macaulay's apparent failure to consider the individual parcels as one unit may be
at variance with the rule established in the Doolittle caseB However, this does
not appear to be of prejudice to the owner since any consideration of the property
as one economic unit would likely lead to a higher valuation as noted in the
Doolittle case. 14
Macaulay's valuation did not deduct for wetlands and buffers, which will
obviously have an effect on the developable area.15 The only information about
wetlands and buffer areas is provided by Mr. Danard. The 30 acres of
undevelopable land should be deducted from the 183.5 acre total area, yielding
153.5 acres of developable area. Reducing the $193,198 assessment
proportionately yields an assessment of $161,612.
5. Jesse Allen, Protest 10. The assessments levied on properties located west of the
freeway are generally higher than those to the east on a proportional basis which
accounts for the difference in benefit as determined by the City. Mr. Allen's
13 Doolittle v. Everett, 114 Wn.2d 88, 786 P.2d 253 (1990)
14 Doolittle, at page 92
15 Exhibit 15, pages I 0, 11 and 19
{WDT1136011.DOC;l/13102.000001/}
evidence when weighed against the City's evidence is not sufficient to overturn
the proposed final assessment on his property.
IV. RECOMMEND A TIO NS
Based on the Findings and Conclusions set forth above, the Hearing Examiner makes the
following recommendations:
I. Other than as set forth in 2, below, the Hearing Examiner recommends DENIAL
of all other protests.
2. The Hearing Examiner recommends the Steiner property protest be GRANTED
IN PART, and the assessment should be reduced to $161,612.
V. APPEAL
Pursuant to Section 3.60.220 MMC, any person who shall have timely filed
objections to their assessments may appeal the recommendations of the Hearing
Examiner regarding his/her property to the City Council by filing written notice of
such appeal together with a fee of $100 with the City Clerk no later than 14 calendar
days after the date the Hearing Examiner's recommendation report is mailed by the
City Clerk.
') 11'{_
DATED this () day of February, 2014
Date of Mailing: L ../6-S ~ 0 IL(
I
{WDTl 136011.DOC;l/13102.000001/ }
HEARING EXAMINER
{WDT1136011.DOC;l/13102.000001/}
EXHIBIT A
LIST OF EXHIBITS
ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK
Exhibit List for City of Marvsville LID #71 Hearing -January 9, 2014
EXhibit Document ... . -Date .
1 Certificate relating to sufficiency of petition Dated May 12, 2010
2 Intent Resolution and meeting minutes Resolution No. 2292 dated July 26, 2010
3 Certificate of mailing notice of hearing Yes, dated August 12, 2010
4 Affidavit of publishing notice of hearing Published July 10, 20!0 and August 4, 2010
Dated August 17, 2010
5 Hearing date and proceedings before hearing Council minutes/hearing minutes from
officer September 20, 20 lO
6 Formation ordinance Ordinance No. 2827 dated September 20, 2010
7 Affidavit of publication Published September 22, 2010
Dated September 27, 20 I 0
8 Receipt of notice filed by City with County Receipt dated September 30, 2010
assessor re: farm and agricultural land
9 Ce1tificate fro1n County assessor or other evidence November 8, 20 lO
that assessor mailed notice to farm/ag land property
owners
IO Certified copy of any v.1aiver offarm/ag land July 27, 2010 -Record No. 20100727035,
exen1ption that was filed with the assessor 20107270536,201007270537,201007270538,
201007270539
11 Resolution or n1otion setting time for assessment Resolution 2352 dated December 9, 2013
roll hearing
12 Certification that notice of hearing was mailed 15 Mailed December 11, 2013
days prior Dated December 18, 2013
13 Certification that notice of hearing was mailed 15 Mailed December 24, 2013
days prior-SPPF Properties, LLC Dated January 3, 2014
14 Affidavit of publication (once a week for two Published December 14, 2013 and December
consecutive weeks with the last 15 days before 21,2013
hearing) Dated January 8, 2014
15 Summary of Final Special Benefit/Proportionate December 4, 2013
Assessment Study
16 Certified Assessment Roll December 5, 2013
17 Certified Assessment Ro11-Amendment 1 December 24, 2013
18 Certified Assessment Roll -Amendment 2 December 26, 2013
18A Certified Assess1nent Roll -Amendment 3 January 9, 2013
19 Certified Final Cost Summary September 17, 2013
20 Correspondence Log
21 Protest Log
22 Lakewood Triangle Assess & Circulation l 561h
Street/1-5 SPUI lnterchange B (Build-out of
Interchange)
23 LID-156th Street Overpass~ City of Marysville January 3, 2014
Hearing Brief
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBITB
THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
(EXCLUDING ASSESSMENTS AGAINST APPELLANT PROPERTIES)
i " : , i i! i I : : ; : ii I! ii : ' : I i ' : 11 : : I i : 'I I' r i ! · ; I ! ' · I! : : I' : · i 1 ' • i 1 _ : 1 ' ' ' ' , i ; · ..;.,I" ,, ,, , <i,"'''1"'1""'1',"~:·, N,, .': :~cnhip,_ ·.r;,:.; ,;'l'.u, ,:r,=, ,,~·1",•, ... !,··~".'-~.:: ,"" ' ' __ .. '··' ': ;,, i'' :-:! , ,.,,.:: '(ActtBJ 1 ICITYOF MARYSV!LLE I 31053200100100 I 0.40 2 I ROGERS DENIS A & MARYL I 0069720()[)00400 I 0.38 INTRlGUE INVESTMENT COMPA."-.'Y 4 I HOUSING HOPE VILLAS AT LAKEWOOD l'ARTNERSLLP lt"TRIGUE INVESTMENT COMPA."'JY 7 !CITY OF MARYSVILLE ZORZI ROBERTO & PAOLA CRESC!l\IIN 9 IHOUSDJG HOPE 10 1~:~~=~~~~ 11 1oa MARYSVILLE PROPERTIES LLC 12 !GREENWOOD 1111 U.C 13 I MARYSVILLE FORD INC 14 1~:0~=~~~ 31os2900201700 I s.74 31052900300100 I 3.0..1 310529-00201soo I 9.20 31052900100900 I 10.07 310s290010D100 I 0.25 31052900400200 l 2.60 310529004009-00 l 3.22 31052900400100 I B.35 31052900401100 I 1.io 31n529004D03oo I 4.66 31052900400400 I 7.70 310529-00400500 I 5_01 1> ITRAN MICHAEL KIM & AMY ! 00697200000200 I 0 >S . I.AM .• 16 I~~;~~ ~SSING I 00697200000501 I 0.78 17 !~~::.~~ ~~SS!NG I 00697200000502 "" 18 ITARGETCORPORATION I OG482S00001306 10.55 19 l~~LL--SMOKEY POINT I 004S2SOOD01201 1.05 20 !~;ELL-SMOKEY POINT I 00482800001202 1.62 21 I COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP I 31052900102500 15.32 23 !~;ELL-SMOKEY POINT I 310529!JOl02700 1.15 24 l~~LL-SMOKEY POINT I 31052900102800 7.:U. 25 l~~VELL-SMOKEY POINT j 31052900102900 1.11 26 IKJM-ALSTON LLC I 0069nooooo'.10l 1.53 27 !KlM·AlSTONLLC I 00482800000801 "' City of Marysville 156th Street NE Overpass Projed···Recommended Final Assessments D•to1i'1IViHl:'J:'1l1 ii' 11-:~i.':ii·' :r di-tiHW':ii',il':lilill:llJ::1H!lii·:n::1; I I Without LID I I W!thLID i-Fli~p~tj.U:J!~fit(~co1nfrien~ei1:F·wn~.miofajtf\t!!1ij LindAfca ,t;andArea· ,8.•;,.;:.· .~ .·,·· "b" ;,/·.,:_,;', ;,:~~~·_:: -1· I..ndValue ECV l'n>bablcMukct LondValuc ECV Probable • p, I IAooe .. mcnt ,,,,l,,,,,,,,lw ....... l,'''"''";,,,l,,',',,,l,,,,,;,,,11 I I I II I I I I I''"'' .. : ·,, ". 1.: -·: . :· ""'"' . unprovemen ""at uul ·=mng " : Lond Value L._nd V:tluc Special Bendit Bcncfil Per A••c••mcnt ,:C~~~•l,1: '(-:(~~:!"!: :·'Arei. · ,::!,;,:.;;p:,:i'i'; ::!,!.,'L'. _-i'i.,'i·!!\ PcrSF Improvement• Voluc PcrSF Improvements MuketV41ue SF FcrSF OAO 17,424 No None NIA GC 1111 $0.00 w '" '" 1//I so.oo '" '" '" '" $0.00 '" $0.00 0.38 16,553 No 3,000 ,.rn GC /Ill $2550 $422,096 $10,000 $4.12,.100 1111 $26.25 $434.500 Sl0,000 $444,500 $12,.400 $0.75 $6,02..1 $0.36 "" 358,499 No t->:ono N/A I RI2,.GC,MU 11111 $5.00 Sl,792.,494 '" $1,792,.500 ///I $5.50 $1,971,700 '" $1,971,700 $179,200 $0.50 $87,036 $0.24 ~.73 162,.679 No N"one NIA MU //II $5.00 5813,395 '" $813,400 1111 $5.50 $894,700 '" 5894,7{]0 $01,300 $0.50 $.19,487 $0.24 "' 405,544 No Nc>ne N/A "' //ti $4,50 $1,824,946 '" $1,824,9-00 !Iii $5.oo $2.027,700 '" $2.,027,700 $202,800 so.so $98.498 $0.24 10.00 435,600 No N<>ne NIA C,C //II S7.00 $3,049,200 '" $3,M9,200 !Iii $7.50 $-.l,267,000 '" 53,267,000 $217,800 so.so $105,784 $0.24 "'" 13,068 No Nooo NIA GC I/II $7.00 $91,476 w S91,500 /Ill $7.00 $91,500 '" $91,500 '" SO.OD '" SO.OD 2.61 113,699 No Nooo NIA GC 1111 $11.00 $1,250,669 '" $1,25-0,7{]0 1111 $12.00 Sl.364,400 '" $1,364,400 $113,700 $1.00 $55,223 S0.49 '"' 108,900 No None WA GC/MU 1111 $5.00 $544,500 "' $544,500 //II $-.'i.50 $599,000 '" $599,000 $54,500 $0.50 $26,470 $0,24 0.94 41,160 No 'no '00" GC 11/I s1200 $493,9ZO 5110,000 $603,900 Ill\ $13.50 $555.700 $110,000 $665,700 $61,800 $1.50 $30,016 $D.73 8.2'; 359,366 No None NIA GC I/II s12.oo $4,312,.392 '" $4.312..400 1111 $13.50 $4,851,400 '" $4,801,400 $539,000 $1.50 $261,787 $0.73 4.63 201.683 No None NIA GC I/II $9.75 $1,966,407 '" $1,966,400 1111 $10.50 $2.117,700 '" $2,117,700 $151.300 $0.75 $73.485 $0.36 7.60 331,056 No t"nne NIA GC 1111 $12.00 s.~,972.,672 '" $'.l,972.,70D 1111 Sl3.DO $4,303,700 "' $4,303,700 $331.000 $1.00 $160,764 $0.49 s.oo 217,800 No t-.:one NIA GC /Ill $12.00 52.,613,600 '" $2,613,60D 1111 $14.00 $3,()49,200 '" $3,049,2DO $435,600 S2.00 $211,567 $0.97 058 25,265 No ,,~ 1977 C£ 1111 $2'>.00 $631,620 S65,000 $696,600 /I/I $26.oo $656,900 $65,000 $721,900 $25,300 SI.DO $12.288 50.49 w 33,977 No 8,448 2010 GC 1111 $24.00 $815.443 $1.675,000 $2.490,400 1111 $25.00 $849,400 $1,675,000 $2.,524,40D $34,000 SI.OD $16,513 S0.49 0.53 23,087 No 2,436 2008 GC Ill $24.00 $554,0133 $510,000 $1.064,100 Ill $25.00 $577,200 $510,000 $1,0S7,200 $23.100 SJ.DO $11,219 $0.49 10.55 459,463 No 126,905 2006 GO Ill $20.00 $9,189,260 $18,900,000 $28,089,300 Ill $21.25 $9,763,600 518,900,000 528,663,600 $574,300 $1.25 $278,932 $0.61 1.15 50,157 No B,658 2007 GC Ill $25.00 $1,253,925 Sl,525,000 $2.,778,900 Ill $26.25 $1,316,600 $1,525,000 $2,841,600 $62i00 $1.25 $30.453 $0.61 1.62 70,521 No 6,843 "'~ GO Ill $25.00 $1,763,025 Sl,200,000 52.,963,000 Ill $26.25 $1,851,200 $1,200,000 $3,051,200 $88,200 $1.25 $42,838 $0.61 15.32 667,210 No 152,543 2006 GC Ill $19.00 $12.676,990 520,150,000 532,527,DOO m S20.25 $13,511,000 $20,150,000 $33,661,000 $834,000 Sl,25 $405,066 S().61 1.lS 50,211 No 1,2BO 1958 GC Ill $24.00 Sl,205,064 $905,000 $2,110,100 Ill S2'i.25 $1,267,800 $9{)5,000 $2.,172.,800 562,700 51.2' $30,453 S0.61 7.24 315,216 No 93,106 2007 GC m $18.00 $5,673,888 Sll,000,000 $16,673.900 Ill $19.25 $6,067,900 511,000,000 517,067,900 $394,000 Sl.25 $191,%2 50.61 1.11 48,424 No 8,589 2007 GC m $22.00 $1,065,328 $1,400.00!l $2.465,30!) Ill 'D2' $1,125,900 $1,400,000 $2,525,900 $60,600 Sl.25 $29,433 S0.61 153 66,666 No 18.550 2007 GC Ill $2..'i.OO $1,M6,650 $4,750,000 $6.416.700 Ill $26.2..S Sl,750,000 $'1..750,000 $6,SIJ0,000 $83,300 $1.25 $40,45H $0,61 L~ 57,979 No 6,356 2008 GC m $25.00 $1,449,475 Sl,135,000 $2.584,500 Ill $26.25 Sl,521,900 $1,135,000 $2,656,900 $72..400 $1.25 $35,164 $0.61
City of Marysville 1S6th Street NE Overpass Project---Recommended Final Assessments j r11::11:n1:il!!:l!!ili::iH • ~';;' ":,·11.rH!l:I' :1:1111:1:1::11::11::ll'1!!!!l11111111HProp•rty[!~t1'i)'.H:1n::n' ·11::11 :1i:111::11::11 :111·1:;i!E.!i';:C:1;;1;,· :;,!l'.•!!.'lli:ill'iii;:ll;lj I without LID I I With LID H:11i;p~da.\il!lihtfit.'lt.ikliiili'l:it\\\ft!d'fii>i,~AtJt8~t11M1iJ "' I ,, ' . . , ' , ''I'''/ :.1·11 ', ·1· .c~•·,1,,;;,~;,;lfai:<:~; 1~·~~1·'·'·· Tot.H,iil'"'''i'.'i ''I ',j: .1 I ,, I l''"""'"'I I 'cv N. p . Ownorllhlp '" .',T.a·T.arcel No .. , · .:Llnd, .. , _ ·) . .:. 'is .T''' ' .. Buffor.: lmpiovcm, '"". YoorBui.t.t ·" •:Zon·l·o· g.;' L•nd V•luo o. ,.,. ... •" · :1·,·;'':;.;·i··:·.:::• 'fA.rreO>' J.....:l't! ···'.· ... l'.'.Ti .>A;..;~~: .';:::·:·s1_:'\;.:·;·,-··:_1.:1;. :,·!':';·:,;::':: PorSF lmpraV1:monls 28 IKIM·ALSTON LLC 00402110oooo602 I 2.54 29 I KIM-ALSTON LLC 004s2sooooo601 I 2.10 30 l~~~~~~~~~~~tcND I 31052900400600 5.77 31 jt.NDALCEDARHOMES!NC I 31052900400601 ! 5.77 32 IMACLYN INVESTMENTS LLC I 31052900401800 I 4.24 33 l!Y!ACLYN INVESTMENTS LLC I 31052900401900 I 2.65 34 ISYNERGYHOWINGSLLC 35 !THOMAS GREG 36 !THOMAS GREG 37 IKIM·ALSTON u.c 38 ICASECDEAN 39 !:~~=~COMPANY 40 l~~~~COMPANY 41 ISNOHOMISHCOPROP )..:!G)..IT 42 l~~O:r.OM15H CO PROP 43 IMARYSVTLLE LAND LLC 44 l~~~::~TCOMPANY 31052900402000 I 2.48 3lll'i290040Z100 I 2.70 31os29!Jo402200 I 1.46 00482800000506 I o.86 0059nooooo600 I 0,30 31052900303200 30.55 31052900401300 7.66 31052900400800 43.60 31052900401700 10.54 3t0529!J0401soo I 16.61 310529!J0303too I 34.38 45 IMADISONMARYSVILLELLC I 0069nooooo7o0 I 1.36 46 I=~~~~~~ VILLAGE 0069nooooo100 1.09 47 I KIM-ALSTON LLC 0()4l!;<800000505 0.76 48 l=s~DESCOIT& 31054800301300 rn 49 l=~~DE SCOIT & 31052800302100 "·~ 50 IUNJON BAl>.:K NA 31052800300600 4.00 51 I ALLEN JESSE 0 & CAMILLE 310528011~1400 0.41 52 l~:~~DE SCOIT & 31052800300400 0,92 53 !HENSRL'DESCOIT 31052800300S!JO °'' ,,. 2.70 5.71 0.00 4.28 , .. "" m 1,41 0.86 "'" 31.09 7.64 43.57 10.4.5 15.97 34.33 '" '"'' 0.76 0.92 0.54 4.13 053 0.92 0.0< 110,796 No ;n,2n 117,439 No 29,469 248,728 No ·~ No :l.,662 186,437 No None 116,741 No None \09,771 No 30,129 117,612 No t-:on~ 61,420 No Nono 37,462 No 6,760 13,068 No 5,776 1,354,280 y., None 332,855 Ye• No~ 1,897,909 No '" 455,202 No None 695,520 No t-:'ona 1,495,415 '" None 59,242 No 14,400 47,480 No "" 33,106 No :l.,847 40,075 No 9,27(1 36,590 No 3,400 179,903 No l'<on~ 23,0R7 No 1,456 40,075 No 14,980 36,590 No 6,000 "'"' cc //II $24.oo S:l.,6S9,104 $4,750,000 2007 cc l!ll $24.00 $:l.,B18,536 $4.985,000 1918 cc m SB.00 $1,989,821 $5,000 1998 cc 1111 so.oo '" $150,000 NIA cc 1111 $8.oo $1,491,494 so NIA GC //ii $8.00 $93.~,926 .. 2006 GC /iii $9.00 5987,941 S4,025,000 NIA cc 1111 $8.So $999,702 '" NIA GC 1111 $8.50 5522.067 '" 2007 cc 1111 $26.00 $974,002 $1,000,000 1989 cc I/II $25.5ll $333,234 $470,000 NIA R12 ond CB I !fl $2.30 $3,114,84.5 '" NIA CB 1111 $7.75 $:!.,579,626 '" '"" RECREATION I/// $3.00 $5,693,72.S $40,000 NIA RECRCATJONI /II $3.00 $1,365,606 '" NIA a 1111 s1.2s 55,042,520 '" NIA R12 ond CB I!// $3.00 $4,41!6,244 '" 2009 cc !!!I ru.oo $1,481,040 $3,050,000 1976 GC //; 52.5.50 $1,210,750 $105,000 IM; cc Ill $27.00 $893,851 5745,000 WS5 cc Ill $9.00 $360,677 5380,000 19SS cc Ill $7.50 $274,428 '" NIA cc Ill S4.25 $764,587 .. .. ~ cc m $12.(IO $277,042 $140,000 ZOO! cc Ill $9.00 $360,677 $S30,000 1985 GC Ill $7.50 $274,428 5155,000 Prab•bk Markel Value $7,409,100 $7.803,500 $1,994,800 $15{),000 $1,491,SQO 5933,900 $5,012.,900 $999,700 $522,100 $1,974,000 $803,200 $3,114,800 $2,579,000 55,733,700 $1,365,600 $5.042,500 $4,486,200 $4,531,000 Sl.315,800 Sl,638,900 5740,700 $274,400 $764.600 $417,000 $1,1911,700 S429,400 Land V•luo Pet SF 11/I SZS.25 1111 $25.25 Ill $B.7S 1111 $10.50 //II SB.SO if/I SB.SO 1111 $9.50 !!!I $9.oo 1111 $9.oo 1111 $27.oo /Ill $26.oo Ill $3.00 Ill S9.00 m $3-00 Ill $3.00 1111 $9.00 Ill $3-25 //II $26.oo Ill $26.25 Ill $28.00 Ill $9.50 Ill $8.00 Ill $5.CO Ill $12.50 Ill $9,50 Ill SB.OD U.nd V•lue $2,797,600 $2,965,300 $2,176,400 so $1,584,700 $992,300 $1,(142,800 $1,058,500 $552,800 $Lo1v;oo $339,800 $4,06:!.,800 $:!.,995,700 $5,693,700 $1,365,600 $6,259,700 $4,860,100 Sl,540,300 $1,246,400 $927,000 $380,70ll $292,700 $899,500 $28B,600 $3!!0,700 $292,700 'CV I Prab•bk I , I Special I I A••"11•mcnt Spoc1al B""ofit Bonofil Por A•••••mcnl !mpravemenls MukclVa!uc SF PerSF S4,750,000 $7,547,600 $138,500 $1.2.> 567,268 $0.61 $4,985,000 $7,950,300 $146,BOO Sl,25 S71,299 50,61 55,000 $2,181,400 $186,600 50.75 $90,630 S0.36 $150,000 $150,000 so SO.OD so SO.OD "' $1,584,700 $93,200 $0.50 $45,266 $0.24 "' $992,300 $58,400 $0.50 $28,:164 $0.24 $4,025,000 $5,067,800 $54,900 $0.50 $26.664 $0.24 so $1,0SB,500 $58,800 $0.SO $28,559 $0.24 so $552,BDO $30,700 $0.50 $14,911 ${).24 Sl,000,000 S2,Dll~~OO SJ7,.<;00 SJ.OD 518,213 S0.49 $4711,000 $809,800 $6,600 S0.51 $3,206 '""' '" $4,062,80ll $94$,000 $0.70 $460,435 $0.34 "' $2.995,700 $416,100 $1.25 $202,096 $0.61 $40,00!! $5,733,700 '" $0.00 '" $0.00 '" $1,365,600 '" S0.00 '" $0.00 '" $6,259,700 $1.217,200 Sl.75 $591,183 $0.85 '" $4,860,100 $373,900 '""' $181,600 $0.12 $3,050,000 $4,590,300 $59,300 $1.00 $2B,B01 $0.49 $105,000 $1,351,400 $35,600 $0.75 $17,291 $0.36 $745,000 $1,672,000 $33,100 $1.00 $16,076 $0.49 $380,0!JO 5760,700 $20,000 $0.50 $~,714 $0.24 so S29:l.,700 $18,300 S0.50 $8,8!l8 S0.24 '" $899,500 $134,900 $0.75 $65,520 S0.36 $140,000 $428,600 $11,600 $0,';0 $.'i,634 S0.24 $830,0D!l $1,210,700 $20,000 $0.50 $9,714 $0.24 $155,000 $447,700 $18,300 $0.50 SB,888 $0.24
City of Marysville 156th Street NE Overpass Project---Recommended Final Assessments 'I '' ,C: :"11:":i1~:1C1,rn1i!~>'1"1,:"11·"1t": '""·"1 ::"'', ::"1: !"! 1 ,c; :": i :rn111'·11m1,rn!i1rnq 1"111m1;rn,~1"1: '"1: :m:1rn1: 1'11:";11m: 1•~·"•~••"•""""••''"':1rn1'i'i1 ,,;,_c,: .,, '""''""·· 1"'"'""": :'i:'1"1: !'1p,;,1•1: 1*1 ! ,;:.11ii,i'w'i, ,'i,: ,Fi,'i.; :i'' .. ,i', ,,;,,;;,i,;;;, ,,;,,;;;d I Without LID I Mll ' . ' ' ' '' ' lond,ATCA l.n!dAtto '' ,' : ' ' : - ' '',' ,', ',,. ·,.; I I '' .i 'I c'"'I ' . , I '' ,' '·''· lw"•o~I '0''"'' 'I' '1 I N .. p ~~erohlp t.ul'a~lNo: _:Und :'.'."·.·)'' .. ;.··IS·"···,'·::· :;.~uf~!'l: ~r:ov~~nta: .. _YenBmt; ;,;~~~~' D. '' ,. ' {A<t09) ' ~---·'-·,;':'·,:Are~· '·.·.'sF·'·:.-·-'" ·' "' 54 l:~~!C CONTINENTAL 55 ]SMOKEY P0INT ~4 S6 i:~~ERG SMOKEY POINT Si ICLA VEL RICARDO/MILLER MARYJANE 58 !STEINER FARNIS LLC 59 IEVARMATIHEWJ 60 I SMOKEY POINT •4 61 l~CAD!A SMOKEY POINT 62 \Cln' OF MARYSVILLE 63 IC!TiOFMARYSVILLE 64 IPETRITZJAMESG 65 l~~;~:~:c~: 66 l~~T~~~:i:~~ 67 I~~~~~:~:=~ 68 IPROVIDE."ICE HEALTH SYSTEM-WASHINGTON 69 \SMOKEYPOINTBLVDLLC 70 IC!TYOFMARYSVILLE 71 ISMOKE;YPOJNTBLVDLLC 72 ISMOKEYPOJNTBLVDLLC 73 I STEINER FARMS LLC 74 I MARYSVILLE NORTH 1 LLC 7S !MARYSVILLE NORTH I LLC 76 !STEINER FARMS LLC 77 !MARYSVILLE NORTH I LLC 31052&00400100 31052800301600 31052800301200 31052700200800 3 tn52700300700 31052700300600 3105280031)1700 31052S00301500 31052~003D0200 31052800300100 31052800301000 31052800301800 31052800301900 31052!!00302000 31052800300700 31052800300800 31052800300300 31052800301100 31052B00300900 310$2700300200 31052700201000 31052700200700 31052700300400 31052700300100 93.25 95.00 5.08 5.00 10.32 10.03 w 0.46 -~ 9.50 1.17 1.00 4.81 100 4.55 "' 15.09 2.'i.04 25.04 25.12 0.45 0.46 2.66 ," LSD 1.80 1.84 LM 1.74 1.74 17.83 17.33 4.93 5.40 36.09 36.09 9.18 9,18 19.51 1950 20.0S 19.50 19.% 19.54 19.90 20.00 19.34 19.50 4.138.200 No Non~ 217,800 No None 436,9-07 No None 20,038 No 2,.38'.l 413,820 No 1'one 43,560 No '" 217,800 No 1'one 187,744 No 19,520 1,090,742 No Noo• 1,094.227 No None 20,038 No "'" llS,870 No 1'one 78,408 No Kone 80,150 No None 75,794 No Nooe 754,895 No Noo• 235,224 No Nooe 1,572,080 No /\:on~ 39'J,881 No !\'.one 849,420 No Non• 849.420 No None 851,162 No Noo• 871,200 No 1,664 S49,420 No None N/A N/A WA 1945 NIA 1922 N/A 1979.SO,BS. " N/A NIA 1968 NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A 1909 NIA Ll C£ GG Ll u u GG cc OPEN GG GC GC GG cc cc GG GG CC/OPEN GG LI Ll LI LI u LondValue Per SF Improvomen!s •cv Per SF land Value Probable Marko! Value hndVolue Ill $1.70 $7,034,940 '" $7,034,9-00 Ill $1.75 m $2.00 $435,600 ;o $4'35,600 Ill $2.05 Ill $2.75 $1,201,494 ;o $1,201,500 Ill $3,00 Ill $5.00 $100.188 $170,000 5270,200 Ill 5$.05 Ill $1.75 $724,l8S '" $724,200 Ill $1.BO Ill $5.00 S217,800 $100,000 $317,800 Ill $5.05 Ill $2.00 $435,600 '" $435.600 Ill $2.05 Ill "'" $S44.S46 $475,000 $1.319,800 Ill $5.0D Ill $0.50 $54.'i.371 "' $545.400 Ill ${).50 Ill $2.00 $2,188,454 ;o $2.188,500 Ill $2,10 Ill $9.00 $180,338 SIB0,000 S360,300 Ill $10.00 Ill $8.00 $926,957 $0 $927,0!JO Ill $9.SO Ill $8.00 $627,264 '" $627,300 Ill $9.50 Ill $8.00 $641,203 '" $641,200 Ill $9.:.0 Ill $8.00 $606.355 "' $606.400 Ill $9.50 Ill $3.0ll $2,264,684 '" $2,264,700 Ill $.125 Ill $7.00 $1,646,568 '" Sl.646,600 IN $7.75 Ill $1.91 $.1,002,674 $0 $3,002,700 Ill $1.99 Ill $7.00 $2,799,166 $0 $2,799,200 If/ $8.25 Ill Sl.75 $1,486,485 "' $1,486,SDO Ill $1.80 Ill Sl.7S $1,486,485 $0 $1.486,500 Ill $UO Ill $1.75 $1,489,534 ;o $1,489,SOO Ill $1.80 Ill $1.75 $1,."i24,60ll $5D,OOO Sl,574,600 Ill Sl.BO Ill $1.75 $L4S6,485 $0 $1,486,500 Ill $1.80 With LID UndVa!uc $7.241.900 $446,SOO S1.31D,700 $101,200 $744.900 $220,000 $446.500 $938,700 $545,400 $2,297,900 $200.400 $1,100,SOO $744,900 $761.400 $720,000 SZ,453,400 $1,823,000 $3.128,400 $3,299,000 Sl.S29,000 SI,529,000 Sl,532,100 $1,568,200 $1,529,000 "v Improvements ;o '" '" $170,000 ;o SJ00,000 ;o $475,000 '" '" $180,000 ;o ;o '" $0 '" "' $0 '" '" $0 '" 550,000 $0 i!H S'pl!i:!aljJli!tlj,ffl/Rl!coinrntndr!d_'liin1t_A1~11111~nt-iil Proboblc I I Special Spo•i•I Bonofit Benefit Perl A••os•mon! Market Value SF $7.241,900 $207,000 S{l,05 $100.538 $446,500 $10,900 so.o.; $5,294 $1,310,700 5109,200 '"" $53,037 $271,200 $1,000 $0.05 ~" $744,900 $20,700 $0.05 $10,054 5320,000 SZ,200 $0,05 $1,069 S-446,500 510,900 $0.05 $5,294 $1,413,700 $93,9()1) so.so $45.606 $545,400 '" SO.DO ;o $2,297,900 $109,400 $0.10 $53,135 $380,400 $20,100 $1.00 $9.762 $1.100,800 $173,800 $1.SO $84,413 S744,9QO $117,600 Sl.50 557.117 5761,400 $120,200 51.50 $58.380 $720,000 $113,600 SI.SO $55,175 $2.453,400 Sl~8,700 S0.25 $91.650 $1,823,000 $176,400 $0.75 $85,676 $3,128,400 $12.S,700 $0.08 $61.0SJ $3,299,000 $499,800 $1.25 $242,748 Sl,529,000 $42.500 SO.OS $20,642 $1,529,0DO $42,500 SO.OS $20,642 $1,532,100 $42,600 S0.05 $20,690 $1,618,200 $4:1,600 $0.05 $21,176 $1,529,000 $42..500 $0.05 $20.642 Ao•e .. m<'nl Per SF S{l.02 S0,02 $0.12 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 S0.24 SO.DO $0.05 $0.49 $0.73 $0,73 '"~ SD.73 S0.12 $0.36 $0.04 $0.61 50.02 S0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02
City of Marysville 156th Street NE Overpass Project--Recommended Final Assessments 'I •::•1:.•:11"""''"111•.11"1::•1•;~1"·:1•1;:•:1,•.:!•~ .. •, -,,1•;•r.•11:•i:1•, •;1~•1:1•111•11•·11"11:"1:;"·r1'r11•nr":11'r:_•1:;:r_rnp-____ -,•rtr•!'!?li":_1a•_1_•H•'.!'';·,11•1-:;1•,s:•.j·•i1!•,:1•:•:11•::1-1 1•i!•;:1"::1-,,•:1•1r1"r11*!11":;"111":11•1:~•!1!i':_1"1'!ii!l'id1"1:1•111":1"1 1"'1d I WHhnu1 uo I i'--------w•,,•,-u"o,..------~"111•;:"s,-""1_..,,•.,.-· .,,,..= .. ""••..,-·.·•·:n-d•e.i,'•'"'"'!1AD'·",,•..,•,•:~"11.t",1"'H: ""I I '·' ',' ' ,', No. .:t~~.~~~~.N~: 78 IMARYSVILLENORTHJLLC i9 l~~uc UTILITY DIST 1 SNO SO !OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 81 IOVERSJZESTORAGELLC 82 IOVERSIZESTOR.AGE LLC 83 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 84 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC SS I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 86 !OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 87 IOVERSIZESTORAGE LLC 88 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 89 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 'I{) I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 91 IOVERSIZESTORAGE LLC 92 !STEINER FARMS LLC 93 I STEINER FARMS LLC 94 /MJLLERJOEA 95 )MILLER JOE A 96 ISNOHOMJSHCOUNT'f F!RE D!5T 12 97 IKL'ANMONGHl/\'Al& 5HUEN-CHEN 98 l~~~~~~=LLC 99 IKAZEN RICK 100 !FLO-WASH LLC 101 IKAZEN RICKS 102 IHOCHREITER HEINRICH 103 I HOCH.REITER HErNRICH 3105270030110il 3105270031)1200 01101300220100 0110130Dll0200 01101300220300 01101300220400 01101300220500 01101300220600 01101300220700 01101300220800 01101300220900 0110131J0221000 01101300221100 01101300221200 3105270040030il 31052700100300 31053200101300 31053200103200 31053200400600 31053200400500 31053200400400 00726700000200 00726700000300 00726700000400 00732200000100 00732200000200 '·"~•':l,_;;;~~•1 ~;~;_~,1~,.,~~·1 ·· Tmd !"J'l;J"I ii !·1 ,'; > / .. ' ··Land. '(' ·i· ·-'·'cS}f"'· :.Bufki'' lmprovomonbl YeorBuilt .::.Zoning;;·: 0\ori.•l· · .. A•~' .. :: i:':';.,.,,:,·: -. .';\101':: · · ':si:<;;:;': !'i::!·''. ' " " 17.30 17-~0 753,5BI! No 1,B52 1948 u 2.47 2.47 107,593 No t>:one N/A u 0.02 "°' 1,959 No ''" 2008 c,c 0.02 0.05 2.176 No '"" 2008 GC 0.02 0.05 2.176 No ~" 2008 GC 0.02 0.04 1,959 No "" 2008 GC 0.02 "'°' 1,959 No "" "'"' GC 0.02 "'°' 1,959 No "" 2008 GC 0.02 0.04 1,959 No ''° 2008 GC 0.02 0.04 1,741 No "" 2008 GC 0.02 0.04 1,741 No '"' "'"' GC 0.02 OM 1,741 No no 2008 GC 0.02 ""' 1,741 No no 2008 GC 0,02 0.04 1.741 No "" 2008 GC 40.16 41.60 1,812.096 No Non~ NIA u 25.7B 25.48 1,109,909 No Kone N/A u 1.12 LOO 43,560 No '"' 1914 " 1.91 1.86 81,022 No N-o N/A " 1.16 1.16 50,530 No 4,981 ;%< u 0.61 o.~4 27,87!1 No 1,530 1980 u 0.52 "" 24,829 No 1,188 1924 u O.Sl 052 22,651 No 7,000 "~ u "'" 0.50 21,7!10 No 5,984 19S7 u 052 0.52 ,,,~, No 7,480 19B8 u ·~ 0,53 23,087 No 11.620 ,~. u 0.50 0.50 21,760 No 8,000 1995 u Ill Iii Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill //! /// Ill II/ Ill Ill m Land V~Iue Per SP $1.75 SS.DO $4.75 $4.75 $4.75 $4.75 $4,75 $4.75 $4.75 $4.7S $4.75 "" $4.75 $4.75 $1.50 $1.50 S5.DO $5.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 S7.00 LandValu~ $1,318,779 $537,%6 $9,303 $10,337 $10,337 $9,303 $9,303 S9,303 $9,303 $8,269 $8,269 $8,269 $8,269 $8,269 nns,144 $1,664,863 $217,800 $405,1(18 $353,707 5195,149 $173,804 $158,558 $152,460 $15S,55S Sllil,608 $152,460 KV l:mprnvemenls '" $0 $41,000 $46,0Q{) $46,000 $41,0ilO $41,000 541,000 541,000 $37,000 $37,000 $37,000 S37,0DO $37,000 $0 $0 53,400 $0 5350,000 $!15,000 $110,00il $430,000 5350,000 $470,000 $815,000 $560,000 Probable M•rlcd Value Sl,318,800 $538.000 $50,300 556,300 $%,300 $50,300 $50,300 $50,300 $50,300 $45,.;oo $45,300 $45,300 $45,300 $45,300 S2.,71B,100 $1,664,900 $221.200 $405,100 $703,700 $280,100 $283,800 $580,600 S502..500 $628,61JO $976,600 $712,500 LandValu.. PorSl' Land Vo.luo Ill $1.BO $1,356,500 Ill $5.0ll $538,000 Ill $4.85 $9,500 Ill $4.85 $10,£00 Ill $4.85 $10,600 Ill $4.85 59,500 Ill $4.85 $9,500 Ill $4.85 $9,500 Ill $4.85 $9,500 Ill S4.85 $8,400 Ill $4.85 $8,400 Ill $4.85 $8,400 Ill $4.85 $8,400 Ill $4.85 $8.400 Ill Sl.55 $2.,S08,700 Ill $1.55 $1,720,400 Ill $5.50 $239,600 Ill $5.50 5445,600 Ill $7.10 $358,800 Ill $7.10 $197,900 ill $7.10 $176,300 Ill $7.10 5160,BOO Ill $7.10 $154,600 Ill $7.10 $160,800 Ill $7.10 $163,900 Ill $7.10 $154,600 KV Improvement. $0 $0 $41,000 $46,000 $46,000 $41,000 $41,000 $41,000 $41,000 $37,000 $37,000 $37,000 $37,0ilO $37,000 $0 '" 53,400 '" $350,000 $85,000 5110,000 $430,000 $350,000 5470,000 $815,000 $560,000 l'mbablo I , I Spc?"l Spctiol Benefit Benefit r~d A•••••mcnl Mo.•lcet Value SF $1,306,SOO $37,700 $0.05 $18,311 5538,0ilO '" $0.00 '" $50,500 S200 SD.DO '" 556,600 $300 so.on $146 556,600 $300 $0.00 5146 SS0,500 $200 $0.00 '" $50,500 $200 $0.00 '" $50,500 $200 S0.00 "' $50,500 $200 $0.()() '" $45,400 $100 SO.OD '" $45,400 $100 $0.00 '" $45,400 5100 50.00 '" $45,400 $100 $0.00 "' 545,400 $100 $0.00 "' $2.B08,700 $90,600 $0.05 $44,004 $1,720,400 SSS,500 S0.05 $26,956 S243,000 S2l,BOO $050 Sl0,S88 $445,600 $4-0,500 $0.50 $19,670 $708,SOO $5,100 $0.10 S2.,477 5282.900 52.800 $1l,l0 $1,360 5286,300 $2..SflO $0.10 $1,214 $590,800 $2.200 $0.10 $1.069 $504,600 $2,100 $0.10 $1,020 S630,SOO 52,200 $0.10 $1,069 S~7B,9{)0 $Z,300 S0.10 $1,117 $714,600 $2.100 $0.10 $1,020 Auo••mcnl rorSP $0.02 SO.DO SO.OD SO.OD $0.00 $0.00 so.oo S0.00 SO.DO $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SO.DO $0.00 $0.0! $0.02 S0.24 $0.24 $0.05 $0.03 Sfl.05 SO.OS $0.05 $0.05 5(),05 SO.OS
City of Marysville 156th Street NE Overpass Project·-Recommended Final Assessments i01"1::"1:·01·",':"v';1:":1:"';"1::";:;":·1"::':11"!!1"· "1:'1:1""'11.':1"1'·."1.:.·',11".!1"::."·11'::.1";1"'11"::i"1:,0nm1,:1";:;"'JF"_i:o'j"1.~"-it)'.o_p•~"!•"11C1m111"::1"1·1m11_":;im":"111":1"1:,'n!".'1"J;mi!!''ii"1'"ili"11"1::'11":11"11~"11:":1"11:"11·":11":.':':-"':1"·:1"1.1">1":::~1 I I -~11hou1uo I r-------w""i1h"u""o------...,,.i1"1:s•,, .• iiW"· "•"~"··~·"""""•"o-""•"'""'"'"""o•".:A11""""""•"'""°'":11'1!1 M•. 'I o~."~" I No. 104 IHOCHREITER HEINRICH 105 IHOCHREITER HE!NRJCH 106 I BAUER PROPERTIES LLC 107 IBAL'ER PROPERTIES LLC 108 !BAUER PROPERTIES LLC 109 ISPPF PROPERTIES LLC 110 IMlLLERJOESEPH A 111 ISPPF PROPERTIES LLC 112 I CASCADE STORAGE LLC JD )HART RONALD L 114 IDANIELSONDA~TELA 115 I BAUER PROPERTIES LLC 116 IBAL'ER PROPERTIES LLC 117 ISTILLAGUAMISHTRillEOF INDIANS. TRUST llS jSTILLAGUA.\.1!SHTRIBE OF TNOJANS ·TRUST 119 Is &JPROPERTIES LLC 120 fSTEWARTGREG 121 I SMOKEY POINT 11'"\'ESTMENTS LLC 122 ISPPF PROPERITES LLC 123 I LARSON LELAND 124 l5PPF LLC 125 l5MOKEY POINT lt\"VESTh!ENTS LLC 126 IBRUNHAVERLEV'<1SG 127 IMIDWAYDEVELOPMENT LLC llB IKIMHEENAN&TARDIFF '"" 129 ll'ATRICKVENTURESLTD Gron .. , I L~;,,'d' A~~ Lapd.,. : (Aei~a) ,'(Mt..').,,! 0074%00000100 I o.s1 0.51 00745600000200 I a.st 0.51 0074.~300100100 I o.s1 0.51 00743300100200 I o.s1 0.51 00743300100300 l 0.51 0.51 31053200101600 I 7.28 7.28 31053200102000 I s.31 4.74 010s3200102100 I 2.54 254 31053200100600 I 4.06 4.06 310.'\.~200101800 \ l.44 '" 31053200102400 I o.68 0.68 31053200102200 I o.JS 0.34 31osnoo102300 I o.88 0.88 31053200100900 I t.86 1.67 31053200102SOO j 3.94 3.73 3to532001oosao I a.9s 0.92 31os3200100400 I 1.92 1.85 31053300302500 I 10,37 10.53 31053200100300 I 14.63 14.63 31053200101100 I 19.90 20.00 31053200101400 I 20.66 20.68 ~1053200.W0800 I 1.25 U3 31053200101soo I 3.11 OM 310s:i200100700 I 2.59 2.59 3105320010osoo I o.42 0.41 31053200101000 I 1.52 1.38 L.'~d;~~ ·':1.~~: 22.216 22,216 22,216 22.216 22.216 317,022 206.474 110,589 176,854 59,242 29,621 14,8!0 38,333 72,745 162,479 40,075 80,51!6 458,687 637,293 871,200 900,729 ST,935 132.422 112,820 17,860 60,113 Wotllltd· 'il11ffur'• ·'Are':!.' No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Ye• '" No No No No No • Too> 'I ''' ' l'I I '.~~~.;.,,.~.,~~· ~ ... ~~~-~·~.~t···: .;·-~~~~··' ' Sf··"'; '"'<'··· ,; 8,550 9,682 4,308 1,750 2,800 NoM 6,808 N~ne 38.410 10,660 4,636 "'' 16,698 None None 3,656 13,728 None None 1,576 None None 24,900 29,474 1,560 6,456 1990 1908 1985 1985 1985 NIA 1987 NIA '"' 1984,87 1958 1%1 1914& woo N/A NIA 1916& 1900 1926& 2003 NIA NIA 1910 NIA N/A 19M 'M' 1955 1933 u u u LI u a; a; a; GC LI LI u Ll a; " GC GC Ll " " a; Ll u "' "' "' LandV>luo Per SF ml $7.oo !Ill $7.00 /Ill $7.oo 1111 $7.00 ml $7.oo 1111 $7.oo /Ill $6.00 //II $9.50 lffl $12.00 ffll $7.00 ml $7.oo 1111 $7.oa 1111 $7.00 I/fl $9.50 f/11 $9.50 ml su.oo I/If $12.00 /Ill $4.00 ml ss.so ffll $4.75 !Ill $4.sa 1111 $7,00 ml $7.oo 1111 s10.oo 1111 s12.so !ff! $12.00 Land Value $155.509 $155.509 SJ55,509 $155,509 $155,509 $2.219,154 $1,238,846 Sl.050,596 $2,122,243 $414,691 $207,346 $103,673 $268,330 $691,079 $1,543,549 $480,90? $967,032 $1,834,747 $5,416,991 $4,138,200 $4.053,281 $405,544 $926.957 $1.125,204 $223,245 Si21,354 "v tmprovcmcnl!l $525,000 $655,000 $136,000 $55,000 589,000 $0 $(>50,000 $0 $2,200,000 s_i;oo,ooo 5360,000 '" $975,0(l{l '" '" '" 5340,000 '" w '" '" '" $600,000 52.400,000 $150,000 $65,000 Probablo !>iorh\ Value $680.SOO $810,500 $291,500 $210.500 $244,500 $2.219.:WO Sl,888,800 $1,050,600 $4,322,200 $914,700 $567,300 $103,700 $1,243,300 $Ml.JOO $1.543,500 $480,900 $V07,000 $1,834,700 $5.417,000 $4.138.200 $4,053,300 $405.5()0 $1,727,000 $.~,528,200 $373,200 $786,400 Land Value Pc< SF //fl $7,10 I/ti 57.10 ml s1.io 1111 $1.10 /Ill $7.10 1111 57.50 fttl $6.50 If/I s10.5o /Iii $13.50 1111 $7.2s /Ill $7.25 lfll $7.IO !!fl $7.10 1111 $9.so //II S9.5o Ill\ $12.75 ml s13.oo ii/I $4.o5 !Iii $10.oO //ti SS.60 !!fl $4.70 1111 $7.10 1111 $7.so lffl $10.75 f!fl $13.25 1111 su.75 LondVoluc Improv•mcnts "v $157,700 $525,000 $157,700 S65S,OOO $157,700 Sl36,000 $157,700 $55,000 5157,700 $69,000 $2,377,7110 $0 $1,342.100 $650,000 $1,161,200 $0 $2.387,500 S2,200,000 $429,500 $500,000 $214.800 $361l,OOO $105,200 $0 $272.200 5975,000 $691,100 '" Sl.543~'i00 $0 $511,000 "' $1,!147,600 $340,000 $1,857,700 '" $6,372.900 '" $4,878,700 "' $4.233,400 '" $411,300 '" $993,200 $800,0()() $1,212.800 $2.400,000 $236,600 $150,000 $766,400 $65,000 p 1 1 Sped"! M robablc Spotl•l Benefit JlcncfitPcrl A•••••mcnt arkc!Vo\uc SF $682.700 $2,200 $0.10 $1,069 S812,700 $2.200 $0.10 $1,069 S293,700 $2.200 $0.10 $1,069 5212.700 $2,200 $0.10 $1.069 $24ii,700 $2,200 $0.10 $1,069 $2,377,700 $158,500 $050 $76,982 $1,992,100 $103,300 $0.50 $50,1i2 $1,161,200 $110,600 $1.00 $53,717 $4,587,500 $265,300 $1.50 $128.854 $929,500 $14,800 S0.25 $7.188 $574.800 $7,500 $0.25 $3,MJ $105,200 Sl,500 $0.10 $i29 $1,247,200 $3,900 SO.JO $1,894 $691,100 '" S0.00 $0 $1,u;,soo '" SO.DO $0 $511,000 $30,100 $0.75 $14.619 $1.387,600 $80,600 $1.00 $39,147 51,857,700 $23,000 SO.OS Sll,171 $6,372,900 $955,900 SJ.50 $464,271 $4,878,700 $740,500 SO.SS $359,654 $4,233,400 $180,100 S0.20 $87,473 $411,300 $5,800 SO.JO $2,817 $1,793.20!) $66,200 $0.50 $32.153 $3,612.800 $84,600 $0.75 $41.089 5386,600 $13,400 $0,75 $6,508 5831,4-00 $45,000 S0.75 $21,856 Aneo•mcnt Pe< SF so.as $0.05 $0.05 S0.05 so.as $0.24 $0.24 $0.49 $0.73 S0.12 S0.12 $0.05 $11.05 SO.DO SO.Oil $0.36 $0.49 S!l.02 50.73 $0.41 $0.10 SO.O.'i $0.24 $0.36 $0.36 50.36
City of Marysville 156th Street NE Overpass Projed·-Recommended Final Assessments [l£iGlJ>1ll :J ';i:::.:,·1i'1li',i 'il!:il!i!li !l:'i1!1:11:!ii;'il'liil!l!!ill:illl!!lli!ll!i'oPtrtY:Dot•il1!'1'·''" ,-(',;' ,:/Ji.•j;::l':'ii'~:i· i~':i! ,l.i;hJ::.1 · ""''·1::;1;:11j j WithoutllD j j With LID i·l!l·SPeliil'<lla\i!fit{lico~llded.~~MtfAl•e•flmoli.t:iil:I M''I' I • (i ·· 1 · G"," l'•~iAml ,_;;,~~.1~"'en'·1 ToW .••·1 •· •' 'I ; •; ,.,. . I l'"'V"o'I I •CV I""'"" ~""I l"''v"" N. Ownonhip· ·Ta.:hn:dNo., t..nd·, ·:fA"''>' ""ISFI·;·-·Suffotc. hn~vemon~· YeuBullt, .Zoning : LlndVa!uo a. ' ::: '· ;. :; · '(Ao.;.s)· , .. ere~ .. : :,:>; ,.,,;:::. , :.\Je~' : ,; ,::'st<";:;,:,: : · ·,:,,. · ': Per SF lmprovcinents Value PorSF no IHOLMESMICHAEL& MAUREEN 131 !BOWER DALLAS B 132 IJ3B P ARThERSHIP 133 !BAUER PROPERTIF-~ LLC 31053200400700 l 0.30 31os3200101100 I 1.36 31053200102100 I 2.73 31053300302200 f 0.50 B4 I WELLS WOODY R & CAROL) I 00623400000100 I 0.40 135 [BRUMMEL CHARLES D JR 136 !MORALES JUAN M 137 ICOPENHAVERKENC 138 IHOLT)AMESL 139 I WILLIAMS INVESTMEN1S ll CCC l40 i:.'J~EVERNONF)R& 141 IEVERETIILLC 142 IEVERETI I LLC 00623400000200 0.23 00623400000300 w 0062.'1400000400 w 00623400000500 w 00623400000601 O.lB 00623400000602 0.29 00623400000800 0.25 00623400000900 "' 143 IDELCADOCARLOS&SILVIA I 00623400001000 I 0.55 144 IS KID MORE HAROW L 0052;.wooouoo I o.25 145 l~~~VIEW COMMUNITY 31053300204700 I 2.43 146 I PIERCE PROPERTIES LLC 31053300201300 I 2.n 147 IWELLSWOOOYR&CAROLJ I 31053300201700 l 1.71 148 !WELLS WOODY R 31053300201800 0.40 149 I RHODES GARY A 31053300204000 0.48 150 IMUt>;SON CRAIG KENNE1H 31053300202100 0.47 lSl I FEDERAL HOME LOA,'\! MORTGAGE CORP ~1053300202000 0.49 152 I THORNQUIST RJCHARO L. 310533002019{)0 "' 153 IKANSEN RO/\:ALD H 3105.~31J0202700 1.09 154 IWELLSWOODYR&CAROLJ I 31053300202900 I 0.60 0.23 l,36 ~" 0.47 o~ 0.23 o~ 0.2; o.n 0.18 0.29 "~ "-~ 0.55 0.25 2.50 '" 1.65 0.37 0.52 "' rn 0.56 1.10 0.6B 10,019 No 59,242 No 115,870 No 20,473 No 17,313 No tD,113 No 10,118 No 10,124 No 10,130 No 8,050 No 12.762 No 10,945 No 10,%1 No 23,836 No 10,890 No 108,900 No 120,661 No 71,874 No 16,117 No 22,651 No IS,682 No 20,909 No 24,394 No 47,916 No 29,621 No "' l,248 4,376 Kone None 3,504 1,204 %0 1,088 ,,,, 1,632 Nane 1,12B 1,920 1,090 N'on~ 2,784 7,498 N~• 1,732 0% uzo "' 1,206 "'" 1971 1930 1955 NIA NIA 1%9, 1976 1969 1971 "ro 1985 1969 NIA 1970 1968 1954 NIA 1928 & 2001 >m NIA "~ "" 1959 1958 1925 1%4 LI ml s10.oo $100,188 s:io,ooo $130,200 1111 $10.10 u 1111 $7.oo $414.691 $15,000 $429,700 1111 57.25 u 1111 $1.00 $811,087 $44,000 5855,100 1111 S7.25 LI !Ill $7.00 S143,312 $0 $143,300 ///( $7.10 LI 1111 S9.25 $160,142 " $160,100 1111 $9.50 LI Ill $7.00 $70,789 $300,000 $370,800 Ill $7.10 u Ill $7.00 $70,829 5110,000 $18-0.SOO Ill $7.10 LI Ill $7.00 $70,869 $90,000 $160,900 Ill S7.10 u Ill $7.00 $70,909 $90,000 5160,9{)0 Ill $7.10 u Ill $7.00 $56,34B $2.'10,000 $2~6.~00 Ill $7.10 LI Ill $7.00 $89,336 $150,000 $239,300 Ill $7.10 u Ill srn $101.241 " $101,200 Ill $9.50 LI Ill $7.00 $76,725 574,000 $150,700 Ill $7.10 u ml $7.oo $166.SSS 5145,000 $Jll.900 //fl $7.10 LI 1111 $1.00 $76,230 $ll0,000 5186,200 ti/I s1.10 GC !Ill $4,50 5490,050 $0 $490,100 1111 $4.60 GC !/II SB.OD $965,290 $125,000 $1.090,300 1111 $8.50 LI 1111 $8.00 $574,992 S7S,000 $650,000 //II $8.50 u Ill $7.00 $112,S20 $0 5112.,SOO Ill $7.SO LI Ill $7.00 $15R,558 $120,000 $278.600 Ill $7.10 LI Ill $7.00 $109,771 $210,000 $319,800 Ill $7.10 LI Ill $7.00 $146,362 $75,000 $221,400 Ill $7.10 u Ill $7.00 $170,755 SJ0,000 $180.SOO Ill $7.10 LI Ill $7.00 $..l35,41Z $35,000 $370,400 Ill $7.10 LI 1111 $7.oo $207,346 $25,000 $232,3ll0 1111 $1.10 LondValuo >CV I Probal>lc I , · I Spo?"l I I AHe••mcnl I M Sp<'i.'.lll!Boncl1! Bemri:itPor A .. e••menl mprovomonls orketVoluo SF Per SF SlOl,200 $30,000 $1:11,200 $1,000 $0.rn $486 SO.OS $429,500 515,000 $444,500 $14,BOO $0.25 $7,188 $0.12 $!!40,100 "4000 SllS4,100 $29,000 $0.2~ $14,GS.<; $0.12 $145,400 $0 5145,41)0 $2.,100 $0.10 $1,020 $0.05 $164,500 $0 5164,000 MAOO S0.25 $2.137 SD.JZ $71,800 $300,000 $371,B-OO $1.000 $0.10 $486 SO.OS $71,800 $110,000 $1SLSOO $1,000 $0.10 "" SO.OS $71,9{)0 59{),000 $161,900 $1,000 $0.10 M% $0.05 $71,9{)0 $9{),000 5161,900 $1,000 $0.10 ~% $0.05 $57,200 5230,000 521!7,200 $900 $0.11 5437 SD.Os $90,600 $150,000 S240,6DO $1,300 $0.10 5631 S-0.05 5104,000 " $104,000 $2.800 S0.26 $1.360 S0.12 $77,800 574,000 $151.800 $1.100 $0.10 $534 SO.OS $169,200 $145,000 $314,200 $2.300 $0.10 $1,117 SO.OS $77,:lOO sno,ooo Sl87,300 suoo $0.10 S534 $0.05 $500,900 " S500,9!JO $10,800 $0.10 $5,245 SD.OS $1,025,600 5125,000 $1,150,600 $60,300 so.so $29,287 S0.24 $610,9{)0 $75,000 $685,900 $35,900 S0.30 $17.436 S0.24 $120,900 " $120,900 $8,100 $0.50 $3,934 $0.24 $160,800 $120,000 SZ80,fi00 $2.,200 $0.10 $1,069 $0.05 $111,300 SZJ0,000 S32I,300 $l,5ll0 SO.JO sn• so.o~ $14R,500 $75,000 $223,500 $2,100 $0.10 $1.020 SO.OS $173,200 $10,000 $183,200 $2.400 $0.10 $1,166 SO.OS $340,200 $35,000 $375,200 54,SOO $0.10 $2,331 $0.05 $210,300 $25,01){) $235,300 53,000 $0,10 $1,457 $0.05
City of Marysville 156th Street NE Overpass Project-Recommended Final Assessments i"1"1·:"'i,"1":;:•1;:":1:":ii"::-":1:"::":::"P":11•:11"1!:•1,•::1"1r:"11:•;1"i:1":1.•:11":1"11.•:!!"':!"1:•1!!",11•: 1•11•.;1•1:1•ne•.-,-,•,~•:o•.•·ta•:11"1r"ill"_r: __ 1"111"1L"!:_1•_1_:1"r11•:,•1,·"•"·"!':"1"'ii"li-":11•:.1,;i:1•11•1:1"11:"11:•11•1;:•11,.;111"':1"11!":1:°'11i;;""::1•1:,ii1i I Withoutuo I r----..,.....,.-w=1.,•u=o------~•:n"-·1s',"""""·"1'•00"· "•"""~,-~mme•· ·"··•,•,•ec1,"•"•>"•"1;M,..,.,.•.,•.-,.•,•J;,j1! ~:'.I . """'""' ,. I 155 I BAKER MONICA M 156 l~~~!~~A& 157 I HARRISON RJCHARD C/OLOFSON DJANA 158 INGO L'YEN 159 IGRIMMSTEWARTLLC 160 I BROWN MATSON LLC 161 ILALLEMAND FAMILY LP 162 !RIVERVIEW COMMUNITY 'ANK 1631PAOFIC!NDUSTRIALPARK "' 164 IQUILCEDA CREEK 1 LLC 31fl533002034-00 31053300201600 310-.;3300203800 31053300205500 31053300203300 31053200102800 31053300205200 31053300200400 00691900000500 3105:l:l00200100 GroH Lind' (A.mil' 0.03 a.so 0.23 0.18 4.15 2.91 0.32 2.59 l.92 0.52 165 IM1GHELL ENTERPRISES LLC I 310S3301J'..003GO I 1.17 166 I RIVERVIEW CO!v!MUNITY BANK 167 I HERNAt\'DEZ ERNESTO & TERIA 168 IMJJ INVESTI.1DJTS LLC 169 ICD! PROPERTIES LLC 170 /GHUMAN HOLDINGS LLC 171 l~R~~N RICHARD L & 172 IPEDEFERRIWALTERJ 173 !WIGGINS ELIZABETH J 174 !ROBERTS ELIZABETH/ 175 jBANNA!'-l PHIUP B & CYNTHIAB 176 ICITY OF MARYSVILLE :i10533oozoosoo I 1.87 310s33002058oo I 1.22 31os33002os900 I 129 3105330()206000 I !Al 31os330020s70o I 0.43 31053:W020MOO I o.98 31053300204400 ! S.62 31053300201400 I S.61 31D53300201401 I S.61 310533002oosoo I 3.59 31053200100200 I o.84 177 I CHRYST MILTON & DIANt>-o'E I 31053300205600 I 1.46 178 I CHRYST MILTON & DJANNE I 3105:l30020070tl I 2.20 179 ICHRYSTSTEVEN&SUSAN I 31053300205100 I 1.30 L~nd:....n.01·~~~~-~~ : (A;;.e's)'' ·:,;;;(SF)'ii[: ,., __ .. · ,,,,,!·':I 0.02 "' a.so 21,780 rn 10,454 o.n 10,019 4.61 200,812 3.01 131,116 0.27 11,761 "" 108,900 1.94 S4,S06 0.66 28,750 135 58,806 1.83 79,715 LU 33,143 ""' 56,192 1.41 61,420 0.43 18,731 0.98 42,689 5.25 228,690 1.00 43,560 4.54 197,762 "' 153,331 O.Bl 35,284 1.41 61,420 ~« 106,2B6 1.34 S8,370 f""~;-1·;:o"!i''li1i· '<''I l'"''""o•I I m l'"''"'M""'l l'"'Volool I •cv I ~""' I I''""' I IA""'•'"' •. 1l11fltt' lmprovomonls, \'.eulluil·····'· Land Value 1m Lond Value Special Benefit Benefit Per A••<>••ment i::ArOa:f ::'·:sf .. "/!' i';;;:.1::.!:: PerSF provcmenl• Value PorSF Improvement. Modr.c!Value SF PorSP N• N~ No 1,664 No %0 No '"~ No None No 4,ilOB No 990 No Non• No 26,400 No 1,458 No 16,702 No None No 2,874 No 3,976 No 14,!!44 No 6,104 No 3,000 No NMo No 1,140 No Kone No 0% No S,216 No None No 6,637 No t>:ono NIA 1924 '"' 1928 & 1993 NIA 20ll2& 2003 19S6& 1927 N/A 1998 1925 "'"' NIA 2004& "'" 2004 2007 2005 ""' NIA 1903 N/A 1939 1922, 1945, 1918 NIA "~ NIA Ll Ill $7.00 u Ill $7.00 u Ill $B.OO Ll Ill SB.OD u Ill $5.00 GO Ill $10.00 GO Ill $10.SO GC Ill $4-.50 u Ill $5.00 GO Ill $9.00 GO 1111 $1!.00 GO /!II s.i.so GC ml ss.oo GO 1111 $5.00 GO 1111 $5.oo GO Ill/ $8.SO GC Ill\ $7.00 GC 1111 $5.25 GO II/I $s.oo GO /ill $8.00 GO 1111 $JO.SO GC !!II s12.so GO 11!1 $5.oo GO //II $6.oo GO 1111 $5.oo $6,098 ;o $6,100 SlS:l.,460 $100,000 S252,S-OO $113,635 $75,000 $153,600 $80,150 $100,mllJ $180,200 $1,004,058 $0 $1,004,100 $1.311,156 Sl00,000 Sl,411,200 $123,493 $100,000 $223,500 S490,0SO $0 $490,!QO $421,532 Sl,415,000 $1.837,500 $2_:;8,746 Sll0,000 $368,700 1>470,448 SS75,000 S!,343,4.QO $358,717 '" $358,700 $265,716 $90,000 $35S,700 $280,962 5220,000 $501,000 :&;307,098 5725,000 Sl,032100 51S9,Zl2 $265,000 $424.200 $298,822 535,000 $3J3,800 $1,200,623 '" $1,200,61'.tO $;348,480 $500 $.349,000 $1,582,099 $0 $1,582.,100 Sl,609,978 SS,000 $1,615,000 $44L045 $135,000 $576,000 $307,098 $0 $307,100 $637,716 $95,000 $732,700 $291.852 $0 $291,900 Ill S7.l0 $6,200 " $6,200 $100 $0.11 "' $0.06 Ill $7,10 $154,60ll 5100,000 5254,600 $2,100 $0.10 $1,020 $0.05 Ill $8.10 $84,700 $75,000 SJ59,700 $1,100 S0.11 $534 $0.05 Ill $8.10 $81.200 $100,000 $181,200 $1,000 $0.10 $486 SO.OS Ill $5.10 Sl,OU,100 $0 $1,024,100 $20,000 SO.JO $9,714 SO.OS Ill $11.25 $1,475,100 $100,000 $1,S7S,l00 $163,900 $1.25 $79,605 $0.61 Ill $11.00 $129.400 5100,000 5229,4-00 $5,900 $0.50 $2.866 $0.24 Ill $4.60 $S00,900 ;o SS00,900 $10,800 SOJO $5,24S $0,05 Ill $5.10 $431,000 $1,415.000 Sl,B46,000 $8,500 $0.10 $4,128 SO.OS Ill $9,10 $261,600 $110,000 $371,liOO $2,90ll $0.10 $1,4-09 SO.OS 1111 ss.10 $476,300 $875,000 $1,301,300 $5,900 $0.10 $2,866 $0.0S 1111 $4.60 $366,700 ;o S366,700 $R,OOO $0.10 $3,BS6 $0.05 1111 $s.10 $271,000 $90,000 $361,000 $5,300 $0,10 $2,574 $0.05 1111 $5.Jo $286,600 $220,000 $506,600 $5,600 $0.10 $2,720 SO.OS 1111 ss.10 $313,200 $725,000 $1,038,200 56,100 $0.10 $2,963 $0.05 1111 $8.6Q $161,100 5265,000 :>426,100 $1,900 $0.10 ;m $0.05 1111 $7.10 $303,100 $33,llllO 5338,100 $4,300 SO.JO $2.0BB S0.05 1111 $5.so Sl,257,800 $0 $1,257,800 $57,200 50.25 $27,7R2 $0.12 l/IJ S9.00 $392,000 ssoo $392,500 $4.'1,500 $1.0U $21,128 $0.49 !Iii $9.oo $1,779,900 $0 $1,779,900 $197,8UO $LOO $96,070 $0.49 II/I SU.DO $LS40,000 $5,000 Sl,845,000 $230,000 $1.50 $111,709 S0.73 !Iii $14.00 ~94,000 $135,000 $629,000 $53,000 Sl.50 $25,742 S0.73 ii/I SS.10 $313,200 $0 $313,200 $6,100 $0.10 $2.963 $0.05 1111 S6.10 $648,30ll S9S,OOO 5743,300 $10,600 $0.10 $5,148 $0.05 11!1 $s.10 $297,700 ;o 5297,700 SS,800 S0.10 $2.817 $0.05
l'ii';:!Jl:,:J!j:•,1'::1!.'i'f:'iil'·•'"l•jf 1'hp I Ownmhi;,' ' No. 180 I PREMIER PACIFIC PROPERTIES LLC lSl I ROBERTS ELTZABETHJ 1821PAOF!C!NDUSTRIALPARK LI" 183 ISMITHJOYL 184 IKIMBALLDAVE 185 IPEDEFERRIWALTER) ', i'iiTTii~~Ti'iT! ;; 'I' ii I!: 11\i 11!·iI'i11' 'i I' Cro" :r~.1'.a~.~1:'.'~-: .i.~nd.i :.'::! · ·. :' (Arns) :11053300204500 2.03 31053300204300 1.78 00691900000600 2.so 31053300205300 rn 31053300205301 I 2.37 31053300203500 I 4.65 1B6 IN ARTE PHTLLlP D l 0096{1007700100 I 10.27 187 IV ANBUSKJRK LEO & MARY I 00960007700200 I 10.27 188 !STEVENS JOANE I 0()960007700300 I 10.27 159 IJEANS DEBRA I 00%0IJD7700400 I I0.27 l'lll l5HELTOK FRED I 00960007700500 I 10.27 191 IKURPGEWE!TJUDJE J 00960007700600 I 10.27 192 IBA!LEY JACOB W SR I 00960007700700 ! 10.27 193 !WOLFE SHARON L I 00960007700800 I 10.27 194 IEVANSPAUL!t>."EC I 00960007700900 I 10.27 195 IDAILEYJEANMARIE I 00960007701000 I 10,27 196 /COATESDAVJD I 00960007701100 I 1027 197 !LARSON LLOYD & S0).1CHAI I 00960007701200 l 10.27 198 IJOHNSONPAULS 00960007701300 I 10.21 199 l~~TJANSONEDWARDW I 00960007701400 I 10.27 200 !TUCKER-AHRNS MARY AN~! 0096{1007701500 I 10.27 201 IMARTh'IKATI-Il 00960007701600 I 10.21 202 ]EDWARDS BARBARA E oo96ooono1100 I 10.21 203 !SHERRILL ANNE M oo96ooono1soo I 10.27 204 IFERU:-JG FRANK M 00960007701900 I 10.27 205 IALLEN MARILYN K 00960007702000 I 10.21 City of Marysville 156!h Streel NE Overpass Project-Recommended Final Assessments o•,.,.,.,..,,,0"•'•"11:•1,"1'1"!i!"11:"1:"1· ":i."':','••"1•"1::"•"•1":':"1!":1"1,:'!l';,ili,,:11"11•111"111"•·°'111'i,il"1::•1,"::1":>1"1!:"':;"n,;,;.11•j I Without LID I i'-------'w"••""cm"'"------~i'"ils">"•'i:ill=!S""""·"fiV"°R>"··-"'""_""_'"·nc"a"· ifi",'na"-11ll.-•"•"••"••"· .c.-;"t:1"'11 "'•'A••l"''A~;lw'"".~l '·'T''"·:"::I (i' I, cA · i, ·'···'(S'f)'':'. ,,llu. ff.:. llnprovei:ncnb ~c:u-lluilt . Zoning' : -ere•.,.· .~:';, .)1', 1-.A .. ~·.· .';•-::SF·';;·:: ;~\i': ·,: .. , .... ' 2.08 90,605 No 37,50\J woo GC 1.91 83,200 No None NIA cc 2.50 108,900 No :<S,164 2000 LI 2.46 107,158 No 2,880 ;m CG 0.00 No Kon• N/A GC S,16 224,770 No Kone NIA cc o.oo No Mobile home \ 1973 GC 0.00 No Mobile home I 1996 cc 0.00 No Mobile homo I 1975 CG 0.00 No Mobile home I 197:5 GG 0.00 No Mobile home I 1980 CG 0.00 No Mobile home l 1977 cc 0.00 No Mobile homo I 1980 cc 0.00 No Mobile home I 1983 CG 0.00 No Mobil• home I 1995 GG 0.00 No Mobile home I 1977 GC 000 No Mol>ile home I 1976 c,c 0.00 No Mobile home nn CG 0.00 No Mobile home 1984 CG 0.00 No Mobile homo 1980 GC 0.00 No Mobile home <m cc 0.00 No Mobile home 1989 cc 0.00 No Mobile home 1979 cc 0.00 No Mobile home "" GC 0.00 No Mobile hom.e 1988 GC 0.00 No Mobile home "M cc ,,, Ill Ill Ill bndVahio Per SF $5.00 SB.DO $5.00 $7.50 1111 $0.00 1111 $6.15 I/I[ 55.00 1111 $5.00 1111 $5.00 1111 $5.00 1111 $5.00 II!\ $5.00 1111 $5,00 1111 $5.oo 1111 $5.00 /ill $5.00 /!If SS.OD 1111 $5.00 /Ill $5.00 /ill $5.00 11/l $5.00 1111 $5.00 1111 $5.00 1111 $5.00 I/II $5.oo 1111 $5.00 L•ndValuo $453,024 $665,597 $544,500 $803,682 $0 Sl,382,333 •o $0 "' ;o ;o $0 $0 ;o so so so '" '" ;o so $0 $0 '" ;o $0 KV Improvements $1,900,000 $0 Sl,900,000 $4(),000 $0 $1,400.000 SS,000 520,000 $8.000 $8,000 59,000 SS,000 510,000 SIS,000 $20,000 $10,000 $8,000 $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 $8,000 SZ0,000 $10,000 $15,000 $15,000 515,000 Prob~bl~ Marko\ V4lUO $V53,000 $665,600 $2,444.500 SB4:l,700 ;o $2,782.300 $8,000 S:W,000 $8,000 $8,000 $9,000 $8,000 Sl0.000 $15,000 $20,000 $10,000 $8,000 $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 $8,000 $20,000 $10,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Ill Ill Ill Iii t..nd V•'"" Per SF $5.10 $9.00 $.'<.10 $8.00 1111 so.oo 1111 $0.so 1111 $5.50 /Ill $S.50 /Ill SS.50 Jiii $0.50 !I/I $s.so /Ill $5.50 /Ill $5.50 /Ill SS.SO 1111 S5.5o 1111 $550 Ill/ $5.50 /ill $5.50 Ill\ SS.SO !Ill $5.50 1111 $5.so 1111 $5.50 /Ill $5.50 1111 55.50 1111 $5.50 1111 $5.50 LllndVa!ue $462,100 $74S,800 SSSS,400 $857.300 $0 $1.461.000 w ;o $0 $0 $0 '" '" $0 $0 '" w ;o $0 $0 '" $0 so so $0 '" oCV I Proboblo I , I Special I I A•••••mcnt 1m M Spooial llcncfit Benefit Per AssO!l•mcnt provcmcnt. . arkclVa!uc SF PerSF 51,900,000 52,362,100 $9,100 SO.JO $4,420 50.0.'i $0 $748,800 $63,200 51,00 $40.409 S0.49 $1,900,000 $2,455,400 $10,900 $0.10 $.'i,294 $0.05 S40,000 $897,300 $53,600 $0.50 $26,033 $0.24 ;o ;o $0 $0.00 w $0.00 Sl,400,ooo S2,B61,000 S7!1,700 SD.35 $38,224 $0.17 ss.ooo SB,000 '" $0.00 "" SO.OD $20,000 520,000 $0 so.oo ;o SO.OD $8,000 $8,000 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $8,000 $8,000 •o $0.00 $0 $0.00 $9,000 $9.000 '" S0,00 '" $0.00 $8,000 SS,000 '" SO.OD '" $0.00 $10,000 510,000 '" 50.00 '" $0,00 515,000 515,000 '" $0.00 $0 $0.00 520.000 520,00D •o $0.00 $0 $0.00 $10,000 $10,000 $0 so.oo w $0.00 $8,000 $8,000 $0 SO.DO so SO.OD SS,000 55,000 so $0.00 '" SO.OD Sl0,000 SJ0,000 so $0.00 $0 $0.00 Sto.000 srn,ooo •o $0.00 '" $0.00 $8,000 ss,ooo $0 SD.DO so so.oo $20,000 $20,000 $0 SO.DO '" S0.00 $10,000 510,000 $0 SO.DO '" so.an 515,000 Sl.'<,000 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $15,000 $15,DOO $0 $0.0D '" $0.0D $15,000 $15,000 $0 $0.00 $0 SO.DO
City of Marysville 156th Street NE Ovetpass Ptoject-Recommended Final Assessments l.i::I .;ii·;' ,. :Wii':'.'' 'i•l•iii::; :::ili:j!;;!i!ilililliilliil!:ill':l!'il!;:l!iii!:ill l'l!o]ltl'lyiOiii!l:ill!il!illl;!!i'!llJ i:Pil :1 :ill il!':li ill!i!l!1li!il!!il!ii!!!iil;,il'if'i:!!:.i;l!0!I! j j Without LID j j With LID Hi!!Sjl~i;ial;B,~fl,t(Rtcqm~nd~illf;l.liAl:,O..R~oiliitnti) 1l M•pl No. ' . I ' ' I Oro" I . I ' ''' '·' ... ' ·' .: '· LiindAt<>n Lai\dAtt• Owncnh1p · , ,1'.·~~= .. cl.No .. :· .. 1.a~~L. <(Ac~i). ·i·;;·(sFJ .. i · ·'i'.' .... · .. CAcros) .·. .· · ,.,., ..... 206 l~~~:~E~A~: 00%0007702HJV I 10.27 0.00 207 l:;~::R~~RICKJ & oo96ooono2200 I 10.27 0.00 208 I WRINKLE JERRY & KA THY 00950007702300 I 10.21 o.oo 209 IPENCEMARLENEJ 00960007702400 I 10.27 0.00 210 ILDJGG JEFFREY R 0096ooono2$00 I 10.27 0.00 211 IA VIST £RIK oo96ooono2600 I 10.27 o.oo 2121:::.::~BERTWSR& 00%()()07702100 I 10.27 0.00 213 IADKL'JS ANCUESS 009500077ozsoo I 10.27 o.oo 214 IBULLARDRUTHA 00950007702900 I 10.27 0.00 215 !STOCJONELL LEATHA L 00950007703000 I 10.27 0.00 216 IFERG1JSON ALICE 00960007703100 I 10.21 0.00 217 IPEDEFERRJJO~R oo96ooono3200 I 10.21 o.oo 218 IJ...1AYV!LLE BARBARA oo96ooono3300 I 10.27 0.00 219 I CAREY EMILY 00960007703400 I 10.21 0.00 llO IBURCHETIWJLLlAMT oo960()(]7703soo I 10.27 o.oo 221 !GIBSON STEPHEN & JAMA 00960007703600 I 10.21 o.oo ll2 j:~:~l~:CKER 00960007703700 ! 10.27 000 m l~~~~:~~RDENM051LE oo96ooo77o3soo I 10.21 0.00 224 !CALKINS GERTRUDE M oo96ooonro90\J I 10.27 0.00 22.5 IMUELLERCANDICEA 00%0007704000 I 10.21 0,00 226 ILUKEYENfl...IA TERRYAN:-1 00964l007704100 I 10.27 0.00 227 !SANDE STEVEN L 00950007704200 I 10.21 0.00 228 !GIES CYNTHIA oo9600077G43oo I 10.27 0.00 229 !SMITH KENNETH 0 oo960\J077044oo I 10.27 0.00 230 IKOEHMSTEDT ALLEN oo96ooo770<tSoo I 10.27 0.00 231 I~!~ GEORGE A & 00960007704600 I 10.21 0.00 w,,,.,~·1·' To<• "'I:,·• ''I·,,, ' :~B. uffe~' tmpnnrer:'.'~n~ ~·~~~! . ;·t;~ng' ; .. Area .. , SF' :,, ,.:.':-·:' ",, ' No Mobile home "~ GC No Mobilohome 1960 GC No Mobile home "~ GC No Mobile home "'" GC No Mobile home 1980 GC No Mobile home 1980 GC No Mobilohome 1966 GC No Mobile home 1976 Ge No Mob~ehomc 2007 GC No Mobile home 1980 GC No Mobile home 1979 GC No Mobile home "~ GC No Mobile home 1964 GC No Mobile home 1986 GC No Mobile home 1969 c,c No Mobile home "~ GC No Mobile home 1993 c,c No Mobile home NIA GC No Mobile home '~" GC No Mobile home woo GC No Mobile home "~ GC No Mnhileh~m• 1993 cc No Mobile home 19SS GC No Mobilohome 1960 GC No Mobilohome 1989 cc No Mobile home "'" GC Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill L>nd V•luo Per SF $5.00 $5.00 S5.00 $5.[l{l $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 ss.oo S5.00 $5.(1{) $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5,00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5,00 $5.00 L>ndVoluo so so $0 $0 $0 " $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 " so so so $0 •o so so $0 so $0 "' " $0 $0 <CV lmproV!lments S.S,000 $10,000 512,000 SI0,000 510,000 $12,000 $20,000 510,000 $25,000 510,000 Sl0,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 SS,000 $8,000 520,000 $10,000 $15,000 $26,000 $15,000 SlS,000 $15,000 $10,000 $18,ll\JO SJ0,000 l'robablc Markel Value $R,OOO $10,000 $12,0DO 510,000 SJ0,000 $U,OOO $20,000 $10,000 $25,000 $10,000 510,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 SS,000 $8,000 520,000 $10,000 $15,000 $26,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $10,000 $18,000 $10,000 Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill 111 Ill Ill Ill Ill II/ Ill Ill Land Value l'crSF $5.50 $5.50 $5.50 $5.50 $5,50 SS.SO $5.50 $5.50 $550 $5.50 $5.50 55.SO $5.50 $5.50 $5.50 $5.50 $5.50 55.50 $5.50 $5.50 $5.SO $5.50 $5,50 s;.;o $550 $5.SO Lo.nd Value $0 $0 w $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 " so $0 $0 w " $0 $0 $0 $0 "' w '" so $0 "' w <CV lmprovcmcnls' $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $10,000 510,000 $12,000 $20,0DO $10,000 $25,000 510,000 $10,000 512.000 $12,000 $12,000 $5,000 $8,000 $20,000 510,000 $15,000 $26,000 $15,000 515,000 515,000 Sl0,000 $18,000 $10,000 Special Probable I , · I . I SJ>"C>al Benefit Benefit Per A"•cosmcn! Markel Va!uc SP A•• .. •mcnt Per SP $8,000 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $10,000 " $0,00 " ${J.OO $12,0DO $0 S0.00 '° so.no $10,000 $0 so.oo '" so.no 510,000 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 512,000 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $20,000 $0 SD.00 w $0.00 $10,000 $0 SD.OD w SD.OD $25,000 $0 SD.DO " SD.no $10,000 " 50.00 $0 SO.OD $10,000 so so.on '" so.no $12,000 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $12,000 $0 $1J.00 $0 SD.00 $12,000 $0 50.00 $0 SD.DO $5,000 $0 SO.DO •o SO.DO $8,000 so so.on so 50.00 520,000 so $0.00 $0 $0.00 $10.000 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $15,000 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $26,000 $0 S0,00 " ${J.OO $15,000 $0 SO.DO '" SO.OD $15,000 $0 SO.DO '" SO.OD $15,000 so $0.00 $0 $0.00 SlO,OllD $0 $0.00 $0 ~0-00 $18,000 $0 SD.DO $0 $0.00 $10,000 $0 S0.00 $0 $0.00
City of Marysville l56th Street NE Overpass Projed---Recommended Final Assessments 'I '''i"' ·C· ,,,,,c,, ,c,mi p"·"· "1 ;": · ;C: :"i: :': 1"' '"': :"! i 1c,•1; ,m,, ! :C·,1•,::,1!"': 1":::":'"'' ·"':"1:."1:;";i•:1 ·', pC·;,•,ro=v•"•'''"'·•"•-"'11"::;'11:'11•'.1.1•1i:'111•1 :"11,m::1":: 1'::",:i"r1":1 :"r1"'r·"• ,;:: 1iii~I: ,,;! 1 ;C: ::i'11.ii, 11ii:: 1~! :m! 1,;;,;1ii:; ;C1 :ii.! ;ii!: :iii i .'i: ,; I I Without LID I I With uo I 11rnspoiliil"Bitlefil:i'R:o!comlni!iid~Pirib:t1Ali8"9omt11~111 ,j . I·· I •·1/ l,Gro~•1ci;dAiJl;(,;<A~o11".•tlood-1 Tobl)'l'' I," .. II I l'""'V""'I I •cv N I Owncnlnp .Toxl'ncdNo. ,, t.ind . :(A · ) : ;1,::~5F;:::'' . 'Buffor. Improvement. YouB)lil~ ;::· Zoruni; ,. Land Volno Jin n. ' .. ·>·:. (Mres): .. "'•s.·:·,j,:,:,.:!·i: ';i..,:c~:: .·gp":·::; .:;;·' .. ;::.-·:· PcrSF pnwem•n1' M., 2n !BRODIE STEPHEN C oo96DDo77D47oo I 10.27 Z33 JHARVl:Y ROBl:RT A 00960007704800 l 10.27 Z.'14 !STEPRO MARY 00960007704900 I 10.21 235 IPEDEFERRIJON R oo91iooonosooo I 10.27 236 IVACANTSPACE 00950007705100 I 10.27 2.17 I FORBES DIANE M oo96ooo77os200 I to.21 238 ]LIVINGSTON BARRY 00960007705300 I 10.21 2.19 IAYUt-.:GD!ANEM oo96ooo77D54DO I to.27 240 I ALFORD LINDA R oo96ooo77ossoo I 10.27 241 I BRENNER JOEL & FRIEDA 00960007705600 I 10.27 242 l5WARTHOUT5TEVE~P oo961l()[l77Ds70o I 10.27 243 IVESTCAROLYNR OD96ooono58oo I 10.21 244 l~DS CLIFTO~ R & NANCY I 00960007705900 10.27 245 !WILLS RJCHARDL 246 ID'NYER DARLENE/D'NYER CHRISTI~E 247 ILAWRE:O-:CERICHARD 248 fVACANTSPACE 249 I HIGLEY LINDA S 250 IHUNTJAMESJ 251 IGE.\JTRY DARYL K 252 I CHASE FRANCILLE L 2~3 lwYAITDEBORAH 254 IMACAR!KATHRYNL 00960007706000 10.27 00960007706100 10.27 OD96D00770&400 10.27 OD96D007706500 10.27 009600077066ll0 10.27 D096000i106700 10.27 D0960007706BOD 10.27 OD961JOD77D6900 10.27 0096DC077D7000 10.27 00960007707100 10.27 2.~S 11-IALLJAMESA&CAROLYNJI 0096000770720D I 10.27 256 I COLLINS JUDY Do96ooo77073oo I 10.21 257 I GRAHAM DORIS A 00950007701400 I 10.21 0.00 No 0.00 No D.DO No 0.00 No O.OD No 000 No 000 No 0.00 No D.DO No 0.00 No O.DO No 0.00 No o.oo No D.DO No 0.00 No 0.00 No 0.00 No 0.00 No 0.00 No 0.00 No O.OD No 0.00 No 0.00 No D.00 No 0.00 No 0.00 No Mobile home 1980 GC 1111 $5.00 '" 510,000 Mobile home 1988 GG 1111 $5.oo '" $15,000 Mobile home 1979 GG 1111 $S.OO '" $10,0DO Mobilohome 1983 GG 11/I $5.0D '" $15,000 Mobile home 1986 GG /Ill SS.00 '" 515,0DO Mobile home 1981 GC !Ill $5.00 '" $15,000 Mobile homo '"" GG !Ill $5.00 '" $8,00D Mobile home "~ GG 1111 $5.00 '" $8.000 Mobile home 1963 GG 1111 $5.00 '" $10,000 Mobile home "~ GG /Ill $5.00 '" 58,000 Mobile home 1983 GC 1111 $5.00 '" Sl0,000 Mobile home 1981 GC !Ill $5.00 '" S10,DOO Mobile home 1982 GG Ill $5.00 $0 SlD,DOO Mobile home 1960 GG Ill $5.00 '" $15,000 Mobile home 1980 GG Ill $5.00 '" $10,000 Mobile home 1969 GG Ill $5.00 '" $3,000 Mobile home 1997 GC Ill $5.DO '" $18,00D Mobile homo 1970 GG ;// $5.00 $0 $4,00D Mobile home 1974 GG Ill $5.00 '" $5,000 Mobile home 1976 GG Ill $5.DO '" S5,000 Mobile home 1978 GC /;/ $5.00 '" SJ0,000 Mobile home 199B GC Ill $5.00 '" S26,000 Mobile homo 1981 GG ;// $5.00 '" $1D,DOO Mobile home 1976 GG /ill $5.00 '" $10,000 Mobile home "~ GG I/II $5.DO '" 58,000 Mobile home 1993 GG //II SS.DO '" $18,0DO Proboblo Markol Value LondVolue Per SF LondVolue <CV I Pro bob lo I , · 1 Spodol I I A••e,.monl I M k Sp0<1al Bcn.11! Benefit Per A••=mont mprovemen1' u etValue SF Per SF Sl0,000 1111 $5.50 " $10,000 $10,000 '" $0.00 '" SD.00 $15,000 1//1 ss.so '" $15,0DO 515,0DO '" $0.00 '" $0.00 $10,DOO II/I S5.50 '" Sl0,000 s10,ooo '" $0.00 '" $0.00 $15,0DO !!fl $5.SD $0 $15,DOO $15,DDO '" $0.00 '" Sll.00 $15,DOO 1111 $5.50 '" $15,000 $15,000 '" SD.OD '" $0.00 $15,000 !I/I $5.50 '" $15,000 $15,000 '" SO.DO '" SD.DO $8,0DO 1111 $5.50 '" $8,000 SS,000 '" SO.OD '" SO.OD $8,000 1//1 ss.so '" $8,000 $8,000 '" $0.00 '" $0.00 $10,DOO I/II ss.so '" $10,000 Sl0,000 '" $ll.OO '" $0.00 $8,DOO 1111 $5.SD '" $8,000 $1!,000 '" SD.DO '" $0.DO $10,000 1111 $5.50 '" $10,000 $10,000 '" $0.00 '" so.no $10,000 /Ill $5.50 '" $10,000 $10,000 '" SO.OD '" SD.DO $10,000 Ill ~'" '" 510,000 510,000 '" $0.00 '" $0.00 $15,00D Ill SS.50 '" 515,DOD 515.DOD '" $0.0D '" $0.00 $10,000 Ill $5.50 '" $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0.DO '" $0.00 $3,000 Ill $5.SO '" $3,000 $.3,000 '" so.no '" $0.00 $18,00D Ill $5.50 '" $16,000 $18,000 '" SO.DO '" SO.OD $4.000 Ill SS.SO '" $4,0DO $4,0DO '" $0.00 '" $0.00 $5,00D ;// $5.50 '" $5,000 $5,000 '" $0.DO '" $0.00 $5,000 ;// $5.SD '" $5,DOO $5,000 '" $0,DO '" $0.DO $10,000 Ill $5.50 '" $10,000 $10,000 '" SO.DO ;o SD.OD SZ6,00D Ill $5.50 '" $26,000 $26,000 ;o so.GO '" SO.OD $10.000 Ill SS.SO '" Sto,OOD SlO.ODO '" $0.00 '" $0.00 $10,000 ti/I s5.so '" $10,000 SlD,OOD '" $0.00 '" $0.DO SB, DOD !Ill $5.50 $0 $8,000 $1!,DOO $0 $0.DO '" $0.00 $18,000 1111 $5.50 '" $18,000 $18,000 '" SO.OD '" SO.DO
City of Marysville 156th Street NE Ove ass Project---Recommended Final Assessments j ·~rK-tiO:il~-.-,-jiilE'ilF;ij: i!•,1::;j111:•1:·:11:• '·Ii' 11:;11:111' :il::i::.1:r·· "l!':l1'1li:i1;:;l WHh<>utLIO I With LID i·liJJSPl!i:W.llleneHt1R.o!ctiri>riKnded.liln.iA11eiifliliiiiki1 :~1.· ~lirshi'f I ... , ... \ura.~1'~~'. Gro"IJ;; A~'I i:;;.;;, l!'.f'""~I • To.01 i : · 1!''\' "I I''"' V""'I I KV I 'roO.»o Mui« I I"'"""' I I KV I Oro>•»• I . I ''•ci•l I I """moo< luld (A· · ··' ,;·;.( ··' , :, , Buffor Impro9omonb :Yoar Built Lond Voluo Und Va!uo Spoc1al Bonofit Bonofil Pot A••••smonl {Ario9) - . ae1_)---. ·" SF>;_,_ .. :·Arca' : ,:· SF:.·:;'<. •;.'" " ·:_ Per SF Impro,,.,m.enl• Value Per SF hnprovell'lonb Markel Value SF Per SF 255 I CHRYST MILTON & DlAt>-:NE I 00960007707500 I 10.27 0.00 No Mobile home " GC /Ill $5.oo '" 10 10 1111 $.5-50 '" '" '° '" $0.00 '" so.oo 259 INEW ACCOUNT j 0096-0007707600 I 10.27 0.00 No Mobllehomo NIA GC lttl $5.00 '" IO •o 1111 $5.so '" '" '" $0 S0.00 $0 so.no 260 INOE LINCOLN R l 1J096-0007703901 I 10.27 o.oo No Mobile home 1992 C£ !!!I SS.00 $0 520,000 $20,000 1111 $5.50 w $20,000 $20,000 $0 SO.DO w S0.00 262 !KLUG DORIS At->N 31053300201200 I o.n o~ 10,019 No 1,764 '"' GC fffl $7.00 $70,132 $130,000 $200,100 1111 $7.50 $75,100 $130,000 $205,100 $5,000 so.so $2.428 S0.24 263 ILALLENIAt>.:D FAMILY LP 310533002009-00 I D.49 0.49 21,344 No N~o NIA GC flfl 510.50 $224,116 w $224,100 1111 $11.00 5234,BOO $0 $234.800 $10,700 $0.50 $5.197 $0.24 264 IWtLLIA1'.1S RlCHARD L 31053300201100 I o.n o.~ 10,019 No 1,724 1%4 GC 1111 sw.oo $100,188 5130,000 $230.200 II!! $10.10 $101,200 $13ll,000 $231,200 $1,000 $0.10 ~"" $0.0S 265 1:~CHMARK RECOVERY 31053300201000 I 0,19 0.20 8,712 No l,SOS 1963 GC 1111 $5.00 $43.560 5165,000 $208,600 1111 $5.50 $47,900 $165,000 $212,900 $4.300 $0.49 $2,088 $0.24 2M l:~~:VIEWCOMMVNITY 31053300204600 I 2.n 2.47 107,593 No Noo~ NIA GC 1111 $4.50 $484,169 $0 5484,WO 1111 54.60 $494,900 w 5494,900 $10,7DO $0.JG s;,191 $0.0S 267 ICDI PROrERTJES LLC 31053300206100 I 1.41 1.41 61,420 No 14,844 2007 GC 1111 $5.00 $307,098 $725,000 $1,032,100 1111 $5.10 $313.200 5725,000 $1,038,200 56,100 SO.JO $2,%3 Sll.05 26S I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101300110200 I 0.05 0.12 5,319 No 2,200 WO• cc 1!/I S-t75 $25,267 $lD,OOO $138,300 /!/I $4.B5 $25,800 Sll3,000 SJ38,ll00 S500 50.00 524.' S-0.00 269 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101w0110300 I 0.02 O.M 1,959 No "'° 2005 GC 1111 S4.75 $9,303 $41,000 $50,31JO 1111 $4.a5 $9,500 $41,000 $50,500 $200 50,00 '" S0,00 270 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101300110400 I 0.02 O.M 1,959 No •rn 200S GC !!fl $4,75 59,303 541,0IJO $50,300 /Ill $4.SS $9,500 $41,000 $50,500 $200 $0.00 "' S0.00 271 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 0110130011osoo I 0.02 0.M 1,959 No "" 2008 GC lffl $4.75 $9,303 541,000 $50,300 1111 $4.85 $9.500 541,000 550,500 $200 $0.00 "' $0.00 272 !OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101300110600 l 0,02 0.04 1,959 No e>O 2008 Ge !!fl $4.75 $9,303 541,000 $50,300 /Ill S4.85 $9,500 541,0IJO 550,500 $200 $0.00 "' $0.00 273 !OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 0110B00110700 I 0.02 0.04 1,741 No "" '~' cc 1111 $4.75 $8,269 $37,000 $4.'i,300 /Ill $4.85 $8,400 537,000 545,400 $100 $0.00 "' $0.00 2i4 IOVERS!ZESTORAGE LLC 01101300110800 I 0.02 0.04 1,741 No no 2008 GC 1111 $4.75 $8,269 $37,000 $45,300 1111 $4.85 $8,400 $37,000 $45,400 $100 $0.00 '" $0.00 275 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101300110900 I 0.02 0.04 1,741 No no '""" cc 1111 H7S $!!,269 $,17,000 $45,300 1111 $4.85 $8,400 $37,000 $45,400 $100 so.oo '" so.oo 276 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 11013000111000 I 0.02 0.04 1,741 No no '""" cc lfll $4.75 $B,269 $37,000 $45,300 1111 $4.85 $8,400 $37,000 $45,400 SlOO so.on "' SD.DO 277 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101300111100 I 0.02 o.~ 1,741 No no 2008 GC !!fl $4.75 SB,269 $37,000 $45,300 1111 $4.85 $8,400 $37,000 $45,400 $100 50.00 $<0 50.00 278 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101300111200 I 0.02 OM 1,741 No no 200~ GC !!fl $4,75 SR,269 537,000 S45,300 !Iii $4.85 $8,400 $..17,000 $45,400 $100 so.on "' so.on 279 !OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101300111300 I 0.02 O.M 1,741 No no 200S GC !!fl $4,75 58,269 537,0()0 545,300 1111 $4.85 $8,400 $37,000 545,400 $100 S0.00 "' $0.00 280 !OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC OllOD00111400 I 0.02 OM J,741 No no 2008 GC 1111 $4.1s $8,269 $37,000 $45,300 /Ill $4.85 $8,400 537,000 545,400 $100 $0.00 "' $0.00 261 IOVERSIZESTORACE LLC 01101300111soo I 0.02 OM 1,741 No no 2008 GC 1111 $4.75 $8,269 $37,000 $45.300 !!fl $4.65 S6AOO 537,000 $45,400 $100 $0.00 '" $0.00 282 !OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101300111600 I 0.02 0.04 1,741 No "" 2008 cc 1111 $4.7S $8,269 S-•7,000 $45,300 lffl $4.65 $8,400 $37,000 $45,400 SJOO so.oo '" so.oo 283 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101300111100 I 0.02 0.04 1,959 No "" '""" GC 1111 $4.75 $9,303 $41,000 $50,300 1111 $4.85 $9,SIJO $41,000 $50,500 $200 SO.DO "' S0.00 284 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 01101300111soo I 0.02 0.04 1,959 No "o >00$ GC t!!I 54.75 $9,303 541,000 $50,300 1111 $4.8$ $9,500 $41,000 $50,500 $200 $0.00 "' $0.00
City of Marysville 156th Street NE Overpass Proje(t--Re(ommended Final Assessments •l£iliI2•':,•t"':!•,,:•1:."1"'''•1•1•·· """""'"1"1':1:•1•:,.•11•::1•1:J•11:"!!"1:1•1::•:p•·;•11:•111•::1•1•:1:'••"•"·"·•"0"0"•"1"11:•i1!•::•11:•,11•i:,•if•:r:"':1•1 •,i•1•::·•11•1:j•11:•:1:•1•w•111":n"11'",J1'1J1'n"11:",:1"1'.I'lE":..t"G'il'"':":i:"';!( __ j without LID I .-------"w"""'""'o,..-------,•,1•1ns'r"·e1JW•"",.,"·"aa•.-.,,..•o--•·•,•,•.,•,•.,•0•1Af'""";-•· "· •nt";'1";1, M•>1 h' T', ""iN' ··~",j' L.ondA .. "'" l.oindAl'I!····· .'B····-·-···-.·.· ···"' · ·.•:,.:· ~··.· iui · ZO. >>1 ILandValuol dVI I "V IProbob\oMorhtl ILondVo1uo I . l'G"" I .. 1 ··.····1•11.1W•'1m•-1< ,,.,111111111•.;1·11· 111 •1 No. Ownon 'P :/~~~tt":::.''!: 'iAt:s); )'.'-~~~.~) .. :;::ii~~;;;;,;::.:::~-1~~~;r~\~; ':~~'~;,/ : · ~g:,: PerSF Lm """ lmprovomcnt• Voluc Per SF 285 IOVERSJZESTORAGE LLC 286 IOVERSlZE STORAGE LLC 287 JOVERSlZE STORAGE LLC 288 I OVERSIZE STORAGE LLC 289 IRlVER'\ilEW COMMUNITY BANK 290 1~;;:VIEW COMML'NITY 291 ]Rl\'ERVIEW CO!v!MUNITY BANK 292 IRlVERVJEW COMMUNITY BANK 293 l=~~R~E~L~ A TRICK & 294 l~~':~~RE~E::ATRICK& 295 IHERITAGEOPERATIC'JG LP 296 I HERITAGE OPERATING LP 297 IDUE CLARENCE W 298 ~~~~~~~:ATRlCK& 299 fUMPQ!JA BANK 300 !DUE CLARENCE W 3011PAOFICCONTIN£!,JTAL BANK 302 IG!LL PROPERTIES I LLC 303 !MAXWELL DANIEL). 304 IMUELLER LARRY A & TAMERA/ JOs IGLENMONTWINDWARD MARYSVILLE LLC 0110!300111900 I 0.02 01101300112000 I 0.02 01101300112100 I 0.02 01101300099900 I 0A1 3105.33oo204'f0o I 4.10 310533oow48oo I 4.86 31053300200200 I 4.40 31053300200000 I s.11 31053300100700 I 17.05 31os280G400300 I 38.74 31053300100800 I 1.89 31053300100900 I o.97 31053300100600 ! 8.04 31053300100400 I o.41 31053300100500 f 9.Sll 31()53300101100 I 21.39 31052300400400 I 38.60 3rns3400201400 I 1.13 31053300100200 I 0.46 ~105.~:WOJOO~OO I 0.46 31053300101600 I 4.98 306 IWELLSWOODYR&CAROLJ I 310.>~300101800 I 4.89 307 IBRU"TIJS AS50C!ATES UC I 31053400200600 I 36.79 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.41 4.77 4.77 5.00 5.00 17,48 40.00 1.93 0.97 8.36 0.50 9,81 21.35 40.00 1.00 "' 0.51 ··~ 5.02 36.51 1,959 No "" 2008 1,959 No '" 2008 2,551 No 1,055 2008 17,958 No Nooo N/A 207,781 No None NIA 207.781 No t>.:one NIA 217,BOO No None N/A 217,800 No None N/A 761,429 No None NIA 1,742.400 No Non~ N/A 84,071 No Nono N/A 42,253 No 1,596 1926 364,162 No None NIA 21,780 No No~ NIA 427,324 No None NIA 931,313 No None N/A 1,742,.400 N> 1,116 1920 43,560 No 1,268 1939 23,958 No 1,261 1961 22.216 No 2.320 "~ 295,772 No None NIA 218,671 No 1.72B ""' 1,590,376 No Non~ NIA GG Ill $4.75 $9,303 $41,000 $.50,300 Ill $4.85 GG Ill $4.7S $9,303 $41,000 $50,300 Ill $4.65 GG Ill $4.75 $12..117 $S4,000 $66,100 Ill $4.BS GC Ill $4.75 $85,301 '" $85,300 Ill $4.85 oern Ill $1.00 $207.781 '" $207,800 Ill $LOO GG Ill $4.50 $935,015 '" $935,000 Ill $4.60 OPEN /fl $1.00 $217,BOO '" $217,800 Ill $1.00 GC Ill $4.50 $980,100 '" $9S0.100 Ill $4.60 u Ill $2.00 $1,522,858 $0 $1,522,.900 Ill 52.05 Ll Ill $2.00 $..1,484,800 '" $3,484,800 Ill $2.05 u Ill $5.00 5420,354 '" $420.400 Ill $5.05 Ll /// $6.00 $253.519 $120,0l}(l $373,500 Ill $6.05 u Ill $3.70 $1,347,398 '" $l.347.41}(l Ill $3.7S u Ill $5.00 $108,900 '" $108,900 Ill $5.05 u Ill $2.50 $1.068,31)9 '" 51,066,300 Ill $2.55 u Ill $2.70 52,514,545 '" $2,514,500 Ill $2.75 u Ill $1.70 $2,%2,0fltl SS0,000 $3.012.100 Ill $1.7S u Ill $5.DO $217,SOO $50,000 $267,800 Ill $5.05 u //! $5.00 $119,790 $115,000 $234,800 Ill $5.05 Ll Ill S5.00 $111,078 $140,000 $251,100 Ill $5.05 u Ill $3.00 $887,317 520,000 $907,300 Ill $3.05 u 1111 $3.oo $656.014 $100,000 5756,000 tt!I s3.os u 1111 $2.20 S3,49S,B26 $5,000 $3,503,800 ml $2.25 Lond Voluo $9,500 S'J.500 $12.400 $87,100 $207,800 $955.800 $217,800 Sl,001,900 $1,S60,9{)0 $3,571,900 $424,600 $2S5,6DO $1,365,600 $110,000 $1,(189,700 $2,561,100 $3,049,ZOO $220,000 $121,000 $112.200 $902.100 $666.900 $3,578,300 "v bnp~menlli $41,000 $41,000 $54,000 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" $120,000 '" '" ~ '" 550,000 550,000 $115,000 $140,000 $20,000 $100,000 $5,000 Probable I I Spod"I M•rketVolue Special Bondi! Benefit Perl A•••••m""t " SS0,500 $200 $0.00 "' $50,500 $200 $0.00 '" $66,400 $300 S0.00 S146 $87,100 $1,800 so.to $874 $207.SOO '" $0.00 '" $955,800 $2n,8!l0 $0.10 $10,102 5217,800 '" 50.00 '" $1,00l,900 $21,800 S0.10 $10.588 $1,560,900 $38,000 $0.0S $18,456 $3,571,900 $87,100 $ll.05 $42,304 $424.600 $4,200 50.05 $2,()40 $~7S,600 $2.tnO $0.05 $1,020 $1,365,600 $18.200 $0.05 $8.840 $110,000 $1.100 $0.05 5534 $1,089,700 $21,4()0 $0.05 $10.394 $2,561,100 $46,600 SO.OS 522,633 $3,009.200 $87,100 $0.05 $42,304 5270,000 $2,.WO $0,05 $1,069 $236,000 $1.200 $0.05 $583 $252,200 $1,100 $0.05 $5:.4 $922.100 $14,800 $0.05 $7.188 5766,900 $10,900 $0.05 $5,294 $3,583,300 $79,500 50.05 $38.612 A"'••~menl PorSF $0.00 $0.00 so.oo so.ns so.on $0.05 50.00 S0.05 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 S0.02 S0.02 $0.02 $0.02 S0.02 $0.02 $ll.02 $0,02 so.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02
.. ,·:::!!·:i!':11:.11J:.1J!_;,i."!!':i''""1H!"i'iii"''' M" I Ownonhip No. G=• ,:rax'P•~ol_~~: 1-:_i..nd (Acre~) 008 IEVARMAITHEWJ I 31052.700301000 I J.80 309 ICRAFTWILUAM&LYNDA I 31053300100100 I 5.94 310 l!!RlITL'S ASSOCIATES LLC I 31Q53400200100 I 9.BB 311 l~~~!NETI LA."'U COMPANY I 310534()0200200 I 0.64 IGITSCHLAG Ml CHA EL & 312 GEIS BRENDAL 313 INAKKENLO'.'JA LEE • I 314 !STEINER FARMS UC • 1 315 !STEINER FARMS LLC 31o:>Moo201200 I o.65 31053400201100 I o.75 3to527003009{]0 I 20.46 31os21003oosoo I 36.89 316 IARLINGTONTLASSOCIATESI 31053400200300 I 6.08 • I 317 ISTEINERFARM5LLC 310527003oosoo I 9.31 316 IARLINCTONTL ASSOCIATES I 31053400200500 I 1.42 319 \ARLINGTON TL ASSOOATE5 I 31053400200400 \ 19.37 320 ILLC EVEREITl 310533002Ml00 I 1.10 321 ;SMOKEY POINT INVESTMENTS LLC 31053300302700 I 3.60 -ISMOKEY POINT ·'22 INVESTM£NTS LLC 31053300300300 I 1.27 323 l~~~~~:~TLLC 31053300300900 I S.56 324 IUNDJ ROLAND 0 31053300301000 I 4.7i 325 IU k S PROPERTIES LLC 31053300302600 I 4.03 326 lu & S PROPERTIES LLC 31053300301100 I o.85 327 l~~~~~~LLC 31053300301900 I t.08 328 i~~-~~~~::LLC 31053300302300 l 1.05 329 !~~~~HWESTFAR.\:IFOOD 3105~300202800 I 11.05 330 l~~~~:~TLLC 31053300203000 I 4.58 City of Marysville 156!h Street NE Overpass Project-Recommended Final Assessments l'Jopc•ly DatA:l!.t_'!l::J!:Jll:-11::11;111::11;:1, fl!'!li i<!!•;'l/.·ii''!!l·i11',il:Jlll'll'!l!':11iill!il!·I I Without LID j j With LID biilS#ciiililltMS.t.l~~~rilliui,;dli~l'biJll:J\J!!l!i~t:ltjtfttiTI ,,;,;..,l.;,,~~-1w"'"'-1 •,To"'''I ;; 'I• ; • ; 'I l''"'v"''I I tov l'""""M'""l l"""""I I tcv I ""'"" I I''~' I IA"'"m'" : · : ,• ,-,·, · '>' 1,:, 'Buffur; lmpmvomont. Yeor Built. ·: ! Zoning U.nd V•luc Lo.nd V:t!uo SpodolBcnofil Benefit Por A .. c•omont (Aaes) ' ,: i(SF .. d:_ ·\,\,~',;_·: · .. SF· .'-··,:;" : ;':' ·' :·, .: .. :: PcrSF [mprovcmcnls V:t!ne PorSF lmpmvoment. MarkotValue SF PctSF 1.73 75,359 No No~ N>A u 1111 $5.oo $,.~76,794 '° S..~76,800 !f!I s..o.os $3B0,600 w $M0,600 $.~.500 $0.05 SU46 $0.02. 5.n 249,163 No 3,HO 1964 u !Ill $2.70 $672,741 $200,000 SB7Z.700 !!II 52.75 $6B5,200 $200,000 $S85,200 $12,SOO $0.05 $6,071 $0.02 10.94 476,546 No None NIA u 1111 si.oa $953,093 '" $953,100 tt!I $2.05 $976,900 '" $976,900 $23,MO $0.05 $11,559 $0.02 m 33,541 No Kone NIA u 1111 s2.20 $73,791 $0 $73,800 !Ill $2.25 $75,500 '" $75,500 $1,700 $0.05 5826 $0.02 058 25,265 No 1,374 "~ u fffl $220 $55r'i83 $125,000 $1B0.600 1111 $2.25 S..06.800 SUS,000 SI81,SOO $1,200 $0.05 $553 S0.02 0,70 30,492 No 1,404 1920 u !!II ss.oo $152.460 S95.000 $247.500 11/I $5.0s $154,000 $95,000 $249,000 $1.500 $0.05 $729 $0.02 20.00 871,200 No N-• N>A LI 1111 $1.75 $1,524,600 '" $1.524,600 !Iii $1.80 Sl,568,200 '" $1,568,200 $43,600 $0.05 $21,176 so.02 37.27 1,623,481 No None NIA u 1111 $1.75 $2,S41,092 '" Sl,541,100 !!fl SJ.SO $2,922,300 '° $2,922,300 $81,200 $0.0~ $39,438 $0.02 6.03 262,667 No None NIA u 1111 $2.oo $525,334 '" $525,300 1111 $2.os $538.500 '" $538,500 $13,200 50.05 $6.411 $0.02 "' 403,801 No Non~ NIA u 1111 $1.75 $706,652 '" $706,700 11/I $1.SO $726,500 '" S726,8DO $20,100 SO.OS $9,762 S!J.02 1.42 61,555 No None NIA u !!ti $2.00 $12.3.710 w $12.3.700 1111 $i.os $126,800 '" $12.6,800 $3,100 $0.05 $1.506 S0.02 18.55 808,038 No N-o NIA LI !!ti $2.oo $1,616,076 '" $1,616,100 1111 $2.os Sl,656,500 '" $1,656,500 $40,400 SO.OS $19,622 $0.02 '·~ 54,450 No None NIA u /I/I $5.00 $272,250 '" $27Z,300 !Ill $5,05 $275,000 '" $275,000 $2,700 $0.05 $1,311 $0.02 2.95 128,502 No N-• NIA u 1111 $4.00 $514,008 '" $514,000 !!fl 54.05 $520,400 '" 5520,400 $6,400 $0.05 $3,108 $0.02 1.00 43,560 No No= NIA LI /Ill $5.oo $217,800 '" $217,800 1111 ss.10 $222.200 '" 5222.200 S4,400 $0.10 $2.137 $0.05 4.88 212.573 No None NIA u 1111 $5.oo $1.062..664 '" $1.062..900 1111 $5.05 $1.073.500 '" $1,073,500 $10,600 $0.05 $5,148 $0.02 4.BS 212.573 No t>:ono NIA u //II $5.00 $1,062,864 '" $1,062,9{)0 It/I $5.os $1,073,500 '" $1,07:1,500 $10,600 SO.OS $5,148 so.02 3.88 169,013 No Kone NIA u //!I SS.DO $845.064 '" $845,100 1111 $5.o5 $-85.'!,500 '" $853,500 $8.400 50.05 $4.080 S0.02 1.00 43,560 No Non~ N/A u !!II ss.oo $217.800 '" $217,800 1111 $5.10 '"""'' '" $222,200 $4,400 50.10 $2.137 50.05 1.01 43,996 No None NIA LI !!fl $5.00 $219,978 '" $220,000 !Ill ss.10 $224,400 '" $224.400 $4.400 $0.10 $2,137 $0.05 1.07 46,609 No None NIA u 1111 $5.00 $233,046 '" $233,000 /1/l $5.05 $235,400 w $ll5,400 $2.400 $0.05 $1,166 $0.03 7.82 340,639 No No~ NIA LI 11/I $5.DO $1,703,196 '" 51,703,200 !!ti $5.05 $1,720,200 ;o $1.720,200 $17,000 $0.05 $8,257 $0.02 4.53 197,327 No None NIA u 1111 $5.oo $986,634 '" $986.600 !!II ss.05 $996,500 '" $996,500 s~,900 50.05 $4,SOS 50.02
City of Marysville 156th Street NE Ove ass Project---Recommended Final Assessments i'"' 1":!i:'P1n.:·!·;::··' 1'i•i:;:' ·;o::::l!!i!:;11:1!!:;1iiill'ill:i1:!il!!i:Pii:ip~l!~DBli:::1l!i!Hi ji'::]i':l;.:11 ii':1ll!1!i!i!li li•:ll!ilP:li :'ii1! i'!i:';!J.:il i!i·!li·'li::j WithoutLIO I WHhLID i:l!l!$Pl!i:i.ilJBl!he£it(~Cl!illmtndedil.'j11il:~ilie~8tilbi\i;!l!j "'' No; oWni:rshlp 331 I CANNON GGC LLC 332 IHA'.'JAUER Gt:RARD L I SMOKEY POINT 333 11'.'VE.SThl.ENTS LLC 334 l:~~lFJC !NDUSTRJAL PARK 335 l:;~FIC !NDUSTRlAL PARK 336 IGRIMM:STEWARTLLC 337 !HANAUER GERARD L 338 !HANAUER GERARD L 339 ICI1Y OF M1\RYSVJLLt: 340 IU & S PROPERTIES LLC 341 ICI1Y OF MARYSVILLE 342 ILLC EVERETT I I ROUND HILL 1NVESD.1EN1S 343 LLC 344 I CANNON GGC LLC 345 ICAKNON GC EXEMIT LLC 346 ICA1'."NON GC EXEMPT LLC 347 IBAUt:R PROPERTIES LLC 348 \~:~~y LTD 349 !BRUTUS ASSOC!A TES LLC 350 I BRUTUS ASSOCIATES LLC 351 !BRUTUS ASSOCIATES LLC IQUJt\N DENNIS W & 352 SANDRA 353 I BRUTUS ASSOCIATES LLC 304 I BRUTUS ASSOCIATES LLC 355 l~~:E~~~~~L 356 l~~~~~~l~~LLC Lind Arca Land~ .: . . ·' · ·,,.,, .· 1• ... • ,: .. , , • LondValue ECV ,• '•.'.I c .. w.•.•.··1' ··1··· ii 'IW'"""'-1 '"'"'I' 'ff'·' 1· TuPam!lNo.' I.And:-·.•·· .· ::·:( •:d: •,Buffer lrnprovcmcllb< Yc:trBuilt, :Zo>ning>,·I I I LondVolu• I '' ·.-.'· "(Ac'.:i.s): :(Aon!!);: )!;·.~Fl,:) '.:A:rca' ;. :;·,.:'<sF::, ;·::j i/':;:::i:;<;, · ' ' l'erSF lmpro,,.,mcnts 31053-.~00202.'iOO 1.20 1.17 S0,965 No Non~ 31053300301500 3.24 3.10 135.036 No Kone 3lll03300:W3100 4.31 4.98 216,929 No Kone 006919ll0000100 2.95 2.96 12B,93B No 39,600 00691900001)400 1.28 L~ 54,450 No U,500 31053300203500 4.39 4.54 197,702 No 27r'i00 31053300302400 3.15 3.17 138,085 No 81,540 31053300302!\00 2.91 2.75 119,790 No Noo< 3 1053300300200 B.BO 9.07 395,1}89 No Nooe 310;;3300301200 '" 4.80 209,088 No 7,560 31053300206300 0.60 0.60 26,136 No No~ 31053300202200 ;,M l.07 46,609 No 1,872 31053300202300 2.34 2.36 102.802 No 1,100 31053300202400 '·" 2.14 93,218 No 2,540 3l05J3!J03ll0600 0.3S 0.4.1 lS,731 No None 31053300201500 1.05 1.06 46,174 No = 3105.1300300500 0.94 1.12 48,787 No None 31053300203200 17.66 18.48 804.889 No Nooe 31053400300300 10.18 ,,,, 554,519 No None 31053400200900 26.52 25,07 1,[)92,()49 No None 31053400201300 1.74 rn 118.919 No None 31053400201000 7.86 7.40 '"""" No 1,916 31053400200700 37.11 34.35 1,496.286 No 3,057 31053400200800 3.22 ;~ J5)r<;89 No Ncne 31053300301300 4.16 3.95 172,062 No Nooo 31053300301600 l.18 1.12 48,787 No 2,755 NIA KIA NIA "~ 1998 1999 1967, 1970, 1971.1979 NIA NIA 2001 NIA """ 1970 1921 1957 N/A 1924 NI' NIA NIA NIA N/A 1947 1934& "~ NIA NIA 1962 Ll Ill $5.00 u Ill $4.00 Ll /II $5,00 u Ill $5.00 u Ill 55.00 Ll Ill $4.50 LI Ill $4.00 Ll Ill $4.00 LI Ill $3.()() u Ill $5.00 u Ill $2.00 u Ill $7.00 Ll Ill $6,00 u Ill $6.00 Ll /// $6.00 u Ill $6.00 u Ill $7.00 Ll Ill $2.70 u Ill $1.00 Ll Ill $1.50 u Ill $1.50 u Ill $1.50 LI Ill $2,00 Ll Ill Sl.00 Ll Ill $6.00 u Ill $6.00 $254,826 ,, $540,144 '" Sl,084,644 '" $644,688 $2.110,000 $272.250 $1,300,000 $889,931 Sl.400,000 $552.341 $2,640,000 $479,160 '" $1,185,268 '" $1,04S,440 $600,000 $52,272 '" $326,264 $50,000 $616,810 '" $559,310 $40,000 $112.385 '" $277,042 SJ0.000 $341.510 w $2.173,470 '" $554,519 '" $1,631!,074 '" $17B,378 '" S4S3,S16 $135,000 $2,992,572 $125,000 $303,178 $0 $1,032,372 $0 $292.723 S227,20D Land Voluo Per SF U.ndValuc "V I Proboblc I I Special I I Aoo,,.•mcnt Speci~I Bniofit Bendit Per A••oo•mcnt [mpmvemcnls M4rktlV4!uc SF PcrSF Pmbablc Mark.I V4Juc Sl54,800 If/ $5.05 $257,400 ,, $2.57,400 SZ..600 $0.05 $1,263 $0.02 $540,100 Ill $4.05 $546,900 ,, 5546,900 $6,800 $0.05 $3,303 $-0.02 $1,084,600 Ill $5.05 $1.09.i;,soo " $1,095,SOO $10,900 50.05 $5,294 so.02 $2,754,700 Ill $5.05 $651,100 sz,110,000 $2,7M,1DO $6,400 SO.OS $3,108 S0.02 $1,572,300 Ill $5.05 $275,000 $1,.300,0llO $1,57:5,000 $2,700 $0.05 $1,311 SD.02 $2.289,900 Ill $4.55 $899,800 $1,400,000 $2,299,800 $9,900 $0.05 $4,808 $0,02 $3,192,30-0 Ill $4.0S $559,200 $2.640,000 $3,199.200 $6,900 $0.05 $3,351 SD.02 $479,200 Ill $4.05 S4SS,100 '" $485,100 $5,900 $0.05 $2,8~ $0.02 $1.185,300 Ill $3.00 $1,185,300 $0 $1,185,300 '" $0.00 '" $0.00 $1,645,400 Ill SS.OS $1,055,900 $600,000 .iJ,605,900 $10~';00 $0.05 SS.JOO $0.02 $52.300 Ill $2.00 $52,300 '" $52,300 '" $0.00 '" $0.00 $376,300 Ill '"' $337,9()() ssn,oco 5387,900 $11,600 $0.2.5 $5,634 $0.12 $616,800 Ill $6.15 ${;32,200 '" $632,200 $15,400 $0.15 $7,480 $0.07 $599,300 Ill $6.15 $573.300 $40,000 5613,300 514,000 S0,15 $6.SOO 50.07 $112.400 Ill $6.10 $114,300 '" $114,300 $1,900 S0.10 $92.1 so.n.'i $287,000 Ill $6.10 $2111,700 $10,000 $291,700 $4.700 $0.10 $2.283 SO.OS $341,500 Ill $7.10 $..'146,400 '" $346,400 $4,900 S0.10 $2,380 SD.05 $2,173,500 Ill $2.75 $2,213,700 '" $2.213,700 $40,200 SO.OS $19,525 $0.02 $554,500 Ill Sl.05 $582,200 '" $582,200 $27,700 $0.05 $13,454 $0.02 $l,63R,100 Ill $1.55 $1,692,700 '" $1.692.700 $54,600 $0.05 $26,519 $0.02 $178,400 Ill $1.55 $1S4.3ITTl '" $184,300 55,900 $0.05 S2.S66 $0.02 $618,500 Ill $1.55 $499,600 S135,000 S634,600 $16,100 SO.OS $7,820 $0.02 $3,117,600 /// $2.05 $3.067,400 $125,000 $3,192,400 $74,800 S0,05 SJ6.330 S0.02 $303,200 Ill $2.05 $310,800 so $310,800 $7,600 SD.OS $3,691 S0.02 $1,032.400 Ill $6.0S $1,041,000 '" $1,041,000 $8,600 SO.OS $4.177 S0.02 $519,900 Ill $6.05 $295,200 $227,2()() $522,400 $2,500 $0.05 $1,214 $0.02
City of Marysville 156th Street NE Overpass Project-Recommended Final Assessments 'l,.,..""'·"·"'·:"::1'::1";••::;•1::'1::"::•1::"1: '111•!:!"• '!n•:;•'::•n".:!•,;;•:,•,:•·· •· ~•.rn:;:C,,,,,,,,,~,,=,,,o,,°"o"••~•'"ii'•;11•>'"1::•n1CT",1:rn!F'':!C11m:1:m, '·"•",:1":11':;,,, -i,,'i,,,'i,;1,;1;;1i!,;;:;1ii!'ii;li':i,,ii:,:;;11;;.,,,;,.,;;11:ii,,iip;,;;:1'1. I Withou1 uo I ·;:..-------w-"•h-U~D------~,;,"1.;1"~P-.. ~-cW-.. ·-'·11-_imt-.-fW""'"-.p-m•m.•...,-• .. •,"•--.·•1.~•· ·-n-,-,.-,-,-t''"'!i Mop I No. . I·'·. I Gm".•li(~<i.~.1"·~~~•1W•"•'·1 To<".•/1 • ·I·· .. <I luodV"••I I >CV l'"""'•M•""l l'"'v''""I I >CV I "'°'"' I . I'''?" I IA""'"'" Ownonh1p :T•XPucclN<>. "Cl.and · · " " ·: ·· " .. · ' "' ' · ·Buffer lmpmvom~nl> YoorBuilt " :ZolUl'lg • , · Lond Value Land Vo.Jue k Speci•l Bonofit Benefit Per A•••••menl , · .. ; · ·:· '(Ao~!): ·:(~c~eg)., ::::r~sFt:-;·, · MeO.. '·'·'·'SF···:::::'.,:'.·:;: .... •,, PerSF In>provomenb Volue PerSF Improvement. Mar otVoluo SF PorSF 357 IZANDECKJWALLY I 310.'>.'1300301700 I 2.45 2.2B I 99,317 No 4,601 35B IL'NDlfAMJLYLLC I 31053300301400 I 31.73 30.46 I 1,326,B38 No 225,380 359 JUND! FAMJLY LLC I .<105$.>00302900 I 5_'17 5.24 ! 228,254 No None 360 \DUE CLAREt\:CE W ] 31D5330030WOO ) 5.43 S.43 ] 236,531 No 2,44B 361 ICITYOFMARYSVILLE I 31053300300100 j lB.98 19.68 ! S57,201 No None 368 IUNDI DEVELOPMENT LLC I 31D52900200200 I 4.69 4.37 I 190,357 No No~ 369 IUNO!OEVELOPMENTLLC I 31052900200300 I 4.37 4.69 I 204.2% No None 500 lcrrv OF MARYSVILLE I 31052900402400 I 0.38 o.38 I 16,553 No None 501 lcm OF MARYSVILLE I 31052900402300 I 0.48 0.48 I 20,909 No None 5021~~~~/\;::=.LC I 31053300303000 4.69 4.69 2()4,491 No 1'on• 503 IDUE CLARENCE W 31053300303100 I 23.32 "" 1.015,861 No 1'ono Adiu•tment AppeuL< !TOTALS uo7.90 I 1,s40.s5 I 67,tzuu 1980 °" 1947 1959-2004 WA 1959 NIA N;A NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA LI LI LI u LI Ge GC GC " GC GC 1111 $6,00 ml $3.so ml $3.so ml $2.50 ml $1.00 1111 $15.00 1111 $14.00 1111 $1.00 1111 $LOO Ill $1.00 /Ill $2.50 54.08 $595,901 $46,000 $4.643.932 $7,025.000 $790,890 $0 $591,327 SSS,000 $1,714,522 $0 $2,855,358 '" $2,S60,150 $0 $16,553 $0 $20,909 '" $204,491 '" $2,539,653 $0 5274.068,537 l S130,l20,l00 $641,900 1111 $6.05 5600,'IOO $46,000 $646,900 $!i,OOO $11,668,900 1111 $3.55 $4,710,300 $7,025,000 Sll,735,300 $66,400 $798,900 !!fl $.3,<;5 $810,300 $0 $810.300 $11,400 $646,300 1111 $2.55 $603,200 555,000 $658,200 $11,900 $1,714,500 /Ill $2.00 $1,714,500 "' $1,714,500 '" $2,855.400 !It/ $15.50 $2,950,500 $0 $2.950,500 $95,100 $2,560,100 1111 $14.25 $2,911,200 "' $2,911,200 $51,100 $16,600 1111 $1.00 $16,600 "' 516,600 '" $20,900 1//I $1.00 $W,9il0 '" 520,900 '" $204,500 NI $1.00 $204,500 "' $204,500 '" $2.539,700 ml $2.55 $2,590.400 $0 $2,.590,400 SS0,700 $404,:>.09,ZCIO I !fl I $4.34 s29i,iso,200 I S13ll,1w,100 I 5421,210,300 I s11,061,100 Rovi,c'<I $0.05 $0.0S $0.05 $0.05 SO.OD $0.50 $0.25 $0.0D $0.00 $0,00 $0.05 50.:!S $2.42B $32,250 $5,537 $5,780 '" $46,189 $24,819 '" "' '" $24,625 $139,202 $193,20B SM:!S,6?3 $B.093,213 Revised $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.00 $0.24 $0.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.02 S0.13
Chapter 3.60 LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND LID HEARING PROCE... Page 1 of3
Chapter 3.60
LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND LID HEARING PROCESS
Sections:
3.60.010 Local improvements.
3.60.115 Time of payment -Interest -Penalties.
3.60.140 Segregation of assessments.
3.60.150 Foreclosure of delinquent assessments.
3.60.170 Acceleration of installments-Attorney's fees.
3.60.220 LID hearing process.
3.60.010 Local improvements.
Whenever the public interest or convenience may require, the city council of the city of Marysville may order a local
improvement to be constructed and may levy and collect special assessments on property specially benefited
thereby to pay the whole or any part of the expense thereof. All such projects, and the financing of the same, shall
comply with Chapters 35.43 through 35.56 RCW and the provisions of this chapter. All references herein to local
improvement districts shall also be construed to apply to utility local improvement districts. (Ord. 2937 § 2, 2013; Ord.
1275 § 1, 1983; Ord. 818 § 1, 1974).
3.60.115 Time of payment -Interest -Penalties. -.-------·····--------··----.... ,. ... ·-····----··· .......... _______ ., ........ ., .... _____ .......... " ""'"·-----.. -----•. .. ....... ,., •• --------·······-----··--·•-»"'"""·"·"" .. """"" .................................. ,. ..........• -----··-····
The city council, by ordinance, shall prescribe the period of time over which local improvement assessments or
installments thereof shall be paid. That ordinance shall also provide for the payment and collection of interest on the
unpaid balance of the assessments at a rate to be fixed by the city council. Any installment or interest not paid on or
before the due date for the same shall be considered delinquent, and shalt be increased by a penalty charge of eight
percent. (Ord. 2937 § 2, 2013; Ord. 1308 § 2, 1983).
3.60.140 Segregation of assessments.
Whenever any land against which there has been levied a special assessment by the city of Marysville has been sold
in part or subdivided, the city council shall have the power to order a segregation of such assessment pursuant to
RCW 35.44.410. Such segregations shall be conditioned upon the following:
(1) A finding by the city council that the segregation will not jeopardize the security of the city's assessment lien;
(2) Payment by the applicant of the applicable lee and costs as set forth in MMC 14.07.005 for every assessment
unit created by the segregation. (Ord. 2937 § 2, 2013; Ord. 2106 § 4, 1996; Ord. 1016, 1978).
3.60.150 Foreclosure of delinquent assessments.
• • • • ••••• • • •, • • ••••••••••-'•"'•"'" ••••••·•-""'''''"'''•' •• • • • • '"'"'''""'u"~'•
11, on the first day of January, in any year, two installments of any local improvement assessment are delinquent, or ii
the final Installment thereof has been delinquent for more than one year, the city attorney is authorized to commence
foreclosure proceedings on the delinquent assessment or delinquent installments by an appropriate action on behalf
of the city in Snohomish County superior court. The foreclosure proceeding shall be in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 35.50 RCW, as now exists or as may hereafter be amended. Such foreclosure proceedings
shall be commenced on or before June 1st of each year. (Ord. 2937 § 2, 2013; Ord. 1275 § 3, 1983).
http://codepublishing.com/wa/marysville/html/Marysville03/Marysville0360.html 2/19/2014
Chapter 3.60 LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND LID HEARING PROCE... Page 2 of 3
3.60.170 Acceleration of installments -Attorney's fees . ......... .-... _.. .......... . ,_,.,., ....... ,,, .. ,.,. ____ ............ ., ......... , ............ --....... _,. ____ _
When any local improvement district or utility local improvement district assessment is payable in installments, upon
failure to pay any installment due, the assessment shall become immediately due and payable, and the collection
thereof shall be enforced by foreclosure. (Ord. 2937 § 2, 2013; Ord. 1275 § 3, 1983).
3.60.220 LID hearing process.
(1) In accordance with RCW 35.44.070, the city council may designate an LID hearing examiner or other officer ("LID
hearing examiner") to conduct the public hearing required for the final assessment roll for any local improvement
district of the city. In the resolution setting the date, time and place for the public hearing, the city council may
establish guidelines for the LID hearing examiner, including a schedule for submitting his or her recommendations to
the city council and other matters as may be consistent with state law governing the confirmation of an assessment
roll. The LID hearing examiner may establish procedures for conduct of such hearing consistent with state law and
the Marysville Municipal Code.
(2) Following an assessment roll hearing, the LID hearing examiner shall file a written report (including findings and
recommendations) with the city clerk within a period to be specified by the city council. Within five business days of
receiving such report, the city clerk shall mail notice that the report has been filed to any person who filed a request
for special notice of the report or written protest at or prior to the public hearing on the assessment roll in accordance
with RCW 35.44.080. A copy of the LID hearing examiner's report will be available to the public in the office of the
city clerk.
(3) If the council designates an LID hearing examiner to conduct the public hearing on an assessment roll, the
following procedures are established for an appeal to the city council by any person protesting a finding or
recommendation made by the LID hearing examiner regarding the assessment roll:
(a) An appeal may be filed only by a party who timely submitted a written protest to the assessment roll at or
prior to the assessment roll hearing. The notice of appeal shall stale clearly (i) the number of the local
improvement district, (ii) the appellant's name, address, LID parcel number and the name and address of the
appellant's attorney or other agent, if any, (iii) the recommendation being appealed, (iv) the error of fact, law, or
procedure alleged to have been made by the heartng examiner and the effect of the alleged error on the
recommendation, and (v) the redress sought by the appellant. The notice of appeal shall be filed with the city
clerk, together with a fee of $100.00, no later than the fourteenth day after the day upon which the report of the
hearing examiner is mailed by the city clerk.
(b) Upon the filing of a notice of appeal, the city clerk shall promptly notify the city attorney and furnish a copy of
the notice to the city council and the LID hearing examiner. Within 14 days following the last date for filing of a
notice of appeal, the city council shall set a lime and place for a hearing on the appeal(s), provided the time
shall be as soon as practicable in order lo avoid accumulating additional interest on any obligations of the local
improvement district. The city clerk shall promptly mail notice to the appellant of the time and place for the
hearing on the appeal.
(c) Review by the city council on appeal shall be limited to and shall be based solely on the record from the
public hearing; provided, however, that the city council may penmil oral or written arguments or comments when
confined to the content of the record of the hearing below. No new evidence may be presented. Written
http://codepublishing.com/wa/marysville/html/Marysville03/Marysville0360.html 2/19/2014
Chapter 3.60 LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND LID HEARING PROCE... Page 3 of3
arguments shall not be considered unless filed with the city council at least two business days prior lo the
hearing on appeal, and the city council may determine the appeal on the record, with or without argument.
(d) In respect to the matter appealed, the city council may adopt or reject, in whole or in part, the findings and
recommendations of the LID hearing examiner or officer or make such other disposition of the matter as is
authorized by RCW 35.44.100. The city council shall reduce its determination to writing, file the original in the
record of the local Improvement district, and transmit a copy of the same to the appellant. No ordinance
confirming an assessment roll may be enacted by the city council until lhe city council rules on all appeals.
Upon ruling on all appeals, the city council shall confirm the assessment roll by ordinance.
(e) Any appeal from a decision of the city council regarding any assessment may be made to the superior court
within the time and in the manner provided by law. (Ord. 2937 § 2, 2013).
The Marysvltle Municipal Code Is current through Ordinance
2952, passed January 13, 2014.
Oisclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the
Marysville Municipal Code. Users should contact the City Clerk's
Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited
above.
http://codepublishing.com/wa/marysville/html/Marysville03/Marysville0360.html 2/19/2014