HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1002 - Denying a variance for utility connections to a proposed residential development located outside of the city limitsCIT Y 0 F MAR Y S V ILL E
Marysville,Washington
RESOLUTI,O~NO.100;(
'f\.(
A Resolution of the City of .Harys'v i.l Le denying a
variance for utility conneciions to a proposed
residential development/lbeated outside of the
City limits..'I,
WHEREAS,R.~Ierkel'i;the'JHn'er'oJ\'tertain.:'·acfeage"located
north of the Marysvi Lle City limits on 'the.vs out heas tcorrll;lr,of 17 2nd
Street N.E.and Shoultes Road,said'~roperty being developed under
the name of Shoultes Mobile Manor,Snohomish County Subdivision No.
PI08 (11-77)'and :,,,,"',P.,-,..'1"'ll
~.-".~
WHEREAS,the development of said property proposes ten lots
with an average lot size of 20,000 square f ee t.;and,.,',
•' •<Ii ,.I 'j ,'.'
WHEREAS,the 1978 Comprehensive Plan for the City of
Marysville,as amended on an interim basis by Resolution No.929,
designates the subject property in the Agricultural Five-Acre
Classification;and
WHEREAS,the subject property is located outside of the
utility service area of the City of Marysville;and
WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 14.04.065 and 14.14.050 of the
Marysville Municipal Code,and Ordinance No.1149,utility services
must be denied to a development of this nature unless a variance is
issued therefor;and
WHEREAS,R.Merkel applied for a variance,and a public
meeting was held thereon on February 23,1981 and March 9,1981:
NOH,Therefore
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE,WASHINGTON HEREBY
ENTERS THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT:
1.The City's Comprehensive Plan,as amended on an interim
basis by Resolution No.929,designates the subject property in the
Agricultural Five-Acre Classification.The proposed development of
lots 20,000 square feet in size is in violation of the Comprehensive
Plan.
2.'By In terlocal Agreement wi.th Snohomish County dated
February 5,1979,the City of Marysville agreed not to extend sewer
service east of 51st Avenue N.E.or north of 108th Street N.E.This
would exclude the subject property.
3.The subject property 1S located outside of the City's
duly-adopted utility service area.
4.Snohomish County has not yet granted final approval
to the proposed plat for the subject property.
5.Literal enforcement of the City's Comprehensive Plan
RESOWT ION - 1
and the City's utility service area will not cause an unnecessary
hardship to the owner of the subject property and will not deny said
owner the beneficial use of his property.
6.There are no circumstances justifying a variance to
the City's Comprehensive Plan and the City's utility service area
which are unique to the subject property and which are not generally
shared by other properties in the vicinity.
7. The granting of a variance in this case would be
detrimental to the public interest and welfare,and would be
inconsistent with the long-range plans of the Marysville Utility
System.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT,THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE,WASHINGTON HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Pursuant to Section 14.04.065 and 14.14.050 of the Marysville
Municipal Code,and Ordinance No.1149,the variance application of
R.Merkel is hereby denied,and City water and sewer utilities shall
not be made available to the subject property.
. .'I ~
.~cPASSED by the City'Council and APPROVED by the Mayor
thIS;J -day of )')1111'1/'1 -',,1981..t.'"..j"\•\~'I •.I._:J'~...,
THE'C ,OF MARYSVILLE·.r, ,,.~..~
I
Approved as teo form:
RESOLUTION -2