HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1840 - Adopting and approving a Comprehensive Water PlanCITY OF MARYSVILLE
Marysville,Washington
RESOLUTION NO/~Yb
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE ADOPTING AND APPROVING
A COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLAN.
WHEREAS,as a public water purveyor the City of Marysville
is required to adopt a Water System Comprehensive Plan;and
WHEREAS,the City's Water System Plan must be consistent
with the Public Water System Coordination Act,RCW 70.116,and
the North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan;and
WHEREAS,the City's Water System Plan must be reviewed and
approved by the State of Washington Department of Health;and
WHEREAS,by letter dated December 31,1996 the State of
Washington Department of Health approved the City of Marysville
Water System Plan pursuant to WAC 246-290 and found said Plan to
be consistent with the Public Water System Coordination Act and
the North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan;NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MARYSVILLE,WASHINGTON AS FOLLOWS:
1.The City of Marysville Comprehensive Water Plan dated
January 1997 is hereby adopted and approved as the City of
Marysville Water System Plan.
2.The letter dated December 31,1996 from the State of
Washington Department of Health approving the City's Water System
Plan and finding it consistent with the Public Water System
Coordination Act (RCW 707.116)and the North Snohomish County
Coordinated Water System Plan is hereby incorporated by this
reference.
3.The City of Marysville Water Comprehensive Plan dated
January 1997 and all figures,tables,appendices,and attachments
thereto shall be considered the official Water System Plan of the
City.Copies of the Comprehensive Water Plan shall be made
available for public inspection at Marysville Public Works
Department,60 Columbia Avenue,Marysville,Washington,during
normal business hours.
RESOLUTION - 1
/mv/waterplan.res
~PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this
10"""'"day of February,1997.
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
CITY CLERK
Approved as to form:
RESOLUTION - 2
/mv/waterplan.res
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of Marysville
COMPREHENSIVE
WATER PLAN
January 1997
HCW~L
HAMMOND,COLLIER &WADE-LIVINGSTONE ASSOC"INC.
civil engineering •sUNeying •materials testing
4070 stone way north •seattle,washington 98703
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of Marysville
COMPREHENSIVE
WATER PLAN
April 1996
HCW-L File No.1500.170-CWP
The technical material and data contained in this report were prepared under the
supervision and direction of the undersigned whose seal,as a professional
engineer licensed to practice in the state of Washington,is affixed below.
Larry M.Cordes,P.E.
Hammond,Collier &Wade-
Livingstone Associates,Inc.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
1511 ThirdAve., Suite 719 •Seattle, Washington 98101·1632
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
.,,..
;'.,.•:
City of Marysville
Snohomish County
Water System Plan
Submittal #95·0520
Standard material and construction specifications for water main extensions within the utility's designated
service area have been approved as a part of the water system pian. With this approval, and consistent
with WAC 246-290-120 (e), the City of Marysville may proceed with the installation of distribution main
extensions subject to:
This water system plan is consistent with the Public Water System Coordination Act (70.116 RCW) and
the North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan.
Approval of this plan is granted through December 31, 2002, and is valid as it relates to current
standards outlined in WAC 246-290, revised July 1994. Future revisions in the rules may be more
stringent and require facility modifications or corrective action.Approval of the update of this water
system plan is required on or before December 31, 2002.
The water system plan has been developed as an educational tool to assist the purveyor with water
system management decisions. The plan combines elements of engineering design together with
policies and procedures for operating, maintaining and managing a public water system.
Approval of this water system plan acknowledges that the technical and planning elements contained in
the plan comply with the minimum requirements of the State's Drinking Water Program. This approval
does not endorse any specific improvement, policy, and/or procedure, as there may be other altematives
which also meet departmental requirements. This approval does not extend to those elements of the
plan that are beyond the regulatory authority of this Department.
The City of Marysville Water System Plan, received in this office on April 11, 1996, has been reviewed
and in accordance with the provisions of WAC 246-290 is hereby APPROVED.
Dear Mr. Larson:
e
Subject:
WAC 246-290-120(e)(ii)-
The purveyor provides documentation to the department that a professional engineer registered
in Washington, certified the construction and that said construction complied with the standard
specifications found in the current department-approved water system plan; and
WAC 246-290-120(e)(iii) -
The purveyor provides documentation to the department of the pressure test results, disinfection
procedures used and tests performed, and water quality sample results obtained prior to placing
the distribution pipe into service.
December 31, 1996
LARRY LARSON
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
80 COLUMBIA AVENUE
MARYSVILLE WA 98270
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
i l
;I
I
I
I
I
Cityof Marysville
December 31,1996
Page 2
cc: Kevin Plemel,Snohomish Health District
Tom Niemann,Snohomish County Planning
Hammond,Collier &Wade-Livingstone
RichSiffert, DOH Planning Program Manager
Nothing in this approval shall be construed as satisfying other applicable federal,state,or local statutes,
ordinances and regulations.
Thankyou for your cooperation.If you haveany questions orwishto checkour records,please contact
Richard Rodriguez at (206)587-5619.
Sincerely,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~w~·.
Richard ROdrigUe~
Regional Planner
NW Drinking Water Operations
enclosure
:;;:tn,;~~
Regional Engineer
NW Drinking Water Operations
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
In accordance with the requirements of the State of Washington Department of Health,
Hammond,Collier &Wade - Livingstone Associates,lnc., hos prepared a Comprehensive Water
System Plan for the City of Marysville.The objectives of the plan are to address the existing condition
of the Marysville water system,determine future demands,and to develop a schedule and financial
plan for upgrades.In addition,the system's role in the rriana~ement of the region's potable water
resources isaddressed..,
PRINCIPAL ISSUES
Although the Comprehensive Water System Plan is intended to evaluate all aspects of system
operation and management,there are specific issues that the City desired to have addressed, Each
is summarized below.
• Impactsoffhe Surface Water Treatment Rule
Two of the City's water sources,Edward Springs and the Stillaguamish Collector have been
classified as surface water sources.As such, filtration and improved chlorination may be
required. Justification for a new filtration facility or for taking one or both supplies off-line, was
to be made.
• Impactsofthe Coordinated Water System Plan and Service to JOA Participants
A larger service area was assigned to the Marysville water system through the North Snohomish
County Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP).The additional demand and long-term
impacts were to be determined.
•Completion ofthe Everelt:Marvsville Pipeline
The completion of the 3D-inch transmission main from the Everett water system has increased
Marysville's available water supply. However, the pipeline has reversed the original distribution
flow pattern.The change affects service pressures and flows throughout the system.An
accurate analysis of the effects and recommendations for correcting the adverse impacts was
desired.
PLANNING PERIOD
A 20-year period,beginning in 1996,is analyzed for the Marysville water system.Key years in
the plan are as follows:
1990 Census year from which system population projections are based.
1996 First year of the Comprehensive Water Plan and beginning of financial analysis period.
2001 Sixth year of the Comprehensive Water Plan and end of financial analysis period.
2016 Endof Comprehensive Water Planning Period.
I
SERVICE AREA HISTORY
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Figure 2-5
Coordinated Service Area Population
"'o
N
oo
N
j......~
"'o
.~
Year
+,r,
os
N
Total,Populatioh'(.
..?4
65,000
60,000
55,000.
c
0 50,000'".!!!
"45,000...
0a..40,000
35,000.
30,000 ,
0
0>
0>
~
DEMAND PROJECTIONS
Basedon 1990 census data and the forecasting methods of the Puget Sound Regionai Council,
projections for the CSA service population were developed.Both the total population and the actual
population expected to be served by the City were determined.Figure 2-5 shows those projections.
Theyear 2016service population is projected to be 60.400.
City water records for the past 10 years were reviewed to obtain historical data on water
system usage. The data showed that water usage has stabilized at approximately 375
gpd/connection.Using the population projections and a density of 2.8 persons per connection,the
demand projections of Figure 4-1 were developed.
In 1990 the Growth Management Act was passed and the City was required to establish an
Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).The location of the UGB is an important factor in the City's water
system plan due to its restrictions on utility service. The area bounded by the UGB is smaller than the
CSA.TheCity will allow water service outside of the UGB,solong asit is within the CWSP boundary.
Since 1982 the Marysville water system has served an area designated as .the Rural Utility
Service Area (RUSA).In 1988 the Snohomish County Council declared north Snohomish County a
Critical Water Supply Service area in accordance with the Public Water System Coordination Act.This
resulted in the formation of a new Coordinated ServiceArea (CSA)in 1993.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
The City receives its supply from three major sources;City of Everett,Edward Springs,and the
Collector on the Stillaguamish River. The water rights and utilization are shown in Table 3-1.
Figure 4·1
Marysville Water Demand Projections
25 ;
PHD
20 --,.-~--.__.
~--,~---_.
15 ,-.-DO0e
::l!10 -.•T -+-
AD
5 ~~.-!.·l·+-
0
0 on 0 on 0 on
0>0>0 0 0 00>0>0 0
~~N N N N
Year
SOURCES
·Current entitlement based on JoInt Operating Agreement.
'*Waler ~ghts are held by the City of Evereft.
1.4 MGO
1.4 MGO
2.8MGD
3.2MGD
4.5MGD
20.0 MGO"
27.7 MGD
Water Rights
1.4 MGO
1.1MGD
2.5MGD
Utilized
3.2MGD
2.1 MGD
11.7 MGD'
17.0 MGD
Table 3-1
CONTRIBUTING SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY
PHD -Peak Hour Demand
MDD -Maximum Daily Demand
ADD -Average Daily Demand
Primary Supply Sources
Stillaguamish Ranney Collector
Edward Springs &Lake Goodwin Well
Everett-Marysville Pipeline
TOTAL
Highway 9 Well
Sunnyside Well NO.2
TOTAL
Secondary Supply Sources
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SYSTEM ANALYSIS
The existing system's capability to meet the demand projections was determined using a
hydraulic computer model.All three principal components,sources,storage,and distribution facilities,
were evaluated.Deficiencies were identified and a listof necessary improvements was developed.
Since one of the objectives of the plan was to determine how to effectively utilize the systemsources,
the following four scenarios were developed.
Scenario 1: EverettPipeline servingentire system:
Scenario 2: Everett Pipeline and Edward Springs combined;
Scenario 3: Everett Pipeline, Edward Springs and the Stillaguamish Collector combined;
Scenario 4: Everett Pipeline serving entire system and Stillaguamish Collector maintained for
industrial use.
Each of the scenarios was evaluated at 1996,2001,and 2016 peak hour demand conditions.A
5,000 gpm fireflow was also superimposed to simulate a major structural fire.
Source Scenario Recommendation
Reviewing the cost estimates for each scenario and considering other factors, such as annual
operation and maintenance costs and source capacities,we recommend that Marysville prepare to
operate under Scenario 3 as long as the Edward springs and Stlllaguamish sources can meet DOH
water quality criteria.However, the service area for the Everett pipeline should be extended north of
100thStreet NE as needed.Edward Springs and the Stillaguamish well would still be utilized as a source
north of 100th Street NE and would be extensively monitored for a minimum of six months. The
additional coliform, turbidity,and disinfection residual monitoring would determine whether the two
sources can remain as unfiltered sources.
By 1999 the City should begin planning for a second Everett pipeline to be built by the year
2010 or construct filtration, as needed,for Edward Springs and the Stillaguamish Collector.A
comparison of the annual costs of each option ispresented in Chapter 7. If filtration is not provided,
further investigation of Scenario 4, with the Stillaguamish Collector providing non-potable water to an
industrial development,isadvised.
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
The first improvement recommended under the Scenario 3 operation is the construction ot the
100thstreet NE reservoir.Thereservoirwas completed in 1996,as planned.
The second improvement isa north end 360 reservoir in the vicinity ot 132nd Street NE and the
abandoned Burlington Northern right-of-way.Both reservoirs should be completed within the first six
years of the planning period (1996-2001)to ensure that sufficient storage is available for future growth.
Construction of the north end reservoir will assist in maintaining service pressures in the system north of
100thStreet when Edward Springs and the Stillaguamish Collector are off-line. The recommended six-
year improvement schedule for Scenario 3 is detailed in Chapter 6of the Plan.
FINANCING
TheCity of Marysville water system isin good functioning order and financially sound.Demand
on the system will continue to grow and,for the most part;can be accommodated by developer
financed extensions and use of Capital Improvement fees. Where the City can expect to tinance
irnprovements isin meeting the treatrnent requirements of itssurface water sources,providing storage
to balance the hydraulics of the Everett pipeline asa source,and in major transmission tacilities.
The improvements proposed in the comprehensive plan cannot be completed without a
thorough analysis of financing options.The City's water system as it stands is in good operating
condition:the utility fund is financially sound. As such, eligibility for state and federal grant or loan
programs is limited;however,tunding opportunities are .still available through the Public Works Trust
Fund and the State Revolving Fund. As shown in Table 7-4,revenue bond financing and/or cash
reserves will be necessary to meet the proposedirnprovements of the tirst six years. The recently
adopted rate structure should also provide some ot the funds.
SUPPLY TOJOA PARTICIPANTS
The Tulalip Tribes and P.U.D.No. 1 of Snohomish cJ~nty are also entitled to a share of the
Everett pipeline capacity.The P.U.D.plans to directly tap the pipeline at the south end of the City's
system and construct a dedicated transmission main to its distribution system.Service to the Tulalip
.Tribes could be by 1)the construction of a dedicated pipeline, 2) utilizing the existing City distribution
system (wheeling),3)additional joint participation facilities, or a combination of all three.These
alternatives are currently being reviewed by the City and the Tribe.
200120001999
Table 7-4
REVENUE PROJECTIONS
(In thousands of 1996 dollars)
1996 1997 1998
Projected Service Connections 13,000 .13,300 13,600 13,900 14,200 14,500
Revenue @ $388/connection
.$5,160(thousandsl $5,044 $5,277 $5,393 $5,510 $5,626
Expense @ $291 /connection
(thousands)$3,783 $3,870 $3,958 $4,045 $4,132 $4,220
Net available for improvernents
(thousands)$1,261 $1,290 $1,319 $1,348 $1,378 $1,406
Scheduled Improvement Costs
(thousands).$6,273 $204 $141 $30 $4,700 $1,225
SUMMARY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page No.
CiTY OF MARYSVILLE
COMPREHENSIVE WATER SYSTEM PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ExecuHve Summary
Chapter 1 Introduction....................................................................................1
Scope ot Work 1
Planning Period 1
Authorization..................................................................................2
Principal Issues 2
Related Studies and Plans...........................................................3
Terminology 4
Acknowledgments 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Chapter 2
Chapter3
Chapter 4
Service Area Description.............................................................7
Impacts ot the Coordinated Service Area 10
New Satellite System Management 10
Growth Management Boundaries 11
Adjacent Service Area 12
Land Use 14
Population 14
Natural Resources 20
Transportation/Circulation 21
Economy 21
Existing Wafer System 23
Water Supply History 23
Source Descriptions 23
Water Quaiity 30
Source Treatment 33
Existing Storage Facilities 33
Pressure Zones 35
Existing Distribution System 37
Interties with Adjacent Systems 38
Control/Telemetry 40
Sate Drinking Water Act Requirements 41
Water Usage 47
Historical Water Use 47
Water Usage Breakdown 48
Projected Water Use 51
Peaking Factors 52
Population Per Pressure Zone 53
Water Study Areas 55
Storage Requirements 58
Recommended Storage Requirements 62
Storage Requirements Per Pressure Zone 63
Conclusion 65
(Table of Contents.continued)
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
ChapterS
Hydraulic Analysis 66
Model Description 66
SystemRequirements 67
Demand Scenarios 68
Model Results 69
Proposed System Improvements 71
Criteria 71
Source Scenario Improvements 72
Additional Source Improvements..76
Additional Improvements 76
Programs 80
Supply to JOA Participants 83
Recommendation 85
Financing System Improvements 86
water Rates and Fees 86
Capital Improvement Charges 87
Historical Financial Data 88
SDWA Monitoring Costs 89
Projected Revenue Requirements 90
Methods of Financing 91
Funding Programs 92
Conclusions and Recommendations 94
Operations Program 96
Operations and Maintenance 96
Emergency Operation 99
Construction Standards 106
Water Quality and Monitoring 106
Cross Connection Control 107
Conservation Program .1 08
Water Reuse 109
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figures:
Page No.
2-1 RUSA Service Boundary 8
2-2 Service Area Boundaries...................................................................9
2-3 Land Use Plan 16
2-4 Population Adjustment Areas 17'
2-5 Coordinated Service Area Populations 18
3-1 System Sources &Pressure Zones 24
3-2 Storage Facilities 36
3-3 Distribution System 39
and Back Pocket
4-1 MarysvilleWater Demand Projections 52
4-2 Population by Pressure Zone 54
4-3 Water Study Areas 56
4-4 Typical Diurnal Demand 60
4-5 MarysvilleStorage Method Comparison 62
4-6 MarysvilleStorage Projections 63
4-7 Storage by Pressure Zone 64
6-1 Regional Alternatives 84
6-2 6-Year Improvement Program Back Pocket
8-1 North 240/170Zone Separation 103
iii
Tables:
PageNo.
2-1 1990 Coordinated Service Area Population Estimate 15
2-2 Extended Urban Growth Boundary Impacts ,...........19
3-1 Contributing Sourcesof Water Supply..........................................25
3-2 Inorganic Chemical and Physical Test Results.............................31
3-3 Trihalomethane Test Results ··.. 32
3-4 Existing Water Storage Facilities 34
4-1 Historical Water Consumption 48
4-2 Municipal Water Consumption for Industries in Marysville 49
4-3 Marysville Water Usage Breakdown 50
4-4 Demand Projection Summary 53
4-5 Pressure Zone Population Projection Data 54
4-6 Projected Water Study Area Populations 57
4-7 Storage Projection Summary 63
6-1 Storage Improvements/Costs 78
6-2 Distribution System Improvements/Costs 79
6-3 Recommended Six-Year Improvement Program 82
7-1 Water User Rate Structure 86
7-2 Marysville HistoricalUtilityFund Revenue/Expense.....................89
7-3 Yearly SDWA Moniforing Costs per Connection 90
7-4 Revenue Projections 92
8-1 Priority of Facilitiesfor Emergency Operation 100
8-2 Pressure Reducing Station Data 105
8-3 Constituent Monitoring Requirements 107
Iv
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendixes:
A Joint Operating Agreement (JOAI
B Everett and JOA Participants Water Supply Contract
C Cross Connection Control Program
D Water Quality Test Reports
E Improvement ProjectsCost Estimates
F Contract for Emergency Intertie - Seven Lakes Water Association
G Interlocal Agreement for Easement, Water Purchase and Municipal
UtilityIntertie - City of Arlington
H Emergency Operations Plan:
Mount St.HelensEruption
Flooding on Stillaguamish
Water Conservation Plan and Checklist
J Water Rights Certificates
K Coliform Monitoring Plan
L SEPA and DNS Documents
M Agreement for Establishing Water UtilityService Area Boundaries
v
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
In accordance with the requirements of the State of Washington Department of Health.
this Comprehensive Water System Plan for the City of Marysville is presented.The objectives of
the plan are to address the existing condition of the Marysville water system.determine future
demands on the system.and to develop a schedule and financial plan to upgrade the system.
In addition.the system's role in the management of the region's potable water resources is
addressed.
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work as requested by the City of Marysville and required by the
Department of Health includes the following tasks:
•Collect and compile basic planning data related to land use.population.and water
demand.
• Perform a system analysis based on existing standards.inventory.hydraulic
capabilities.and water quality.
•Develop an improvement plan to correct existing and projected system deficiencies
with a schedule and financial program.
•Document the City operations program.specifically.responsibilities and authority.
preventative maintenance.cross connection control.water quolity monitoring.and
emergency response program.
• Provide SEPA checklist.water resource agreements.construction standards and other
supportive documents.
PLANNING PERIOD
A 20-year period.beginning in 1996.is analyzed for the Marysville water system. Key
years in the plan are as follows:
1990 Census year from which system population
projections are based.
1996 Rrst year of Comprehensive Water Plan and
beginning af financial analysis period.
- 1 -
2001 Sixth year of Comprehensive Water Plan and end of
financial analysis period.
2016 End of Comprehensive Water Planning Period.
AUTHORIZATION
This report has been prepared in accordance with an agreement between the City of
Marysville and Hammond.Collier &Wade -Livingstone Associates. Inc ..dated May 10.1993.
PRINCIPAL ISSUES
Although the Comprehensive Water Sysfem Plan is intended to evaluate all aspects of
system operation and management.there are specific issues that the City desires to have
addressed.Each is summarized below.
•Impacts of the Surface Water Treatment Rule
Two of the City's water sources.Edward Springs and the Stillaguamish Collector have been
classified as surface water sources. As such. filtration and improved chlorination must be
provided.Justification for a new filtration facility or for taking one or both supplies off-line
must be made.
•Impacts ot the Coordinated Water System Plan and Service to JOA Participants
A larger service area has been assigned to the Marysville water system through the North
Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSPI.The additional demand and
long-term impacts are to be determined.
•Completion olthe Everett-Marysville Pipeline
The completion of the 30-inch transmission main from the Everett water system has increased
Marysville's available water supply.However.the pipeline has reversed the original
-2 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
distribution flow pattem.Instead of the principal supply located north of the system, the
pipeline now provides the majority ot the supply from the south. The change will affect
service pressures and flows throughout the system. An accurate analysis of the affects and
recommendations for correcting the adverse impacts is desired.
RELATED STUDIES AND PLANS
Several studies addressing the City of Marysville water system have been completed prior
to this plan.These studies have addressed both project-specific issues and regional
management concems.The following studies were references for this plan:
City of Marysville Comprehensive Water Sysfem Plan;Hammond,Collier &Wade -
Livingstone Associates. Inc ..February 1982.
City of Marysville Supplemental Engineering Study -Water Source Development;
Hammond,Collier &Wade - Livingstone Associates, Inc ..August 1984.
Everett/Marysville Water Supply Pipeline Project Comprehensive Wafer Plan;James M.
Montgomery Consulting Engineers,Inc ..December 1989.
Feasibility Sfudy -Water Treatment Facility of Stillaguamish Collector Well for City of
Marysville,Washington;Hammond,Collier &Wade - Livingstone Associates, Inc ..March
1987.
Marysville Area Comprehensive Plan;Snohomish County Office of Community Planning,
January 1983.
North Snohomish County Coordinated Water Sysfem Plan;Economic and Engineering
Services,Inc ..October 1991.
Northwest Snohomish County Regional Water Study and Preliminary Assessment;
Rasmussen and HuseEngineering,March 1987.
Northwest Snohomish County Water Supply Alternative Evaluation;Huse and Associates,
lnc..November 1988.
- 3 -
TERMINOLOGY
reader.Definitions will be provided in the text in addition to the following list.
Several terms and acronyms are used in the plan which may not be familiar to the
ac
ac-ft
oc-tt/cc/vr
ADD
AWWA
Bureau
cfs
City
County
CSA
CU
CWSP
DIP
DOE
DOH
DSHS
ea
el
ENR
EPA
FAZ
ft
gpcd
gpd
gpm
gpm/sq ft
HCWL
HGL
hp
hr
in
ISO
Ib
JMM
acres
acre-feet
acre feet per acre per year
average daily demand
American Water Works Association
U.S.Bureau of Reclamation
cubic feet per second
City of Marysville
Snohomish County
Coordinated Service Area
color units
Coordinated Water SysfemPlan
Ductile Iron Pipe
State of Washington Department of Ecology
State of Washington Department of Health
State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services
each
elevation
Engineering News Record
U.S.Environmental Protection Agency
Forecast Analysis Zone
feet
gallons per capita per day
gallons per day
gallons per minute
gallons per minute per square foot
Hammond.Collier &Wade - Livingstone Associates, Inc.
hydraulic grade line
horsepower
hour
inch
Insurance Services Office
pound
James M.Montgomery,Consulting Engineers,Inc.
- 4 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MCl maximum contaminant level
I MClG maximum contaminant level goal
MOD maximum day demand
MG million gallons
I
mgtl milligrams per liter
MGD million gallons per day
min minutes
mm millimeters
I MPNIlOOml most probably number per 100milliliters
msl mean sea level
I O&M operation and maintenance
PHD peak hour demand
PRV Pressure Reducing Valve
I PSCOG Puget Sound Council of Governments
psi pounds per square inch
PUD Snohomish County Public Utility District
I RUSA RuralUtilityService Area
I SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act
sec seconds
SOCs synthetic organic chemicals
State State of Washington
I sq ft
square feet
sq mi
square mile
SWTR Surface Water Treatment Rule
I TDS total dissolved solids
THMs trihalomethanes
I THMFP trihalomethane formation potential
TU turbidity units
UGB Urban Growth Boundary
I USGS U.S.Geological Survey
VOCs volatile synthetic organic chemicals
I WUCC Water Utility Coordinating Committee
I yr year
I
I
I
I - 5 -
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank the following individuals and organizations for their generous support
and assistance in the preparation of this report.
Honorable David A.Weiser,Mayor of the City of Marysville
Ken Baxter,otto Herman, Mike Leighan,Shirley Bartholomew,John Meyers,
Donna Pedersen,and Donna Wright,City of Marysville Council members
Dave Zebell, City Administrator,City of Marysville
Ken Winckler, Public Worl<s Director,City of Marysville
Gary Olsen, Utility Maintenance/Sanitation Supervisor
Larry Larson,Public Works Superintendent.City of Marysville
- 6 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Chapter 2
SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER 2
SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
Since 1982.the Marysville water system has served an area designated as the Rural Utility
Service Area (RUSA).General boundaries for the RUSA.as seen in Figure 2-1. are Interstate 5 and
the Tulalip Indian Tribe Reservation on the west.and 55th. 67th and 83rd Avenues on the east.
The northern boundary varies but is considered as 180th Street NE and the south boundary is
Steamboat Slough. Three small developed areas located along 172nd Street NE and Warm
Beach Road are located beyond these boundaries but are served by the City system. Service
outside the RUSA boundary is by a variance.
In 1988.the Snohomish County Council declared North Snohomish County a Critical
Water Supply Service Area in response to an assessmentof the area's water resources and future
demands.The declaration was in accordance with the Public Water System Coordination Act
of 1977 (RCW 70.116)which established a procedure for regional water utilities to coordinate
planning and construction programs. A Water Utility Coordinating Committee (WUCC).
comprised of representatives from all water utilities with 50 or more service connections plus
representatives from the Department of Health and Snohomish County.was formed to begin
preparation of the Coordinated Water SystemPlan.
The principal task assigned to the WUCC was to define the proposed future service area
of each utility. Future service area boundaries were plotted on base maps to identity overiaps
and unclaimed areas.Overlaps were resolved by negotiation between the utilities involved.
Marysville's future service area overlapped the Snohomish County P.U.D.and Lake Cassidy
Estates on the east.This overlap was resolved and the Marysville Coordinated Service Area
ICSA)as shown in Figure 2-2 wos approved by the City Council in 1993.The North Snohomish
County Coordinated Water SystemPlanwas also adopted by the County Council in 1993.
-7 -
-------------------
\(5 E.
,,\1;,
~,":I I
I I~: I ~•••
te "
o 2000 4000I! ! !1
I
\
z
rg ........
"
•-r'-··18 ~-
•,
•,
MAY.1995
4010 STONEWAY NORTH
SEATTl£,WASHINGTON 98103
(206)832-2684
HAMMOND.COWER &WADE-
LIVINGSTONE ASSOOA TES.INC.
I~
1\
_:~I'",~Q '\0
i!I~"\
-
......,..
II "
•,
I
v
te
"
\\'-----'1
ra
z
or:24
f-
/rTI.LAllP~TF IBE~
"
-------------------
r ."\_r)~r:PECIAL'SERVICE~"'\IV I~LAND CROSSING"~~~~
z
on
>-'
•
Tr:'-"
18 s-.
,
r
!
-,""..
~~.
J~UARY.1997
SERVICE AREA
BOlN)AfIES
4010 STONEWAY NCRTH
SUT1\£.WASHINGTON 91l103
(2OIl)e32-2884
HAMMOND,COlUER &WADE-
UYiNGSTDNE ASSOCIATES,INC.
o 2000 ....I ;! !!
r
•,
!
v
"
19
I ,~•
J
(
PORT GARDNER SAY
"
"
z
or:24>-
L
::>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IMPACTS OF THE COORDINATED SERVICE AREA
The Public Water System Coordination Act requires that each utility be exclusively
responsible tor providing water service in its respective service area.This obligates each utility to
anticipate future demands and plan for necessary capital improvements.In the City of
Marysville's case,the CSA increases the system's obligation from the RUSA's original 10.400 acres
to 17,500acres. The largest part of the increase is contained in the area east of 55th Avenue NE
and south of 172nd Street NE,an area that is currently rural and essentially undeveloped.
However,under the City's Interim Comprehensive Plan this area is zoned for residential
development and presents the possibility of on additional 7000 acres of residential water
demand.
Although the net acreage of the service area increases,two areas currently served by
the City are outside of the CSA. The Island Crossing Area near the intersection of Interstate 5 and
State Highway 530 is two miles beyond the north boundary and served by a ten-inch main.At
the southwest comer of the service area the Marysville West residential development is located
along 66th Street NE and west of the Interstate 5 boundary.It islikely the CSA will be modified to
include these areas.How soon this will be accomplished is unknown.For planning purposes. it
was assumed that both areas will continue to be served by the Marysville Water System.
NEW SATELLITE SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
Under the provisions of the Public Water System Coordination Act.all new developments
within the Marysville service area are to be served by the Marysville water system unless
providing service is not feasible.To determine what other utility will be responsible or if a new
independent water system is appropriate,the Utility Service Review Procedure (USRPj was
developed in the Coordinated Water SystemPlan.
The USRP is initiated by the Snohomish County Planning Department when a permit
request for a new subdivision, short plot, or other related land use activity requiring a water
- 10 -
supply is filed. For proposed developmenfs within the designated service area the USRP is
presented below.This is the procedure as stated in the Coordinated Water SystemPlan.
UTILITY SERVICE REVIEW PROCEDURE
FOR
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE MARYSVILLE
SERVICE AREA
In response to a request for water service. the City of Marysville will give notice of
its intent to exercise one of the following options. in order of priority:
• The City will provide direct service by extending existing mains and supply;
or
• The City will approve design of a detached.remote system and upon
construction in accordance with said design. own and operate the system.
A contract establishing financial obligations for maintenance.operation.
and management until the two systems are connected will be prepared;or
• The City will approve design of a detached.remote system and will enter
into an agreement specifying the operationai requirements and financial
obligations of the owners of the remote system. The remote system may be
operated by an adjacent utility. an SSMA.or the developer/homeowners
association.The City will retain contractual responsibility for monitoring
operation and for water quality.The remote system owners are responsible
for financing.construction,and proper operation.Where the remote
system consists of four or fewer connections and requires no fire flow. the
City may allow facilities which meet DOH standards but are less stringent
than the CWSP minimum design standards."is anticipated that these
more lenient standards will be utilized primarily when the proximity of a
small system will benefit from larger nearby facilities planned for future
installation by the City; or
• TheCity denies the provision of service. relinquishes that portion of itsservice
area.and service options are further determined through additional steps in
the USRP.
For the complete USRP.the reader is referred to the North Snohomish County
Coordinated Water System Plan.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT BOUNDARIES
As a result of the 1990 Growth Management Act. the City, in conjunction with Snohomish
County.is required to establish an Urban Growth Boundary IUGB).The purpose of the boundary
is to limit urbonization to areas that are adequately supported by a transportation and utility
infrastructure and also to preserve valuable agricultural and natural resource lands.
-11 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
III
Defining limits to urban growth is not new to the City. The RUSA was initially established in
1982 to define water and sewer service boundaries for the Marysville area and to designate land
use within the boundary.In 1995.the City and County established the current UGB location and
the classifications of surrounding lands. The boundary is shown in Figure 2-1.
The location of the Urban Growth Boundary is an important factor in the City's water
system plan due to its restrictions on utility service,The area bounded by the UGB is smaller than
the CSA and several large blocks of land are within the CSA but outside the Urban Growth
Boundary. TheCity most likely will be faced with a situation in the future where it is obligated by
the Coordination Act to extend service to rural water users outside of the Urban Growth
Boundary.
ADJACENT SERVICE AREAS
The City's CSA is adjacent to five other separate water utilities. With increased demand
on regional water resources and the interaction required through the coordination act,these
utilities will play an integral part in the City's water system planning efforts.General locations of
each utility are shown in Figure 2-1.
Cltv of Everett. The Everett service area is located south of Marysville and across
Steamboat Slough and the Snohomish River.The principal supply is Spada Reservoirin the Sultan
River Basin by way of the Snohomish County PUD Hydroelectric Power Plant (the Jackson Project
and the City of Everett's water filtration plant at Chaplain Reservoir). In addition to its own
service area.the Everett water system also provides wholesale water to Monroe.Snohomish.
Lake Stevens,Alderwood Water District, the Snohomish County P.U.D ..and over 100 other water
districts and water associations.
In 1992 a 3D-inch pipeline was constructed between the Everett and Marysville systems to
provide an additional reliable source to Marysville. The initial connection is at the southeast
corner of the Marysville system near the intersection of 44th Street NE and 83rd Avenue NE.In
1993 the 24-inch supply line was extended along 83rd Avenue NEto 64th Street NE where it was
-12 -
~-
connected to the City's transmission/distribution system. The supply system has an ultimate
capacity of approximately 20 MGD. Marysville is entitled to 60%of the pipeline capacity and
the remaining is wheeled to the Snohomish County P.U.D.and the Tulalip Tribes.Conditions for
the water apportionments were established in a Joint Operating Agreement between all three
users.
City of Arlington.The City of Arlington is supplied with water from four wells and a
filtration plant adjacent to the Stillaguamish River.The City of Marysville CSA boundary is
contiguous with the City of Arlington water service area boundary.An interlocal agreement for
interties and wafer purchase exists between Arlington and Marysvilie. The systems are intertied
at 198th Place NE and 51 st Drive NEwithin fhe city limits of Arlington.A copy of the interlocal
agreement is found in the Appendix.
Seven lakes Water Associatlon.The Seven Lakes Water Association is located west of
Edward Springs and serves water to the area surrounding Lake Goodwin and vicinity. An intertie
exists between Seven Lakes system and the Marysville system near the Marysville Lake Goodwin
well and provides an emergency backup for the residents served by the Lake Goodwin well.
The Seven Lakes system pressure is 80 psi greater than the Marysville Lake Goodwin system. A
copy of the emergency intertie contract is found in the Appendix.
Tulalip Indian Reservation.Located west of the CSA and contiguous from Steamboat
Slough north to Fire Trail Road. the Tulalip Reservation system servesan area of approximately 24
square miles. A surface water spring. a well system.and a single connection to the Marysville
system are the original water sources. With completion of the Everett/Marysville intertie.the Tribe
will begin utilizing its share 01 the intertie capacity by adding two new connections to the
Marysville system. The three connections will be located along Interstate 5 at 4th Street or 66th
Streef NE.88th Street NE.and 116thStreet NE.
A portion of the Reservation east of Quilceda Creek and the subdivision of Marysville
West is served by the City. A portion of the area is served in conformance to a Settlement and
- 13 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Compromise Agreement dated April 25.1983.Service to the Reservation first began in the late
1950's.
Snohomish County P.U.D.No.1.The P.U.D.NO.1 service area is contiguous with the east
boundary of the Marysville CSA along Highway 9.This boundary was disputed during the initial
service area designation process but was resolved through negotiations between Marysville and
the P.U.D.An intertie between the two systems is located near the Sunnyside Reservoir and was
originally constructed to provide the City with an emergency supply of 1MGD. With completion
of the Everett/Marysville pipeline.the P.U.D.will be constructing a new intertie south of 44th
Street NE.Thefuture of the Sunnysideintertie has yet to be determined.
LAND USE
TheCity's Comprehensive Land Use Plan was revised and the UGB established in 1995.
Zoning within the UGB shown in Figure 2-3 concentrates retail and commercial uses in
downtown Marysville and along State Avenue.Industrial usesare provided north of 122nd Street
NE along Old Highway 99. Residential use is designated in areas north. east.and southeast of
downtown.
Land use outside of the Urban Growth Boundary is intended to be low density rurol and
agricultural.A review of the boundary is to be performed every 10 years to determine if there is
a need to expand the boundary to include these lands for higher density uses.
POPULATION
An accurate projection of populction is essential to determine future demand and
system improvements.North Snohomish County is ropidly growing due to the influence of the
Boeing and Everett Naval facilities and the favoroble Puget Sound economy.Continued growth
is anticipated through the 20-year time frame of the plan.
The Interim Comprehensive Plan has addressed current and projected population within
the Urban Growth Boundary based on 1990 census data and the forecasting methods of the
- 14 -
the larger service area.
trends for the area.Since the Urban Growth Boundary is not contiguous with the CSA.the
population.Numeric identifiers are shown in Figure 2-4.
service area.Each area's population was developed using the following assumptions.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
36.000
+480
+874
+1534
-1494
:1.lll
+283
36.189
36.472
Change
Persons per
Dwelling Unit"
0.34
0.15
2.70
0.30
0.15
Dwelling
Units per
Acre"
428
1880
247
1660
2390
Acreage
-15 -
FOR 1990 ANALYSIS USE
'Based on 1990census data.
1
2
3
4
5
Area
3.3
3.1
2.3
3.0
3.1
NET CHANGE
1992 MARYSVILLE PLANNING STUDY AREA POPULATION
1992 CWSP SERVICE AREA POPULATION
Table 2-1 gives a summary of the additions and subtractions made to the UGB
Table 2-1
1990 COORDINATED SERVICE AREA POPULATION ESTIMATE
" The annual rate of population growth will be 2.19 percent.This is based on a 1990
population of 34.200 and a 2010 population of 52.760 as projected in the Interim
Comprehensive Plan.
"Dwelling unit and person per dwelling unit densities from the 1990 census tract data
are appropriate for estimating populations.Each area was assigned the density
values of the census tract it was located in or one that had similar characteristics.
Proiectlon Method.The population within the Urban Growth Boundary was 34.200 in
outside the UGB and subtracting the populations of areas within the UGB but outside the CWSP
1990.The population within the CSA can be estimated by adding the populations of areas lying
area.However.with some reasonable assumptions the data can be extrapolated to represent
projections from the Interim Comprehensive Plan are not accurate for the water system service
Puget Sound Regional Council.This is the most recent and thorough analysis of population
-
-1
I
I
-..l :.,
24
-
LAM)USE PLAN
-
4010 STQNEWA ...NORTH
SEATTlE.WASHINCTON 98103
(2CG)632-266'
JANUARY,1996
HAMMOND,COWER &WADE-
LlI/INGSTDNE ASSOClA TES.INC.
CITY OF MARYSVLLE
-------
7
.0
--
Jr.HI.'Middle Sc'rool
Jr.HJgh Scloo Pro."ed
B~Sdwl Prooosed
High Scl'ool
ProPOSed Public
G~Of!kes
-
*
8
o
@
@
6
b
6
T
V
o
l11n
--
-
Legend
--Map rcr 10000tional purpose!'only
-
Low ~ily Muftl-Farrily
Gererol Con1rerclol (GC)
fioodillalr:Overby 0--M.:l1)~lle Urbiln Gl"G'Nth BoulYlarf
Pfanning Department-January 1996
Medium Cknsft}'Multl.Fornly
Ught looustriol
-
o
o
o
C•m
n
~
o
o
o
11
Q
;g
D
~~
~
--
-------------------
o 2OllO 4000I ;! !I
~l til 5
E.
8 HWYeJO~
18
,!'-!1V PECIAL'SERVICE
~h '\I _..lpLAND CROSSING
-..~~~~-~~.~..
i 17~\te h*
I _I '~.\\\~_..i [~·'n i,-c-~\\\\'\.
i \\'\0 _'\G;•'"
~4E.i
~\~
I
(
,,
!
z
o
'">-'
•~r'-· ·
",-.
•,
!
19 .......
~....•'r~-!""
JANUARY.1997
FIGURE H
4010 STQNEWAY NOOTH
SEATllE.WASHINGTON gSl03
(2OB)832-2684
HAMMOND.COlLIER 8<WADE-
LIVINGSTONE ASSOClA TES.INC.
-
POPULATION ADJUSnEHr
AREAS
•,
I
as
v
18
/.....
ts
v..
)
o
~24
f--
JG
tz
.Year
- 18 -
Extensionsto the Urban Growth Boundary
or>;;
N
o
o
N
or>s
N
so
N
or>enen
,-.-------------\-- --,--:----:--------- - ---,-- --- ---
30,000 .'-------------------------'
omm
60,000
55,000
c
.2 50.000
7i:;
Co 45.0000
Co
There is a long-term possibility that the Urban Growth Boundary could be extended to
35,000
Although the change in service area boundaries increases the population the Marysville
40,000
Figure 2-5
Coordinated Service Area Population
The projected population for the service area can be estimated by applying the 2.19
match the Coordinated Service Area, If this would occur,the areas identified in Figure 2-3
between the two boundaries would change from rural land to urban land use designation.
the total population.Figure 2-5 shows the service population in comparison to the total.The
same annual rate of 2.19 percent.These assumptions give a service population slightly less than
year 2016service population is approximately 60,400.
the fact that these residents are already served by private or small public water systems and the
was assumed that of the 1,816 additional population,only 10 percent would have access to the
majority will maintain that service as long as possible in years ahead.For estimating purposes it
system is obligated to serve, only a fraction of the increase will actually be served.This is due to
population for the service area is estimated at 63.200in the year 2016.
Marysville water system. It was also assumed that this 10 percent fraction would grow at the
percent annual growth to the 36.000 base figure calculated in Table 2-1. The20-year projected
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Higher dwelling unit densities would be allowed and the potential impact on water service
would be greater.To assess the impacts from expanding the UGB.an additional analysis of
population trends was necessary. Thefollowing assumptions were used in the analysis:
• The new areas brought into the UGB would have land use designations the same as
adjacent areas or areas that have a similar location and characteristics.For the six
areas described above,SingleFamilyResidential isthe likely designation.
• The densities of the land use designations would be in accordance with the
recommendation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan with low density single famiiy
residential at 2.0 dwelling units per acre and medium density single family residential
at 3.5 dwelling unitsper acre.Person per dwelling unit would be 3.0.
Applying these assumptions to the acreages of each area gives an estimate of the
.saturation population.This is the maximum population each area could contain if the UGB and
its associated land use regulations were extended.As shown in Table 2-2,approximately 57,600
persons would be accommodated in the area between the two boundaries.This represents an
increase of 55,BOO over the 1990 population estimate based on rural densities. The impacts of
extending the UGB and changing land usein these areas will be determined in Chapter 4.
Table 2-2
EXTENDED URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY IMPACTS
Predicted Dwelling Persons per
Area Acreage land Use"Units per Acre
Dwelling Unit Change
1 484 MSF 3.5 3.0 +5,082
2 1880 MSF 3.5 3.0 19,740
3 247 MSF 3,5 3.0 2,594
4 873 MSF 3.5 3.0 9,167
6"2000 LSF 2.0 3.0 21.000
TOTAL 57,583
1990 CENSUS ESTIMATE -1.816
ADDITIONAL IMPACT AT SATURATION 55,767
"Based on Interim Comprehensive Plan recommendations.
""Area 5 is omitted since it is currently within the UGB but outside of the CSA. Extension of the GB would not
change land use in that area.
MSF;Medium density single family:LSF;Low density single family.
- 19 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NATURAL RESOURCES
Geology and Solis.Most of the service area is composed of unconsolidated deposits of
sand and gravel more than 40 feet thick.The slopes of Getchell Hill to the east of the service
area are composed of an advance outwash from stream and lake deposits,composed mostly
of clays.The area around Kellogg Marsh features till, a gray concrete-like mixture 20 to 80 feet
thick. The majority of the geological or soil conditions within the service area,if considered
independently,would not adversely affect most bUilding development.
Topography.Topographical and geological characteristics ot the service area are
important because they determine location ot water facilities,capacity,and also because
highly Irregular terrain creates the need for several pressure gradients or pressurezones.
The service area is dominated by a large outwash plain commonly referred to as the
Marysville Trough.This plain stretches from Marysville to Arlington and varies in elevation from 51
to 100 feet above sea level. On fhe east side of the service area east of Edgecomb Road, the
trough rises sharply from about 100 feet in elevation to above 400 feet at the crest of the
Getchell Hill Plateau.To the west of the study area,the Marysville Trough ascends quickly to the
Tulalip Plateau,which rises to an elevation of 500 feet.
Climate.Snohomish County has a modified maritime climate typical of the Puget Sound
lowland.featuring mild, moist winters and cool,dry summers. The modifying effects of ocean
and mountains upon the climate are evident.The Olympic Mounfains retard the precipitation
from the Pacific Ocean,while the winds predominate from the west.These winds carry the
precipitation and modity femperatures.The Cascade Mountains sheiter the county from the
extreme continental temperatures to the east. Three-fourths of the precipitation is in the form of
rainfall during the winter months. Annual precipitation averages 30 to 35 inches in the western
portion of the county,and 80 inches in the east.Heavy snowfall occurs only in the mountains.
In the Marysville area the mean annual temperature is 51°F.,ranging from a low mean
monthly temperature of 37.6°F.in January to a high of 62.8°F.in July. Daily temperatures range
from an extreme high of 98°F.to an extreme low of ]OF.
- 20 -
The annual average precipitation is 35 inches.Precipitation ranges between a low
monthly average of under 1 inch in July to a high of almost 5 inches in December.for a
comparatively even distribution throughout the year.
water Resources and Quality.The study area is located in the Quilceda Creek suc-bcsin
of the Snohomish River basin.Surface water drainage flows in a southwesterly direction towards
Ebey Slough. Area streams (Quilceda Creek, Allen Creek, Munson Creek.and Ebey Slough) are
classified as having excellent water quality.The significant point discharge affecting water
quality in the area is the City's Sewage Treatment Plant located on Ebey Slough and discharging
into Steamboat Slough.
Flora and Fauna.Much of the original lowland forest or natural vegetation of the area
has been removed for logging or urbanization purposes. Most of the areas which are not
committed to urban areas are found in pasture lands. with scattered sites devoted to limited
crop production.Trees are concentrated along the banks of area creeks and in the southeast
quadrant of the service area near 83rd Avenue NE.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
The transportation/circulation system of the area is almost exclusively auto-oriented.
Interstate 5 and State Avenue IHighway No. 99)constitute the major access routes for the study
area.
Transit service from Marysville to Everett.connecting to other bus routes within the
Seattle-Everett metropolitan area.is provided by the Snohomish County Public Transportation
Benefit Area Corporation.
ECONOMY
The economy of Marysville is classified as service based.primarily producing goods and
services for residents who are employed outside of the City. Boeing's airplane plant in Everett
has the greatest impact on the economy and is located 10 miles to the southwest of Marysville.
-21 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------------------------------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Approximately 25.000 people from fhroughouf the Puget Sound area are employed at the
facility.
Employmenf in electronics and etectrtc equipmenf is also a major contribufor fo the
economy of Marysville.Adjacent to the Everett Boeing plant is the John Fluke Manufacturing
Company which manufactures precision electronic equipment and employs approximately
2.000 people.In addition Hewlett Packard has a 16o-acre facility at the southem border of fhe
Marysville CSA boundary and currently employs 800 individuals.and has the capability to
employ up to 1.000 individuals in the existingtacilifies.
The approval of the U.S.Naval Base in Everett will have an impact on the economy of
Marysville. It is estimated by the Puget Sound Council of Governments that in the next seven
years, the Naval base in Everett will bring an additional 19.830 people to Snohomish County.It is
estimated that the area within the Marysville CSA boundaries will realize approximately 10
percent of the Naval base growth,Nof only will this growth require additional housing.but also
the associated support services,
- 22 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Chapter 3
EXISTING WATER SYSTEM
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
CHAPTER 3
EXISTING WATER SYSTEM
The previous chapter described the area served by the Marysville water system and the
regional characteristics that influence planning.This chapter will detail the system components
and how water is supplied,distributed,and stored.
WATER SUPPLY HISTORY
The Marysville water system was first constructed in the 1930's with the development of
the Edward Springs collection system and a transmission main to the City. Initially, the water right
for the springs was limited to 0.5 MGD,but through application for additional rights over the
years a total of 3.6 MGD can now be legally withdrawn.
Following Edward Springs,the City began developing groundwater sources to help meet
increases in demand.The Sunnyside wells were the first to be brought on in the 50's and 60's,
followed by the Lake Goodwin well in 1970.In 1978,the surface waters of the Stillaguamish River
were added by way of a Ranney collection system.This was soon followed by construction and
development of the Highway 9 well in 1981.The latest source addition is the Sultan Rivervia an
Everett to Marysville pipeline constructed in 1992.The pipeline has an ultimate capacity of 20
MGD of which the City of Marysville is allocated approximately 60 percent.Figure 3-1 shows the
location of each source and its relative capacity.Approved water rights are also shown.
Specific details of each source are discussed in the following section.
SOURCE DESCRIPTIONS
TheCity's water sources can be defined in two groups --primary and secondary.Primary
sources are those that provide the bulk of the system supply.Secondary sources are intended
to be used as backups to be utilized when one of the primary sources is out of
- 23 -
- ------ - - - -- - --- ---
•
'-STlLLAGUAMISH
RIVER (3.2 MGD)
PECIAL'SERVICE
I LAND CROSSING
- ---
u
_n.
ts •I
!
...•2000 4000
'.
"
I
•"JO
JO !
I •_n!
!
_n-.._n.
""•,
!
,.........
•!
I se
""'01«
\
l
"/
e
•:r-I---"""-}-l-~..JE:(~~lf=~
_n'
4010 STONEWAY NORTH
SEAm.E,WASHINGTON 98103
(206)632-266'
JANUARY.1997
SYSTEM SOlItCES I
PAESSlR ZOfES
HAMMOND.COUJER &WADE-
UVlNGSTONE ASSOCI ...TES.INC.
CITY OF MARYSVLLE
PORT GARDNER BAY
"
12 .............1111:7
rc \
1;
~
~n'
"te "te
"..•,
!z
~0
'0•,..:,.......
0
~2~"........"f-l
.:Cj LAKE
__ _~_ARTH"-.-JO _l!2S 7.-.••n ,
!
on-line in 1978.
- 25 -
diameter by 35-foot-deep caisson buried in the riverbed.Seven screened lO-inch collector lines,
and the reliable capacity of each source.
1.4MGD
1.4MGO
2.8MGD
3.2MGO
4.5MGO
20.0MGO"
27.7MGD
Water Rights
1.4MGD
1.1 MGD
2.5MGD
Utilized
3.2MGO
2.1 MGO
11.7MGO"
17.0MGD
Table3-1
CONTRIBUTING SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY
"Current entitiement based on Joint Operating Agreement.
""Water rights are held by the City of Everett.
Highway 9 Well
Sunnyside Well NO.2
TOTAL
Secondary Supply Sources
Stillaguamish Ranney Collector
Edward Springs &Lake Goodwin Well
Everett-Marysville Pipeline
TOTAL
PrImary Supply Sources
to the system. Two 100 HP pumps with 1.125 gpm capacity each are installed in a 16-foot-
The collector well has the capacity to supply the full 3.2 MGO entitied by the water rights
water sources. The Stillaguamish Riverwas selected and the Ranney Collector was installed and
As can be seen from Table 3-1.the City has water rights,excluding Everett, to 10.5MGO,
Stillaguamish Ranney Well Collector.In 1977 the Puget Sound region experienced a
system capacity by 20 percent.Loss of the well and the obvious need for additional water to
serve the rapidly growing service population prompted the City to evaluate potential regional
conservation ordinances.As a result, Sunnyside Well No. 1 went dry,effectively reducing the
due to water quality and/or pumping equipment.The largest share of the unutilized amount is
severe drought.Oomestic water demand was high and at the time use was unrestricted by
however,only 7.8 MGO is utilized.This is due to limitations on the actual production capability
Edward Springs/Lake Goodwin wells which use only 5.3 MGD of the 8.7 MGO water right.
commission or demands exceed the primary capacity.Table 3-1 summarizes the classifications
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
each approximately 100 teet long.extend out radially from the caisson bottom.Subsurface
water present in the riverbed gravel deposits is screened through the collectors and flows by
gravity to the caisson pumps where it isthen pumped to a chlorine contact facility on shore and
to the distribution system. The pump discharges are at a HGL elevation of 240feet.
During low and average flow periods the subsurface Stillaguamish River water quality is
acceptable.However,during spring runoff and the winter rainy season turbidity of the collected
water exceeds the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)maximum of 1.0 NTU.Turbidity is monitored
at the site and when the maximum is exceeded the pumps are shut down.In past years the
systemhas been off-line as much as 30 days out of a month during the rainy seoson.
The 1989 Surface Water Treatment Rule amendment to the SDWA added additional
restrictions to the continued operation of the Stillaguamish collector.The rule requires that all
public water sources that are surface waters or directly influenced by surface waters must:
a) Disinfect:
b) Be filtered unless cerfain stringent water quality criteria are met,and
c)Implement specific controls on activities within the contributing watershed.
The Department of Health has confirmed that there is direct hydraulic connectivity
between the surface river water and the subsurface flow; therefore. the source must meet the
requirements of the rule.The water quality criteria for avoiding filtration are a proven track
record of low coliform counts and low turbidity. The Stillaguamish history of high turbidity
immediately places it in the "filtration required" classification.
Furthermore, the Stillaguomish watershed is several hundred acres in size with no control
over activities.Agricultural.industrial.and municipal runoff all impact the river water quality.
Implementing the required watershed control requirements would be essentially impossible.
Continued use of the Stillaguamish collector will require construction of a filtration plant if the
water is to be used for potable purposes. No further treatment is anticipated if the source is used
for industrial needs and emergency potable service. The feasibility of various options will be
evaluated in Chapters 6 and 7.
- 26 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I:,
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Edward Springs.The Edward Springs watershed was developed as a WPA project in the
1930's with an initial capacity ot 1.4 MGD.Improvements to the collection system have
increased the capacity to 1.5 MGD. The contributing watershed is over 400 acres in size with
signs and fencing prohibiting trespassing,although the area is frequented by local residents
walking dogs and horseback riding. Water is collected from small brooks and springs by a
subsurface system of perforated piping and flows by gravity to a screening house. The water is
then chlorinated and then directed into the 6 MG below-grade Edward Springs Reservoir.A
hypalon cover and PVCliner protect the reservoirfrom contamination.The integrity of the cover
and liner were questioned in the 1989 comprehensive plan due to incompatibility between
hypalon and PVC.An improved anchoring system for the cover was recommended at that
time.
The Washington Department of Health has classified Edward Springs as a surface water
source making it subject to the requirements of the Surface Water Treatment Rule.As opposed
to the Stillaguamish Collector though, Edward Springs has a controlled access watershed and
consistently low turbidity water.There may be the possibilityto avoid filtration by improving the
fencing around the watershed perimeter and documenting the water quality history. Coliform
and turbidity criteria for avoiding filtration are asfollows:
•Coliform -Source water samples must have a fecal coliform density less than or equal
to 20/1 00 ml in 90 percent or more of all samples taken during the six previous
calendar months the system served water to the public.For Marysville. five source
water samples per week taken before the first point of disinfection would be required.
•Turbidity -Source water must be continuously monitored for turbidity with readings
not exceeding 5.0 NTU.In the case that 5.0 NTU is exceeded,the City must prove
that the event was due to unusual and unpredictable circumstances.No more than
two such events can occur in the previous twelve (12)months. nor can more than
five (5)have occurred in the previous 120months (10years).
A thorough review of the Edward Spring water quality records will be necessary to
determine if filtration can be avoided.In addition,an evaluation of the disinfection system to
- 27 -
- 28 -
insure that the concentration-time product (CT)meets the treatment rule guidelines. A detailed
analysis of Edward Springs filtration feasibility is also presented in Chapters 6 and 7.
Edward SpringsWells.In addition to the spring. there are three drilled wellsin the Edward
Springs watershed.Wells 1 and 2 were installed prior to 1960.Well number 3.located near the
Edward Springs Reservoir.was installed in 1987.
Lake Goodwin Well.The Lake Goodwin well is approximately two mileswest of Edward
Springs and pumps directly into the reservoir through a twelve-inch transmission main. A few
area residences are also served by the well. Originally constructed in 1970.the well was
intended to provide an additional 500 GPM backup to Edward Spring. However.pumping at
this flow created immediate problems due to clogging of the well screen by small silt particles.
To avoid this problem.the maximum operating capacity of the Lake Goodwin well is limited to
275 GPM.
Water quality from the well is generally good with the exception of high levelsof iron and
manganese which is typical for groundwaters in the Marysville trough region.
Everett-Marvsville Pipeline.In June of 1992.a 30-inch transmission main was constructed
from Everett Pipeline No. 3 to the southeast corner of the Marysville system.The main was
constructed to increase the supply to Marysville rather than construct a new filtration plant for
the Stillaguamish collector.Everett's principal water supply is the Sultan River.a surface water
source that is filtered at the Chaplain Reservoir and meets the requirements of the Surface Water
Treatment Rule.
An evaluation of options in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan determined the best route.The
main begins at Everett to Pipeline No. 3 near the intersection of the Bonnevilie Power
Administration right-of-way and Hewitt Avenue East in Everett. It then heads north
approximately 3.6 miles to the Marysville connection near the intersection of 83rd Avenue NE
and 44th Street NE.justnorth and east of the Sunnyside well and reservoir.
Total capacity of the Everett-Marysville pipeline is 20 MGD of which the City is currently
entitled to 12 MGD.The remaining capacity is wheeled to the Tulalip Tribes and Snohomish
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
----__1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--- - -----------------------------------
County P.U.D.No.lin accordance with a joint operating agreement between the three users.
Construction costs for the pipeline were financed through bonds issued by the City with the Tribe
and P.U.D.Sharing the cost in proportion to their entitled pipeline capacity.A copy of the joint
operating agreement is included in the Appendix.
Highway 9 WeI!.Located west of State Route 9 at 64th Street NE.the Highway 9 well was
constructed in 1981 to serve the 490 pressure zone. A 1.1 MG reservoir is adjacent to the well
and provides control for the 1000GPM capacity well pump.The pump can also be controlled
at the Utilities Department central telemetry panel.
Similar to the Lake Goodwin well. the Highway 9 well has had serious iron and
manganese problems since it was first brought on-line.Customer complaints of reddish water
and stained laundry prompted the City to treat the well output with a sequestering agent to
prevent the iron and manganese from precipitating.The sequestering process was effective
only for a short period and as the water was stored in the reservoir iron precipitate formed and
settled.
Compounding the iron and manganese problem was the influence of the Highway 9
well on private wells in the area.It became evident that the aquifer had limited capacity when
the water level and level of area wells dropped after a period of operation.Operating the
Highway 9 well caused water levels to drop enough that the private wells were nearly dry and
the City was forced to respond by providing water service free of charge.In 1984 the Highway 9
well was taken off-line due to these problems. Only during high demand periods and when the
Stillaguamish collector is shut down is the well used to augment supply. Theoptions for future use
are evaluated in Chapter 6.
Sunnyside WeI!No.2.The Sunnyside Well No.2 was constructed in 1965 to operate in
conjunction with Sunnyside Well NO.1 which was constructed in 1956.In 1977,and again 1980.
Well No. 1 went dry during a drought in August of each year. Well No.1 was taken off-line soon
after and relegated to backup duty.
- 29 -
Construction of the Everett-Marysville pipeline has affected the operation of Well No. 2
and the adjacent Sunnyside standpipe.Well pump control is provided by the standpipe which
has an overflow elevation of 360 feet. The pipeline ties into the Marysville system less than a half
mile away with a hydraulic grade line elevation of 435 feet. The higher pressure fills the
standpipe to the 360 elevation and causes the altitude valve to close and prevent the reservoir
from overflowing.As long as the reservoir is full and the Everett-Marysville pipeline pressure is
above 360 the well pumps will not operate.The result is stagnant water in the reservoir.a
condition that often leads to taste and odor problems.This scenario will be analyzed further in
Chapter 6 with recommendations for restoring the Sunnyside reservoir operation or taking the
well and reservoirotf-Iine.
WATER QUALITY
The City monitors the system's water quality in accordance with the requirements of
WAC 246-290.TheSafe Drinking Water Act and its amendments have increased the monitoring
requirements to include bacteriological.inorganic chemical and physical characteristics.
turbidity.trihalomethanes.radionuclides.volatile organic chemicals (YOC's),and synthetic
organic chemicals (SOC's).Copies of the latest test reports for each category are included in
the appendix.Summariesof each quality parameter are as follows:
Bacteriological
Colitorm samples are collected at 40 sites throughout the distribution system on a
monthly basis.Six samples are also taken at the system sources monthly.Sample sites and
repeat sample procedures are described in the City's Coliform Monitoring Plan. A copy of the
Coliform Monitoring Plan is provided in the appendix..
Inorganic Chemical and Physical
Surface water sources and groundwater sources are analyzed annually and every three
years. respectively. for the constituents shown in Table 3-2. High levels of iron and manganese
- 30 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
are evident for Sunnyside Well No. 2 and the Lake Goodwin Well which is typical for
groundwaters from the Marysville Trough region.Asis typical for wafers in the Pacific Northwesf.
the Marysville sources can be classified as low in hardness (soft)with high levels of iron and
manganese.Bofh Sunnyside Well NO.2 and the Lake Goodwin Well show manganese levels
exceeding the MCL.
Table3-2
INORGANIC CHEMICAL AND
PHYSICAL TEST RESULTS
Edward Sunnyside SIlIIa.lake
MCl Springs Well No.2 Colleclor Goodwin
Tesf for mall 12/29/92 3/14/89 12/29/92 3/14/89
Arsenic .05 <.010 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Barium 1.0 <0.10 <.25 <0.10 <.25
Cadmium .01 <.002 <.002 <.002 <.002
Chromium .05 <.010 <.010 <.010 <.010
Iron .3
<0.10 0.27 0.19 <.10
Lead <0.002 <0.002 0.003 <0.002
Manganese .05 <0.010 0.115'<0.010 0.074'
Mercury .002 <.0005 <.0005 <.0005 <.0005
Selenium .01 <0.005 <.005 <.005 <.005
Silver 0.1 <.010 <.010 <.010 <.010
Fluoride 4.0
<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <.2
Nitrate 10.0 2.6 0.2 0.6 <.2
Turbidity 1.0
0.1 1.0 0.8 0.2
Color 15
5.0 5 5 5
Conduct 700 150 200 80 140
Hardness N/A 58 10 33 60
Sodium N/C*6 5 5 5
Copper <0.2 <0.25 <0.2 <0.25
Zinc 5.0 <0.2 <0.25 <0.2 <0.25
Chloride 250 <5 <5 <5 <5
"Lead and Copper do not have MCL·s.Action Levels of 0.015 mg/l and 1.3 mg/L
respectively.have been established by the Lead and Copper Rule.Sodium also does
not have an MCL but there is enough public health concerns regarding sodium that
monitoring is required.
Turbldltv
Edward Springs.Sunnyside Well No. 2 and the Lake Goodwin Well typically have low
turbidity levels. The Stillaguamish Collector experiences significant shifts in turbidity in direct
-31 -
relation to storm events on the Stillaguamish River.During high seasonal flows turbidity often
exceeds 1.0 NTU and the collector is taken off-line.
Trlhalomethanes
Sampling for THM's is done at the system's three chlorinated sources: Edward Springs.
Stillaguamish Collector.and Sunnyside Well No.2.Current regulations require annual sampling of
groundwater sources and quarterly sampling of surtace water sources.THM results are shown in
Table 3-3. The MCl for total THM's was exceeded at the Stillaguamish Collector in 1991 and the
Department of Health was notified.asrequired.
Table3-3
TRIHALOMETHANE TEST RESULTS
Edward Sunnyside SlIlIaguamish
MeL Springs Well No.2 Collector
Testfor mgll 2112/91 2/12/91 2112/91
Chloroform 0.0824 0.0383 0.0977
Dichlorobromo-0.0121 0.0088 0.0047
methane
Dibromochloro-0.0018 0.0027 <0.0005
methane
Bromoform N.D.N.D.N.D.
Total THM 0.100 0.0963 0.0498 0.1024
Radlonuclides
Current Department of Health requirements call for gross alpha particle,activity,radium-
226,and radium 228 monitoring every four years. Marysville has not monitored for radionuclides
to date and no current records are available.
Volatile Organic Chemicals
Marysvillesamples the Stillaguamish Collector.Edward Springs.SunnysideWell NO.2.and
lake Goodwin Well every three years for volatile organic chemicals.Since sampling began in
1988.none of the eight requloted compounds have been detected.Trace amount of
chloroform.dichlorobromomethane.and dibromochloromethane were detected in the latest
- 32 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Edward Springs samples.These compounds are included in the list of unregulated compounds
that do not have MCL's but must be monitored.
Synthetic Oraanlc Chemicals
The City will begin monitoring for SOC's at the Stillaguamish Collector in 1995.The 1994
revisionof WAC 246-290setsforth the new requirements for SOC monitoring that meet the SDWA
PhaseV rule.
Lead and Copper
Marysville has completed the first two rounds of lead and copper sampling in
accordance with the EPA regulations. A total of 60 tap samples were collected from residences
that met the sample site criteria. The 90th percentile samples were all less than the 0.015 mg/I
and 1.3 mg/I action levels for lead and copper.respectively.Monitoring from the same sites will
be repeated on an annual basis and if the action level is not exceeded for three consecutive
years.monitoring frequency is reduced to once every three years.
SOURCE TREATMENT
As described previously, the only source treatment in the system is disinfection with
chlorine at Edward Springs,the Stillaguamish Collector,and Sunnyside Well No.2.Screening and
settling is provided at Edward Springs without the addition of chemical.Iron and manganese
control was attempted at the Highway 9 well but was unsuccessful and is not continued when
the well is periodically brought back on-line. All Everett water is filtered and chlorinated and
conveyed to the Marysville system with a minimum chlorine residual of 0.2 mg/1.
EXISTING STORAGE FACILITIES
TheMarysville water system currently operates with 11.3 MG of storage. Table 3-4 reports
specific features of each storage facility.
- 33 -
- 34 -
and comes on-line in the 170zone when the Cedarcrest level begins to drop.
control and adequate service pressure to the Lake Goodwin area customers.
for the 490zone and can assist the lower zones through pressure reducing valves.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Capacity
(Gollons)
6.000.000
3.500.000
1.100.000
467.000
200.000
11.267.000
236.5
170.0
490.0
172.5
360.0
Water Surface
(Feet)
TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY
1975
1987
1981
1963
1958
The largest storage volume in the Marysville system is
Year
Constructed
As described above.the Highway 9 reservoir is filled by the
Table 3-4
EXISTING WATER STORAGE FACILITIES
Facility
Edward SpringsReservoir
Cedarcrest Reservoir
Highway 9 Reservoir
Kellogg-Marsh Standpipe
Sunnyside Standpipe
Highway 9 Reservoir.
Edward Springs Reservoir.
through the 360 zone via pressure reducing valves. Support to the 170 pressure zone is also
Cedarcrest pump station and occasionally by the Highway 9 well. It provides the only storage
provided by the Kellogg-Marsh standpipe which has a slightly higher operating water surface
Cedarcrest Reservoir.The Cedarcrest Reservoir.constructed in 1987.replaced the old
170 water surface. the principal source of inflow to Cedarcrest is from the Everett supply line
the reservoir pumps to the Highway 9 reservoir in the 490 pressure zone.Operating at a nominal
1.5 MG below-grade asphalt lined Cedarcrest Reservoir.A booster pump station adjacent to
Goodwin well pumps. A small standpipe adjacent to the Lake Goodwin well provides pump
discharge into the 240 zone which in tum feeds the reservoir through the north end distribution
system. The reservoir elevation controls the collector pumps but it does not control the Lake
Stillaguamish collector.The Lake Goodwin well pumps directly to the reservoir where a pressure
reducing valve lowers the intlow pressurefrom 104psi to 5 psi. TheStillaguamish collector pumps
reservoir is suppiied by the spring collection system.the Lake Goodwin well.and the
provided by the 6 MG Edward Springs reservoir.Operating at the nominal 240 water surface. the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Kellogg-Marsh Standpipe.In conjunction with the Cedarcrest Reservoir,Kellogg-Marsh
is filled by the 240 zone through pressure reducing valves. When the water level in the
Cedarcrest reservoirbegins to drop,Kellogg-Marsh comes on-line with itshigher operating water
surface. If the Kellogg-Marsh water surface also drops, then the reducing valve at the 240/170
boundary opens and Kellogg-Marsh isrefilled.
Sunnyside Standpipe.The Sunnyside Standpipe was designed to be filled by Sunnyside
Well No. 2 and operates at the 360 water surface elevation.As described previously. the
Everett/Marysville supply pipeline now connects to the system near the reservoir at a higher
pressure gradient.Thereservoir altitude valve limitsthe fill height to the 360 foot elevation.Asa
result.the reservoiris typically full and does not fluctuate.A problem with stagnant water islikely.
During normal operation.pressure reducing valves allow the Sunnyside standpipe to provide
water to the 240 and 170 zones.
Rgure3-2shows each storage facility's location in the system.
PRESSURE ZONES
The City distribution system is divided into four pressure zones labeled according to the
elevation.relative to mean sea level. of the static pressure head in each zone. Each zone's
boundaries are located to provide a service pressure range of 30-90 psi under maximum and
average day demand conditions. Zone boundaries are shown with the associated reservoirs in
Figure3-2.
The I70zone is the lowest pressure zone and serves the Marysville business district and a
large residential area.A total of 4.0MG of storage is provided to the zone by the Kellogg-Marsh
and Cedarcrest reservoirs which are primarily supplied by Edward Springs and the Everettsupply
line. Seven pressure reducing/sustaining valves are located south of 100th Street NE and are set
- 35 -
-------------------------------------------- ------- - - ------- --
\
•I
!
)
\"\~
._....
JO
"
4010 S~EWA Y NORTH
$EA.Tll£.WASHIHGTCW 98103
(206)e32-21lO4
JANUARY.1997
STORAGE FACUTES
HAMMOND.COWER ole W.o.DE-
UVINGSTONE .O.SSOO.O.TES.INC.
2000
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
"
----o
-"
5E.
16
PECIAL'SERVICE
I LAND CROSSING
"•,
I
•
"
"
i
Ise
PORT GARDNER SAY
I
I
!
I
I'.
tz -.
"-"'"'......,
to \
:I,
[.....
""""
"
•,
•I Z>0 0
'"•....:r ........
0 •r:2""I "f-I
l
"/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
to reduce pressures from the 240 zone to the 170 zone but also to maintain a set minimum
pressure in the 240 zone. Along 67th Avenue NE.two additional valves are used strictly at
pressure reducing and set such that a minimum of 30 psi is maintained in the lower 170zone.
Since system tiow affects pressures.all valves have two settings.one for high demand summer
conditions and fire tlow and one for low demand winter conditions.
EXISTING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
The Marysville distribution system is oriented on a north-south grid with the principal
sources of supply located at the north and south ends. The piping is generally classitied in three
groups.transmission mains. arterial mains.and distribution mains.
Transmission mains convey the main flow from the sources to the system and are
generally considered as any main greater than 16 inches in diameter.Marysville has four
principal transmission mains.one each from the three sources and an additional that directly
connects the Stillaguamish Collector to the Edward Spring Reservoir.The largest is the 3D-inch
steel Everett-Marysville pipeline constructed in 1992 and connected to the south end ot the
system near 44th Street NE and 83rd Avenue NE.This Everett supply line also connects at 64th
Street NE via a 24-inch ductile iron pipe added in 1993.Edward Springs supplies the north end
via the smallest transmission main -- a 12-inch asbestos cement pipe from the reservoir to
downtown Marysville along the Forty Five Road and Old Highway 99. TheStillaguamish Collector
transmission main is an l8-inch diameter ductile iron pipe running south to a 12-inch at 172nd
Street NE.At this point the Stillaguamish flow goes south into the distribution system and also
west to the Edward Springs reservoir.When the Stillaguamish Collector is off-line. flow in the
172ndStreet main is east from the reservoirto the distribution system.
Before the Everett-Marysville pipeline was constructed.the south end was supplied by
the SunnysideWeli No.2 via a 14-inch cast iron main from the well north to 52nd Street NE where
it split into two lO-inch mains that supplied the downtown and the Cedarcrest Reservoir.The
- 37 -
I-
I
!
Sunnyside well and reservoir do not operate properly with the nearby pipeline and the original
transmission mains now serve essentially as arterials.
Arterial mains are generally eight and ten-inch mains that cross-connect with the
transmission mains.Many of the system arterials are restricted by control valves at the pressure
zone boundaries.Flow from the Edward Springs and Stillaguamish transmission main cannot be
discharged directly into the central downtown system due to the pressure differential.For this
reason.adequate storage is provided in each pressurezone to buffer the immediate demands.
Distribution mains are typically eight inch and smaller and supply water to service
connections and fire hydrants. The minimum size distribution main is 8-inch based upon current
City standards.
Figure3-3 shows the system layout with transmission and arterial mains. Distribution mains
that are critical linksin the systemare also shown. A larger scale foldout of Figure3-3 is included
in a back pocket.
INTERTIES WITH ADJACENT SYSTEMS
In addition to the Everett-Marysville pipeline.the City system has interties with the City of
Arlington. Snohomish County P.U.D .. the Tulalip Tribes and the Seven Lakes Water Association.
The Arlington connection is provided as an emergency backup to Arlington and is located near
the Stillaguamish Collector at the intersection of 198th Place NE and 51 st Drive NE.The intertie is
8-inch and can flow both directions.In addition.service is provided on a continuous basis at
two other locations.
The Snohomish County P.U.D.intertie is at the south end at the system at 4020 71 st
Avenue NE.The intertie is 4-inch and is located between the PUD's recently completed 8-inch
line and the City's 14-inch along 71 st Avenue NE.Flow can be in both directions.Use ot the
intertie is mutual with an agreement stipulating that the P.U.D.is to provide water at a hydraulic
- 38 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------------------------------------------------------
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
MARYSVLLE
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
FIGURE 3-3
I
!I~
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I,
1
I
I
I
I
!
:
;
i
1
\
c-
I
I.
MAY,1995
4010 STONEWAY NORlH
SEATll£.WASHINGTON 98103
(206)632-2664
1
HAMMOND,COWER 8<WADE-
LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES,INC.
2S
36
12
,
I
i
,
~~
26 ~z
I \I
I
,
I en
<,I ,
35 <L
)
18
I
/1
36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
gradeline of 420 feet and in retum the Cily is to provide the P.U.D.water at a gradeline of 360
feet.
A second P.U.D.intertie is in the 7300 block of 44th Street NE.Flow is only to Marysville
through the 8-inch connection.The intertie contains a meter and pressure sustaining valve.The
original intertie near 71st Avenue NE may become obsolete or could be maintained to allow the
PUD to benefit from storage provided by the Sunnyside standpipe during an emergency.
North of the lake Goodwin well an intertie with the Seven lakes Water Association is
maintained as an emergency backup for the Cily's customers served by the well. A pressure
reducing valve is necessary since the Seven lakes system pressure is approximately 80 psi greater
than the lake Goodwin well discharge.The intertie can operate both directions through use of
PRY.pump and meter.These interties are also shown in Figure3-3.
Interties to the Tulalip Tribe's system also exist west of the Interstate 5/Fourth Street
interchange.A dual direction.8-inch connection is located at Marine Drive and 27th Avenue
NE.This connection has no meter or pressure reducing valves. A second smaller 4-inch
connection is located in the 2000 block of Marine Drive.This intertie only flows to Marysville.
CONTROL/TELEMETRY
The water system has a central telemetry control panel at the Taubeneck Building on
Columbia Avenue which monitors the Cily's sources of supply and reservoir levels. The control
panel has reservoir level recorders for the Kellogg-Marsh and Sunnyside standpipes plus the
Cedarcrest.Highway 9.and the Edward Springs reservoirs.Additional instrumentation and
control devices at the control panel include:
Edward Springs System
Edward Springs high/low alarm
Reservoir outlet flow recorder
Reservoir level recorder
-40 -
Stillaguamish System
Well low level alarm
Well pump overload/failure/shutdown alarm
Smoke/chlorine alarm
Water in control room alarm
Surge control valve failure alarm
Control room intrusion alarm
Line/power failure alarm
Police night alarm
Well level recorder
Flow totalizer
Water pressure indicator
Well water turbidity
Pump controls
Highway 9 System
Station intrusion alarm
Reservoir outlet flow recorder
Reservoir level recorder
Reservoir high/low olarm
Cedarcrest ReservoirSystem
Reservoir level recorder
Reservoir outlet flow recorder
Reservoir high/low alarm
Pump failure alarm
Pump flow recorder
Commercial power failure alarm
Station intrusion alarm
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT REQUIREMENTS
The enactment of the federal Safe Drinking Water act (SDWA)in 1974 signaled the
beginning of 0 new era for owners.managers.and operators of public water systems.The
catalyst for passage of the SDWA was the discovery of a variefy of organic contaminants in the
water supplied by drinking water systems throughout the United States. For fhe'rst time.
Congress authorized the federal government to establish national drinking water req ations.
These regulations set maximum permissible levels for certain contaminants in drinking wa:er and
established monitoring requirements.
-41 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
As a result of fhe SOW A.more is now known about the quality of drinking water in the
United States than ever before.Although there is a high level of compliance with the water
quality standards.there is still a great deal of public concern about unregulated organic
contaminants.This concern.together with the frequent contamination of groundwater from
industrial solvents and pesticides.spawned an interest in substonficllv revising the original act.
The SDWA Amendments of 1986 were the result.Many new regulations have been developed
based on these amendments.(AWWA)
In Washington.all public water systems are categorized by the State Board of Health as
either a Group A system or a Group B system.Group A systems are those that are subject to
federal water quality regulations (generally those that have 15or more service connections.or
that supply regularly to 25 or more customers).Group B systems are non-federally regulated
(generally smaller systems with two to 14 service connections).Marysville is a Group A system
and as a resultmust adopt monitoring frequencies and schedules that have been developed by
the EPA.In the event of a violation of a drinking water standard or failure to monitor or treat for
a known contaminant.the utility must notity itscustomers it may have to perform additional tests
and it might be required to provide additional treatment for the water.
In Washington.the SDWA is administered by the DOH. as set forth in WAC 246-290.The
1994 revision of WAC 246-290 includes several new monitoring requirements.and further SDWA
rulesare anticipated.Each rule. the contaminants addressed and the dates for adopfion at the
state level are described below.Thestate water quality monitoring requirements are discussed
in Chapter 8.
The new rules adopted by the DOH olso include a provision whereby purveyors can
apply for waivers of selected monitoring requirements. Thewaivers are granted based upon low
susceptibility of contamination.and con significantly reduce future moniforing requirements.
- 42 -
Phase I VOC's •Volatile Organic Chemicals
The Phase I YOC rule was adopted by Washington state in 1991.Monitoring
requirements and maximum contaminant levels for eight regulated YOC's were established. In
addition,monitoring for 51 unregulated YOC's that do not have MCl's is required.Detection of
a YOC will require systems to increase monitoring and may lead to treatment or altemative
source development.In addition to these.monitoring for two additional YOC's is required
where the chemicals have been applied.transported,handled or stored in the vicinity of water
supply sources.
Surface water Treatment RuleISWTRl
TheSurface Water Treatment Rule became law in Washington State in April 1993.Aswas
discussed in Chapter 3, the rule requires that all surface water sources must:
o] Be disinfected:
b) Be filtered unless certain stringent water quality criteria are met,and
c)Implement specific controls on activities within the contributing watershed.
Ground water sources that are directly influenced by surface waters must also meet the
requirements.
Total Coliform Rule
The presence of coliforms in drinking water indicates the potential presence of
pathogens associated with waterborne disease outbreaks.Regular bacteriological analyses of
water systems have been required since the early 1900's with a specified density of coliforms per
100ml generally used as a standard.The Total Coliform Rule mandates two major changes in
the procedure for coliform testing.First.is the presence of total coliforms in a given sample isthe
standard.Second, all samples testing positive for total coliforms must be followed by repeat
sampling and further tests to determine if fecal coliforms are present. Fecal coliforms are an
-43 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----------_._--------------
indicator that animal or human wastes may have come in contact with the water.The Total
Coliform Rulehas been in effect in Washington since 1991.
lead and Copper Rule
Concern over adverse healfh effects of lead and copper in drinking wafer prompted
Congress to require sampling and monitoring at household taps beginning in 1992.Samples are
required every six months at high-risk locations.defined as homes with lead solder installed atter
1982.The number of samples required is based on system population.If more than 10 percent
of the samples exceed 0.015 mg/I for lead and 1.3 mg/I for copper the system must take action
to determine the source of the lead or copper.If the water supply is the source.treatment
before distribution will be required.If lead solder and copper or lead service lines are the
source. corrosion inhibitors and pH adjustments are typically required.In addition.the utility must
notity all customers that elevated levels of lead and copper have been detected and provide
information about the potential adverse health effects.Systems that do not exceed the action
levels during the first three years are allowed to reduce sampling to once every three years.
Phase II - Synthetic Organic Chemicals/Inorganic Chemicals
The Phase IIrule expands on Phase I by establishing MCl's for 38 inorganic and synthetic
organic contaminants.Synthetic organic contaminants (SOC's)are manufactured carbon-
based chemicals commonly existing as components of pesticides and industrial solvents.
Ethylene dibromide (EDB).a pesticide and polychlorinated biphenyl's (PCB's).a compound used
to insulate electrical transformers are examples of SOC's.Inorganic chemicals (IOC's)are non-
carbon-based chemicals.elemental metals. or minerals. Examples of IOC's are cadmium.
mercury. nitrate. or barium. The MCl's set by the Phase II rule include twelve of the 51
unregulated compounds that are monitored under Phase I.and also requires asbestos
monitoring.
- 44 -
The Washington DOH implemented the Phase IIrule in 1994.The implementation requires
all water systems to monitor for the 48 contaminants with MCL's of Phases I and II plus the
remaining 69 unregulated contaminants.The monitoring framework is based on nine-year
cycles consisting of three 3-year periods.Sampling requirements vary within the 3-year periods
according to the contaminant.In general,if samples are consistently below MCL's within a 3-
year period,monitoring frequency is reduced.
Phase V • Synthetic Organic Chemlcalsllnorganic Chemicals
The Phase V monitoring requirements and MCL'sfor 24 additional SOC's and IOC's were
implemented in 1994 by the DOH,This is an extension to Phase I and II within the same
monitoring framework.
Phase III -Radionuclldes
The Radionuclide regulations will go into effect in 1995 or 1996 for Washington State
water systems.These regulations will include new monitoring and treatment requirements for
radioactive chemicals that are both naturally occurring and man-made,and are carcinogenic
(e.g.radon,radium and uranium),Treatment processes will include aeration.ion exchange,
reverse osmosis and solid precipitation,
Disinfection Byproducts
The disinfection bypro ducts rule will go into effect in 1996 or 1997.This rule regulates
byproducts of the disinfection of water supplies with chlorine.Research has shown that when
chlorine reacts with dissolved organic matter by-products are created that have adverse health
effects.This rule includes new monitoring for disinfection by-products throughout:J:stribution
systems and new MCL's for substances created by disinfection (e,g.totol trihalomethanes,free
chlorine residual.formaldehyde,pidochlorin).Treatment processes for the byproducts include
- 45 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
alternative methods of disinfection.activated carbon or optimized coagulation and
flocculation.
Groundwater Disinfection
The groundwater disinfection rule will go into effect in 1996 or 1997.The regulation will
require increased monitoring and disinfection treatment for all systems using groundwater
sources.plus establish regulations for distribution system disinfection.qualified operators.
treatment techniques.and monitoring.
- 46 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Chapter 4
WATER USAGE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER 4
WATER USAGE
The Marysville water system has consistently grawn in population served since the 1930's
and continued growth is expected through the next 20 years.Anticipating this growth and
providing for the additional demand on the system will insure that a high level of customer
service is maintained.This chapter will analyze historic water usage and.aiong with several
assumptions.project future system demands.The population projections presented in Chapter 2
will be used in the analysis.
HISTORICAL WATER USE
City records for the past ten years were reviewed to obtain historical data on water
system usage. The average daily demand (ADD)and maximum day demand (MOD)were
determined and are summarized in Table 4-1.
A comparison of the total system ADD and the number of service connections isshown in
Table 4-1. As can be seen. the number of service connections has grown steadily while the
average daily demand per connection peaked in 1987 and has dropped off since then.except
in 1994.The decrease is attributed to a strict conservation program and ordinances enforced by
the City since 1987.The 1994 increase is probably due to a dry summer and increased industrial
demands.These measures ore described in detail in Chapter 8.
- 47 -
Table 4-1
HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION
Avg.Dally MOD
Demand (Date)MOD/ADD No. of
Avg.GPD/
Year MGD MGD Ratio Connections Connection
1994 4.74 9.3 (7123)2.0 12.088 392
1993 4.05 6.0 (8/6)
1.5 11.490 353
1992 4.12 4,4 (6/6)
1.1 10.889 378
1991 3.97 4.9(8/16)1.2 10.700 371
1990 3.94 6.1 (8/3)1.6 10.435 377
1989 3.82 7.9(8/6)2.1 9.824 388
1988 3.56 7.9 (8/29)
2.2 9,261 384
1987 3.72 6.6 (7/3)
1.8 8.930 416
1986 3.49 5.9 (7/20)
1.7 8.675 396
1985 3.37 6.1 (7/16)1.8 8,406 401
1984 3.18 8.086 393
1983 3.00 7.858 382
WATER USAGE BREAKDOWN
Potable water usage is generally categorized in four uses:industrial.commercial.
wholesale.and domesfic.Domestic use is the primary demand on the Marysville system as is
evident by the demographics of the service area.A breakdown of usage in each of these
classes is presented as follows.
Industrial.An estimate of the industrial usage was developed from data presented in A
Preliminary Survey on the Industrial Waste Discharges to the City of Marysville.Washington
prepared by Brown &Caldwell Consulting Engineers in 1990.The survey analyzed industrial
wastewater discharges to the Marysville sewage treatment plant to gain information on the
volume and composition.Included in the survey was information on potable water usage for
the major industries in the service area.Table 4-2 lists those industries.the materials produced
and the average daily water usein 1990.
- 48 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------------------------------------------_._-----
- 49 -
future rate structure to cover the operation and maintenance costs of the pipeline,Everett
Wholesale.The City currently has wholesale water agreements with the Seven Lakes
As shown in Table 4-2. the major industries accounted for an average of approximately
Water Consumption
(gal/day)
214,0002
125,000
34.000
30.000
10,000
2.000
2.000
TOTAL 417,000
Material
Produced
Aircraft Test Site
Feathers/Down
Eggs
Grinding Wheels
Metal Products
Engine Parts
Jet Engine Impellers
Table 4-2
MUNICIPAL WATER CONSUMPTION
FOR INDUSTRIES IN MARYSVILLE I
Industry
Boeing
Pacific Coast Feathers
National Food Corp.
Pacific Grinding Wheel Co.
Pacific Metal Finishing
RiversideFoundry
IMO Contura Industries,Inc.
Aninqton interties,respectively.The JOA Agreement with the P.U.D.and Tulalips anticipates a
Commercial.Commercial facilities are generally retail stores. motels, restaurants and
I FromA Preliminary Survey on the Industrial Waste Discharges to the
City of Marysville.Washington.1990
2 From City of Marysville billing records,1993.The test site facility does
not operate full-time.
that the breakdown of wastewater usage is similar to potable water usage,commercial usage is
Water Association, City of Arlington, Snohomish County P.U.D ..and the Iulolip Tribes.The Seven
Lakes and Artinqton agreements are for emergency water usage at the Lake Goodwin Well and
estimated at 16 percent.
1990 Marysville Comprehensive Sanitary Sewerage Plan in which commercial waste discharge
others that do not use water for processing but have a high water demand due to
concentrated human activities.A survey of commercial water usage has not been completed
averaged approximately 16 percent of the total discharge to the treatment plant.Assuming
and an accurate breakdown is not available.However,an estimate was developed from the
Table 4-2 derives an industrial usage percentage of approximately 8 percent.
0.4 MGD in 1990.Comparing the total to the 3.94 MGD system average for 1990as reported in
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 50 -
United States is shown in Table 4-3.
percentage of wholesale demand iszero.
maintenance costs associated with the limited use of the Marysville system. Therefore. it is not a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N/A
7-27
25-80
Typical Range I
7-67*
66
100
Marysville
Percentage of ADD
8
16
a
10
Table4-3
MARYSVILLE WATER USAGE BREAKDOWN
Use
Industrial
Commercial
Wholesale
Unaccounted/System
Leakage
Domestic
Domestic.The remaining 66 percent of demand isassumed domestic.Domestic usage
Unaccounted/System Leakage.Due to uncalibrated metering equipment.inaccurate
unreasonable.A summary of the usage breakdowns and typical values for municipalities in the
• Industrial and Commercial combined.
I From Water Quality.Tchobonoglous &Schroeder.1987
percent will be used which isa typical value for systems similar to Marysville.
system. it is likely that the percentage of unaccounted water islow. For estimating purposes 10
residential and the major industrieswithin the service area have a moderate demand.this is not
is typically less than 50 percent of system demand but.considering the service area is largely
percent.Considering that there are very few corrosion prone steel mains in the Marysville
records to not balance.Typical percentages for unaccounted water range from 7 to 27
records.and leaking distribution mains it is not uncommon for a system's supply and demand
true wholesale arrangement.Since a continuous wholesaling agreement is not in effect.the
water costs.upgrades to the Marysville system that benefit participants.and operation and
------ - ------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECTED WATER USE
With reference to Figure 2-4, the Coordinated Service area population projected for the
year 2014is 63,200.This isthe population anticipated based on an annual growth rate of 2.19%
with a 1990 population of 36,000. As discussed in Chapter 2, it is unlikely that the entire 63,200
population will be served by the Marysville system,but rather as the areas beyond the system
are developed,only 10 percent of new growth will be connected to the system. The effect of
this adjustment reduces the serviceable population to 57,800as was shown in Figure 2-4.
Method.The approach used to calculate the projected system demand was first to
determine the system averages of persons per connection and demand per connection.Two
values for person per connection were available.The 1990census data presented in the Interim
Comprehensive Plan reports an average of 2.8 persons per dwelling unit within an area slightly
larger than the Urban Growth Boundary. Within the RUSA boundary,1990census data showed a
population of 34,479 being served by 10.889 connections.an average of 3.2 persons per
connection.The difference may be attributed to the definition of connection versus dwelling
unit. One connection may serve several dwelling units and in another case may serve a
commercial property that would not be considered as a dwelling unit.Although the per
connection value may be more appropriate,a conservative projection is obtained by using the
smaller per dwelling unit value and assuming that each dwelling unit isa single connection.
As shown in Table 4-1 demand per connection has varied considerably in the last ten
years. However. the last three years'averages appear to be consistent;therefore.a three-year
average of 375 GPO/connection was used for future projections.
The projected average daily demand resultinq from this method is shown in Figure 4-1.
An average daily demand of 7.5 MGO is projected for the Marysville water system in the year
2016.
-51 -
-52 -
MOD to ADD for Marysville systemranges from 1.1 to 2.2.
The demand projections developed thus far are average daily demands equivalent to
the annual total consumption divided by 365 days per year.Actual usage varies considerably
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
(;
N
ong
N
Year
oo
~
,,,,,,,,,, ,
,,
,,,,,,,
,, , ,
,,,,
,,,, ,, ,,,, ,, , , ,
,, ,
,,;..--"- - -
c -,--,--•-,-,--,-"-,----J ------,-------'--c -,--,--,-,
,,,,
,,,,,,l'HD ,
,•,, ,,,,,,
,,, ,
,,,,,,,
-t --- --t --,----,-------------r -'t ----,-,--r--r --,--,--
,,,,,,,, , ,
, ,
,,,,MOD ,,,
, ,
,,
,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,
-,-,--,,--,--"-"-,c -"-----,-_c -"-,--c -,--,--c -,--,--,,,,,,,,,, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,,,,'ADD
,,,,
,,,,,,,, ,,, ,,
,,,,, ,, ,,,,,
-,-,--,, ,,, ,
, ,
----------------r --------t ----,---,----
, ,,,,,, ,
,,,,,,, ,
,,,, ,
,,,,
o
summer. An error in recording the daily readings may also have occurred.The lower 1.1 ratio
shown for 1992 reflects both a higher ADD and a lower MOD tor the year,This could possibly be
The ratio appeared to be decreasing since the mid 1980's with the exception of 1988,
Figure 4-1
Marysville Water Demand Projections
5
20
15
25
10
1989,and 1994,The decreasing trend is likely due to the implementation of conservation
possibly due to an abnormally high demand created by either a watermain break,fire, or dry
measures which have effectively reduced the maximum day demand,The 2,2 ratio for 1988 is
typical design variables and are determined from system records or by multiplying ADD by
peaking factors,Maximum day demand is the highest total volume of water used during a 24-
hour calendar day and expressed in million gallons per day.As shown in Table 4-1.the ratio of
increasing source production,Maximum day demand (MOD)and peak hour demand (PHD)are
provide for demands in excess of the average either by providing storage in the system or
about this average due to seasonal and diurnal patterns.Water system facilities must be sized to
PEAKING FACTORS
- 53 -
the projections graphically.Theassumptions used were as follows:
Peak hour demand is the highest flow recorded within an hour and is also expressed in
will be used. A summary of the demand projections is presented in Table 4-4.
20.4
14.7
13.2
PHD
MGD
9.8
8.8
13.6
MOD
MGD
7.5
4.9
5.5
ADD
MGDReference
Table 4-4
DEMAND PROJECTION SUMMARY
Fifth year of Comprehensive
Water Plan
End of Comprehensive Water
Planning Period
Rrst year of Comprehensive
Water Plan.beginning of
financing period
2016
2001
1996
Year
Since each pressure zone has specific storage requirements.a projection of population
• The 1990 service populction developed in Chapter 2 can be split among the pressure
zones according to density and acreage calculations.
POPULATION PER PRESSURE ZONE
assumptions.popu'otion estimates for each pressurezone were developed.Figure 4-2 presents
per zone is useful. Using the service population projections of Figure 2-4 and some additional
for the Marysville system;therefore.the 1.5 ratio recommended in the 1989 comprehensive plan
through a review of hourly source meter records and storage records.This information is limited
overall day's use isstill near the average.Thebest method for determining the PHD/MODratio is
million gallons per day.Frequently the peak hour will occur during the maximum day but not in
all cases. A large fire or watermain break can increase demand to peak hour levels while the
a value of 1.8 which will be used tor thisanalysis.
which will tend to decrease the maximum day variation.A 1.1 MOD/ADD ratio is not typical for
water systems similar to Marysville.Averaging 10years of data for the MOD/ADD ratio produces
explained by the addition of several larger users with uniform demands and a cooler summer
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 54 -
40000 -,-~
AS was discussed in Chapter 2. future expansion of the Urban Growth Boundary to the
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -to--170Zone,
____240Zone I
i-.-360Zone I
i--490Zone I
----.-+-:--
Projected
Annual Growth.percent
4.6
4.6
1.7
2.0
1990Service population
3.800
700
6.500
23.400
- ----~--------------------------------.--_.--
~~--~--------------------
Table 4-5
PRESSURE ZONE POPULATION PROJECTION DATA
--- - ---- --- --- - --- - -,---- ---- -------- - -------- ---- -.._-
- -~------..;- ---------,------------- ---- - -----
------ - - ---- --- ---- - -,- --- --- - ------ --- - ----------- --.--,
Zone
490
360
240
170
0
0 '"0 '"0 ~en en 0 0 C;en en 0 0 0
~~N N N N
Year
15000
25000.---
30000
35000
co
~20000-=Q.o...
Figure 4-2
Population by Pressure Zone
• The total population of all of the pressure zones was fit to the overall CSA service
population presented in Chapter 2.
•Annual growth in each pressure zone can be derived from the Puget Sound Regional
Council Forecast Analysis Zone (FAZI data presented in the Interim Comprehensive
Plan.FAZ's 8406 corresponded to the 490 and 360 zones while FAZ's 8320 and 8310
covered the 240 and 170 zones.respectively.Projection data used are shown in
Table 4-5.
service population.At land-use saturation the increase would be approximately 55.800 persons.
The average doily demand generated by such an increase would be approximately 7.5 MGD.
Coordinated Service Area limits would change zoning densities and increase the potential
~-----------------------------------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The rate at which this demand would develop cannot be accurately determined.With the
current 5-year restriction on changes to the UGB and the 2D-year planning horizon. it is unlikely
the significant zoning changes and saturation growth would occur within the next 20years.
WATER STUDY AREAS
In addition to CSA population and demand projections.the Marysville City Council
requested an analysis of seven water study areas that are outside of the CSA but may possibly
be served by Marysville in the long term.These areas are shown in Figure 4-3 and are generally
justoutside of the north and east CSA boundaries.
Population projections in the Water Study Areas were developed in the same manner as
the CSA with adjustments to the dwelling unit density and persons per dwelling unit factors.
Since these areas are predominantly rural. a lower density was assumed based on census tract
data from the interim Comprehensive Plan. Census tract 527.01 is in the same vicinity as Water
Study Areas 4 and 5 and was assumed to have population characteristics similar to all of the
remaining Water Study Areas.Data from the 1990 census shows0.15 dwelling units per acre and
3.1 persons per dwelling unit for tract 527.01.Applying these factors to the acreage in each
study orea gives the estimated 1990 populations.Projecting the 1990 populations through the
year 2016at an annual growth rate of 2.19 percent gives a total population of 10.700 within the
seven study areas.
The actual population served by the Marysville water system was also estimated by the
same method used for the CSA.It was assumed that only 10 percent of the current population
could be served with the remaining 90 percent maintaining their current service by way of
individual wells or small community systems.The fraction served was assumed to also grow at
2.19 percent annually.Demand was projected at 375 GPO per connection or dwelling unit.
Table 4-6 summorizes the Water Study Area populations and average day demand over the 20-
year planning period.As can be seen, the projected impact of the additional areas is less than
1MGD of average day demand.
- 55 -
- ------ - - - ---------
.
J2
--,-
w··.':,.
I',
"
..-~-'"-'
"
;5\
"-'".
-!
4010 STONEWA Y NORm
SEArna,WASHINGTON 98103
(20Cl)632-2&64
MAY,1995
HAMMOND,COLLIER &<WADE-
LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES,INC.
WATER STUDY AREAS
"
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
zeee
!
•
rt.:~:.
o
I
!,.
,"
•••••••
J5
_..
ARUNGTON
"
-..
ae
•,
I
-..
""""•
•
"
-.
"
"
"
PORT GARDNER BAY
"
"
•!
i.
~•!,
L ••e .\!
::>,-'':.~
0.09
its CWSP
0.13
ADD
MGD
0.07
0.08
erved by
actions:
Boundary
variance.
proposed
he City of
apply to
tion. No
m the 1-5
ry will be
ons of the
I
I
I Table4-6
Prolected Water Study Area POt ulations
I
Actual Actual
WaterStudy Areas Total Pap. Conn.
Served Served
Year I 2 3 4 5 6 7
I 1990 375 312 217 1.721 3.117 245 131 6.119 612 197
1996 427 355 247 1.960 3.550 279 149 6.968 697 225
2001 476 396 275 2.185 3.956 311 166 7.765 777 250
2016 659 548 381 3.023 5.475 430 230 10.747 1075 347
I Acres 807 671 466 3.702 6.704 527 282
I After study of the seven areas by the City Council.it was concluded that porti
I study areas east of a projection of the east CWSP planning boundary would best be s
others. The potential areas of long-range service by the City that are currently outside
I planning boundary are shown enclosed by the red dotted line in Figure 4-3.
Water service within the City's current CWSP boundary and its long-range
I planning boundary will be governed by the following conditions of service or proposed
I l.Service within the (CWSP)Comprehensive Water Planning Bounda
without a variance.
I 2.The Tulalip Tribes will relinquish service to Marysville for the area fro
Freeway to Quilcede Creek.
I 3. Service to Areas 1.2.and 6 within the (PWPB)Proposed Water Planning
will be by a variance or a modification of the CWSP boundary.
4. Service to Areas 3 and 4 will require the property owner to first apply to t
I Arlington.If Arlington refuses to provide service.the applicant can then
Marysville and furnish a copy of the refusal letter at time of applica
variance will be necessary.
I 5.Service outside the Coordinated Water Planning Boundary will require a
I 6.RUSA Boundary will be abolished or become the CWSP.
I
I
I -57 -
STORAGE REQUIREMENTS
Water system storage requirements are based on the number of connections the system
serves and the peak demands.System storage is generally separated into three components:
(1)operational or equalizing.(2)emergency,and (3) fire protection.
Two methods are generally used for determining system requirements.The first.the
standard method,is based on maximum day demand projections.The second method usesthe
Washington Deportment of Health Sizing Guidelines which size storage requirement according to
number of connections and source reliability. The standard method provides a slightly more
conservative analysis and is more appropriate for larger systems.It will be used for the Marysville
system storage projections.The DOH method will also be presented for comparison.The
subsequent analysisassumes that the other regional supply participants will develop the storage
necessary to meet their own needs. If this does occur,Marysville will supply additionai storage
through a deficiency charge in wholesale purveyor rates.
STANDARD METHOD
Operational/Egualizlng Storage.Operational storage Is provided to control the demand
on the system sources. With sufficient operational storage.peak demand periods can be
supplied by storage rather than repeatedly colling on the sources.Maximum day demand is
used to determine operational storage requirements based on a typical diurnal usage curve.
The diurnal cycle for a water system serving predominantly residential customers has a shope
similar to that shown in Figure 4-4 with demand peaks during the morning and evening hours.
Demond is lowest from midnight to approximately 4:00 a.m. The total amount of water used
during the day is equivalent to the area under the curve.System supplies are sized IQ meet Ihe
maximum day demand and,when flows exceed MOD,slorage isrelied upon.As snow "in Figure
4-4,Ihe volume of slorage required is typically 25%of Ihe lotal volume pumped.
As was shown in Table 4-4.Ihe projected MOD for Ihe Marysville system is 13.6MGD for
the year 2016.Operalional storage requiremenls would be 3.4 MG using a 25 percent design.
-58 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
~~-~------------------------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Emergency Storage.In the case of a power outage or any other event that interrupts
the water supply.emergency storage is provided to cover the period until supply can be
restored.Sizing of emergency storage is based on assumptions of duration of interruption.In
most cases power can be restored or a principal transmission main repaired within 48 hours.
Assuming that the emergency would occur during average day demand conditions.two days
of ADD isa reasonable emergency storage design.
FIre Protection Storage.The capability of a water system to supply water in order to fight
a fire influences the fire insurance premiums paid by property owners served by the system.
Guidelines established by the Washington Survey and Rating Bureau set minimum standards for
system fire protection capacities.The standards are based on size.type.and use of the
buildings to be protected.with the most hazardous requiring higher fire flow and storage
capacities.The Bureau has determined that the critical requirement for Marysville is5.000 GPM
for a 4-hour duration.This equates to a fire storage requirement of 1.2MG.
Providing the 1.2MG fire storage alone does not meet the Bureau's rating requirement.
The distribution system must also be able to provide the required flows in the critical areas and
have storage located appropriately throughout the system.These conditions will be evaluated
in Chapter 5.
DOH METHOD
The DOH method determines storage accordingly:
Operatlonal/Eguallzlng Storage.When source pumping equipment operates on a call-
on-demand basis.operational storage issized according to the following equation:
Operational Storage =(MID-Q) (150min.) gallons
Where MID =Maximum instantaneous demand (equivalent to peak
hour demandj.gpm
Q =Source production rate.gpm
- 59 -
12 a.m.3 a.m.6 a.m.9 a.m.12 noon 3 p.m.6 p.m.9 p.m. 12 p.m.
TYPICAL DIURNAL DEMAND
TYPICAL DIURNAL CURVE
SOURCE:AWWA MANUAL OF
WATER SUPPLY PRACTICES.M-J2
HAMMONO, COLLIER &WADE-~
LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES. INC.
4010 STONEWAY NORTH
SEArnr.WASHINGTON 98103 BClF.L
(206)632-2664
-60-
OPERA TIONAL
STORAGE VOLUME
A
c
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I:-~------j
FIGURE 4-4
40
140
P 120
E
R
C
E
N
T
~80
M
D
D 60
-61 -
connections of 18.900 as follows:
Figure 4-5.
gpm fireflow for a 4-hour duration equates to 1.2MG.
(5.3MGD)(1 day) = 5.3 MG
(15.1 MG-5.3MG)=9.8MG
Allowable Storage Reduction
Required Emergency Storage
'Reflects only Marysville's portion of Regional Source.
below the 20 psi level is considered dead storage and has limited value to the immediate
storage component must be high enough to provide a 30 psi service pressure.Any storage
FireStorage.Rre storage is calculated the same for each method.The designated 5000
Dead Storage.Each of the storage components described above must have sufficient
Emergency Storage
18.900 connections x 800 gallons/connection =15.100.000 gallons (15.1 MG)
Total Source Capacity 17.0MGD
Less PrimarySource (Everett Pipeline)11.7 MGD'
Available Capacity 5.3 MGD
Summarizing the above.the total storage required for the year 2010 using the DOH
Emergency/Standby Storage.For systems with more than 100 connections.the DOH
As an example.the year 2010 peak hour demand is prajected to be 12.7 MGD.
Drinking Water Regulations require that the emergency and fire protection volumes be at an
elevation high enough to provide a minimum 20 psi service pressure.The operational/equalizing
elevation relative to the system to provide adequate service pressures.The Washington State
same year. A comparison of the two methods over the 20-year planning period is shown in
method is 11.1 MG.This is less than the 17.4MG projected using the standard method for the
off-line. The reduction can be demonstrated by using the year 2010 projected service
be reduced by the available pumping capacity of back-Up sources when the primary source is
method requires 800 gallons of standby storage per connection.With multiple sources this can
11.800 gpm.The required operational storage would then be 90.000gallons.
equivalent to 12.400 gpm.With all sources operating.the total production rate is 17.0MGD. or
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~-------~---------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
o
('oj
-'----- --- ---------'-_.
, ,
- --,-- i -..-_.--;"-...,--.----
,,-:---~-_:-~--'--"--;--...-- --~
..,.""~~
Year
('oj
8
N
, ,
...-- - - - - - -.--_...---...-.........--- - - -...- ---...-."'
------~_.
,'______L _-'..._~__1__'-,'__~_..l -,
-- - --''''---...-_.- -~----'-------,-...- ----'--- --...- -...--..-......_._.
- --- - --- - -...- - --...- - - --- --...- -...--...-- -----...--...-- -......-..-.
Standard Analysis:
- - ---,--.-...-:--,-,-'--l -:--
.~~_~~-,-- - - - -DOlt Method-- .~- - -c •.
,
- - --'----....- -----...--'--'---- --'-
I I',------------,...----,-,.-...,--,------,-
2°EE~~18
16
14
12
~10
8
6
4
2
0.1.--------.:...------------
Figure4-5
Marysville Storage Method Comparison
- 62 -
A summary of the projected storage requirements over the 20-year planning period is
shown in Figure 4-6. By the year 2014 the system-wide sforage requirement will be 19.0 MG.
Table 4-7gives a summary of the storage projections for the key planning years.
In the following analysis,storage requirements are determined for each zone. The
RECOMMENDED STORAGE REQUIREMENTS
provided may be greater when dead storage is included.
volumes are intended to be above the 20 psi elevation for each zone.Actual volumes to be
should have all the required storage above the 20 psi minimum elevation.
zone can be utilized by a lower zone. In the Marysville system. this could occur during a major
dead storage in the highest zone is nof accessible to that zone. Therefore. fhe highest zone
service area.However.where there are multiple pressure zones.the dead storage in a higher
fire in the 170 zone. As the 170 zone reservoirs are drawn down.the dead storage of the
Highway 9 (490 zone)and the Sunnyside (360 zone)reservoirs could be utilized. However. the
-------~~~~~---------------_----I
-----------------------------------------------------,
I
1 __Operational I
1
Emergency I
........Fire I
[-Total I
on
o
N
o;;
N
-...,- ---..--,--~--,--..--.--f"-
g
N
Year
...--,--
g
N
--:---:---,---:--.--~-,--,----.,.-.,----.,.--,--r--;--r-
---I -..., ,
____L ,__....__1__.I..__,__.,._-,__..,-_..j __1__-"__1__.;.__:__.1.._
,
•I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I--;--,---;- - - -...----T ----i --,--,- -, - - ,--,--,--...--,---- ---j"-, ,,
_~__'..!..!.__'__!...__'__l '__1 __'__1 __'__.!.!.._
I I I I I I I I,
-
t:tt~---t:.----~.----~-------.---------.--.--.--.-
Table 4-7
STORAGE PROJECTION SUMMARY
Operational Emergency Fire Total
Year Reference MG MG MG MG
1996 First year of 2.2 9.6 1.2 13.2
Comprehensive Water
Plan.beginning of
financing period
2001 Fifth year of 2.5 10.9 1.2 14.6
comprehensive Water
Plan,end of financing
period
2016 End of Comprehensive 3.4 15.1 1.2 19.7
Water Planning Period
e 10.0~
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
onenen
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STORAGE REQUIREMENTS PER PRESSURE ZONE
An evaluation of storage requirements within each pressure zone is also necessary to
assess future needs.Using the population per pressure zone data presented in Figure 4-2 plus the
- 63 -
- 64 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
___1701
-e-240 1
~3601
~4901
:~......,.......e.....--~-~-------------------~-,
,''-------7----------------------0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - --------~-------- ---;------;;,-
0.0
0 "'0 "'0 "''"'"0 0 ;;;;
.'"'"0 0
~N N N N
Year
4.0 .. _. _- - - - - - ..~- - - - - - - - - - -,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.-~-"".
--
10.0
~6.0.__ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .
construction of the proposed 6.0MG reservoirin the 360 pressure zone. the storage requirements
12.0.,-.,--,--..--,
The bulk of the current storage capacity is provided by the 6 MG Edward Springs
Figure 4-7
Storage by Pressure Zone
Reviewing Figure 4-7 it can be seen that the majority of the projected storage
requirements are in the 170 pressure zone followed by the 240 and 490 zones. With the 1995
Cedarcrest reservoir to the Highway 9reservoir maintains storage in the 490zone.
400 feet.Storage below this elevation istiiled by gravity flow through PRY's.Pumping from the
throughout the 20-year planning period.
the Edward Springs storage is only available to the 240 zone north of l00th Street NE.The
respectively.With separation between Everett and Edward Springs/Stiilaguamish surface waters.
remaining storage is supplied by the Everett pipeline at a hydraulic gradeline of approximately
determined.Figure 4-7 summarizes the total storage requirement for each pressure zone
Reservoir and the 3.5 MG Cedarcrest reservoir located in the 240 and 170 pressure zones.
demand and storage projection methods of this chapter.storage requirements by zone were
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
of the three lower zones will be met through year 2014.However.the projected requirement for
the 490 zone due to the potential for growth in the Whiskey Ridge area is substantial and
indicates that increased storage in the 490 zone is necessary.Recommendations for the
appropriate time and location of a 490reservoiris presented in Chapter 6.
CONCLUSION
The demand and storage projections presented in this chapter give a partial indication
of the status of the Marysville water system.Asshown in Table 4-4. the 2016 projected maximum
day demand is 13.6MGD which is more than the 11.7MGD Marysville is entitled to through the
Everett pipeline JOA. In the short-term. the projected maximum day demand is 9.8 MGD for
2001 which coincidentally was reached three times in the summer of 1994.Loss of the
Stillaguamish and Edward Springs sources due to the Surface Water Treatment Rule would limit
source supply to 11.7 MGD which will suffice until approximately 2010.It fs evident that If
demand does grow as projected the City should consider either initiating construction of a
second pipelinein accordance with theJOA or constructing a filtration facility to allow full use of
the Edward Springs and Stillaguamish sources.
The storage projections of Table 4-7 show that the system's current 11.3MG of storage is
inadequate compared to the 13.2MG needed in 1996.Constructing the 6 MG reservoir east of
I OOlh Street NE will improve the situation by increasing the total to 17.3MG which will suffice until
approximately the year 2004.Bythe year 2016a total of 19.7MG will be required.The feasibility
of constructing additionai storage will be analyzed in Chapters 6 and 7 in conjunction with the
necessary distribution system improvements.
- 65 -
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Chapter 5
HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
CHAPTER 5
Hydraulic Analysis
The capability of the Marysville water system to meet future demands can be simulated
by a hydraulic analysis. Usingthe existing system information presented in Chapter 3 a computer
model was developed and evaluated under the demand conditions presented in Chapter 4.
System deticiencies determined where improvements are needed.The scenarios and
components of the model are described in this chapter.
Model Description
The computer model of the Marysville system was prepared using Cybernet.a software
package that combines the hydraulic analysis function of the Kentucky Pipe program with the
graphical representation of AutoCAD. All of the system components -distribution piping.storage
reservoirs.pressure reducing valves.and supply sources.were input to the system using an
AutoCAD base map and the Cybemet interface.The system was simplified by only inputting
pipes that were at least eight inches in diameter with the exception of smaller pipes that
provided critical linksin the system.
After inputting and compiling all of the system component data and assigning water
usage demands to various points in the distribution network.the model will generate output
detailing service pressures within the system.reservoir levels.and headlosses. However. these
results initially do not compare well with actual field test results.To bring more accuracy to the
model it must be calibrated by adjusting the input.i.e..changing the roughness coefficients or
inclUding additional pipes. to produce output data that matches the field results.For the
Marysvillesystem model the first run was calibrated to match the conditions of July 27.1993.This
was the maximum day for 1993 with a demand of 6.0 MGD.Actual field data was obtained
from reservoir level. source flow meter.and pressure records. The initial model run produced
system pressures that were lower than field results.A careful review of the original input found
- 66 -
several pipes and pressure reducing valves within the model that were not configured correctly.
Correcting the piping and valves brought the model closer to actual conditions.
SYstem Requirements
In accordance with the Washington state Drinking Water Regulations (WAC 246-}). a
property sized water system must have the capability to provide peak hour demand while
maintaining a 30 psi minimum service pressure throughout the system. In addition,the system
must be capable of providing the maximum fire flow plus the peak hour demand while
maintaining a 20 psi minimum service pressure.
As shown in Figure 4-4.water demand varies throughout the day.During maximum day
conditions there are typically two times at which demand is equal to MOD. The first is shown as
poinf A in the early morning after a low demand period when system storage is being filled. The
second is as point B during the late evening after the high demand period where system storage
is lowest. The most-limiting condition for the system would be at point B where all of the
operating storage has been utilized. At point D.peak hour demand occurs and the operating
storage has been partially utilized.As required by the Drinking Water Regulations. this would be
the point at which the fire flow should be superimposed and the system analyzed.Each
scenario was evaluated at point 0 with the operational storage volume partially utilized at each
reservoir. A drawdown equal to 25%of the MOD was removed proportionally from each of the
system reservoirs.
The location of the fire flow also influenced the analysis. The highest fire flow demand.
5000 GPM was assigned to the Pacific Industrial Park on 152nd Street NE.Determining if the
system can meet such a demand was critical.However. it isalso important that a 1000 GPM fire
flow be available in a residential area for a two-hour period.Each condition was evaluated in
the demand scenarios.
The maximum day demand projections of Chapter 4 were distributed throughout the
network to simulate actual conditions.Domestic demand was distributed evenly throughout the
-67 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
system. Industrial and commercial demand was assigned to the locations of the major industries
listed in Table 4-2.
Demond Scenarios
The principal objective of the Marysville water system model was to determine how
future changes in sources of supply will affect the system. As a result of the Surface Water
Treatment Rule.both Edward Springs and the Stillaguamish Collector may be removed from the
system. If this happens.the Everett pipeline would effectively become the sole source and a
complete reverse in the system flow pattern would occur.To assess the impacts of the reversal.
four scenarios were developed that simulate the source options being considered.
Scenario 1:Everett Pipeline Serving Entire System.As described above.this
scenario evaluates the systemwith the sole source being the Everett pipeline.Sunnyside
Well No. 2 and the Highway 9 well are not included.The current pressure zone
boundaries are maintained with the pipeline supplying the entire system through the 360
zone along the eastern side of the Service area.
Scenario 2:Everett Pipeline and Edward Springs Combined.This scenario
simulates the removal of the Stillaguamish River Source while Edward Springs is
maintained.Such a condition may occur if water quality at Edward Springs meets the
requirements for avoiding filtration and the Stillaguamish is used for industrial water.
limited domestic use.and emergencies.To maintain the desired separation between
Everett and Edward Springs waters. a service area was isolated for Edward Springs.This
area is bounded by the northwest boundaries of the CWSP service area and Old
Highwoy 99. Based on projected demands per acre,this is the maximum area that could
be served by the Edward Springs 2.1 MGD capacity.
Scenario 3:Everett Pipeline.Edward Springs.and the Stillaguamish Collector
Combined.This scenario is similarto the current 1994 system condition and assumes that
a filtration facility will be constructed for the Stillaguamish Collector and Edward Springs
- 68 -
will also be filtered or will meet the requirements for avoiding filtration.The current water
boundaries are maintained:Everett water south of 100th Street NE and Edward Springs-
Stillaguamish water north.
Scenario 4: Everett Pipeline Serving Entire System with Stlllaguamish Collector
Maintained for Industrial and Emergency Use.The potential exists for the Stillaguamish
Collector to be maintained as an unfiltered water source for industries in the northem
portion of the system and for emergencies such as an interruption of the Everett pipeline.
The Stillaguamish transmission main would be isolated and dedicated to industrial use
from the collector to just upstream of the Arlington emergency intertie.This would require
that a new domestic water main be extended to any services that tapped the original
Stillaguamish transmission main. The Everett pipeline would then serve the entire system
and the Arlington intertie while lower quality and less expensive water would be
available for industrial use.
Each of the four scenarios was analyzed using the 1996,2001 and 2016 PHD projections
and the 5000 gpm fire flow requirement.These are the first,fifth and twentieth years,
respectively,of the planning period and allow comparisons between short-term and long-term
needs. An additional assumption in developing the model was the inclusion of the 6MG reservoir
authorized to be constructed in 1995 along lOOth Street NEin the 360 pressurezone.
Model Results
The output from each scenario was carefully reviewed to locate regions of low pressure
and flow.Findings from each are summarized below.
Scenario 1 results show that when system demand reaches 6.0 MGD headlosses are such
that the Edward Springs reservoir cannot be filled from the south.6ther a new pump station
along 100thStreet NE,an additional north-end reservoir, or reconfiguration of pressure reducing
valves along the 240/170 pressurezone boundary will be necessary.
-69 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~---~.------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
At peak hour demands.service pressures were greater than 30 psi throughout the entire
system.This was consistent over the entire planning period from 1994 through 2016.However.
when the 5000 gpm fire flow was included at the Pacific Industrial Pork.service pressures rapidly
dropped below 0 psi north of 1DOth Street NE.South of 1DOth Street NE.service pressures
remained above 20 psi with the exception of the upper elevations of each pressurezone.
Scenario 2 is not feasible under current and future PHD demands.The Edward Springs
reservoiris critical to maintaining pressures in the north end as shown by the total loss of pressure
at approximately 152nd Street NE under this scenario.Pressures do not improve to 30 psi until
approximateiy 140th Street NE.Isoiating Edward Springs to keep Everett water separate will
immediately require construction of a new reservoireast of Smokey Point Boulevard.
The addition of a fire flow demand at Pacific Industrial Park significantly impacted service
pressures throughout the system. At 2016 PHD with fire flow. service pressures less than 20 psi
occur as far south as 72nd Street NE and 60th Drive NE.The vicinity of State Avenue and 100th
Street NE has no pressure at this condition.
Scenario 3 provides the system with a balanced operating condition but requires
filtration of the Stillaguamish Collector and possibly Edward Springs.Under PHD.service pressures
are well above 30 psi throughout the system.TheSmokey Point area maintains service pressures
of 35 psi at the 2016 PHD.However. a 5000 gpm fire flow can not be provided by the
Stillaguamish Collector or the remaining storage available at Edward Springs.Additional storage
in the north end is necessary.
Scenario 4 is essentially identical to Scenario 1 and would require the same
improvements.In addition.a new potable water main would have to be constructed to serve
those customers north of 172nd Street NE that currently top the Stillaguamish transmission main.
Identification of a major industrial water user in the north end would be necessary before
implementing this scenario.
Chapter 6 provides further assessment of these findings and determines what
improvements are required under each scenario and the costs of each.
- 70 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------------------
Chapter 6
PROPOSED SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------------------------_._-
CHAPTER 6
PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
The results of the hydraulic analysisof Chapter 5 gave an indication of how the Marysville
water system will perform under the various source scenarios.This chapter will determine what
improvements would be necessary for each scenario and provide cost estimates and schedules
for implementing the improvements.Each improvement will be classified according to the need
being addressed. Classifications are as follows:
Maintenance Based:Those necessary improvements that are a result of age.wear.or
regulatory requirements.i.e..corroded steel water mains or additional disinfection equipment to
meet requirements of the Surface Water Treatment Rule.
Growth Based:Improvements that are needed as a direct result of increased demand.
i.e..larger water mains or increased pumping station capacity and correcting existing
deficiencies.
Management Based: Nonstructural improvements that are required by requlofions or
would enhance system etficiency.i.e..Wellhead Protection Program or Comprehensive
Performance Evaluation.
Improvements will also be identified according to the time frame in which their need
comes about.The principal time frames to be addressed will be the e-yeor. 20-year,and long-
term, Long-term will be considered as beyond the 20-year time frame.In addition to the
improvements evident from this planning effort.other improvements that were identified in either
the 1982 or 1989 plans that have not been constructed will also be addressed.
CRITERIA
Thecriteria used to identify and schedule system improvements are:
1)Health
Does the improvement provide a sater water supply to the systemcustomers and
support all applicable health regulations and standards?
-71 -
2)Service
Does the improvement increase the level of service to system customers?
Specifically,are service pressures,flows, or water quality upgraded by the
improvement?
3)Fire Protection
Does the improvement enhance fire protection throughout the system?
4)Supply
Does the improvement increase the available water supply?
5)Cost
Can the cost of the improvement be financed by the system?
6)Land Use
Does the improvement conform with land use plans and policies?
In general,the criteria are arranged in order of priority. An improvement that addresses
the health criteria will have priority over one that addresses fire protection.Since most
improvements will address multiple criteria and others may have benefits that don't match the
criteria.some jUdgment will be used in prioritizing improvements.
SOURCE SCENARIO IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements identified for each scenario in Chapter 5 are summarized below.Details
of the cost estimates are provided in the appendix.
Scenario 1
Pump Station:A new pump station along the 240/170 zone boundary near 100th
street NE may be required if 0 new 360 reservoir is not constructed north of 100th
Street.Approximate capacity would be 2.2 MGD with a hydraulic gradeline at
discharge of 255feet.
1996 Cost Estimate $265,000.
-72 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Additional 360 Reservoir:An additional 360 reservoir east ot 67th Avenue NE.
possibly in the vicinity of 132nd 51.NE and the abandoned BUrlington-Northern
right-ot-way,is recommended.An extension of the Everett pipeline from 100th 51.
NE would be necessary for filling. The reservoir would discharge to the 240 zone
by way of an 18-inch main along 132nd 51.NE.This would help to maintain
service pressures at the north end and also assist in filling the Edward Springs
Reservoir.A pressure reducing valve to the 240 pressure zone would be
necessary.Recommended reservoir size is 3.0 MG with 14,700 feet of 24-inch
transmission main.
1996Cost Estimate $4,000,000
Adjusfment of Pressure Reducing Valves: The hydraulic gradeline at 100th Street
NE can be raised by tapping into the new 360 reservoir proposed at 100th Street
NE or east of 67th Avenue NE.Changing the 12-inch main along 100th 51.NE to
the 360 pressurelevel and stepping the pressure down to a hydraulic gradient of
255 at 51st Avenue NE and State Avenue would improve pressures at the north
end.An alternative would be to increase the line along 100th 51.NE to a 255
pressure level without reducing valves to the north. The change may require
individual PRY's on all service connections along l00th St.PRY's on all distribution
mains to the south that are to remain in the 170zone would also be required.
As an interim step before another reservoir is added in the 240 service
area,the pressure zone separation could be moved north to approximately
122nd Street.This scheme would then have Everett water serving south of 122nd
and Edwards Spring/Stillaguamish Collector north. Three new pressure reducing
stations would be required.
J 996Cost Estimate $251.000
- 73 -
Addlflonal Everett Pipeline:Without the Stillaguamish or Edward Springs sources.
demand projections indicate Marysville will have fUlly utilized its share of the
Everell pipeline by the year 2010.Prior to 2010. in accordance with the JOA.
Marysville should begin planning for construction of a second pipeline.The likely
route would be the East Lake Stevens alignment described as Phase II in the
Coordinated Water System Plan.
1996 Cost Estimate $10.800.000
In addition to the construction of a second pipeline.the City of Everell is in the
preliminary planning stages of improving its regional system. Projects that may
benefit Marysville include filter plant expansion.north/south cross-tie between the
two pipeline corridors.Panther Creek screen house modifications and Pipeline
NO.6.
2001 First Phase Cost Estimate $2.700.000
Scenario 2
Addillonal360 Reservoir:Without the Edward Springs reservoir.service pressures in
the north 240 zone proposed to be served by Everell water cannot be
maintained and.in effect.6.0 MG of storage is removed from the main system.
The same additional 360 reservoir described for Scenario 1 increased to 5.0 MG
would be necessary.
1996 Cost Estimate $4.712.000
Scenario 3
Filtration Plant:Continued utilization of Edward Springs and the Stillaguamish
Collector will require filtration and disinfection.A single facility or two separate
facilities with a total capacity of 6.8 MGD would fully utilize the water rights for
each source. A conventional direct filtration process with pretreatment steps of
chemical coagulation.rapid mixing.flocculation and sedimentation followed by
- 74 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 75 -
Scenaria4
filtration would be an appropriate design.Other processes such as package
purposes cost estimates for a direct filtration facility are as follows.
1996Cost Estimates
$3.000.000
$2.700.000
$5.700.000
Separate Facilities
Edward Springs
Stillaguamish
Total
Option 3:Service Area Adjustment/Common Service Area.Service to one area would
be by both purveyors. Marysville would provide industrial water and the other purveyor
potable water.A modification to the CWSP would be required.
The same improvements itemized for Scenario 1 would be necessary for Scenario
Annual Operations &Maintenance for Separate Facilities:
Edward Springs $462.000
Stillaguamish $450.000
plants.membrane filtration.and/or cartridge filters may also be appropriate
depending on the raw water quality and acceptance by the DOH. For planning
Single Facility
Cost Estimate $9.384.000
Annual Operations &Maintenance $565.000
outside the City's coordinated service area.the following options could be considered:
Option 2:Service Within Transmission Pipeline Corridors would allow Marysville to serve
within another purveyor's territory from its Stillaguamish transmission main.Section III.4.C
of the Coordinated Water System Plan recognizes such a service connection.Requires
an agreement between Marysville and the purveyor indicating that such a connection is
acceptable.
water for industrial purposes would be the responsibility of the industry. If the facility was
Option 1:Interim Service Agreement would allow Marysville to operate a utility within the
designated area of another purveyor. Requires an agreement and assumes the other
purveyor would eventually provide the service.
parallel main for potable water service would be required to serve those connections
currently on the Stillaguamish main. The transmission facilities for utilization of untreated
4. plus isolation of the Stillaguamish transmission main for industrial use. A new 8-inch
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Option 4: Automatic Procedure would require a letter from fhe ofher purveyor to fhe
customer indicating they are unable to serve. The customer can then seek water from
Marysville. A written agreement for the service is entered into between Marysville and
the customer.
1996Cost Estimate $1.250.000
ADDITIONAL SOURCE IMPROVEMENTS
As indicated in Chapter 3, the quality of water produced by the Highway 9 Well does not
meet State DOH standards for iron and manganese.If the well is operated manually for
emergency purposes. it is still of benefit to the water utility. In addition.the well can be used to
meet the irrigation demands for the City's Cedar Crest Golf Course. Byso doing.the demand for
potable water could be reduced accordingly.
It is recommended that the Highway 9 Well remain in service to provide emergency
needs and that it be considered as a seasonal source for the irrigation needs at the Golf Course.
Appropriate modifications to controls and piping would need to be made.An engineering
study is recommended to report costs and alternatives.
ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS
Unrelated to the source scenarios are improvements in the storage and distribution
tacilities and implementation of new programs.These improvements are necessary due to
growth,maintenance and regulatory requirements.Descriptions of improvements with cost
estimates and a schedule are provided below.
Storage
As was demonstrated in Chapter 4, the Marysville system is currently operating in
a storage deficit.Construction in 1995 of the planned 6.0 MG 100th Street reservoir will
deiay the need for additional storage until 2002. However.depending on the source
scenario selected,it may be prudent for the City to construct another 3.0 MG reservoirat
the north end of the system.(This would be appropriate for Scenarios 1 or 4.) An
- 76 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
additional north end 360 reservoir would improve pressures in the 240 zone and also
maintain a hydraulic gradeline sufficient to fill the Edward Springs Reservoir.Such a
reservoir would have to be constructed prior to the year 2000 to keep pace with the
projected storage need.
In the longer term. the City should plan for additional storage in the 490 zone.
Projections from Chapter 4 show that the 490 zone storage requirement is currently
greater than the 1.1 MG available in the Highway 9 Reservoir.Additional 490 storage is
available from the 3.5 MG Cedarcrest Reservoir by way of the Cedarcrest booster pump
station. In general.it is more economical and reliable to have storage available that
can be filled during off-peak hours rather than rely on a booster pump to come on-line
during peak demands.An additional 3.0 MG of storage in the 490zone is recommended
for the year 2002.or before.if growth in the zone continues at its current pace.
Shortly after construction of the Highway 9 reservoir in 1981 it became evident
that a higher hydraulic gradeline was necessary to properly serve customers in the direct
vicinity. By raising the water surface by as much as 20 feet (to 510)better service
pressures could be maintained.The increase would require raising the Highway 9
Reservoir by the same amount.This could be accomplished by disconnecting the
existing steel shell from the tank foundation.jacking the shell up and adding incremental
plate sections below.Increasing the structure's height would change the seismic design
requirements.An increase in the footing size would be likely.Sufficient space is available
at the Highway 9 site to undertake such a project.The timing for the change would be
dictated by the 490zone development.if development is in the lower elevations of the
pressurezone, the change may not be necessary for 10to 15years.Raising the Highway
9 Reservoir in conjunction with construction of the 3.0 MG reservoir after 2002 is an
appropriate long-term plan. Cost estimates for the storage improvements are shown in
Table 6-1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 _
- 77 -
- 78 -
Distribution
Pump Stations
was the only source to serve the eastside 490 and 360zones.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proj.No.Description an~'Purpose Size 1996 Cost
ST-l roon-St.NE360Reservoir 6.0MG $2.200.000
ST-2 North End 360 Reservoir and
14,700 LF 24"Main,near 132nd
St.NE and abandoned BNRR 3.0MG $4,000,000
ST-3 Raise Highway 9 Reservoir to 1.0MG
510 Water Surface (Add'il $525,000
ST-4 North End 490 Reservoir 3.0MG $1.300,000
ST-5 Edward Sorinas Reservoir Liner -$700,000
around Whiskey Ridge along the Olympic pipeline right-of-way is proposed.The next extension
is scheduled for construction in 1995.To ovoid loss of pressure due to higher elevations a route
Ave.NE intersection to the 84th St.NE/83rd Ave.NE intersection which has been authorized and
operation of the lOOth St.Reservoir.The first extension recommended is from the 64th st. NE/83rd
determine if there is sufficient savings to warrant the cost of the modifications.
The hydraulic grade line of the regionai supply line has a minimum water surface of 440
The Marysville distribution system is generally in good condition due to a series of water
The Cedarcrest Pump Station is supplied by the 170 zone Cedarcrest Reservoir and
Table6-1
STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS/COSTS
by analysis of the hydraulic model output and/or were identified in past comprehensive plans.
The listing isin order of priority.Extension of the Everett pipeline is necessary for proper long-term
main replacements during the past ten years. Table 6-2 lists improvements that were identified
supply line at a higher suction pressure.A possibility exists to make the pump station more
at its point of delivery,or approximately 400 at the intersection of 64th Street NE and 83rd
pumps to the 490zone Highway 9 Reservoir.Priorto the regionai supply main,this pump station
energy efficient by a net reduction in the pumping head of 230 feet.A study should be made to
allows the opportunity to supply the Cedarcrest Pump Station with water from the regional
Avenue.It is possibie to now directly serve the 360 zone from the regional supply.This.in turn,
----------------------------------------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
would be from the 84th St.NE/83rd Ave.NE intersecfion to the proposed lOOth 51.NEreservoir
along a due-north alignment.This extension would require easements across private property.
This improvement has likewise been authorized and is scheduled for construction in 1996.
A tie-in to the firstsupply line extension near the Cedarcrest Reservoiris proposed to assist
in filling the reservoir.Right-of-way has been dedicated for the future extension of Grove Street
which terminates at the Olympic pipeline right-of-way.A tie-in to the Everett supply extension
with a new main along Grove Street to the Puget Sound Power and Ught/Olympic pipeline right-
of-way would allow direct inflow to Cedarcrest.A pressure reducing valve at the reservoir would
be necessary.
The remaining distribution improvements listed in Table 6-2 complete loops and replace
undersized moins in the system.These are lower in priority relative to the Everett extensions and
are scheduled later in the six-year schedule.
Table 6-2
DISTRIBUTiON SYSTEM iMPROVEMENTS/COSTS
Proj.No.Description and Purpose Approx.Pipe Size 1996
Unear Ft.Clnchesl Cost
D1 Intersection of 64th St.NE and 83rd Ave NE
8900 24 $1,800,000
to intersection of 84th 51.NE and 83rd Ave.
NE.via 83rd Ave.and Olympic Pipeline
Row.Provides extension of Everett
transmission main.
D2 Intersection of 84th St.NE and 83rd Ave.
4600 20
$830,000
NE to proposed 100th St.NE reservoir.
Continues extension of Everett trans-
mission main to 100th St.NE reservoir.
D3 Cedarcrest Reservoir to Project No. D I via 2000 24
$438.000
Grove Street extension.Assists in supply-
ina Cedarcrest Reservoir.
D4 lOOth Street Reservoir to the intersection of 5200
24 $1,000.000
67th Avenue NE and 100lhStreet.
D5 Extension of 64th St.NE main east to 71 st 250 10 $90,000
Ave. NE with PRY installation. Improves
flow from 360 to 240pressurezone.
D6 Replacement of existing 6-inch main from 300 12 $30.000
intersection of State Ave.and 100lh St.NE
to 300 feet east. Eliminatesrestriction and
improves flow to north 240zone.
• 79 -
Regulatory Programs.The federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulations and the
Washington Deportment of Health are bringing on new program requirements to improve the
planning and operations of public water systems.The following describes those that Marysville
can anticipate and will require a commitment of capitol.
Wellhead Protection Program.Section 1428 of the 1986 Amendments to the federal Safe
Drinking Water Act mandates that every state develop a wellhead protection program.In
Washington state,the govemor designated the State Deportment of Health (DOH) as lead
agency for wellhead protection program development and administration.The Safe Drinking
Water Act requires that all federally defined public water systems (Group A systems)using either
wells or springs as their source impiement a wellhead protection program.In Washington stote.
local wellhead protection programs are to be included in the water system plan and sholl.at a
minimum,include the following elements:
• A delineated wellhead protection area for each well.wellfield,or spring;
• An inventory within the wellhead protection area of all potential sourcesof
groundwater contamination;
• A management pion to reduce the likelihood that potential contaminant
sourceswill pollute the drinking water supply;
•Contingency plans for providing alternate sources of drinking water in the event
that contamination does occur;and
• Inclusion of public participation while the program is developing.
All groundwater based Group A systems will be required to complete a hydrogeologic
characterization as on element of the wellhead protection program.This hydrogeologic
characterization consists of two components:a vulnerability assessment and on assessment of
the circuiarity of the zone of contribution.The findings trom the assessments.plus system size,
determine the minimum acceptable delineation method.For most systems a Calculated Fixed
Radius method may be employed.
- 80 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
---------------------------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Systems using the Calculated Rxed Radius method are required to complete the initial
delineation.including boundary mapping.by July 1995.Systems using more sophisticated.site-
specific modeling approaches are provided two years to complete the delineation process.
Marysville will need to develop a Wellhead Protection Program for the Sunnyside.
Highway 9.Lake Goodwin.and Edward Springs wells. plus the Edward Springs to maintain them
as approved sources.
1996 Cost Estimate $204.000
Edward Springs Surface Water Influence Monitoring.Water temperature and particle
monitoring are necessary to determine if a source is influenced by surface waters. The DOH is
requesting that water purveyors monitor groundwater sources tor a one-year period to collect
sufficient data to determine if the source is influenced by surface water.Water temperature
and particle analyses are the primary criteria. If the water temperature data has a distinct
seasonal pattern of warming in summer and cooling in winter.surface water influence is
occurring.The results of a particle analysis showing plant matter or insects present would also
indicate surface water influence.The level and frequency of monitoring required has yet to be
determined by DOH. However, it is likely that City staff can conduct the monitoring.Some
investment in monitoring and sampling equipment may be necessary. A budget amount of
$5.000 should be sufficient to cover these costs.
1996 Cost Estimate $5.000
Edward Springs Watershed Control Program.As detailed in WAC 246-290-135 Source
Protection.a watershed control program is required for any system using surface waters or
groundwater influenced sources. Since a level of control has been established by fencing,and
a watershed control program is a required element for avoiding filtration,preparation of a
detailed program is recommended.The program would be updated every six years and would
be included as part of the Comprehensive Water Plan.Completion of the program is
recommended by the end of 1996.
1996 Cost Estimate $51.000
-81 -
A summary of the additional recommended improvements is presented in Table 6-3.
Improvements for the first six years are scheduled as recommended.Improvements beyond six
years are not scheduled in a specific year.All costs shown are in 1996 dollars.Chapter seven
will determine the City's capability to finance the first six years of the program.
Table 6-3
SCENARIO 1
RECOMMENDED SIX-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM·
Project
No.lmnrovement 1996 1997 1998
1999 2000 2001 2002+
ST-1 l00th 51.6.0 MG Reservoir $2,200
0-1 Everett Pipeline Extension -
64th 51.NE/83rd Ave. NEto
$1,80084th51.NE/83rd Ave.NE
0-2 Everett Pipeline Extension
84th St.NE/83rd Ave. NEto
$830100thSt.Reservoir
P-l Wellhead Protection Proaram $204
P-2 Edward Springs Surface Water
Influence Manitorina $5
0-3 Cedarcrest Reservoirto
Olympic Pipeline ROW via
$438Grove51.
0-4 100th 51.Reservoirto 67th Ave.$1,000
P-3 Edward Springs Watershed
Control Program (Dependent
$51on DOH determinationl
0-5 Extensionof 64th 51.NE Main to
71stAve.NE $90
0-6 Replace undersized main from
$30State Ave. 300 feet east
ST-2 New North End 3.0 MG Reservoir
$4.000at132nd/BNRR
ST-3 Raise Highway 9 Reservoirto
$525545WaterSurface
ST-4 North End 490 Reservoir
$1,300
ST-5 Edward sonncs ReservoirLiner $700
5-1 Everett Renional Phase I $930 $900
$900
TOTALS $6,273 $204 $141 $930 $5,600
$1,425 $1,300
• All costs in thousands of dollars;adjusted to 1996 dollars.
- 82 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·....._...~--------------------....J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUPPLY TOJOA PARTICIPANTS
Thereare two other participants in the regional water supply pipeline.Public UtilityDistrict
No. 1 of Snohomish County and the Tulalip Tribes.The JOA is silent on how the water is to be
fransmilted from fhe pipeline to the service area of each participant.In the case of the P.U.D .•it
is assumed fhat the District will construct a dedicated pipeline from the regional main to its
service area.Two known points for future service connections are shown in Rgure 6-1.
Service to the Tuialip Tribes could be by the construction of (1)a dedicated pipeline.(2)
utilizing the existing main capacity of the City's system. (3)additional joint participation facilities
or a combination of the three methods.The City's existing system has limited capacity.The
maximum water that can be delivered to two proposed connection points isshown in Rgure
6-1. The total average daily supply is713 gpm.This is based on the principle that the flow would
not depress the pressures to existing customers. The water available at the time of maximum
demand is542 gpm.This is based upon the service pressure to existing customers being no less
than 35 psi.
The available water to the two proposed 170 zone connections is less than the Tribes'
future needs;therefore.a future dedicated main must be constructed or improvements made to
the existing 170 service zone.Another possibility exists to supplement the Tribes'170zone from
the north 240zone. The piping network to accomplish this alternative is discussed as follows.
Water service to the Tribes'116th Street NE connection is from the City's 240 pressure
zone.This zone is not currently a part of the regional supply facilities and is not included in the
JOA. For the Tribes to receive service in the higher pressure zone. the joint participation lines
shown on Figure 6-1 will need to be constructed.More than half the facilities shown have been
constructed or will be completed prior to J 996.
Once 240 pressure service is available to the Tulalip Tribes.it can then be reduced and
used to supplement the two low flow connections at 88th Street NE ond 27th Avenue NE.
Storage for equolization.emergency.and fire will be provided by the Tulalip Tribes.
- 83 -
--- ---- - --- - --..- - -
4010 STONEWAY NORTH
SEATlLE.WASliINGTON 9810J
(206)632-2••'
JANUARY,1995
-I
7'1 ~!.:
.1",,.:
,'\1
HAMMOND.COLLIER &WADE-
LIVINGSTONE ASSOOATES.INC.
REGIONAL ALTERNAT1VES
CfTV OF MARVSVLLE
1:
,
'-'---
""--tl--.-
\
\
\
l
\
.-t
;
\
---.j
r:)
.-.."
;i
~----~-,.-+-:
!
i
j
----1-...
j
;
!
i
,----------------------------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECOMMENDATION
Reviewing the cost estimates for each scenario and considering other factors.such as
annual operation and maintenance costs and source capacities.we recommend that
Marysville prepare to operate under Scenario 3. as long as the Edward Springs and Stillaguamish
sources can meet DOH water quality criteria.However.the service area forthe Everett pipeline
should be extended north of JOOfh Street NE as needed.The Edward Springs and the
Stillaguamish wells would still be utilized as a source north of lOOth St.NE and would be
extensively monitored for a minimum of six months. The additional coliform.turbidity.and
disinfection residual monitoring would determine whether the two sources can remain unfiltered.
The first improvement under this scenario should be the construction of the 100th St.NE
360 reservoir as planned.The second improvement would be a north end 360 reservoir in the
vicinity of 132nd St. NE and the abandoned BUrlington Northern right-of-way.Both reservoirs
should be completed within the first six years of the planning period (1996-2001)to ensure that
sufficient storage is available for future growth.Construction of the north end reservoir will assist
in maintaining service pressures in the system north of 100th street when Edward Springs and the
Stillaguamish Collector are off-line. The recommended six-year improvement schedule for the
scenario is shown in Table 6-3.
By 1999 the City should begin planning for a second Everett pipeline approximately in the
year 2010.or construct filtration. as needed.for Edward Springs and the Stillaguamish Collector.
A comparison of the annual costs of each option is presented in Chapter 7. If filtration is not
provided,further investigation of Scenario 4, with the Stillaguamish Collector providing non-
potable water to an industrial development,is advised.Figure 6-2 shows the improvements
necessary.This figure isa full-size map folded in the back pocket.
Scenario 2 is not a feasible operating condition under current or future demands.
Inclusion of the Edward Springs Reservoir is critical to the system storage.
-85 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
Chapter 7
FINANCING SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER 7
FINANCING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
The improvements proposed in Chapter 6 cannot be compieted without a thorough
analysisof financing options.This chapter will present the current City of Marysville rate structure
and will develop a schedule for the proposed improvements.
Water Rates and Fees
The principal source of revenue for the Marysville water system is user rates. A rate
structure with a bimonthly allowance based on meter size and an overage charge for water use
in excess of the allowance was established by Ordinance No. 2109in 1996.The rate structure is
summarized in Table 7-1 .
Table 7-1
WATER USER RATE STRUCTURE
Connection Bimonthly
Classification or Meter Consumption City Rate CWSP Rate OCWSP Rate
Size Allowance (Ga!.)Bimonthly Bimonthly Bimonthly
Multiple Residential
Units (per dweliing unit)6,000 $16.50 $24.50 $33.00
5/8"x 3/4"6,000 $16.50 $24.50 $33.00
3/4"x 3/4"9,000 $21.75 $32.30 $43.50
1"15,000 $32.25 $47.90 $64.50
1-1/2"30,000 $58.50 $86.90 $117.00
2"48,000 $90.00 $133.70 $180.00
3"75,000 $137.25 $203.90 $274.50
4"150,000 $268.50 $398.90 $537.00
6"360,000 $636.00 $944.90 $1,272.00
8"450,000 $793.50 $1,178.90 $1,587.00
Overage Rate
Consumption of water in excess of the bimonthly allowance specified above shali be
charged at a rate ot one dollar. seventy-five cents ($1.75)per one thousand galions of overage
within the City,two dollars sixty cents 1$2.60)per one thousand galions of overage within the
CWSP,and a rate of three dollars fifty cents ($3.50)per one thousand gallons of overage outside
CWSP.
-86 -
service connection a reduced fee is charged.The schedule of fees is shown below.
the service connection and meter. If a request is made for a meter installation on an existing
Automatic sprinkler systems that have a service connection separate from the domestic
systemare charged a monthly rate based on the size of service line.Charges are summarized
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
$ 85.00
$105.00
$130.00
n/a
n/a
n/a
Drop·ln Only
$27.00
$34.00
$42.00
$53.00
$69.00
$87.00
$100.00
B)·monthly Charge
$26/year/hydrant
$26/year/standpipe
No charge
- 87 -
Rate for Meter
Installation by City
$300.00
$300.00
$325.00
$800.00
$900.00
Cost of labor and materials.
but not less than $2.000.00
2-inch
3-inch
4-inch
6-inch
8-inch
1O-inch
12-inch
Private hydrants
Wet standpipe systems
Dry standpipe systems
Size of
Sprinkler Service Une
5/8"x 3/4"
3/4"x 3/4"
I"
1-1/2"
2"
over 2"
Rate for Full
Meter Size
When a new service connection is requested.the City charges a fee for installation of
below.
In addition to user rates. fees for fire protection.automatic sprinkler systems.and service
installations contribute to revenues. Private fire protection rates for properties inside or outside of
the corporate city limits are as follows:
Summer Surcharge for Residential Users
Water consumption by single family and multiple residential units beyond 15.000 gallons
bimonthly per unit shall be surcharged to 150%of the normal end rate.The surcharge shall apply
for the bimonthly billsof May/June.June/July. July/August.and August/September.
- 88 -
statement was obtained from the official statement for the 1993 bond issue.
Capital Improvement Charges
The City of Marysville combines its water and sewer finances into one Utility Fund.
$0.83per sq. ft.
floor space
$930 per unit
Rural WaterCity Wafer
$715 per unit
$0.64 per sq. ft.
floor space
Commercial and industrial units
and schools, churches,etc.
Type of Connection
Residential living units,including
multi-unit housing,mobile homes,
and motels
New service connections are also charged a fee to cover the benefits gained by past
shown in Table 7-2, with the proportional share of the water revenues separate.The income
and operating expenses. The utility fund income statement for the years 1987 through 1992 is
Historically,water revenues have accounted for 70 percent of the combined utility revenues
Historical Financial Data
capital improvement charges.
dedicated to funding future capital improvements to the system. The following are the current
portion of the previously existing capital assets of the system. Monies generated by the fee are
improvements to the system.This fee is considered an equity payment by new customers for a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The historical expense data shown in Table 7-2 include the costs of monitoring under
current requirements.Within the next five years, the Phase 2 and Phase 5 SOC/IOC rules and the
Department of Health conducted a water systems needs assessment study to estimate the
requirements under these rules will increase the system operating expenses, The Washington
19871988198919901991
.89 -
1992
Table7-2
MARYSVILLE HISTORICAL UTILITY FUND
REVENUE/EXPENSE STATEMENT
(In thousands ofdollars)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------1
decreased with increasing population due to economics of scale,
Disinfection By-product will also become law in Washington state,Additional monitoring
monitoring costs associated with SDWA compliance,The assessment took into account actual
administration for systems serving 25 to 10,000 population.Over this range,costs generally
SDWA Monitoring Costs
iaboratory analyses costs plus ancillary costs associated with sample collection and
I User rates.interest revenue,&other operating revenues
'Operations and maintenance. purchasedwater.taxes.and benefit payments
31nterest and othernon-operating revenues less debt interest.fiscalchorqes.ondother non-operating
expenses
'First liendebt. secondliendebt,1991 bond issue,and 1992 bond issue
Operating Revenues I 4,687 3.713 2.397 2,199 2,532 2,420
Water Fraction 3.281 2,599 1.678 1.539 1.772 1,694
Operaflng Expenses~2,262 1.998 1,738 1.365 1.217 1,009
Water Fraction 1.583 1.399 1.217 956 852 706
Nan-operaflng Revenue &Expenses"l.504 1,252 1.878 1.771 38 18
Waterfraction 1,053 876 1.315 1.240 27
13
Assessment Income 321 393 447 585 645 597
Water Fraction 225 275 313 410 452 418
Net Revenue AvailabletorDebt Service 4.250 3.360
2,966 3.190 1.998 2.026
Water Fraction 2,975 2.352 2,076 2,233 1.399 1,418
Total Debt"2,290 1.514 1,033 957 971 984
Annual Debt Service Coverage 1.86 2,22 2,87 3,33 2,06 2,06
Water Customers
(at 12/31)10.824 10,580 10,435 9,824 9,261 8,930
Sewer Customers
(at 12/31)6,755 6,537 6.429 5.861 5,360 5.099
7-4 lists the estimated per connection costs.
particular systems and required monitoring due to particular forms of treatment that systems
Since the Marysville system serves a population of approximafely 35,000,it was assumed
certain number of years.Additional costs are costs associated with repeat samples and
$0.18
0.76
$0.94
Probability x Cost
$0.05
0.29
$0.34
Cost
$0.15
0.59
- 90 -
Violation Probability
Phase2/5 SOC 30%
Dis.By-Products 50%
Total Vulnerability Cost
Phase 2/5 SOC's and ioc's
Radionuclides
Total Baseline Cost
Vulnerability Based Monitoring:
Baseline Additional Monitoring:
percentages of systems in each category that will face the specific additional costs from each
calculated to be the additive costs resulting from a violation.Also given are the predicted
Table 7-3
YEARLY SDWA MONITORING COSTS PER CONNECTION
rule based on historical data and assumptions mode by the DOH Drinking Water Program. Table
costsare spread over the some time periods as the initial and vulnerability based costs and were
may employ (e.g..disinfection).Similarto initial costs.vulnerability based costsare spread over a
systems are predicted to incur.These percentages are based on vulnerability assessments of
(see rules below).Vulnerability based monitoring costs are initial costs that only a percentage of
100%of systems statewide will be facing.These baseline costs are spread over a certain number
increased frequencies resulting from a violation or presence of contamination.These additional
of years taking into account reduced sampling frequencies and appropriate sampling cycles
that the Deportment of Health estimates for 10,000 population would be comparable and
monitoring,and additional monitoring.Baseline initial monitoring costs are minimum costs that
costs have been placed into three categories:baseline initial monitoring,VUlnerability based
would also provide a conservative estimate. The SDWA monitoring requirements and associated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-91 -
projections.
•Assume that a minimum debt service coverage of 2.0will be required.
and are discussed in the following section.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Probability x Cost
$0.14
0.20
0.44
0.22
$1.00
Cost
$2.83
2.02
1.47
2.16
Requirement Probability
Phase 2/5 SOC 5%
Phase 2/5 IOC 10%
Radionuclides 30%
Dis.By-Products 10%
Total Additional Cost
•Assume that annual water operating revenues will be $388 per connection annually,
based on the average of the years 1987 through 1992 with 4 percent annual inflation.
These assumptions are applied to the Chapter 4 data and presented in Table 7-4.It is
Total Annual Cost per Connection $2.28
Adjusted for 1992-1996 Inflation $2.56
•Assume that annual water operating and non-operating expenses will be $291 per
connection for a net revenue of $97 per connection.
•Assume that the water operations will continue to contribute approximately 70
percent of the utility fund revenues and account for the same percentage of
expenses.
Table 7-2 and the service population projections of Chapter 4 can be combined to
These additional monitoring costs for Marysville are taken into account in the funding
Additional Monitorinq:
proposed improvements for the first six years of the plan. Several financing options are available
evident from Table 7-3 that financing and/or a revised rate structure will be required to meet the
project revenue are as follows.
develop revenue projections for the first six years of the planning period.Assumptions used to
Projected Revenue Requirements
- 92 -
methods.
on city residents since the systemalso serves non-city residents.
the tax revenue of a city is a direct pledge against the bond.Therefore. the interest rates are
200120001999199819971996
Table 7·4
REVENUE PROJECTIONS
(In thousands of 1996dollars)
combined water and sewer system.Financially-sound water systems can sell revenue bonds
There ore several methods of financing water system improvements:general obligation
the city approaches its legal debt limitation more rapidly than with revenue bonds.Even at
Revenue Bonds.This type of bond is secured solely by the revenue developed from the
General Obligation senes.General Obligation Bonds ore sold and then repaid from the
based upon the assessed valuation of the property he owns.One disadvantage of general
Further. the bonds ore only supported by the residents of the city.This causes an unfair burden
lower interest rates. the general obligation bonds will restrict the city in making other municipal
obligation bonds is that the amount is included as a part of the total city debt.Consequently.
bonds.revenue bonds.cash financing.State matching monies or a combination of these
improvements that could only be financed through the sale of general obligation bonds.
normally less for general obligation bonds than for revenue bonds.A vote of the residents is
required for the sale of general obligation bonds.and the obligation of each property owner is
taxes collected by the City of Marysville. The purchaser bases the interest rates on the fact that
Methodsof Financing
Proiected Service Connections 13.000 13.300 13.600 13.900 14.200
14.500
Revenue @ $388/connection
(thousandsl $5.044 $5.160 $5.277 $5.393 $5.510 $5.626
Expense @ $291 /cannection
(thousandsJ $3.783 $3.870 $3.958 $4.045 $4.132 $4.220
Net available for improvements
(thousandsl $1.261 $1.290 $1.319 $1.348 $1.378 $1.406
Scheduled Improvement Costs
(thousandsl $6.273 $204 $141 $30 $4.700 $1.225
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 93 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---1
with interest rates often as low as those obtained from general obligation bonds.Revenue
bonds do not affect the legal limitation of bonded indebfedness of a city.and are normally a
fasfer method of securing funds for major water improvements.since an election is not required.
A city ordinance which stipulates the exact facilities to be constructed.is necessary for
saie of revenue bonds.This ordinance also specifies that the water rates maintained must
provide adequate revenue to payoff the bonds and resulting interest costs. It also normally
includes a stipulation that the city must develop additional revenue coverage to insure that
repayment of the bonds can be made.The amount of coverage varies with the financial
capability of each system.
Cash Financing.This method involves setting aside a certain amount of the net income
each year to finance improvements.Cash financing is sometimes used for well-developed
systems where large capital improvements.new storage facilities. source development or
transmission mains are not necessary. TheCity of Marysville is estimated to have an unassigned
income.in addition to the capital investment charges of $50.000-$150.000 per year. Assuming
that it is desirable to make all the proposed improvements shown in Table 6-3 by 2000. the yearly
cash.exciuoinq the capital investment charges necessary. is approximately $1.000.000.
Funding Programs
Several state and federal funding programs are available which provide loans and
grants to eligible municipalities and utility districts. The amount of funding is often linked to
annual state and federal budgets and fluctuates from year to year with changes in legislative
agencies.Currently active programs and descriptions are as follow.
Public Works Trust Fund.Administered by the Department of Community
Development (State) to provide low-cost loans for public works improvements.primarily
those that repair or upgrade existing facilities. A minimum of 10%of the total project cost
must be provided by the applicant with conditions of the loan dependent on the
applicant's share.Funds are disbursed annually from a pool of approximately $51 million.
A limit of $2.5 million per jurisdiction is mandated.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------------------------------------------------
Community Development Block Grant. Also administered on the state level by
the Department of Community Development to provide grant for public facilities.
economic development.housing and public service projects that benefit low and
moderate income households.Funds are federally administered to the state by the
Housing and Urban Development program.The annual amount available is $8.4 million
with a limit of $500.000 per grant.
Community Economic and Revitalization Boord. State loans and grants
administered by the Department of Trade and Economic Development.The purpose of
the funding isto provide low-interest loans and grants to public entities for construction of
public facilities that are necessary for a specific private sector development.
Deparfment of Healfh. Grants administered by the State Department of Health to
upgrade existing systems.insure effective management and improve water conservation
efforts. Eligible applicants are municipalities.utility districts.and Indian tribes.Annual
funds available are appropriated by the state legislature. None have been
appropriated for the current biennium.The program will be reviewed again and possibly
funded in 1997.
Washingfon State Energy Office. Efficient use of energy at water supply.
distribution.and treatment facilities is promoted through technical assistance from the
Bonneville Power Administration. Assistance with ieak detection and pump efficiency
testing are principal activities.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Marysville water system is in good operating condition:the utility fund is financially
sound. As such.eligibility for the grant and loan programs described above is limited.Water
and sewer utility revenue bonds are a more feasible option.TheCity has excellent ratings on all
of its current outstanding bonds. In April of 1993 a new issue for $22.8million in water and sewer
revenue bonds was released.Advanced refunding of all outstanding water and sewer revenue
- 94 -
bonds was accomplished by the new issue with savings realized through lower interest rates.
Future issues are also planned,specifically an additional $1 million of water and sewer revenue
parity bonds and $3.7million of limited tax general obligation bonds.These funds will be partially
committed to sewer improvements and other capital improvements.Completing the 100th
Street reservoir and the other recommended water system improvements will require additional
financing.
An option for grant assistance may be available with the Centennial Clean Water Fund.
Activities that protect groundwater are eligible for 75%grants or 100%loans. Both the Wellhead
Protection Program and the Edward Springs Watershed Protection Program would be eligible. It
is recommended that the City submit applications for funding in either the fiscal year 1995 or
1996 cycles.
- 95 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Chapter 8
OPERATIONS PROGRAM
~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER 8
OPERATIONS PROGRAM
The City of Marysville has implemented an Operations and Maintenance program that
gUides the day-to-day operation of the water system.This chapter describes the program
elements.
Operationsand Maintenance
The City is developing an operations and maintenance program in accordance with the
recommendations of the 1989 Comprehensive Water System Plan prepared by James M.
Montgomery Consulting Engineers. Inc. These recommendations are presented below.
1)Monitoring and Control.The City's day-to-day operation of the water system is
augmented by the telemetry control panel at the Utility's offices.The panel monitors the
status of the sources of supplies. the well pumps.reservoir levels.and flow from each
source of supply.The operators of the water system have the ability through the
telemetry system to control the pumps at the Stillaguamish Ranney Collector and the
booster pumps at the Cedarcrest Reservoir.The Sunnyside well NO.2 pump and Lake
Goodwin well pump are controlled by reservoir levels. All pumps have the ability to be
operated manually In the case of an emergency.
2) Water System Maps.The City maintains a 1"=800'scale map of the distribution
system.This map should be updated routinely with the addition of water lines. hydrants.
and valves. The City should also maintain as-built drawings as changes to the existing
system are made.All as-built drowlnqs should indicate the size of the water line. the
location of service connections.the locations of valves and the normal operating
position of the valves.
3)Valves. The City should establish a record keeping system for the valves in the
water distribution system. A regular schedule for exercising the valves and maintenance
should be developed.Valves greater than or equal to 8" in size should be checked
- 96 -
annually.and those smaller than 8"every two years.Annual maintenance should
include visual inspection of each valve box.and if necessary the box should be raised
and the lid replaced if damaged.The valve should also be operated between the fully
open position and fhe fully closed position. The valve maintenance schedule should
contain the location of the valves by address and physical description.manufacturers
recommended maintenance check list.normal operating position of the valve. the
depth of the valve nut.and the number of turns required to fully operate the valve.
4) Pump Maintenance.Pump maintenance for the submersible well pumps at the
Stillaguamish. Sunnysidewell No.2 and Lake Goodwin well and the booster pumps at the
Cedarcrest Reservoir should follow the pump manufacturer's recommendations for
routine maintenance.A schedule with the routine maintenance items listed should be
developed and followed for each pump.In addition to checking for wear on the pump
and pump performance.it is recommended that the suction and discharge pressures.
and flow rate for the pumps be checked periodically and compared to the original
pump performance curve.
5)PRY Maintenance.The downstream PRY pressure setting should be checked at a
minimum of twice a year. In the case of the PRVs at the 240/170 zone interface.the
pressure sustaining setting and any closed valves should also be checked.The valves
should also be exercised between fully opened and fully closed twice yearly. The valve
can be exercised by venting and pressurizing the top chamber.The PRY's pressure
settings can be checked when the winter and summer pressure settings adjustments are
made.
6)Reservoir Maintenance.Routine maintenance of the reservoirs consists primarily
of visual inspection.The water level gauges.overflow.reservoir facility locks and fences
should be examined daily for leaks and vandalism. The condition of the interior paint of
the Sunnyside.Highway 9.and Kellogg-Marsh standpipes should be evaluated annually.
- 97 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Thestructural support.foundation.and exterior point should be checked carefully.and a
record kept for all of the City's reservoir facilities. Pointing or any other maintenance
work on the reservoir interiors should be planned so that the reservoir is removed from
service during the lower water demand periods.
Ali concrete reservoirs should be removed from service every two years. The
interior should be cleaned and all sediment removed from the floor. Wall washing and
cleaning should be performed os necessary. The reservoirs should be chlorinated and
then retumed to service.
Until the recommended cover and liner improvements are mode.the Edward
Springs Reservoirshould be checked for infiltration on a regular basis. The cover should
also be checked for drainage after each period of heavy rainfall.
7)Mefer Testing.It is recommended that the flow meters from ali sources of suppiy
be calibrated annually per manufacturers recommendations.All meters to future
purveyors should also be checked and calibrated annually.
8) Watershed Maintenance.It is recommended that per the State WAC 248-54-225
requirement for watershed control.the City odd watershed surveiliance to routine
operation and maintenance procedures.The City should check the fences around the
Edward Springs Reservoir routinely each time maintenance is conducted at the Edward
Springs screen house. The City should also monitor the activities of Arlington Sand and
Grovel. such that the impact of materials removal on the Stillaguamish can be assessed.
Visuai inspections should also be mode in conjunction with doily testing.
9) Source Maintenance.
Highway 9 Well. The well should be manually operated for a few hours each
month. Ali valves should be exercised monthly. Electrical connections should be
tightened yearly. Pump and motor should be inspected monthly for lubrication.A visual
check of all instruments and pilot lights should be mode each time the well is operated.
-98 -
Sunnyside Well NO.2. Thewell should be manually operated for a few hours each
month.All valves should be exercised monthly.Electrical connections should be
tightened yearly. Pump and motor should be inspected monthly for lubrication.A visual
check of all instruments and pilot lights should be made each time the well is operated.
Edward Springs Wells.Each well should be operated in the late spring to assure its
availability during the peak flow summer months. All other checks and maintenance
noted above should also be performed.
Emergency Operation
Previous comprehensive plans have detailed various operation scenarios should a
particular source or storage facility fail.These plans were based upon a system that primarily
supplied water from the north and relied on several sources available on a continuous basis.The
Utility is currently in a transition to the City of Everett as the major source with the past sources
serving as backups.
It is anticipated that all the City's past and present sources will remain in operating
condition and can be used for emergency purposes. If there should be a failure of a particular
facility. Table 8-1 lists the backup facilities that can be used to compensate for the loss.This
table assumes that only one facility is out of operation at anyone time.This would hold true if
the emergency was due to equipment failure. such as a pump failure at a well. or an isolated
water supply line failure. such as along the Everett supply line.
Until the new 360reservoir and associated pipeline is completed in late 1995.lOoth Street
NE acts as the line of separation between Everett water on the south and Edward
Springs/Stillaguamish on the north. All other sources except Lake Goodwin are currently
delegated to backup roles for emergency use.
- 99 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..__..--.J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table8-1
PRIORITY OF FACILITIES FOR EMERGENCY OPERATION
System Failure BackupFacility
Lake Goodwin Well Seven Lakes W.D.Intertie
Edward Springs Everett Supply
Stillaguamish
Cedarcrest Reservoir &Booster Pumping Sta.
360 Reservoir (1995)
Edward Sorinas Reservoir
Edward Springs Reservoir Everett Supply
Stillaguamish
Cedarcrest Reservoir &Booster Pumping Sta.
360 Reservoir t 19951
Stillaguamish Everett Supply
Edward Springs
Edward SpringsReservoir
Cedarcrest Reservoir &Booster Pumping Sta.
360 Reservoir 119951
Kellogg-Marsh Reservoir Cedarcrest Reservoir &Booster Pumping Sta.
360 Reservoir 119951
Sunnyside Well NO.2 Everett Supply
360 Reservoir (1995)
Hiahwav 9 Reservoir
Cedarcrest Reservoir Everett Supply
360 Reservoir (1995)
HiQhwav 9 Reservoir
Everett Supply Stillaguamish
Highway 9 Well
360 Reservoir (1995)
Sunnyside Well No.2
Edward Springs
Edward SpringsReservior
Cedarcrest Reservoir &Booster Purnpino Sta.
360 Reservoir (1995)Everett Supply
Highway 9 Reservoir
Cedarcrest Reservoir &Booster Pumoina Sta.
Cedarcrest Pump Station Everett Supply
360 Reservoir (1995)
Hiahwav 9 Reservoir
Action Plan 1- Stillaguamish Failure.Flooding.high turbidities or pump failure will
cause the facility to be shut down.Edward Springs reservoir.with its 6 million gallons of
storage.will give sufficient time for utility crews to respond.The Springs will then be fhe
primary source of water north of lOath SI.NE.Should the reservoir show a continuous
drop.the Edward Springs wells should be activated.If the drop continues.the Seven
- 100 -
- 101 -
help you understand the significance of a drop in the reservoir.
reservoir and can be activated without regard to the cause of the failure.
announcements to restrict water useuntil the problems can be corrected.
Remaining
Storage 19a1.l
6.016.400
5.542.300
5.075.000
4.614.600
4.161.000
3.714.200
3.274.300
2.841.000
2.414,700
1.995.200
1.582.500
1.176,700
777.600
385.400
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------~---j
Drop from Max.
Water Surface ffeet)
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Action Plan 2 - Edward Springs Source Failure.Since the Edward Springs supply
Lake Goodwin Well and the Stillaguamish Well also feed the Edward Springs
the Edward Springs wells. If the failure isin the line between the screen house and the
utility should closely monitor the height of water in the reservoir. The following table is to
5 days of emergency water would be available in the reservoir. If the event took place
demand in 1998 is projected to be 5.1 MGD and in 2014 to 7.2 MGD. Thetwo sourcesare
combined supply from both sources is approximately 3.9 MGD. The average daily
zone should the source be interrupted.The storage will allow City crews time to activate
Reservoir.Both of these sources should be activated if they are not on line. The
Lakes interties can be activated.Continued loss of reservoirlevel should activate public
water to the Edward Springs Reservoir.there will be 6.0 MG available for the north 240
in 2014. 1.8 days would be available.If all sources to the reservoir were interrupted.the
reservoir.Wells 1 and 2 can not be used. Well No. 3 has a direct connection to the
less than the projected demands for both years. If the interruption were to occur in 1998.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Action Plan 3 - Everett Supply Line Failure. Should a short duration shutdown of
the Everett source occur.the Cedarcrest.proposed 360 and Highway 9 reservoirs have
sufficient emergency storage to meet two days of average system demand.As demand
increases over the planning period.the supply from Everett will be the greatest
contributing source and a systemfailure will have great impact on the utility.
Currently, there isa source separation across a series of pressure reducing valves
in the vicinity of l00th Street NE.A gate valve is closed at some of the facilities to
prevent the flow of water through the PRY.At other stations. the opening has been
suppressed to allow for flow only under fire demands.Each PRY should be set in
accordance to the values shown in Table 8-2. The zone separation line and pressure
reducing stations are noted on Figure 8-1 .
Should the Everett flow be interrupted for more than two days, it will then be
necessary to reactivate the flow across the north 170/240zone separation.Flowwill then
come into the 170zone from the Stillaguamish Riveror Edward Springs.
To reactivate the north sources,PRY's #8, 9,10,11.12,13,and 14 must first be
checked to determine if a closed valve separates the zones. If a gate valve at the PRY is
closed it must be opened.Thesetting of the PRY valve must then be checked against
Table 8-2.If the setting needs to be changed.make the adjustment according to the
table.If the pressures in the 170zone drop to a low level (30 psi)due to demand,the
PRY settings should be adjusted to allow more water to flow from the north.
In conjunction with the activation of the PRY's.the well sources at Highway 9 and
Sunnyside NO.2 should be activated.These sources will need to be manually activated
and allowed to run continuously until the Everett supply isrestored.
In addition.the adjacent water systems should be contacted.P.U.D .. Arlington
Tulalip Tribes,and Seven Lakes Water Association to begin steps to bring water through
- 102 -
I
I
SCALE '"=1000'
r
)
\
:..-l~~-.:~.....,:J.Jr-J •ldiJ •~I 100m 5T NE
CI
1
,
,'.I ~!.j ,.'..~
ii';;, -~
,,
r -'-"UI :-jl~""r,..,.fi'·u-.;._i -nl·-lV2_..~..........n __...._._t,-r ,--'..,--t-~:-:.--:..:.1 I .',FESTA
BROEK£R ~,
OUILCEDA
MEADOWS
~~j ,-.~~•
I i·l~!»....s~NE;.\
...~\,
KELLOGG-MARSH
STANDPIPE
W,S. EL.172.5
CAP.0.467 MG I
--••0.,-1 ......®"j \--._-'.' ;:"i11 ••_L-,I rv v ,,,,vol II-~I
\"~~.,;
'<~!".~~:..:-::~.~-j-_._-:i --.j 8 In 5T .--,EN-CRt:.~I;~/L--;fDf~::I /;I 10';0 ~I.,'.:;-I 1-·.L,-.~''''r '-1"_:-.,',-.--...•."-.,--
'";;',;r.M'LEvi£ljT ,- ..f··.'"1Oy 14C D~i I '~rr.'n':'.".".i~-''::T:<j:!-,t,').,1.H,!,L~J.'J!j;lJ.i .,<,cJ~~L,~~~~~:i
!~!--_:-"-GL:U'!:IA?'-'-qAR~EN I ,1/\I /".-.(i.":.,.,...SCHOOl .j"1!\;~~~~~~,
_~_._..J
21
a
6
Q:
---J
;;;'
Q:
lB'
--_..,
....:.:;,~'"f1;1;o"'""=:;""".bB"
~
7'/~.'TANNm,
«t
i
.---
,
:.:..L.,__;.
IllST ST
'.
MEADOW EST
..•"1'-T-§<t:~.
,~,5
on<s~""0 ~
,
..__..,... .__.._._"':'~~&0-
.i:;;;;,i-lt-}:J..iaUILCE~A!~AST.I ;:.~T-l,.t,..
-"f'.-:.._~.-.._.d
z u,pr~...·_~t
IL:~>f .:{
,.'~'../.
J I .')~:,:~llAGE CRE'N
':,c.;L.~.4'.'r:.':-,,;T'?'~fF-15~r "..;.~40 ,1110,.'.))'"
q ~'.,i::,;,~o ::'lCASCADE.:.L ::!,~'JLL .:,:.:~~"_..::..~.'-"'.,"7731 ,--:;'""1 ~'j CREEN '.,"I _''"L.,._
[[•..:•i:;;;-'.="'.."'~.:.',,,-'--',·f I'I "'0 ",'NU,".w ,I."i 'C',•"'",,",..
;...~:..~','aRDEK"\".'.,.,,-"'iT'"1..,ii""J y",'..
.....~".l'i.";u.L __•.-'.;'1 "I'..,..."CAS,Ab,', ,1~~"~~"~~'i~',;:..~..~:L;~4'~,:.~"~'i:'~;,'",I .~;.,--~:~.",•~J.
Jr''f;''\t >':ifi }i,.,,, ,Y ,,:1:.,f i\-,
"'§Ii!;"T·..,~....,•.•.,•.'-'-.-'-.,..1 'DRY.Cjl{,"-"l!:SI',"'....3"J'.~
"",.""'r-,'<..·,n""",..,"'"1 /V
o
'ii'i'>;c>;.i ",,r"!",,"".".,'".!~'"n -,92ND SI.,',...,',ST ",'.,CASC DE ~SIA ;.r ...i-.w
'en rTl J..!."';,.'..,,"";,,_.,._~<4:.•...:~r"-'l.:-.:;:::ll~l I r-....~"I -~...........,~~1..',;'<.~
I
I
I
.1
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF MARYSVLLE
NORTH 2401170
ZOtE SEPARATION
FIQUIE ...
I HAMMOND.COLUER &WADE-
UViNGSTONE ASSOCIA1£S. INC.
1
04010 STa..EWAY NORTH
SEAm.£.WASHINGTON 98103
(:ZOO)632-2'"
MAY.1995
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----------------------
the emergency interties. if necessary. The P.U.D.may not be able to assist.depending
upon where the Everettfailure occurred.
After the emergency has passed, the well sources should first be shut down and
then the PRY's can be reset to their original settings.
BacKup Power. In the event of a power failure, the City has a backup portable
generator.Use of the generator would not be necessary for outages of less than 24hours
if the reservoirs contain sufficient standby storage. The system would have additional
occkup provided by the Everett pipeline source which has hydraulic gradeline elevation
of 440.The majority of the distribution system is below this elevation and could be
supplied by gravity flow. Adjustments to the PRY's along 100th Street NE would be
necessaryto improve flowsto the north end.
Depending on what sources are maintained on-line, the generator may be
needed at the Stillaguamish collector to ensure adequate service pressures to the north
end. If the Stillaguamish collector is not part of the system,a more appropriate location
may be at the Cedarcrest Booster pump station. The Highway 9 reservoir could then be
filled and adequate pressures provided to the 490zone. Thestorage of Highway 9 could
then be utilized by all of the lower zones.
If filtration facilities are provided for Edward Springs and the Stillaguamish
collector,an additional bcckup generator should be provided to power the process
pumps. Two generators could adequately support the system during an extended
outage.
- 104 -
Table 8-2
PRESSURE REDUCING STATION DATA
Type 8 Elevation Seffing Seiling
Station No.Valve Size Model No.01 Valve U"slream Downslream
Bot.Vault 169.6
1 8 Cia-Val 90 Top Vault 178.7 81 psi 5 27 psi 5
Valve 172±29 psi 5el
2 8 Ross Top Vault 106.6 58 psi 5 31 psi
Valve 103±a 15talic+2 csil
47 psi
3 8 Ross Top Vault 65.67 75 psi 5 (5totic+2 psi)
Valve 61.5+49 psi
4 12
4 avooss
5 8 166'±84 psi 5 30 psi 5
(Futurel a 32 psi a
8"·21 psi
11/2Tank)
6 8 Bailey 400
Top Vault 116.11 54.5 psi S 2"·26 psi
2 svooss Bailev Valve 110.0+a {FullTank}
7
(Future!
8 8 Cla·Val90 Top Vault 66.3 75 psi S
51 psi
Valve 63.0+52-75 psi a IStatic+5 psi)
9 6 Cia-Val 90 Top Vault 67.10 75 psi S
51 psi
Valve 63.0+48-75 psi a IStatic+5 osn
10 12 cio-vcrso Top Vauil 53.3 80.5 psi S
57 psi
Valve 50+58-<30 psi a tStalic+5 psiI
11 8 ctc-votso Top Vault 115.5 53.5 psi 5
29 psi
Valve 112.5 25·53 psi a ISlatic+3 psil
12
(Fred 6 cic-vervo Top Vault 57± 77.5 psi 5 55.5 psi
Mever}Valve 53.3±a IStatic+5 osil
47 psi S
13 4 Cia-Val 90 Top Vault 65.6 75 psi S
52 psi
Valve 62.1 ISlatic+5 pSi)
47 psi S
14 4 Cia-Val 90 Top Vauil 64.1 76 psi S 52 psi
Valve 61.0 IStatis+5 osi)
S =Static Pressure (No Flow Through System)
o =Operating Pressure
.105 •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Construction Standards
The City of Marysville has adopted its own set of Water Distribution System Design and
Construction Standards and Specifications for developer extensions to ensure extensions to the
system are designed and installed properly.These specifications are a supplement to the
Standard Specifications for Municipal Public Works Construction prepared by the Washington
State Chapter of the American Public Works Association. In addition.the North Snohomish
County Coordinated Water System Plan contains minimum design and construction standards
for the participating utilities. By adoption of the plan. the City can reference the standards as
part of the developer extension requirements.
Wafer Quality and Monitoring
The City samples and monitors the system water quality in accordance with WAC 246-
290.Table 8-3 lists the constituents that are regularly monitored and the sampling location.
Maximum contaminant levels (MCL's)for each constituent were iisted in Chapter 3.
If the monitoring results exceed an MCL the City is required to notify the Department of
Health in accordance with WAC 246-290-320.A secondary standard violation requires
Department notification only. (A primary standard violation requires notification of both the
Department and the public.)
The public notification process is as follows:
I. A newspaper notice within 14days of the violation.
2. A direct mail notice or hand delivery to all permanent residents served by the
systemwithin 45days of the violation.
3. A notice to a radio and/or television station serving the area within 72 hours of
violation of a Nitrate. MCL or other acute violation as determined by the DOH.
4.Repeat mail or hond delivery every three months until the violation is corrected.
- 106 -
Table 8-3
CONSTITUENT MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CLASS CONSTITUENTCS)SAMPLE fREQUENCY LOCATION
Bacteriolooical Coliforms 30Samples per Month PerColiform Monitorina Plan
Disinfectant In conjunction with
Residual Chlorine Residual bacterioloaical PerColiform Monitoring Plan
Primary Inorganic 'Groundwater and Surface
Chemical and I Complete Analysis Water Sources before
Phvsical PerWAC 246-290-300 everY36Months Chlorination
Secondary Groundwater and Surface
Chemical and 1 Complete Analysis Water Sources before
Physical PerWAC 246-290-300 every 36Months Chlorination
Groundwater sources -Groundwater and surface
Nitrates Nitrates annually: Surface water water sources before
sources -auarterlv chlorination
Turbidity
At entry to distribution system
Suspended Particles
Dailyl [surface water sourcesonly)
Trihalomethanes:1Sample per source At extreme end of distribution
Surface Water Total THM's eveiv 3 months svstem
Max. Total THM 1Sample per source At extreme end of distribution
Ground Water potential annually systemor at source prior to
treatment
Lead,copper 60 samplesevery 6 Residential taps
Lead &Coooer months3
Radium 226 1 Analysis every 48 Source before Chlorination
Radionuclides Radium 228 months 2
One Analysis every 3 Source after Chlorination,
Volatile Organic months for one year,before Distributing
Chemicals (VOC's)every 36 months
PerWAC 246-290-300 thereafter
Synthetic Organic
Chemicals [SOC'sl PerWAC 246-290-300 Every36 months Before distribution
Asbestos Asbestos fibers Prior to 1995 Distribution System
'Sampling requirements are conditional on initial results as specified in WAC 246-290-300.
1Dependent on statusof Edward Springs and Stillaguamish Collector.
2S ampling requirements are conditional on initial results as specified in WAC 246-290-250.
3S ampling can be reduced to 30 samples every 3 years if 90th percentile is less than the action levels for
the first year.
Contents of the public notification should include at a minimum a clear explanation of
the violation,discussion of potential adverse health effects and the population at risk, a list of
protective measures the consumer should follow,and the City's address and phone number.
Cross Connection Control
In accordance with WAC 248-54-285,the City has a cross-connection control program in
effect.Chapter 14.10 "Water Supply Cross-Connection,"of the Marysville Municipal Code details
- 107 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
the program and requirements for compliance.A copy of the program is included in the
appendix.One full-time person is assigned to the program.
The program purpose is to protect against contaminants being drawn into the system
due to back pressure created by improperly plumbed mechanical equipment or back
siphonage due to low pressures in the distribution system.Backflow prevention devices are
required wherever.in the judgment of the Utilities Superintendent.the premises served by the
City water systemare prone to cross-connection.
Conservation Program
In response to the severe drought of 19B7,the City of Marysville implemented a water use
restriction program that controls usage for nonessential activities during water shortages. The
program has two restriction conditions.the first being an altemating schedule for sprinkling and
irrigation of properties that is in effect every year from June 1 to October 1. The second
condition is implemented by the City Mayor by declaration of a water shortage condition.With
the declaration,the mayor also may implement any or all of the following water use restrictions:
1.Prohibition of Nonessential Use of Water - Washing of paved surfaces or motor
vehicles,lawn watering,dust control,etc..is prohibited.
2.Suspension of New Connections - No new service connections allowed except for
those that were approved prior to the suspension or those that were previously
served by a well which has run dry,
3.Emergency Rationing -Limits residential and nonresidential water usage to a
specified volume per week or month as determined by the mayor.
As recommended in the North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan. the
City will begin evaluating the current conservation measures. A conservation plan prepared in
accordance with "Guidelines and Requirements for Public Water Systems Regarding Water Use
Reporting,Demand Forecasting Methodology and Conservation Programs" as published by the
State Departments of Ecology and Health has been prepared.The conservation plan and
associated checklist are provided in Appendix I.
-108 -
water Reuse
The M~lrysville Sewage Treatment facility recently underwent an upgrade that included
an effluent filter. The filter discharge will meet the water quality standards of a Class A
Reclaimed Water as specified in the Department of Health reuse standards.Potential approved
uses for the reclaimed water are as follows:
Irrigation of nonfood crops and pastures
Landscape irrigation and impoundments
Recreational impoundments
Groundwater recharge with Department of Health approval
Fish hatchery basins
Decorative fountains
Flushing of sanitary sewers
Street cleaning
Dust control
Dampening for soil compaction
Water jetting for backfill consolidation around non-potable utilities
Fire fighting and protection
Toilet and urinal flushing
Ship ballast
Aggregate and concrete production
Industrial cooling and boiler feed
In the near future the City's use of reclaimed water will be limited to applications where
hauling by tanker is appropriate.A separate reclaimed water distribution system is not currently
feasible unless a user is located in close proximity to the treatment piant.As required by the
Department of Health, an Engineering Report detailing the application proposed,means for
compliance with regulations,and operation procedures would be submitted for review prior to
actual use. A sampling and monitoring program is also required to ensure effluent water quality
standards are met.
- 109 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
JOINT OPERATING AGREEMENT (JOA)
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NORTII SNOHOMISH COUNIY
REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY
J.QlNI'OPERA'IWG AGREEMENT (JOA)
WHEREAS.an adequate and safe water supply for North Snohomish County is
important to both existing citizens and the long-term comprehensive plans of the
Participants and Snohomish County;and
WHEREAS.the State.Snohomish County.and public water purveyors jointly
agreed to prepare a Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP)for North Snohomish
County;and
WHEREAS.the preliminary finding and recommendations of the CWSP concludes
that projects that provide for the joint use and operation of transmission.storage.and
pumping facilities as defined by the CWSP, is in the best interest of the citizens of the
County; and
WHEREAS,independent of the preliminary findings and recommendations of the
CWSP, the current and near-term water needs of the City of Marysville (Marysville),
Tulalip Tribes (Tribes).and Public Utility District No.1 of Snohomish County (PUD)
require immediate steps to construct a transmission line to the Sunnyside vicinity.
NOW THEREFORE.Marysville. the PUD.the Tribes.(Participants)as the initial
signatories to this JOA.agree as follows:
1.GENERAL
A.There is an immediate need for additional water supply in North Snohomish
County;and
B. A proposed 30 inch pipeline (Pipeline)from the Everett Transmission line to
the Sunnyside vicinity,to be contracted and owned by Marysville, is
consistent with the preliminary findings of the CWSP and the near-term
needs of the Participants;and
C.The issues concerning the rights of the City of Everett to deliver water to
Marysville, the Tribes, and the PUD for retail distribution as defined by the
Amended Agreement Between PUD No. 1 of Snohomish County and the
City of Everett for Multipurpose Development of the Sultan River are
resolved and met bythis JOA;and
D.The Participants will assist Marysville. as the lead agency, in completing the
necessary environmental review of relevant actions proposed.including the
construction of the Pipeline per the agreement of the Participants herein and
associated SEPA documents (SEIS and FEIS) and be responsive to such
environmental findings in accordance with SEPA;and
E.The Participants acknowledge the requirement to incorporate land use
planning in water supply planning;and
2.
3.
4.
F.The Participants recognize that any delay may result in higher cost for the
proposed Pipeline,in which all Participants will share proportionately;and
G. A fundamental incentive for the Participants to enter into this JOA is the
commitment of all of the Participants to cooperate toward regional solutions
for long range water supply needs through the year 2040.
INTENT
A.The general intent of the Participants is to cooperatively plan. design,
construct,operate.and maintain the water transmission pipelines and related
facilities generally identified in Attachment A.
B.The specific intent of this JOA is to initiate the construction of the Pipeline,
allocate its capacity to the Participants,and provide for future cooperation.
Prior to completion of the Pipeline the Participants agree to amend this JOA
pursuant to 3D.
C.It is the desire of the Participants that this JOA be incorporated into a final
CWSP.When the CWSP is completed and approved by the State
Department of Health,(Health)this JOA will be amended to provide for
implementation of the CWSP provisions consistent with the JOA.
SCHEDULE -REGIONAL PROJECTS
A.The Participants agree to cooperate with Marysville. the lead agency, in the
Environmental Review, as defined in paragraph 10 to be completed on or
about February 28. 1991.
B.The Participants agree to expedite completion of the construction of the
Pipeline as early in 1991 as possible.consistent with appropriate
environmental review and permitting requirements,with a goal of
completing the project by September 1, 1991.
C.The Participants agree to immediately initiate joint negotiations with the City
of Everett for a regional wholesale water contract rate.
D.Prior to Pipeline completion.the Participants will develop detailed
procedures for the management.operation.maintenance,and financing of
the Pipeline and associated JOA projects as an amendment to this JOA.
E.Within 6 months following the CWSP approval by Health and subject to the
unanimous agreement of the Participants.the JOA will be amended to
incorporate the recommendations for development of additional facilities, as
outlined in the CWSP that are consistent with the JOA.
WATER SUPPLY·CAPACIlY RIGHTS
Unless otherwise modified in writing and agreed to by all parties.the capacity rights
and the cost share agreed to herein shall be as outlined below.
-2-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A.
••
B.
c.
D.
Capacity Rights - Each Participant shall be entitled to purchase capacity in
the Pipeline in proportion to the year 2010 Peak.Day demand forecast, as
shown on attachment B. Capacity rights will be based on the percentage of
actual pipeline capacity which is estimated to range from 17.3 - 20 MOD.
depending on operating conditions.Each participant will pay the percentage
of the cost of the pipeline that corresponds to the percentage of capacity, as
specified in Table I,within 60 daysof the date that Marysvillegivesnotice to
the Participants of completion of the Pipeline and the estimated cost of the
same.The final cost will be based on the audited record of the project and
Participant payments will be adjusted accordingly.If a Participant fails to
make full payment within 60 days, the remaining Participants will have the
option to purchase the capacity rights of the non-paying Participant in the
same ratio of their assigned capacity per Table 1.Any capacity not
purchased bythe PUD or Tribe shall remain with Marysville.
Table-l
Assigned Capacity Rights
%of
Pipeline
Capacitv
Marysville 56.44
PUD 16.55
Marysville/PUD Overlap 7.21"
Tribes 19.80
Total 100.00
The MarysvillelPUD overlap area supply will be assigned to the utility
eventually providing service to the area, with the initial assignment of the
Pipeline capacity being divided equally between Marysville and the PUD.
Payment to Marysville will be adjusted when final capacity assignments are
determined.
Operation and Maintenance - As provided in 3D. the Participants will
establish operation and maintenance (O&M) charges that include a minimum
charge and a charge based on quantity of water delivered. O&M payments
willbe made on a monthly basis.
Additional lOA Participants.Other agencies can purchase capacity rights
from the Pipeline only with unanimous consent of the Participants.Other
agencies will be given the opportunity to become a lOA participant for
future projects.
Wholesaling Water. A Participant claiming the right to wholesale water
delivered through the Pipeline maydo so as long as the other Participants to
the lOA are not negatively impacted, and the Participant in fact has legal
authority to wholesale such water.
-3-
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
Wholesaling outside a Participants designated service area (per Attachment
A) shall not trigger or impact the provisions of paragraphs 4E or 4H without
the agreement and concurrence of the other Participants.
Tulalip Tribes Supply. The Tribes' capacity rights are based on the Pipeline
capacity to the Sunnyside Standpipe.Marysville agrees to wheel water to the
Tribes'as shown in Table 1,to the extent possible within the capacity limits
of Marysville's existing distribution system while also providing for
Marysville's own use of said system.In order to wheel the capacity rights as
shown in Table I, it may eventually be necessary to upgrade Marysville's
distribution system. The cost for those necessary upgrades shall be paid
proportionately on the basis of benefits received. A wheeling charge shall be
established by the two parties.
It is anticipated that additional transmission and storage facilities will be
constructed in the 116th Street area when additional capacity for the Tribes
and Marysville is needed or other system improvements are made. The
estimated quantity of water available to the Tribes by the year 2040 is based
on the Tribes' projections as shownon Attachment B.
Additional Facilities. The Participants agree that the Pipeline will meet only
a portion of the Participants' future projected needs and that additional
facilities, including a second pipeline intertie with Everett and a regional
reservoir, willbe required.
Projected needs will be identified annually based on the Participants
designated service areas. The preliminary designated service area and
projections are shown in Attachments A &.B.
Planning for these additional facilities will commence no later than the date
on which any Participant's demand on the Pipeline reaches 60 percent ofsaid
Participant's capacity rights, as enhanced by Lease Backs, if any.
Construction of additional facilitieswill commence no later than the date on
which any Participant's demand on the Pipeline reaches 85 percent of said
Participant's capacityrights, as enhanced by Lease Backs, if any.
Quality. The objective of the Participants is to maintain the quality of the
water in the Pipeline at the same quality required to meet State drinking
water standards.
Financing. Financial participation in additional facilities will be based on
each Participant's projected need for each such facility.
Lease Back Capacity Rights. The actual water needs of each Participant will
be reviewed annually against the projected need which shall be calculated to
the completion date of construction for additional capacity.If additional
facilities will not be completed prior to the time projected needs of a
Participant exceed the capacity rights of the Participant,then the remaining
Participants agree to lease unused capacity rights in excess of their projected
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
.1
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.
6.
7.
8.
needs.Lease terms shall include payments to the lessor based upon a
proportionate cost of the lessor's Debt Service and Operation and
Maintenance (0 &.M)for the leased capacity.Leases shall terminate upon
availability of additional capacity from additional facilities unless otherwise
agreed by the Participants.
COSTS
A.The cost of the Pipeline shall include the cost of construction.as defined in
the State BARS system exclusive of legal fees incurred in litigation directly
between Participants in this Agreement.
.
B. 0 &.M costs for the Pipeline shall include costs as defined in the State BARS
system that are directly attributable to operation and maintenance of the
Pipeline.Marysville will establish separate accounting for 0 &.M costs for
the Pipeline.
C.Debt Service for each Participant shall include either actual Debt Service on
debt issued for the Participant's proportionate share,or the amortized value
at 8 percent over 20 years for cash spent by the Participant for its
proportionate share, or a combination of both,if applicable.
INCENTIVE FOR PARTICIPATION
II a Participant fails to participate in the planning,financing, or construction of
additional facilities as outlined in the CWSP and generally identified on
Attachments A and B,said Participant will be required to sell to the other
Participants any then unused capacity rights in the Pipeline at cost.
REOPENER OF AGREEMENT
The Participants agree to act in good faith to assist the City of Marysville in
completing the Pipeline by September I, 1991.The Participants agree to seek all
lawful means to expedite completion of the project in accordance with the schedule
outlined in the FEIS. Should any Participant breach this covenant of good faith and
fail to jointly pursue all lawful means to complete construction of the Pipeline the
non-defaulting Participants may reopen the JOA.
ADMTNJSIRATIVE.LEGAL AND OTHERPROVISIONS
All Participants reserve the legal rights to challenge any documents promulgated in
relation to the CWSP water supply program.except this document and the related
Pipeline project.This document is binding upon the Participants except for
allegations of the breach of this agreement by a Participant.
The execution of this JOA and the participation of the Tulalip Tribes in the
processes contemplated by the JOA do not constitute nor imply any abrogation,
diminishment or waiver of its existing or reserved rights or sovereign powers,
whether arising under treaty,statute or common law.
-5-
Public Utility District No.1
of Snohomish County
/[;(/4'/£/.,'/1'By:.'/7!j,'L ' ",
Charles N.Earl
District Manager
-6-
Th'~~By:~~
Stanley G.Jon • r.
Chainnan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
_____1
Approv~to fonn:
~ted:~~~e;\~cl..9-
Approved As To Fonn:
By:/J~T~t./~
Grant Weed, CityAttorney
Attest:BY:~)~){)e£"tt-CJ
Phillip E.~er,City Qerk
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Participants hereto have caused this agreement to
be executed by their proper Officers on the //l'I"fr day of c1:f..v'1&'7'
199~/_
•
•
»
~....-_.
~
•
•
•
,,,,•-'••
•
•
•
PIPEUNES
A
•
RELATED
•
------....=Q
WATER INTERnES
STUDY AREA BOUNDARY
COUNTY BOUNDARY
WArr.~TRANSMISSION PIPEUN(S
FUTURE SERVICE,AREA OVEllLAP
FUTURE ,<RVlCE AREA BOUNDARIES
FUT\.IRE STORAGE RESERVOIRS
&
ATTACHMENT
AJ'ID ENGINEERING SERVICES.INC.
o
!
o
R
_0_..
-----
•
(
I
;
SERVICE AREA,
EB ECONOMIC
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
,,,
•!\I ."!-~\1 )~+,,
\,
..
•
•;••,,---,,,
•:8,,,
•
(/
SH~OMI~co."
-~n~~--.r---
,,••,
,..~-----+-·,.,.·..,,,,,.
------~-
,•,,•,,,
..--t----~-,,,,·,·,,,,,,,
--------~--------+-,,, ,,,,,·..
rr:,.,,.
-____",,,,_....
...1....•
,,,,,,,,,----r---------,,
i-':.,
r-'--'",~--.,....."..,.iI"ttAol(1
,.--'
~N;'~I
•
•
•
•
•
...
.,,,,•
:~---
-,
•
•
•
,.•:.
te...I I~-I ,V ..cl._
•I I I.ooal----4--~-_+_---_+-----,, ,, ,,,..:.:.:·,.·,.,. .
~----+-----+,•·•,,,,
•
•
•
rf
·,,,·,,,-----t--I +{,··•,•,
\0'0\'.
~.
~
I
#
V.e a.._.
~.-~'u
~..,.
•.#11-
a.
I
I
'I
I '-.(
'I Vi:
1 I r"'.....
'.I \"I.I \~~
• I
\
\I I
I I ~
I
\1
'I
'.'J".
,
I •
i ......v "-\:!:J::~\J -•\.\.'\:~
Footnotes:
(1)Forecast as currently developed through the Coordinated Water System Plan.
(3)Demand to be assigned to utilities based upon final resolution of service area overlap.
(2)Demand forecast assumes current supplyof 1.9MGD from Edwards Springs and Lake
Goodwin wellswill serve other users.
((
ATIACHMENl'B
(,
,"
WATER REQUIREMENTS FORECAST FOR
MARYSVILLE -lAKE STEYEriS -TIJLALIP TRIBES SERVICE AREAS (l)
(peak Day MGD)
YEAR
SERVICE AREA 2000 2010 2020 2040
Marysville (2)9.71 11.66 13.68 17.72
Lake Stevens/PUD 0.75 3.42 5.93 10.96
MarysvillelPUD Overlap (3)1.04 1.49 2.05 3.17
Tulalip Tribes -Ul 4.09 ~~
TOTAL 14.61 20.66 27.00 ~--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX B
EVERETT AND JOA PARTICIPANTS
WATER SUPPLY CONTRACT
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EVERETT AND JOA PARTICIPANTS
WATER SUPPLY CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the city of
Everett,a municipal corporation of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as "Everett,"and the city of Marysville
(Marysville),and Public utility District No. 1 of Snohomish
County (PUD) ,municipal corporations of the State of Washington,
and the TUlalip Tribes of washington (Tribes),a federally
recognized Indian Tribe,hereinafter referred to as
"Participants."
WHEREAS,Everett owns and operates a water supply system located
in the Sultan Basin of Snohomish County,Washington.said system
has regional supply capability for domestic,commercial and
industrial water consumption;and
WHEREAS,pursuant to RCW 35.92.170,RCW 35.92.200 and RCW 39.94,
Everett is authorized to enter into contracts with other
municipalities and recognized tribes to supply said
municipalities with water.Pursuant to WAC 248-54,Everett has
prepared a Water System Plan identifying certain areas of north
Snohomish County as being within its long-range wholesale water
supply service area;and
WHEREAS,the participants own and operate water supply systems in
north Snohomish County,Washington,and distribute said water on
a retail basis to domestic,commercial and industrial customers
within their respective service areas;and
WHEREAS,the Participants have entered into a Joint Operating
Agreement (JOA)for the purpose of initiating construction of a
30-inch pipeline by Marysville from the Everett transmission line
to the Sunnyside vicinity,allocating pipeline capacity among the
Parti.cipants,and cooperating in a regional solution to meet
future water supply needs;and
WHEREAS,the Participants together with Washington State,
Snohomish county,Everett and other public water purveyors have
jointly agreed to prepare a Coordinated Water system Plan (CWSP).
for north Snohomish County;and
WHEREAS,the execution of this contract and the participation of
the Tribes in the processes contemplated by the contract do not
constitute nor imply any abrogation,diminishment or waiver of
the Tribes existing or reserved rights or sovereign powers,
whether arising under treaty,statute or common law;and
L----
NOW,THEREFORE,for the mutual benefits to be derived,the
parties agree as follows:
WHEREAS,the preliminary findings and recommendations of the CWSP
demonstrate an immediate need for additional water supply to meet
current and near term water needs of the Participants and a need
for long-term regional solutions through joint use and operation
of water transmission and storage facilities;and
1.Delivery of Water.Everett hereby agrees to deliver to the
Participants,and the Participants hereby agree to pay Everett
for the delivery and treatment of water to be used as their
primary source of supply in accordance with its usual and
accustomed rates and conditions for customers similarly situated
and as provided in Section 5 hereof.
WHEREAS,a study of available and alternative sources has
identified Everett as being the best source for water supply for
the Participants'service areas in the foreseeable future.
Pursuant to WAC 248-54,Marysville and Everett have updated their
respective Water System Plans to include an intertie with
Everett;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2
Water.Marysville will construct a 30-inch
Seattle RjW point of delivery as Phase 1 of the
and JOA.Everett and the Participants agree
and will continue to make significant capital
2.Point of Deliverv.Everett shall deliver wat ar to the
Participants at agreed connection points along Everett's Northern
Transmission Pipeline corridor.Said agreed connection points
include existing connections located at 73rd Avenue S.E.,91st
Avenue S.E.,l03rd Avenue S.E.and at Williams Road.Said agreed
connection points also include new connections to be located at
Woods Creek Road and the Seattle City Light power line right-of-
way (Seattle RjW).Other future connection points shall be
subject to mutual agreement.participants shall install,at
their cost,a master meter system at the Seattle RjW new
connection point.Said master meter installation shall include
telemetry of flow data and any necessary control functions and
shall meet the specifications and approval of Everett and shall
become the property of Everett after its installation.The Woods
Creek Road new connection and other future connections shall be
installed per Everett's standard policies for new service
connections or by other mutually agreeable means.The actual
point of delivery at each connection point shall be the upstream
flange of the valve downstream of each master meter and check
valve.
3.Ouanti ty of
pipeline from the
preliminary CWSP
that each have,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------------------------
investments in water supply facilities which are interdependent,
and that coordinated planning will be required throughout the
term of this contract to maximize public benefits and minimize
costs.In the design of Marysville's 30-inch pipeline and future
Participants'water supply projects,Everett shall not be
responsible for storage except as it relates to Everett's
existing storage at Lake Chaplain.Everett agrees to use best
efforts,sUbject to meeting the requirements of all Everett
customers,to provide a regular and uninterrupted supply of water
at said point of delivery.(Everett will exercise best efforts
to operate so as to supply water at a hydraulic head of not less
than 440'mean sea level at the Seattle R/W connection point and
the hydraulic equivalent at other connection points throughout
the term of this contract.)It is understood that the
Participants will reach peak demands of 18 million gallons per
day through Marysville's transmission pipeline before the
expiration of this contract and that additional facilities,
including a second pipeline connection to Everett and a regional
reservoir,will be required to meet long range demands.
Estimated average daily demands and peak day demands of the
participants,for the near future (Phase 1)are shown on Exhibit
A attached hereto.Everett's facilities have,or will have in
the future,the capacity to supply the Participants'water
quanti ty demands.Everett and the Participants shall develop a
technical operating plan to accommodate the operational needs of
the parties.The quantity of water delivered shall be measured
by the master meters referred to in paragraph 2 above.Nothing
herein,however,shall be construed as obligating the
Participants to take or purchase any minimum quantity of water
from Everett at any time except as Everett's rates require
minimum payment related to each connection.
4.Quality of Water.Everett agrees that all water delivered
to the Participants at the points of delivery shall be of the
same standard and quality as that normally delivered by Everett
to master meter customers east of the Snohomish River.Everett
shall be responsible for meeting state and federal standards for
safe,high-quality drinking water at the point of delivery.All
water supplied by Everett for use or sale by the Participants
shall be upon the express condition that after it has passed the
point of deliver the same becomes the property of the
Participants,and Everett shall not be liable for any damages or
loss reSUlting from degradation of water quality which may occur
beyond said point.Further,Everett shall not be responsible for
changes in water quality or operating problems which may result
from mixing of different sources of water in the participants'
systems.Participants shall provide means to assure that water
will not backflow into the Everett system.
3
4
o =Annual overhead attributable to filtration plant to be
determined from previous years expense as follows:
R =E (M +C +os +0)
X Q
R =Additional cost for filtered water computed to the
nearest ten-thousandth of a dollar per 100 cubic feet.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
reserve interest
bond proceeds,
for all past and
filtration plant,
exclusive of
funded from
proj ect costs
Lake Chaplain
M =Maintenance &Operation costs for Lake Chaplain
filtration plant for preceding year.
C =Additional capital Outlay costs attributable to
filtration plant for preceding year.
os =Annual debt service,
income,if reserve
attributable to total
future construction of
including coverage.
In addition to the base rate for water,Participants agree to pay
the ordinance filtration rate.If flow telemetry is installed on
all of the Participants'connections,or mutually agreeable daily
meter-readings are arranged and the Participants'daily average of
water consumption exceeds 3 MGD,the Participants may elect to
pay the filtration charge in accordance with the following
formula:
5.Rates and Charges.Rates shall be established by ordinance
of the City of Everett.The charges for water service shall
include a base rate,a minimum charge for each connection,and a
filtration charge.The base rate for water and the minimum
charge for each connection shall be established by ordinance of
the city of Everett and shall be based on cost of service
principles;provided that it is agreed that rates may include
usual and accustomed charges imposed on the City utility by the
Ci ty's general fund.The rate structure may include a minimum
charge for each point of connection without regard to consumption
plus a commodity charge.The Participants agree to read each of
the master meters on a monthly basis and provide Everett with the
readings by the 7th day of each month.Everett agrees that the
Participants shall be served with notice of any future rate
modifications that will impact the Participants at least thirty
(30)days prior to consideration of said modifications by the
Everett City council.
·.------------------------------l
5
Q =Quantity of water produced in previous year expressed
in-100 cubic feet.(Filter Plant Meter Reading)
x =System Maximum Daily Demand
(day of highest system use in preceding year)
System Average Daily Demand
(for preceding year)
6.Payments by Participants.On a monthly basis,Everett shall
bill Marysville for water delivered through the Phase I JOA
pipeline master meter and each participant,directly,for water
delivered through master meters at connection points which serve
one Participant only.Bills for water delivered at future
and
at
2%of filter plant material,supplies
utilities costs and 14%of labor costs
filter plant including fringe benefits.
o =
P =JOA Participants Maximum Daily Demand
(day of highest participant use in preceding year)
JOA Participants Average Daily Demand
(for preceding year)
The filtration charge according to the above formula shall
commence in April following one full calendar year (January
through December)starting the January after the date of the
Participants'election to pay by formula (formula date).
Commencing on said formula date Everett agrees to establish a
Participants'sinking fund made up of the bond coverage funds
required for the Annual Debt Service (OS)for the Lake Chaplain
filtration plant facilities.Bond coverage funds collected from
the Participants under the Rate Formula (R)above shall be placed
in this sinking fund and the principal and interest from
investments of said funds shall be used for Additional Capital
outlay Costs (C)attributable to the filtration plant before
other City funds are used thereby reducing the (C)value in the
Rate Formula (R)by the amount used or if revenue bonds are
required for future construction the amount of bonds required
shall be reduced by the amount collected or remaining in the
sinking fund including interest on investments at the time of
issue of the bonds.
In the event the Sinking Fund exceeds One Million Dollars
($1,000,000)during the term of the bond issue(s),funds in
excess of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000)shall be used to
defray Maintenance &Operations (M)costs.At the expiration of
the term of the bond issuers)any balance remaining in the
Sinking Fund shall be credited to Maintenance and Operations (M)
until fully utilized.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--------------------------------------------
b.The Participants will distribute water received from
Everett in a manner consistent with the Everett Water System
Plan,the CWSP,and the individual Participants'Water Systems
Plans,as approved by the Washington State Department of Health
if appropriate.
connection points which serve more than one Participant shall be
sent to an agency designated by the Participants.said bills
shall be payable within thirty (30)days after receipt of the
invoice.Delinquent bills shall accrue interest at the rate of
twelve percent (12%)per annum for any delinquency greater than
sixty (60)days.
8.Term of Contract.The term of this Contract shall be from
the date of its mutual acceptance by all parties until July 1.
2020.with provisions for amendment to incorporate Phase 2
facilities and demands to be consistent with the CWSP.The
Participants shall have a right to renew this Contract for an
extended term of similar duration and for a quantity of water
consistent with the demands projected by the CWSP.
7.Resale or Distribution of Water by the Participants.After
water has passed the points of delivery and has entered the PUD's
system or Marysville's transmission pipeline,said water becomes
the property of the Participants according to the point of
delivery and/or their respective capacity right as established in
the JOA and the use and distribution of the same shall be under
the exclusive authority of the Participants,subject only to the
following express limitations.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Capital
capital
of
all
not serve water received from
of this agreement,in areas
Exhibit B attached hereto.
6
Operation and Maintenance
Participants shall construct
a.Ordinance No.1347-87 (EMC 14.15.460)requires that new
connections outside the City of Everett greater than 12 inches
are sUbject to Everett Water System Plan modification.
Participants agree not to allow any customer connection to
Participants'water systems which is using water purchased from
Everett if said connection is greater than 12 inches in diameter,
or supplies more than one million gallons per day,unless
Participants first obtain approval from Everett for said
connection.Everett's approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld and shall be based on the water supply impacts to the
Everett water system caused by said connection.
c.The Participants shall
Everett,pursuant to the terms
outside the service area shown in
9.Construction,
Improvements.The
12.Notices.All notices complying with this Contract shall be
sent by registered mail as follows:
11.Assignment;Successors Bound.Neither this Contract nor any
right or privilege herein shall be assigned by any party without
the written consent of the other parties.This Contract shall
apply to and be binding upon the lawful successors of all
parties.
10.Uncontrollable Forces.None of the parties hereto shall be
considered to be in default in respect to any obligations
hereunder if prevented from fUlfilling such obliga~ions by reason
of uncontrollable forces.All parties rendered unable to fulfill
any obligation hereunder by reason of an uncontrollable force
shall exercise due diligence to deal with such uncontrollable
force with all reasonable dispatch.
improvements to their water systems and shall own all capital
improvements downstream from the points of deli very and shall
assume exclusive responsibility for the operation,maintenance
and repair of the same.All construction,operation,and
maintenance and repairs shall be in strict compliance with
standards approved by the Washington State Department of Health
as appropriate.By separate agreement,the Participants may
contract with Everett for certain inspection,repair and
maintenance services relating to the 30-inch pipeline.The
Participants shall annually provide to Everett a water system
report to include number of customers,peak use and other
information useful in optimizing joint operations.
Mayor
City of Marysville
Marysville City Hall
514 Delta Avenue
Marysville,WA 98270
To Marysville
To the Tribes
Executive Director
TUlalip Tribes of
Washington
6700 Totem Beach Road
Marysville,WA 98270
7
To Everett
Mayor
City of Everett
Everett City Hall
3002 Wetmore Avenue
Everett,WA 98201
2320 California
Everett,WA 98201
To the PUD
Manager
PUD No. 1 of Snohomish County
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clerk
caused this Contract to
on the fL~day of
RITA MATHENY,Mayor
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/\/!
/..J ~cr--I'(j\..//.-0-'
THE TULALIP TRIBES OF
W~SHLNGTON
\
ATTEST:
GRANT WEED,City Attorney
8
,
."<,»
'I I
/'
!
./
,
\
"n\\\.:.:~\_\;t
,/,yi,;1;.
'/.J .'•
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have
be executed by their proper Officers
fJrr1I.,&J ,1 9 9 1.
ATTEST:ATTEST:
f /,c,
..,\ /.,~.1 ..r tfe~,';-
'.J U1J2N 11.(1 /a.J!la.''u.:.4.-&.z:C!U..\~~~~~~~~~=:;!::;~;:-DONNA L.RIDER,city Ced J PHILLIP
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
f::tL<.'~pv-r--
BRUCE E.~-::is:",-::::C""i-:-t-y--:A-::t"'t"'o-'-r:::n"'e-'-y:---
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1
OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY
(0110)
CHARLES N.EARL,District Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Dated:
CITY OF EVERETT
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXHIBIT A
WATER REQUIREMENTS FORECASr FOR
MARYSVILLE'LAKE STE\'ENS •J1JIALIP TRIBES SERVICE AREAS m
(peak Day MGD)
YEAR
SERVICE AREA 2000 2010 2020 2040
Marysville (2)9.71 11.66 13.68 17.72
Lake StevenslPUD 0.75 3.42 5.93 10.96
Marysville/PUD Overlap (3)1.04 1.49 2.05 3.17
Tulalip Tribes .an ~~6.39
TOTAL llll 1Q&§1ZQil ~
Footnotes:
(1)Forecast as currently developed through the Coordinated Water System Plan.
(2)Demand forecast assumes current supply of 1.9 MGD from Edwards Springs and Lake
Goodwin wells will serve other users.
(3)Demand to be assigned to utilities based upon final resolution of service area overlap.
en
LoW-I--~en-....•
---
•EXHIBIT B
w
'"...........
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
···1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
APPENDIX C
CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM
14.10.010--14.10.040
Chapter 14.10
Water Suooly Cross-Connections
14.10.020 Customer defined.For the purpose of this chap-
ter,"customer"means any person,family,business,corporation,
partnershic or firm connected to the city of Marysville water
supply.(oxd ,788 §2,1972).
320
Chapter compliance required.
Customer defined.
Compliance by district or organization
required.
Requlations interpretation.
Defini tions.
Cross-connection prohibited.
Use of backflow prevention devices.
8ackflow prevention device--Types required.
8ackflow prevention device--Installation--
Location.
8ackflow prevention device--Installation--
Supervision.
8ackflow prevention device--Model.
8ackflow prevention device--Inspection and
testing.
Violation--Service termination.
14.10.010
14.10.020
14.10.030
14.10.040
14.10.050
14.10.060
14.10.070
14 .10.080
14.10.090
14.10.100
14.10.110
14.10.120
14.10.130
(Marysville 10/87)
14.10.040 Reaulations interoretation.These regula-
tions are to be reasonably interpreted.It is their intent
to recognize the varying degrees of hazard and to apply the
principle that the degree of protection should be commensurate
with the degree of hazard.(Ozd ,788 §4,1972).
14.10.010 Chaoter comoliance reauired.Any customer,
regardless whether residing within or without the city limits
of the city of Marysville,who is now receiving water from
the Marysville water system or who will in the future receive
water from the city of Marysville,shall comply with the rules
and regulations contained in this chapter.lOrd.788 §l,1972).
14.10.030 Comoliance bv district or organization reauired.
In addition,any water district,municipal organization or
other organization which is connected to the Marysville water
supply for water and/or which is furnished to people or mem-
bers within the district or organization,shall cause all the
people or members within the district or organization as well
as the district or organization itself to comply with the rules
and regulations contained in this chapter.(Ord.788 §3,1972).
Sections:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
14.10.050
(Marysville 2/l5/73)321
14.10.050 Definitions.As used in this chapter,un-
less the context states otherwise,the following definitions
shall apply:
(al "Air gap separation"means the unobstructed verti-
cal distance through the free atmosphere between the lowest
opening from any pipe or faucet supplying water to a tank,
plumbing fixture,or other device and the flood level rim of
the receptacle,and is at least double the diameter of the
supply pipe measured vertically above the flood level rim of
the vessel.In no case shall the gap be less than one inch;
(b)"Auxiliary supply"means any water source or system,
other than the public water supply,that may be available
in the building or premises;
(c)"Backflow"means the flow other,than the intended
direction of flow,of any foreign liquids,gases'or substances
into the distribution system of a public water supply:
(1)"Back pressure"means backflow caused by a pump,
elevated tank,boiler or other means that could create pressure
within the system greater than the supply pressure,
(2)"Back siphonage"means a form of backflow due to
a negative or subatmospheric pressure within a water system;
(d)"Backflow prevention device"means a device to
counteract back pressures or prevent back siphonage;
(e)"Cross-connection"means any physical arrangement
Whereby a public water supply is connected,directly or in-
directly,with any other ,water supply system,sewer,drain,
conduit,pool,storage reservior,plumbing fixture or other
device which contains,or may contain,contaminated water,
sewage or other waste or liquid of unknown or unsafe quality
which may be capable of imparting contamination to the public I
water supply as a result of backflow.Bypass arrangements,jump-
er connections,removable sections,swivel or change-over de-
vices,and other temporary or permanent devices through which,I
or because of which,backflow could occur are considered to
be cross-connections:
(f)"Double check valve assembly"means an assembly
composed of two single,independently acting check valves,I
including tightly closing shutoff valves located at each end
of the assembly and suitable connections for testing the
watertightness of each check valve;I
(g)"Reduces pressure principle back flow prevention
device"means a device incorporating two or more check valves
and an automatically operating differential relief valve lo-
cated between the two checks,two shutoff valves and equipped I
with necessary appurtenances for testing.The device shall
operate to maintain the pressure in the zone between the two
check valves,less than the pressure on the public water supply I
side of the device.At cessation of normal flow,the pressure
between the check valves shall be less than the supply pressure.
In case of leakage of either check valve the differential relief
valve shall operate to maintain this reduced pressure by dis-I
charging to the atmosphere.When the inlet pressure is two
I
II
-._.._._----------------------"-----------
14.10.060--14.10.070
pounds per square inch or less the relief valve shall open
to the atmosphere thereby providing an air gap in the device.
lOrd.788 §5,1972).
14.10.060 Cross-connection rohibited.la)Except as
provi ed in Section 14.10.070,all cross-connections,as de-
fined in Section 14.10.050,whether or not such cross-con-
nections are controlled by automatic devices such as check
valves or by hand-operated mechanisms such as a gate valve
or stop cocks,are prohibited.
lbl Fail~re on the part of persons,firms or corpora-
tions to discontinue the use of any and all cross-connections
and to physically separate such cross-connections will be suf-
ficient cause for the discontinuance of the public water ser-
vice to the premises on which the cross-connection exists.
(c)The purveyor shall,in cooperation with the health
officer or the local plumbing inspection authority,make per-
iodic inspections of premises served by the water supply to
check for the presence of cross-connections.Any·cross-con-
nections found in such inspection shall be ordered removed
by the responsible agency.If an immediate hazard to health
is caused by the cross-connection,water service to the pre-
mises shall be discontinued until it is verified that the cross-
connection has been removed.(Ord.788 §6,1972).
14.10.070 Use of backflow orevention devices.Backflow
prevention devices shall be installed at the service connec-
tion or within any premises where in the jUdgment of the pur-
veyor or the secretary the nature and extent of activities on
the premises,or the materials used in connection with the
activities,or materials stored on the premises would present
an immediate and dangerous hazard to health should a cross-
connection occur,even though such cross-connection does not
exist at the time the backf10w prevention device is required
to be installed.This inCludes but is not limited to the
following situations:
(1)Premises having an auxiliary water supply,unless
the quality of the auxiliary supply is in compliance with
WAC 248-54-430 of the rules and regulations of the State
Board of Health,three copies of which are on file with the
city clerk;
(21 Premises having internal cross-connections that
are not correctible,or intricate plumbing arrangements which
make it impracticable to ascertain whether or not cross-
connections exist;
(3)Premises where entry is restricted so that inspec-
tions for cross-connections cannot be made with sufficient
frequency or at sufficiently short notice to assure that cross-
connections do not exist;
(4)Premises haVing a repeated history of cross-connec-
tions being established or re-established;
322(Marysville 2/15/73)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.-14.10.080--14.10.090
(5)Premises on which any substance is handled under
pressure so as to permit entry into the public water supply,
or where a cross-connection could reasonably be expected to
occur.This includes the handling of process waters and
cooling waters:
(6)Premises where materials of a toxic or hazardous
nature are handled such that if back siphonage should occur,
a serious health hazard may result:
(7)The following types of facilities will fall into one
of the above categories where backflow prevention device is
required to'protect the public water supply.A backflow
prevention device shall be installed at these facilities as
set forth herein unless the city and the secretary determines
no hazard exists:
(a)Hospitals,mortuaries,clinics,
(b)Laboratories,
(c)Piers and docks,
(d)Sewage treatment plants,
(e)Food or beverage processing plants,
(f)Chemical plants using a water process,
(g)Metal plating industries,
(h)Petroleum processing or storage plants,
(i)Radioactive material processing plants or nuclear
reactors,
(j)Others specified by the secretary.
(Ord.788 §7(A),1972).
14.10.080 Backflow prevention device--Types required.
The type of protective device required herein shall depend on
the degree of hazard which exists as follows:
(1)An air gap separation or a reduced pressure princi-
ple backflow prevention device shall be installed where the
water supply may be contaminated with sewage,industrial waste
of a toxic nature or other contaminant which would cause a
health or system hazard:
(2)In the case of a substance which may be objection-
able but not hazardous to health,a double check valve as-
sembly,air gap separation or a reduced pressure principle
backflow·prevention device shall be installed.(Ord.788
§7 (B),1972).
14.10.090 Backflow prevention device--Installation--
Location.Backflow prevention devices required in Sections
14.10.070--14.10.120 shall be installed at the meter,at the
property line of the premises when meters are not used,or at
a location designated by the secretary or city.The device
shall be located so as to be readily accessible for maintenance
and testing,and where no part of the device will be sUbmerged.
(Ord.788 §7 (C),1972).
323 (Marysville 2/15/73)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IIII
,----------------------------------------------
14.10.100--14.10.130
14.10.100 Backf10w prevention device--Insta11ation--
Supervision.Backf10w prevention devices required in Sec-
tions 14.10.070--14.10.120 shall be installed under the super-
vision of,and with the approval of,the city.(Ord.788
§7 (D),1972).
testing.Backf ow prevent~on ev~ces ~nstal e un er Sec-
tions 14.10.070--14.10.120 shall be inspected and tested an-
nually,or more often where successive inspections indicate
repeated failure.The devices shall be repaired,overhauled
or replaced whenever they are found to be defective.In-
spections,tests and repairs and records thereof shall be
done under the city's supervision.(ord ,788 §7 (F),1972).
.•
324(Marysville 2/15/73)
14.10.130 Vio1ation--Service termination.Failure of
any customer or any district organization to cooperate in the
installation,maintenance,testing or backflow prevention
device or the requirements of an air gap separation shall be
grounds for the termination of the water services at a point
where such flow,which is to be terminated by the city of
MarySVille,would best prevent possible contamination of
the public water supply.(Ord.788 S8,1972).
14.10.110 Backf10w prevention device--Mode1.Any pro-
tective device required in Sections 14.10.070--14.10.120
shall be a model approved by the secretary.A double check
valve assembly or a reduced pressure principle backf10w pre-
vention device.wi11 be approved if it has successfully passed
performance tests of the University of Southern California
Engineering Center or other testinq.laboratories satisfactory
to the secretary.(Ord.788 S7(E),1972).
14.10.120 Backflow
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX D
WATER QUALITY TEST REPORTS
-------
I ..--:--',I
North Creek Anelvticel.Inc.
18939 120th Avenue NE. Suite 101.Bothell.We.hington 98011 12061 481-9200
I VOLATILE ORGANIC CHEMICAL REPORT
Results of Anelvsis bV EPA Method 524.2
I
Measurement of Purgeable Organic com~ounds in Water by Capillary Column
Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry
Send Report To:
Bill To:
I City of Marysville City of Marysville
80 Columbia Avenue 80 Columbia Avenue
Marysville,WA 98270 Marysville,WA 98270
I COUNTY King
I SYSTEM NAME City of Marysville
SYSTEM ID NO.·51900 C LABORATORY NO.104-0828·
DATE COLLECTED ·01/24/95 DATA FILE B501262-14
I DATE ANALYZED ·01/26/95 ANALYST R.Lister·
SOURCE NUMBER : S06,Edwards Spring #3 DATE OF REPORT :02/06/95
I SOURCE TYPE : Well
SUPERVISOR'S INITIALS cf73
EPA NAME OF COMPOUND MCL'AMOUNT EPA NAME OF COMPOUND
AMDUNT
CODE pglL pg/L CODE pglL
I ~::f:t>,:~::·i;i!imij,~Q.~Tg?88!i1~9!img§i;lj!1lllm,J1~g~r!;.~;.l.a;,j:~;:~~:::i{:;:);;i::::~;
2978 VINYL CHLORIDE 2 ND
2210 CHLOROMETHANE ND
I 2977 1.1 ·DICHLOROETHYLENE 7 ND 2214 BROMOMETHANE ND
2981 1.1.1 -TRICHLOROETHANE 200 ND 2216 CHLOROETHANE ND
2982 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 ND 2978 1.1 -DICHLOROETHANE ND
I 2990 BENZENE 5 ND 2416 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND
2980 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE 5 ND 2410 1.1·DICHLOROPROPANE ND
I 2984 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 5 ND
2408 DIBROMOMETHANE ND
2969 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 75 ND 2412 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE ND
2979 T-l.2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 100 ND 2986 1.1.1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND
I 2380 CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 70 ND 2993 BROMOBENZENE ND
2983 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 5 ND
2414 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND
I 2991 TOLUENE 1000 ND 2988 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND
2987 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 5 ND
2965 O-CHLOROTOLUENE ND
2989 CHLOROBENZENE 100 ND 2966 P-CHLOROTOLUENE ND
I 2992 ETHYL BENZENE 700 ND 2967 M-DICHLOROBENZENE ND
2995 ~~c~~IJJIJO!totol xvlene 10000 ND 2212 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND
I 2997 O-XYLENE Itotel xvlene MCL~100001 ND 2218 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND
2996 STYRENE'100 ND 2430 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND
2968 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 600 ND 2994 ISOPROPYLBENZENE ND
I 2964 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 5 NO 2998 N·PROPYLBENZENE ND
2985 1.'.2-TRICHLOROETHANE 5 ND 2424 1.3.5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND
I 2418 1.2.4·TRIMETHYLBENZENE 70 ND 2426 TERT·BUTYLBENZENE ND
~UA;'h idT~M!ill;T"""")}."'I}IIT Iii,2428 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE ND
2941 CHLOROFORM ND 2030 P·ISOPROPYLTOLUENE ND
II 2943 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 2422 N-BUTYLBENZENE ND
-
2944 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE
2942 BROMOFORM
•Mel:Maximum Contaminantlevel
NOTE:An amount of NO Jjg/L indicates that the true
concentration is less than the method
ND
NO
2378 ,,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
2248 NAPTHTHALENE
2246 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2420 ,,Z.3·TRICHLOROBENZENE
2228 CIS-',3-DICHLOROPROPENE
NO
ND
detection limit of 0.5 t/g/L.
COMPOUND
2224 TRANS·',3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TENTATlVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUND
REL,CONC,
ND
I
The above compound has been tentatively identified 8S present. This compound is non regulated and does not require follow up by the orinl
Water Program.
1/93
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~NORTH
.=CREEK
~E ANALYTICAL
18939 120th Avenue N.E ..Surte 101 •Bothell.WA 9801 1·9508 (206j481·9200.FAX 485·2992
East 11115 Montgomery.SuiteB•Spokane.WA 99206·4776 (509)924·9200·FAX 924·9290
9405 S.W.Nimbus Avenue·Beaverton.OR97008·7132 (503)643-9200.FAX 644.2202
I
I
I
geffY~igfM:iY;Viir;;~~~,:~~~.$'~&·~··:::s?-].;,:;~~~.~:,:;.~.~~~:.~~$:·~~~·(::;cfl~rir~;~;Y~rio~mn:'N~ti;.it>~Ya:rM~ji:x~~~~;.l",,'".l~:m::.:%::~:~;x~$:t.:?~:IDS=PT~:~'~:WF~'~~~
Iso CoI~mbla Avenue Sampl~Descript:Water.EDWARD SPRINGS #1 Received:Feb 27.19951;1
llMarysvllle,WA 98270 AnalysIs Method:EPA 524.2 Analyzed:Mar 10.1995!\
;iAllention:GaryOlsen Sample Number:B502431-o1 Reported:Mar 14,1995t
':':'W1'C~%1®t:1Nm,%%mW%%R~"*,!Wjm%"'}*"":w,~~%'~",,,",,,,..,i"%""~Nm%@t!:"1'C:=:IT"%1lf.%"»,.'..S'%Mi;qM':%,,,@J~,$\>:,*,••M,,"\%1l~!m!~:},.j!%k**I
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS
Analytes reported as N.D.were not detected above the stated Reporting Umit.
Acetone.............................................................................0.50
Benzene.............................................................................0.50
Bromodichloromethane....................................................0.50
Bromoform........................................................................0.50
Bromomethane.................................................................0.50
2-BlIlanone........................................................................0.50
Carbon disulfide................................................................0.50
Carbon tetrachloride.........................................................0.50
Chlorobenzene..................................................................0.50
Chloroethane.......................................0.50
Chloroform........................................................................0.50
Chloromethane.................................................................0.50
Dibromochloromethane....................................................0.50
1,1-Dichloroethane............................................................0.50
1.2-Dichloroethane............................................................0.50
1.1-Dichloroethene............................................................0.50
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene......................................................0.50
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene..................................................0.50
1.2·Dichloropropane.........................................................0.50
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene...................................................0.50
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene................................................0.50
Ethylbenzene.....................................................................0.50
2·Hexanone.......................................................................0.50
Methylene chloride............................................................0.50
4-Methyl-2-pentanone.......................................................0.50
Styrene..............................................................................0.50
1.1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane.................................................0.50
Tetrachloroethene.............................................................0.50
Toluene..............................................................................0.50
1,1.1-Trichloroethane........................................................0.50
1.1.2-Trichloroethane........................................................0.50
Trichloroethene.................................................................0.50
Vinyl chloride.....................................................................0.50
Total Xylenes 0.50
Analy1e
NORTH CREEK ANALYTICAL Inc.
~~~~~
ProjectManager
Reporting Umit
119/L (ppb)
Surrogate Standards Percent Recovery:
1.2-0ichtoroethane-d4 104
Toluene-d8 101
4-8l'omofluorobenzene 95
Sample Results
119/L (ppb)
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
Control
Umits
76-114
86-110
86-115
B502431.CCC <2>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:'CilY"J~I';""~','''';"'''-'C!''''''''''''6ii:;;ifP~e;rlf:''''''~p,~~'''''''''...."""'''''.''''...:""':":"Si~;r:''''~';;h::2:9.."i'99'5~~
~80 Columbia Avenue sample Oescript:Water.SUNNYSIDE WELL Recetved:Feb 27.'995~
:'Marysvllie.WA 98270 AnaIysIsMIIlhod:EPA524.2 Analyzed:Mar 10.1995i
::~~~~~~:~I~~2.:~~:':~;_~~£~.~.'.~_i,~;~.8 ~~~.~~~~~~~.'4"';~~'~:~;-;~"t~~:.~.~;~~~~~~:~~;·~!~:..~~~
lWh 120\:"A1j'fl"lUf N E.•S..181Ul•UOthC'I,WA.~FIl'llt·A~1M tliIfi141t1!f1lJU'FAA 4w.,.:>99'
Etno1111'5 \4Onl.9O""<'Y.Suite R •~K.""•.WAWlUb 41/6 (:1.>9)9'4·1,11110'tAJl,11101 ~l'JO
94~S W Nlne"w,.....1tluC 'lJc~Cf1on,on 9700A.l1:l:'(!nJI &1'.1 WOO·rA'l(r-...,,..,,
Analytn report.d ••N.C.wer.not detected abOve ttl.stat.d Alportl"O Umrt.
P.03
850243\cee ".:)>
76-114
8&-110
~116
Sample Ra.uIta
I'll/L (ppb)
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
1.1
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.O.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D
Control
umlll
15:5203-14-95
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
o.so
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
1,2.DtChloroelhan'-d4 101
To!w.n.-d8 100
4·8tomotlvolobSOI.M Q5
Reporting Umlt
POlL (ppb)
ZOO 485 zssz
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS
~NORTH
~CREEK
=~ANALYTICAL
NORTH CREEK
Analyte
ACelOM .
Bonzono .
Bromodlchloromelhane ,.
Bromotonn .
Bromomelhane .
2-8utanone .
Carbon disulfide .
Carbon llltrachIOf!de ..
ChIorobonzena .
ChIoroathana ..
Chlorotonn._.
ChIoromothana..
Dlbromochloromelhana ..
1.1-Dlchloroathano ..
l,2-DlchlorOOlhane .
1.1-Dichloroathene ..
cis 1.2-DIChlor08thane ..
trans 1.2·DlchlOfoolhane ..
1.2-Dlchloropropane ..
cis 1.3·Dlchloropropene .
trans 1.3-Dlchloropropone ..
Elhylbenzene ..
2-Haxanona ..
Methylene chloride .
4·Molhyl·2-pentanone ..
Slyrane ..
1,1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane .
TetraChlor08lhane ..
Toluono .
1.1.1.Trlchloroethane ..
1.1.2·TrlchioroOlhane ..
Trlchloroethana .
Vinyl chloride .
TolelXy1anes ..
NORTH CREEK ANALYTlCALInc.
J~~r~~p~:t:=
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
III
1206148'·9200'FAX '85·2992
1509192'·9200'FAX 92'·9290
150316'3·9200'FAX 64'·2202
18939 1201h Avenue N.E ..SUIte 101 •Bothell.WA 98011 ·9508
East 11115 Montgomery.SuiteB •Spokane.WA99206·4776
9405 S.w.Nmnus Avenue e Beaverton.OR97008·7132
~NORTH
=CREEK
-~ANALYTICAL
I
I
I
.;,:::••,•••,••••::.,::.',~::'••.•;:.'.'.;;.::.'.::.•::.::::.;~~,.,.::.•::.::.::.•••;::.,.';.::".•:•..,.::.~.".•..'.'.•'.::'.••.'..::.::.•:~.••...,.•~••:.••'.•.~..,..:~•.•.•::::•.,.;:.::::.•:,.'.:~.••,.::.::..:~.•,.::.'.•:::<..•:~::.:::.'•.,.:::.•.:;••.:?'"......•~;..:.».....•.•..•:;•.'.•.•..,.'.•':..::.':'...'.'.:::-.•..•,•.:,.'.•.,.':.::.:;•.•,.::~.::..~~.•.••;.::;:--••.::.:,.'.•..,.::,::•.••::;:;:.::.:~.•..:••.,•.:::.::'•..::::.::.:,'.••~.::••.::.'.':::.::.':.':;:.::.'~:.~:;::~:::.::~:::::;:~;:::':::::....<;,.;.•:.:':~.:.::':,:!:",':.:':.::.:.:;~:;:~;:::y :.:.:.:.:-;::~;~:::;,"*.:'t:;:$:'::::;::::;;.::~::~::.~~;':;:~:~:::;::;:':':):.:'"':'::...',.....'v''.•...,_.'........•..,•.· ••••··.·.·.··.,·,·,w·...•-,·:·.·,·,·,,..',$,,;.,.",,w.·,·,·w···,··..•'::<::Ciiyof Marysville "OielltProjecllD:Not Provided .ampled. Dec 20.1994"
80 Columbia Avenue SampleDescript: Water.SUNNYSIDEWELL Received: Dec 20. 1994 1[I
,:Marysville.WA 98270 Analysis Method: EPA 8081 Extracted: Dec 21,1994t
jAttention: Gary Olsen SampleNumber:412-13n Analyzed: Dec 23·30.1994W
Reported: Jan 5. 1995 Ii;\>r.'%!wm~m1\'""ww,1i:i%'Wnwnwi:":,c·",~"m,I;:i"%&'Wm';:,:',::,"'EI:1%:i''''",""·"m,:·:·,:,..';;·,,,,'d,.,,'n':':iW''M·;;,c,prM1i:':·:'MH';"""%';W""R'·~t.!xl.'1C.,;.,·,,,,,I'h»:,.'W'~«~I
ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES AND PCB'S
Tetrachtoro-rn-xytene Surrogate Recovery.%:95
Surrogate Recovery Control Limits are 28 -144 %.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated Reporting Limit.
~o CREEK ANp.tYTiCAl:.lnc.
,,0./.'t5f'1'1 -'1~,'f "::A-.-''/~.'/7//1...-'.,/(/~norfSto~ell.(I w C l
.Project Manager
Analyte
Aldrin .
alpha-BHC .
beta-BHC .
delta-BHC .
gamma-SHC (Undane).
Chlordane ..
4,4··000 ..
4,4·-DDE ..
4,4'-DDT .
Dieldrin ..
Endosulfan I .
Endosulfan II .
Endosulfansulfate ..
Endrin .
Endrinaldehyde .
Heptachlor ..
Heptachlor expoxide .
Methoxychlor ..
Toxaphene ..
PCB-1016 .
PCB-1221 .
PCB-1232 .
PCB-1242 .
PCB-1248 .
PCB-1254 .
PCB-1260 .
Reporting Limit
j./g/L (ppb)
0.040
0.020
0.030
0.020
0.030
0.15
0.040
0.030
0.090
0.070
0.030
0.050
0.070
0.080
0.080
0.030
0.030
5.0
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
Sample Results
j./g/L (ppb)
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
4121376.CCC <4>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I:
II
~'.'
-;
mgtl
0.;;2..--------
----'-
<.5.0
0_002
0.1·
0.002
0_05
0.1
'.0.05
Hardness
Conductivity 700
Turbidity 1.0
Color 15.0
Chloride CI 250
Cyanide CN 0.2
Fluoride F 2.0
NilrateP as N 10.0
Nitrile as N 1.0
Sulfate 504 250
ros 500
LABORATORY COMMENTS:
'(;,.
Sta.of Walhlngton..'~
Thal/ium TI
Zinc Zn
Iron Fe
Nickel Ni
Mercuri'Hg
Manganese Mn
Lead'Pb
Chromiun!'Cr
Copper Cu
.Sodiun!'_..Na".
·Seleniun!'Se
·Silver,', .Ag
·Cadmiun!'Cd
.,.",
s. -
'j ...
9. SOURCE NAME:
DAFTER
.TREATMENT
DWELL i
o P.lJRCHA~E
-L
13. PART
12. IF TAKENFROMDISTRIBUTION, INDICATE ADDRESS
....
II.IF TA,KEN AnER TREATMENT.
CHECK TREATMENT.
•!....0 FLUORIDATIONoCHLORINATION
:...0 FILTRATION
-s 0 WATER SOFTENER.
TYPE:_
o OTHER,
',:'SIGNATURE:-.1-.l.U!.A.lt---61~""''''''~=_
1·~.NAME_'_---""--I--J-.:r_--UI=-_ln.t:1~V:t.U!"
I
I
I
Ci79-
'ADDRESS~"•
.~~.,'(J -'..' .en.1\:.~sv;u..t:-w"RW~__
I·ii'.pllj))
1-;-:~L~,::::~",,'-,q-~'''-''Y-=o;-,:-,~-m-'-'-d:-''-'~-~-:::''-:';:l-'-''-''-',-,-:C I
I
I
-------.._._------_._-~----_.,.-
LABORATORY SUPERVISOR'
"..--f-~?;?~,~::-,'--1;'
I
...'.•~••••,:0-.....,_.,IIY
''',
.',-:
.."t..','.J ",
"
'.,.:;;/f
.-.,t;:..L".
i';f,3:'SYSTEMI ':',
.',1.;"
..I ;i.LC",".
aup
.'H&>A/\,'.,5 hi
'j'00 -c,
.5.,C<;xJ
A B
Copper,
Iron
Lead'
Cr 0.1
Cu ~-ul.
.Fe,/-·0,3
Pb 0,052
mgn '.
mgn
ManganeseMn 0.05 .mgil '"
MercurY·Hg 0.002 ..mgn :
Nickel Ni O.1
SeleniumP·.'·Se ·0.05
'Thallium TI .'0.002
;I'I Hardness
II Zinc Zn 5.0
~iAKEN AFTER TREAH.1ENT
"'ECK iJ:;EAH..IENT
Conductivity 700
TurbidnyP 7.0
Cbtonde
Cyanide
Fluoride
Nilrate P as N
20
Nitrite as N I,
Suttete 50.1 250 mgn
TOS I 500
;..
I
..","
:LABORATORY SUPERVISOR'
.---.,-------..---------------....--...-------OATEOF'nEP21
",&.;.'0';:•
:CHARGL
APPENDIX E
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS COST ESTIMATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
1 _
D-1.XLS
Watar System Project Costs
Estimating method per North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan
Project:0-1,64th St.NE/83rd Ave.NE to 84th St.NE/83rd Ave.NE
(Via OIYlJlpic Pipeline ROW)
4874 Mar-90
5443 Jan-95
Unit Costs based on ENR CCI
Current ENR CCI =
Construction (Bid)Costs:Qty Unit Unit Price
Transmission main,24·8,900 LF $103 $916,700
Construction Costs Subtotal:$916,700
Contingency @ 25 %$229,175
Environ. Reg.'s @ 0%$
Indirect Costs @ 40 %$366,680
Land Cost
Easement/ Right - of -way 7,000 LF $10 $70,000
TOtal $1,582,555
Index factor:1.12
Adjusted total:$1,767,305
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D-2.XLS
Water System Project Costs
Project:0-2,84th St.NE/83rd Ave.NE to proposed 1DOth St.NE Reservoir
Estimating method per Nnrth Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4874 Mar-90
5443 Jan-95CurrentENRCCI=
Unit Costs based on Efo,;c CCI
Construction (Bid)Costs:Qty Unit Unit Price
Transmission main,20"4,600 LF $90 $414,000
Construction Costs Subtotal:$414,000
Contingency @ 25 %$103,500
Environ.Reg.'s @ 0%$
Indirect Costs @ 40 %$165,600
Land Cost
Easement/Right - of - way 4,600 LF $10 $46,000
Total $729,100
Index factor:1.12
Adjusted total:$814,217
D-3.XLS
Water System Project Costs
Project:0·3.Cedarcrest Reservoir to Project 0-1 via Grove St.Extension
Estimating method per North Snohomish County Coordinated Water Syst~m Plan
4874 Mar-90
5443 Jan-95
Unit Costs based on ENR CCI
Current ENR CCI =
Construction (8id) Costs:Qty Unit Unit Price
Transmission main,24'2,000 LF $103 $206.000
Construction Costs Subtotal:$206,000
Contingency @ 25 %$51.500
Environ. Reg.'s @ 0%$
Indirect Costs @ 40 %$82,400
Land Cost
Easement! Right - of - way 4,600 LF $10 $46,000
Total $385,900
Index factor:1.12
Adjusted total:$430,951
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D-4.XlS
Project:0-4,100th St. NE Reservoir to 67th Ave.NE
Water System Project Costs
Estimating method per North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan
------
I
I
I
I
I
I
535,600 I
535,600
I133,900
I
214,240
I
883,740 I
I
986,909
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4874 Mar-90
5443 Jan-95CurrentENRCCI=
Unit Costs based on ENR CCI
Construction (Bid) Costs:Qty Unit Unit Price
Transmission main,24n 5,200 IF $103 $
Construction Costs Subtotal:$
Contingency @ 25 %$
Environ.Reg.'s @ 0%$
Indirect Costs @ 40 %$
land Cost
Easement! Right - of -way 0 IF $10 $
Total $
Index factor:1.12
Adjusted total:$
----------------------------------------------
D-5.XLS
Water System Project Costs
Estimating method per North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan
Project:0-5,Extend 64th St.NE water main to 71st Ave. NE and Install
new PRY and vault
5443 Jan-95
4874 Mar-90
Construction (8id) Costs:Oty Unit Unit Price
Transmission main,10·250 LF $103 $25,750
PRY and vault 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
Construction Costs Subtotal:$46,750
Contingency @ 25 %$11,688
Environ.Reg.'s @ 0%$
Indirect Costs @ 40 %$18,700
Land Cost
Easement! Right -of - way 250 LF $10 $2,500
Total $79,638
Index factor:1.12
Adjusted total:$88,935
Current ENRCCI =
Unit Costs based on ENRCCI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
o-6.XLS
Water System Project Costs
Project:0-6,Replace 300 LF of existing 6"at State Ave.J100th St.NE
Estimating method per North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'.
I
I
4874 Mar-90
5443 Jan-95
Construction (Bid)Costs:Qty Unit Unit Price
Transmission main, 12
1
•300 LF $54 $16,200
Construction Costs Subtotal:$16,200
Contingency @ 25 %
$4,050
Environ.Reg.'s @ 0%$
Indirect Costs @ 40 %$6,480
Land Cost
Easementl Right - of -way 0 LF
$10 $
Total $26.730
Index factor:1.12
Adjusted total:$29,851
Unit Costs based on ENR CCI
Current ENR CCI =
ST-1.XLS
Water System Project Costs
Project:ST • 1, Recommended 6.0 MG 100th St.NE Reservoir
Estimating method per North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan
4874 Mar-90
5443 Jan-95
Construction (Bid) Costs:Oty Unit Unit Price
Steel tank,estimated 50 ft tall 1 LS $1,048,000 $1,048,000
Foundation 594 CY $186 $110,484
Construction Costs Subtotal:$1,158,484
Contingency @ 25 %$289,621
Environ. Reg.'s @ 0%$
Indirect Costs @ 40 %$463,394
Land Cost
Reservoir site 0.5 acre $10,000 $5.000
Easementl Right - of - way 0 LF $10 $
Total $1,916,499
Index factor:1.12
Adjusted total:$2,140,234
Current ENRCCI =
Unit Costs based on ENR CCI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ST-2.XLS
Watar Systam Project Costs
Estimating method per North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan
Project: ST - 2, Recommended North End 3.0 MG Reservoir
(Near 67~h Ave. NE and 132nd St. NEI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4874 Mar-90
5443 Jan-95
Construction (8id) Costs:Qty Unit Unit Price
Steel tank,estimated 50 ft tall 1 LS
$631,438 $631,438
Foundation 163 CY $186 $30,318
Transmission main,24"13,500 LF $103 $1,390,500
Construction Costs Subtotal:$2,052,256
Contingency @ 25 %
$513,064
Environ. Reg.'s @ 0%$
Indirect Costs @ 40 %$820,902
Land Cost
Reservoir site
0.5 acre $10,000 $5,000
Easement! Right - of - way
13,500 LF $10 $135,000
Total $3,526,222
Index factor:1.12
Adjusted total:$3,937,880
Current ENR CCI =
Unit Costs based on ENR CCI
ST-3.XLS
Water Systam Projact Costa
Project:ST - 3, Raise Highway 9 Res. &improve 490 zone pressures
Estimating method per North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan
4874 Mar-90
5443 Jan-95CurrentENRCCI=
Construction (Bid)Costs:Qty Unit Unit Price
Jack existing tank &
add 55 feet of plating 1 LS $258,908 $258,908
Additional ring footing 113 CY $186 $21,018
Construction Costs Subtotal:$279,926
Contingency @ 25 %$69,982
Environ. Reg.'s @ 0%$
Indirect Costs @ 40%$111,970
Land Cost
Reservoir site 0 acre $10,000 $
Easement! Right - of -way 0 LF $10 $
Total $461,878
Index factor:1.12
Adjusted total:$515,798
Unit Costs based on ENR CCI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ST-4.XLS
Projact:ST -4, New 490 Zone Reservoir.3.0 MG
Watar Systam Projact Costs
Estimating method per North Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
4874 Mar-90
5443 Jan-95
Construction (8id) Costs:Qty Unit Unit Price
Steel tank,estimated 50 ft tall 1 LS
$631.438 $631.438
Foundation 163 CY $186 $30,318
Construction Costs Subtotal:$661,756
Contingency @ 25 %
$165.439
Environ.Reg.'s @ 0%$
Indirect Costs @ 40 %$264,702
Land Cost
Reservoir site
0.5 acre $10,000 $5,000
Easementl Right - of - way 0 LF $10 $
Total $1,127,215
Index factor:1.12
Adjusted total:$1,258,809
Current ENRCCI =
Unit Costs based on ENR CCI
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
APPENDIX F
CONTRACT FOR EMERGENCY INTERTIE
SEVEN LAKES WATER ASSOCIATION
I
I
I
:.:::.'.~."
'1 .'"',
"':.',.
c,', .•~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'rhi s con t r nc t l s mnde nnd cn t or cd into.hy nnd he t wcen the
City or Mn rys v l ltc,n r mun I c l pn l co rpor n r i cn duly o r gan i z cd nnd
cxistiTlg tinder the Inw~01"tl,e State of Wnshington,hcrci,nnrtcT
ref'er r ed to ns "City",and Seven Lakes Wat"T Association,a non-
prorit Wn~llington corporation,11crcinaftcr referred to as
"i\!'~Oci3tion";
IVITNnSSf:TlI:
WHEREAS,the City ond the A••ociotion arc hoth eotohli.hed
:15 pub l i c pu rvcy or s of water within their respective uti lity ...c rv i cc
n r cn s l oc a t cd in Snohomish County,W:l5hington;a nd
WIIF.REAS,said uti]ity service ar eas or o ad i nccn t to one
another,nnd an lntcrtic IJctwcen the water 5Y5tcln~wouJd I,C of
mutual hcnc Li t under emergency circumstances;and
WHEREAS,the City is authorized pur.uont to RCW ~SA.80.0In
nnd ]5.92.200 to entcr into contrncts with privatc corporntions and
~~Roci:'tions for such purposes;Now,'rllerc(ore
In consideration of tile mutual covcnants contained florein
:lnd IIIC Ilcncfits nrl.sing thercfrom it is herehy 3Arecd as follow~:
1.Point of Connection."11C point of connection j-or
tllc intertie I,ctween the C1tyi s water Rystcm and tile Associati,on's
watcr system shall he at the City'~J~akc Goodwin well site.Saitl
connection shall i uc Lude a meter,n pp r ov cd by the City,a p r c s su r c
r cduc c r ,:1 pump ,and c lcc tri cn l service to sa i d pump.
z.Connection and Maintenance Cost •.Tile City .hall paf
1"01"onc-hnll oi'the cost OT materuds,lncluding the'wn t cr mc t cr ,
nnd i ns t aLl n ti on of the s amo ,.in the npp r ox i ma t c amount of
$1,1(19,50,p j us the City shall pay for the pressure reducer in t hc
llpproximatc nmount of $6SR.OO.'fhe Association shall pny for onc-
hal f or the cost of the materials,including the water meter,and
instnlJation of the snmc In the npproximnte amount of $1,169.511,
plus tile A~50ciation ~lln11 pRy for tile cost of the pump and
e l cc t r i ca I service.The As s oci a t i on shall he responsible for n l l
(ost~of m~int~lining tl,C pllmp,:llld illl ~lcctric~1 cllnrgcs il1cllrrcu
In COllllcction tllcrewith.
~.S!!£of \\Iotcr on 0 T~mporn,!.Y_~tJsi::.tJpo,:the completion
of t hc intC'Ttlc t and lor a pcrlod o:rnot more than lour mon t hs
t ho r co Lt c r ,thc City n~rC'cR to SI'11 thc Ass oc i n r t on wa t c r which,
\"';'1)he de l i vor cd t hr ough said intertie i.n quantities not exccc di n g
200,()UU g~llon~per day.'I'hl'snJc of ~uid water ~hnll 1)('sul,jcct
'"0 tile fOllowing conditions:
:1.The As s oc i n t i on s hn l I pn y the Ci.ty ]5et p cr
t hou s un d g:Jllons dc Li vc r ed ,with said pnymc n t s t.o
he ma de on .,monthly has i s within thirty d:JY~01 :1
r cr oi p t or n hi II ing fOT the:'!,;lIl1C'from the Cit)'.
h.The:'City sho t t usc r-cuson nhl c diligence nnd
c nre to provide .1 re qul or ;.1fHI uni nrcr ru p tcd supply
or wu t c r n t.the p oin t c o f dc.l l ve r y .[10h'C-VCI',tilt,
City shall not be 1 i ab l e f or a ny F u i lure,
intcrrllptjon or sllorttlgc of w:ltcr,or rOt·;111Y
Joss or clnmugr rcsulti,,~tl1crcfrorn,OCC~~I()rlCd
1n whole or in part hy :.lily cause heyond the
rcnsonablc control of the <:ity.
c.In pCTiod~of peak cOI\sumption or
restricted supply caUSill&water sllortagcs,the
Association agrees to i~pose lise rcstrictiollS
on all of its customers I>cing served w~tcr to
the s ume extcnt <.IS the City imposes usc re s r r i c t i cu s
on i t s customers during 5,1 id periods.
d.The City agrees that all water delivered
to the Association shall conform to and meet
water quality criteria of tI,e Stote of Wasl,jllgtofl
Deportment of Health,and will he of the .ame
qual ity ~IS to chem i cu l and bnc t cr i nl con t en t :IS
that delivered I,y the City to its otller W:ltcr
customers.All wuter supplied by the City for use
or sale by the Association ~hlll1 be upon ti,e
express condition that after it has p:,~scd tIle
point of de I ivcry the same hcc omes the property
or the Association,and the City shall not be
liable for al'Y dtlmages or lo~s Ilcyond SllicJ l'Oillt.
Thc Association shall assumc the sale right and
responsibility for the distrlhutlon of all woter
passing beyond tile point of delivery,nnd Ilcrcby
agrees to indemnify and hold tI,e City Ilnrmlcss
rrom any and all claims which mny arise from s uch
distribution.
4.Emergency t:ross Connections.Botll ti,e City lilld ti,e
Association ngrce that tl,e lntertle may be used to provide lldJition:11
water to eitllcr party,at nny time,a~temporary emergency relief
in cascs whcre the watcr supply of onc of the p~rties i~suddcllly
t b rea t oncd by unanticipated damage,d i sas t er ,source La l lur c ,or
mechnnical or electrical failure.Tl,C mere fnct tllot there is a
drought,and either party is Iowan water,shall not hc c ous i dcrcd
~s calise for use of the intcrtie.In the event that hotl\ptlrtics
su If cr from simultaneous emergencies,both s haLl l mp lcmcn t wu r cr
restricti.ons;if such restrictions do not relieve the cmCl'~cncy,
the party supplying the water through tl,e intertie may give
preference to its customers nnd may sltut off the illtertie.At
nny time tile intcrtie is beillg used for emergency relief pllrl'os~s,
the party supplying the water shnll have the discretion to
determine the quantity supplied,if any.Payment for water
pUSSiTlg t}lrougll the intertie for emergency purposes sllul1 I)c all
tl,c busis of tl,e then current Marysville rural w~ter Tntc.
s.~imitation.Nothing in tbis contract shall hc
construcd ns creating 3 permancnt water usc agreement I'CtWCCll tl,C
City olld ti,e Association,nor vesting either purty witll rigllts-to
the other party's water.Neither this contract nor any p r i v i lege
grunted herein shall be n~signed by eitllcr party wi.thout ti,e
written consent of the otller party.All amcndmelltS I,ereto sllall
he effective only wllcn reduced to writing alld signed by hoth p:ll'tics.
The terms and conditions hereof s ha l l be b i ndl ng upon and inure
to the l>cnefit of ti,e SUCCC5sors nnJ ilssigns of eithcr p'lrty.
6.Termination of Contract.The term or t h i s c cn t rnc t
shall be Lr om the dlltc or i t s cx ecu t t on and s ha l l continue in
effect until terminated 11y ~utual conScllt of the parties,01"l)y
sixty days writt~n notice.of illtention to terminate lleing scrvctl
by one p ar t y on the other.
Con rr nc t for Water System Emergency Tntcrt ic ~Pag,c '1'\0/0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATI:D this JL~d"Y'or __N1_.·L J"7'IJJIi'-l~""'=>=.__':J ••
TIlE CITY or MIlIlYSVTI.I.E
IITTEST:
I
I
I
I
111''1'105'1':
TIll:SeVEN LIlKeS IiIlTER
))
u ."---;1:I,/J'y .::..::-<::<:....(,.<::..)~,,
PresIdent.
ASSOCI liT ION
/~'-~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Contrnct fOT Water System Emergency l n t er t i.e -Page Three
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX G
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT,
WATER PURCHASE AND MUNICIPAL UTILITY
INTERTIE -CITY OF ARLINGTON
I
I
I
lIrrUlll.OCAL J\GIlUi;~'UNT I'D\(UASE~U:NT,
WATUJ(I'UllCIlASU,ANU ,
~IUN I CI r AL UTI LI TY 1NTUIlTl U
jj!/I7/t)
«:Ire",1.,11'"iii
osvr 2AiU
(;..If:.A '"7 W i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TillS AGRIJl;MUNT is made and entered into:by and between
ti,e CITY 01'NAIlYSVILLIJ,a municipal corporation d~ly-orcanized and
existing under the laws of the State of Washington,and the .CITY OF
AIlLINGTON,a municipal corporation duly-organized and existing under
tile laws of the State of Washington;
!!1!.~§.~~!!.!.f1 :
~d-
WHElleAS,the CITY OF ~IAIlYSVILLl;duires t9 construct a
water transmission main connecting its well on the Stillaguamish
River to its distribution system,and said main is a8sigftsd te cross 4A1
certain property at the Arlington Municipal Airport owned by and
within the corporate limits of the CITY OF ARLINGTON;and
WllElljj/(~CI'fY OF MARYSYI LLU Idy i Ie 5 ella t 'l1ie CI'fY
UF ARLINGTON gran~>+an e as emen t for its water line to cross a certain
portion of said airport,and the CITY OF ARLINGTON agree,t9 grant~
said easement without cost to the Cl'I'Y 01'MARYSVILLe upon the terms
and conditions hereinafter·set forth;and
WHURUAS,the CITY OF ARLINGTON .ee~e5 ta tal1r:to said
transmission line and purchas{limited quantities of water from the
CITY OF ~lARYSVILLU for the purpose of distributing the same through
the Arlington public water system to a certain limited area as
hereinafter described;and
WHUREAS.the parties herete desire to enter into an agree-
ment whereby their water systems will be inter tied solely for emergency
purposes;and
WHEREAS,the CITY OF MARYSVILLE is authorized to contract
for the distribution of water to other municip~lities pursuant to
HCW 35A.80.010 and 35.9Z.Z00;and
WHl;RIJAS.the CITY OF ARLINGTON is authorized to provide
wu t ur utility serv Lcu i ns Ido and ou t s Ldo of it~ce rpo ru t o Ilndt.,lind
to contract with other JIlunicipo.lities for the ~cquisition of water f01"
said purposes pursuant to RCW 3S.Z1.ZIO,35.9Z.170 and 35.9Z.ZZ0;and
Agreement - I
WllllJUlAS,the part ies here to des ire to en te r in to th is
I
Interlocal Agreement pursuant to the provisions of RCW 39.34 for the
purpose of providing for the CQl\6\rlKtiOlI alld maintenance of ~Iarys
ville's trunsmission line referred to above,and providing for the
sale of wuter from said transmission line to the CITY Of ARLING'I'ON;
Now,Therefore,
IN CONSIDliRAl'ION of the mutual covenants contained herein,
and the benefits arising therefrom,it is hereby agreed as follows:
1.liasement.Arlington hereby grants,bargains,sells,
t r ans Ee r s and conveys unto ~Iarysville 8 permanent e as emen t over,uc rc s s I
uLoug and under the following described property situated in Sno-
homish County,Washington:
The llast 10 feet of the Eust 3/4 of the NWI/4 of
Section 21, Township 31 North,Itange 5 EWM,LllSS
County Road.
Said easement shall be for the purpose of installing,constructing,
operating,maintaining,removing,repairing,replacing and using a
water pipeline Or lines with all connections,manholes and appurtenances
thereto,together wi~h the right of ingress to and egress from said
described property for the foregoing purposes;provided that in the
event private improvements are disturbed or damag ed in either the
original installation or in maintenance of such water pipeline or lines,
~Ia rysv i Ile shall irnmedia te ly,after such ins tall ation or main tenance,
restore said premises to their original condition as near as may be.
This easement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be
binding on Arlington,its successors and assigns,forever,unless
terminated pursuant to the terms of this agreement.
Z.Permits and Franchises.Arlington agrees to grant
Marysville all permlts and franchises required for the construction of
the transmission line on property within the jurisdictional boundaries
of Arlington,and on public rights-of-way owned or controlled by
Arlington.Such permits and franchises shall be at no cost to Marysville,
3.Fire Hydrants.Marysville agrees to install fire
hydrants along the transmlSsion line at points designated on the map
marked "lixhibit A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference.The local fire district and the City of Arlington
Fire Department shall have access to such hydrants for emergency purposes
at no cost.
4.Sale of Ilater.Subject to the terms,ccnd i t Lons and
limitations hereInafter set forth.Marysville agrees to sell and deliver
water from the above-described transmission line to Arlington,and
Arlington agrees to purchase and receive said water from Marysville:
(al Price.In determination of.the price
hereinaftermentioned,Marysville acknowledges that
after considering all factors mentioned in RCW
35.9Z.010 (and partiCUlarly the capital contribution
made to its water system through the grunr of tne
uus~mellt II"r~ln),It I,as classlflud Arlingtu"us
being in a differont class thall that'of an ordinary
Jlousellold.industriul or comillerc!u!user of wlltor,
and under such classification the price or rates to
be charged as herein set forth is not other than
Agreement .2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
uniform for said class.Arli a rees to ~ay
Marysville the minimum sum 0 r 100 cubic feet
of water delivered under thi ement;with said
payments to be made on a mont y basis within 30
days of receipt of a billing for the sa~e from
Marysville.The water rate fixed herein shall be sub-
ject to review and revision by increase;or decrease
on or before the 1st day of June of eVefY Sth year
hereafter,or at such other intermediat6 times as the
parties may mutually agree upon. In such rate reviews,
the following criteria and method shall be followed to
establish the rates for the ensuing period of time:
(1) The "cash method"shall be used
which is based on a requirement of derivIng
sufficient revenue for Marysville to cover
the costs specified in subparagraph (3) below.
(2) For the purpose of calculating the
COStS provided for herein,the parties will
assume,regardless of fact,that'sufficient
water is available at the Stillaguamish Well
to ..eet the delivery requirements provided
for in this agreement,and that the trans-
mission line between said well and the point
of delivery is the only utility line used in
connection with this agreement.
(3) Only the follOWing two costs will beconsidered:
a. 'Opera tion,main tenance und
repair expenses of the Stillaguamish
Well,waterworks,transmission line
and appurtenances between the source
and the point of delivery at 172nd
Street NE.Said costs,for which
MarYSVille is solely responsible,shall
be analyzed by an engineering consul-
tant retained by Marysville,and an
accounting shall be made for the same
shOWing the allocation per 1,000 gallons
of water delivered over the preceding
rate period,and also projecting the
allocation per 1,000 gallons delivered
OVer the ensuing rate period~
b.Depreciation (replacement and
improvement costs)for the Stillaguamish
Well,waterworks,transmission'line and
appurtenances between the source and the
point of delivery at 172nd Street NB.
Such costs shall be based upon a lOa-year
life of the pipeline and of all structural
components of the system;and a 2S-year
life of all mechanical and electrical com-
ponents of the system,inClUding pumps and
controls.Such costs shall ba analyzad
by an enginaering consultant retained by
MarYSVille and an accounting shall be
made for the same shOWing the allocation
per 1,000 fallons of water delivered over
thu precod IIg ruto puriod,end ulso
projecting the allocation per 1,000 gullullS
delivered over the ensuing rate period.
Agreement·3
(4) The rate t.O be charged to .
Arlington during the next rate period shall
be the sum of the projected costs calculated
pursuant to paragraphs (3)a and b ilbove,
provided that such costs shall be divided by
the total number of gallons of water delivered
-through ~Iarysville's transmission l~ne from
tho Stilluguamish Well site to all bf Marys-
ville's end Arlington's customers.A master
meter at the well site shall be installed to
determine this total flow figure..
(b)Point of Uelivery.Marysville shell deliver
water to Arlington at a maximum of three points of
delivery,all of which will be located by mutual agree-
ment of the parties.Two of said points of delivery
shall be located along the transmission line within
the above-described easement,and one of said points of
delivery shall be located along 43rd Avenue NB at a
point chosen by Arlington,At each point of delivery
there shall be a tae and gate valve with a lO-inch valve
capacity.Such tees and valvas shall be installed at
Marysville's cost;any and all additional tees or valves
shall be installed at Arlington's cost.
(c)Service Areas.Marysville and Arlington
hereby mutually recogni.e and grant to the other the
exclusive right to provide water utility services to
any and all persons and property loceted within their
respective service areas as identified on tile map
marked "exhibit U"and incorporated herein by refarence.
Although Arlington does not have a formal service area,
it is recognized that water delivered pursuant to
this contract is intended solely for use on the Arling-
ton Airport,west of Runway 115-33,and wast of said
runway if extended north and south to the north and
south boundaries 'of said airport.The service area
boundaries may be amended by mutual consent of the
partios.Neither party will sellar distribute water
to customers in the service area of.the other party
without haVing obtained a prior consent of that other
party,and where necessary,the Snohomish County
Boundary Review Board.
(d)Land Use Planning.In determining the avail-
ability of expanded water service within their respective
service areas,the parties shall act consistently with
the applicable comprehensive land use plans and the appli-
cable comprehensive utility studies affecting said areas.
(eJ Quantity of Water.
(1)Marysville shall use reasonable
diligence and care to provide a regular and
uninterrupted supply of water at the point
of delivery for as long as .the Stillaguamish
Well is functioning .s a collector site.
Marysville shall not be liable for any failure,
interruption or shortage of water,or for
any loss or damage resulting tllerefrom,occa-
sioned in whole or in purt by any cause beyond
the roa.ullobIo control of Murysville.In tl,o
event the Stillaguamish Well falls to produco
the quantity of water requirod by reason of a
change of natural conditions at the collector
l\~reCJ1lent •4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I\~re c..:1110 II t •5
I
site,~larysvilll\reserves the right:to abandon
the waterworks'and ~he portion of the trans-
mission line north of 43rd Avenue NU,and
terminate all service'connections thereto,
including those provided for in this agreement.
All rights and obligations under th~s agreement
shall thereafter terminate as provided below,
except that ~Iarysville shall ccnt iuue to provide
water from an alternate source to the north
terminus of 43rd Avenue Nil on the terms and
conditions provided for herein,and such water
service shall continue for as long as Marysville
maintains its stotus as a public utility.
With respect to the portion of Marysville's
t runsmtss Ion line which is abandoned along the
easement granted herein,Arlington reserves
the right to require ~Iarysville to remove said
line or to deed the same to Arling tcn ,
(2)After commencement of delivery pur-
suant to this contract,in periods of peak
consumption or restricted supply causing wDter
shortages,Arlington agrees to impose use
restrictions on all of its customers being served
water from the Marysville line to the same ex-
tent as Marysville imposes use restrictions on
its customers during said periods pursuant to
Ordinance No.950,a copy of which is attached
hereto'as "Exhibit C"and incorporated herein by
ruEDr.nco,and all umolldments thereto.
(3)Marysville shull not be obligated ut
any time to deliver to Arlington a quantity of
water in excess of the amount agreed upon by the
parties pursuant to this contract.Said maximum
quantity is contained in SUbparagraph (4) below
and may be renegotiated and'determined by the
part~Ds on or before the 1st ~ay of June of every
5th year hereafter,or at such other intermediate
times as the parties may mutuafly agree upon.
At no time shall said maximum quan~ity be more
than 100,000 gallons per day.Nothing herein shall
be constru~d as obligating Arlington to take or
purchase any water.
(4)The parties mutually agree'for the '
first term of this contract that 'Marysville shall
be obligated to deliver water to Arlington in
an amount up to but not exceeding 100,000 gallonsperday.
(S) The quantity of water delivered shall
be Measured by such master meters,as Marysville
may determine,and such meters shall be installed
at any and all tee connections being used for
delivery.The first such meter shall be purchased
and installed at Marysville's cost.Such installa-
tion shall be at the tee designated by Arlington
and within a reasonable time after such designation.
The other two master meters shall also be pur-
chased and installed by MarySVille,but Arlington
shall,withill 30 duys uf t er demond,puy to
MarySVille the cos t of such mc t ers ,
(f)Qualitf'Marysville agrees that all water
delivered to Ar ingt<on at the point of delivery shall
conform to and meot water and quality critaria of the
State of Washington Department of lIealth,and will be
of the same quality as to chemical and bacterial
content as that delivered by Marysville~to its oth,r
water customers.All water supplied byiMarysville for
use or sale by Arlington shall be upon ~he express con-
dition that after it has passed the poidt of delivery,
the same !'ecomes the property of Arlington,and Marysville
shall not be liable for any damages or loss beyond said
point.If the quality of water deteriorates by reason
of source pollution or a change of conditions at the
collector site,Marysville reserves the right to abandon
the waterworks and the portion of the transmission line
north of 43rd Avenue NB,and terminate all service
connections thereto,including those provided for in
this agreement.All rights and obligations under this
agreement shall thereafter terminate as provided below,
except that Marysville shall continue to provide water
from an alternate source to the north terminus of 43rd
Avenue NE on the terms and conditions provided for
herein,and such water service shall continue for as
long as ~Iarysville maintains its status as a public
utility.With respect to the portion of Marysville's
transmission line which is abandoned along the easement
granted herein,Arlington reServes the right to require
Marysville to remove said line or to deed the same toArlington..
All waterworks construction and service connections
shall conform to the requirements of the Washington State
Department of Social and Health Services.
(g) Ownershi
Marysville s a assume so e owners lp,en responsibility
for maintenance and improvement,of all parts of the'
water system preceding the point of delivery!inclUding
the master meters and recorders referred to n subpara-
graph (5)above.Arlington shall assume sole o~nership,
and responsibility for construction,m~inten.ance and
1mprovement,of all parts of the water system beyond
the point of delivery.Maintenance of the second and
third master meters installed at tee connections shall
be performed by Marysville and billed to Arlington,and
such bills shall be paid within 30 days of receiving the
same.Further,Arlington shall assume the sole right
and responsibility for the distribution of ali water
passing beyond the point of delivery,and hereby agrees
to indemnify and hold Marysville harmless from any and
all claims which may arise from such distribution.
Arlington shall have the sole right and responsibility to
charge and collect fees for connections to the water
system beyond the point of delivery,:and fees for the use
and consumption of the water delivered.
(h)MuniciEal Utility Intertie.Notwithstanding
the provislons 1n SUbparagraph tcl above restricting the
use of water sold pursuant to this agreement to Arling-
ton customers located on the Arlington Airport property,
west of Runway 115'33,there shall be un intertie
constructed between Murysville's trunsmission line and
Arlington's municipal water system,which intertie will
be a~ailable.solely for emergency relief purposes.
The 1ntertie shall be designed by and et the .xpense of
Marysville,end the cost of material,labor and installa-
tion shall be paid in equal shares by Arlington and
Agreement·6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Marysville,and sha~l be constructed at a point
where Marysville's transmission line r~ns parallel to
Arlington's existing water system.The,use of said
intertie for emergency r~lief to a city suffering from
water shortage shall be at the sole and exclusive
discretion of the city supplying the em:orgency relief
wa rer , The lIIe re fact tha t there is a d'l'ough t,and
either city is low on water,shall not be considered as
cause for use of the intertie.The intartie may be
used as temporary emergency relief in cases where a
city's water supply is suddenly threatened by unantici-
pated damage,disaster,or source failure.In the
event that both cities suffer from simultaneous emer-
gencies.both shall inlplement water restrictions;if
such restrictions do not relieve the emergency r the ci ty
supplying the water through the intertie may glVe
preference to its customers and may shut off the intertie.
Payment for water passing through the inter tie shall be
on a basis mutually agreed upon by the parties at that time.
(i)Delinquent Payments.In the event that
Arlington luIs to make payments in fUll for the water
delivered each month, and for meter maintenance charges,
within 30 days of being filled for the same,MarySVille
shall have the right,after 30 days'written notice
personally served upon the City Clerk of Arlington,to
discontinue service at all tee connections until there
has been a,mutually satishctory arrangement for payment
on the delinquent account.Delinquent accounts shall
bear interest at the rate of 10\per annum until paid.
(j)Assignment and Amendment.Neither this contract
nor any rIght or prIvilege hereIn shall be assigned by
either party without the written consent of the other
party.All amendments hereto shall be effective only when
reduced to writing and signed by the parties.The terms
and conditions hereof shall be binding upon and inur~to
the benefit of the successors and assigns of either party.
(Ie)Duration and Termination of Agreement.The term
of this agreement shall be from the date of its execution
and shall continue in effect until terminated for Bny of
the following reasons and upon the following terms:
(1)By mutual consent of the parties.
(2)Uy a judgment or decree of the
Superior Court of Snohomish County,Washington.
(3)One year after Arlington shall have
in writing notifiad MarYSVille of termination,
but such notice may not be given prior to January
I,1979, and such termination shall not cause
the easement hereinabove granted to terminate.
(4)Marysville may terminate this agree-
ment upon written verification from an engineering
consultant that the Stillaguamish water source,
or collector system,is failing to produce a
quantity or 'quality of water adequate to meet
the requirements of this agreement.Upon such
notification all rights and obligations of both
parties hereunder shall cuase,and easement
rights granted herein shall terminate.Arlington
reserves the right to require Marysville to
remove the transmission line alorig said easement,
or to require a deed granting the same to Arlington.
Agreement - 7
APPROVED AS TO FORN:
ATTEST:
Provided,Ilowever,notlling herein shall
terminate the obligaticln of Marysville to continue
water service from alternate sources to •point
located at the north terminus of 43rd Ayenue Nc.
With respect to such water service only,the terms
and provisions of this agreement shall remain in
force and effect.
Provided further,Marysville shall be required
to use reasonable diligence to preserve and maintain
the sufficiency and suitability of water at the
Stillaguamish waterworks so as to make termination
pursuant to this paragraph unnecessary.
DATI:lJ this \~day of .M a yc:..l.,,1978.
TIlE CiTY OF ~lAIIYSVI LLE
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTEST:
B~~oI2t 1-.ZZ;:J
City er -
I
I
APPROVED AS TO FOIl~I:
B~~~o/
C1 ty torney
Agreement • B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX H
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
MOUNT ST.HELENS ERUPTION
FLOODING ON STILLAGUAMISH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
MOUNT ST.HELENS ERUPTION
1. Prepare all rolling stock equipment -pickups. cars. all vehicles -for heavy dust
conditions.Immediate preparation of all vehicles isnecessary since most damage occurs in the
first 24 hours.Theash penetrates paper filters easily.Cover air intake with sponge rubber (inside
air cleaner of car.pickup.etc.) or spray with oil or lubricant.Spray WD40on paper filters.With
paper filters.oil-type air cleaners are the best. If you have to use paper filters.they must be
cleaned every two hours under the ash fallout situations.and more frequently. if possible.
Change oil more frequently. at least every 500 miles.This isnecessary when the fallout exceeds 1
inch in any area.
2.Ash conducts electricity and will short out electrical systems and pumping
equipment in deep wells and booster stations.Therefore. it is necessary for the local electric
company to shut off the electrical systems of other utilities in order to completely clean their
equipment.Prepare the system far an 8 to 10hour electrical shutdown. Prepare for transformer
failures and pole fires due to the conductivity of the volcanic ash.
3. Close all ventilation to buildings.pump stations and reservoirs.If there is no time
to close the vents to the reservoirs.then bypass them. if possible.Use furnace filters.or whatever.
and staple over windows. Closing them up with protective material is necessary because the
ash iscorrosive and conductive and will short out motors.electrical panels.and pump control
systems.It isextremely important to protect all electricai control systems.Keep spare parts on
hand for electronic maintenance.Tape shut all telemetry equipment.High-velocity air is about
the only cleaner for electronic equipment.
4. Conservation of water is necessary.especially the first two or three days. After
that.prepare the system for maximum usage. Prepare for at ieast triple the water consumption.
mainly due to massive cleanup.washing cars and houses.washing the ash off roofs.and street
washing. Because the ash is heavy (weighing 95 Ib/cu.ft.).great quantities of water are
required to saturate it. Rain water increasesits weight enough to cause structural damage from
the heavy load it becomes.Itis imperative that everyone get to work immediately cleaning up.
The first taskfor everyone isto wash the ash from the roofsof buildings and the reservoirs.
5. All of the water for the Marysville water system.except the Everett supply.is
protected from volcanic ash and all reservoirs are covered.The Lake Goodwin well.Sunnyside
well.and Highway No.9 well are all deep wells (over 100 feet deep).The Stillaguamish well
receives its water from horizontal screens.35 feet below the river bottom.and Edward Springs
receives its water 4 to 6 feet below ground level. Both the Stillaguamish and Edward Springs
water should be monitored for turbidity. If the turbidity rises.the chlorine should be increased to
accommodate the increase in turbidity.
6. If the Everett water should be affected by ash.consideration should be given fo
taking it off-line. A switch would then be mode to groundwater sources and the Stillaguamish.
7.Rnally.it is very important to set up the best communication system possible.A
radio with channels for the public works deportment.police.and fire deportment is invaluable
for continuous communications and control of the situation during the emergency and
afterwords for the cleanup.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
FLOODING ON STILLAGUAMISH
The only water facility which is exposed to flooding is the Stillaguamish River Control
Facility.The control facility will flood if the Stillaguamish River rises above a lOO-year flood. The
high well alarm at headquarters is an indication that the Stillaguamish River is flooding at the
level which the alarm is set. When the pumps are off, the well level indicator-recorder also
indicates the river'slevel. A lOO-year riverflood is equal to an elevation of 60 feet which is equal
to 52.2 feet on the well level recorder-indicator.
If a river level greater than the lOO-year flood is anticipated.the following procedure is
recommended to prevent flooding of the control facility:
1.Call the National Weather Service in Seattle at 284-4300 and ask for the
Stillaguamish River stage information and forecast at Arlington.
2.Tum exhaust fansoff.
3.Seal the air intake ventson each access hatch with duct tape.
4.Tum the water line to the turbidity meter off.
5. Plugthe drain line which entersthe sump pump sump.
6.Tum the 1OO-horsepower pumps off.
7.Open the two lOO-horsepower pump circuit breakers.
8. Leave the main circuit breaker closed because it provides power to the sump
pump.
9. Closeall access hatches. Each access door is equipped with a neoprene seal.
10.Ifan extreme flood is anticipated.seal closed the air exhoust vents.
11 . If you are absolutely sure that no matter what is done to protect the control
facility and everything is going to be flooded.then open the main circuit breakers
and abandon the site.
12.A lOO-year flood will start to flood over the dike access road and will flood
everything for several miles around the site except for the adjacent gravel
storage pilesin the sand and gravel plant.If the river confinues to flood over the
dike access road there is danger than the access road will wash out. If the
access road washesout while you are at the site.park your vehicle on top of one
of the gravel storage piles and wait for evacuation.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX I
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN &CHECKLIST
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX I
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
The Water Use Efficiency Act of 1989 requires water systems to prepare water
conservation plans in conjunction with their capital improvement planning efforts. The purpose of
the act and the conservation plans is to reduce overall water consumption and heighten the public's
awareness of water as a limited resource. Conservation planning is especially appropriate for
Marysville, which is located in the North Snohomish County Critical Water Supply Service Area.
The "Guidelines and Requirements for Public Water Systems Regarding Water Use Reponing,
Demand Forecasting, Methodology, and Conservation Programs"has been published by the
Departments of Health and Ecology and the Water Utility Council for guidance in preparing these
plans. The City's conservation plan is as follows:
Water lise Data Collectjon Requjrement
Table I-I summarizes the City's current data collection procedures and whether these
comply with conservation planningrequirements.
Table 1-1
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
DATA COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS
Type of Data Units Frequency In Compliance?
Source of
Supply Metering:
Read daily, Yes, with exception
Stillaguamish Collector gal reponed monthly of units. Cubic feet
and annually.
is desired.
Edward Springs gal ....
Lake Goodwin Well gal ....
Highway 9 Well gal ....
Sunnyside Well No.2 gal ....
I - I
Table I-I (continued)
Type of Data Units Frequency In Compliance?
Emergency Interties -
Imported &Exported
Yes, with exception
City of Arlington gal Monthly total of units. Cubic feet
is desired.
Seven Lakes Water Assoc. gal Monthly total.
Wholesale
Yes, with exception
City of Everett (import)gal Monthly total of units. Cubic feet
is desired.
Snohomish Co. PUD (export) gal
....
Tulalip Tribe (export)gal ....
Peak Day/Peak 1\'onth gal Recorded annually
..
Non-Revenue Water
Unaccounted gal Annual total
..
Accounted gal u ..
Service Meter Readings
Single Family gal Monthly total
..
Multi-Family gal ....
Commercial/Industrial
Government gal ....
Agriculture (N/A)N/A N/A N/A
Population Served &
Connections ---Annual total Yes
Economic Data ---Existing Water
Rates Yes
Conservation Data ---Annual review of Yes
conservation
measures and level
of implementation
I - 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ii
IIi
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
Water Demand Forecasting
Chapter 4 of the Marysville Comprehensive Water Plan analyzes historical water usage and
forecasts demands through the year 2016. The historical data shows a downward trend in demand
per connection beginning in 1987, the year that the City implemented its conservation program and
ordinance. In 1987 the average demand per connection was 416 gpd. By 1993, the average had
dropped by 18% to 353 gpd.In 1994, the average jumped to 392 with the increase attributed to
larger industrial demands.
The Chapter 4 projections are based on a conservative 375 gpd per connection. With
implementation of additional conservation measures and public awareness efforts, it is reasonable
that actual demand could be lowered to 310 gpd, a value that equates to approximately 110 gallons
per person at 2.8 persons per connection. If accomplished, this would significantly reduce water
usage. Table 1-2shows the projections of chapter 4 in comparison to the potential reduction.
Table 1-2
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
WATER DEMAND FORECASTS
Year Projected Annual Conservation Annual Reduction
Demand Reduced Demand
MG MG MG
1996 1789 1479 310
2000 1935 1600 335
2005 2154 1781 373
2016 2738 2263 475
Conservation Program
The intent of a conservation program is to reduce overall water consumption as well as
improve the efficiency of water usage. The specific objectives of the Marysville Conservation
Program are as follows:
• Attain maximum utilization of current supplies.
I - 3
• Reduce peak daily consumption per connection.
• Reduce peak monthly consumption per connection.
• Reduce total annual consumption per connection.
• Promote public awareness of the need for wise water use.
• Evaluate each customer class and identify specific means for reducing usage
within that class.
The City's water use restriction program has been in effect since the severe drought of
1987. The program was implemented to reduce peak day and peak hour demands on the City
system. The measures of the 1987 program are integral to this plan but will be augmented 10
effectively reduce overall consumption. To accomplish the objectives listed above, the following
measures will be implemented:
1. Public Education - By way of brochures,news articles, public service announcements,
etc.,promote wise water usage.
2. Technical Assjstance - Provide assistance to customers in reducing water usage.
Receive operations assistance from other agencies 10 more efficiently distribute water to
the system customers. Provide summaries of consumption history with all billing
statements.
3. System Measures - Maintain meters at all sources and interties and collect data in
accordance with requirements. Evaluate all meter data monthly and annually to assess
unaccounted water. Detect and repair system leaks promptly.
4. Incentjyes - Structure water rates to encourage conservation. Enforce existing 1987
conservation program consisting of the following:
a) Alternating schedule for lawn irrigation from June 1 [0 October I.
b)Water shortage declaration by Mayor requiring any of all of the following:
• prohibition of nonessential water use,i.e.,washing cars. lawn watering.
dust control,etc.;
• suspension of new service connections;
• emergency rationing.
1-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
Program EyaluatioD
The Conservation Program will be evaluated annually using the following criteria:
1.Are the program objectives being met as evidenced by the usage data?
2.Are cost savings being realized as evidenced by annual cost per gallon of water
distributed?
3. Have public awareness efforts been effective?
Regional Conservation Efforts
Since Marysville is within the North Snohomish Critical Water Supply Service area and has
interties to adjacent water districts, its conservation efforts will affect and be affected by the
adjacent districts. To be effective on a regional basis, the City will coordinate its conservation
efforts with these utilities directly or by way of the Water Utility Coordinating Committee.
Schedule
As stated above, the City first implemented its water restriction program in 1987. As well,
source meters and service meters have been in place and recorded for several years. The
additional measures presented in this program will be implemented beginning in 1996.
I .5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX J
WATER RIGHTS CERTIFICATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
WATER RIGHTS
Auth.Max.
Year Withdrawal
~Appropriated Location ~Certificate No.
Edward Springs July 14. 1921 Sec. 23. 24.25.26 360 S.W.Cert.No. 184
Twp 31N.R4E.W.M.
Edward Springs Nov.14. 1931 Sec. 23. 24.25.26 1,035 S.W.Cert.No. 2180
Twp 31N.R4E.W.M.
Edward Springs #1 Jan. 12. 1946 Sec. 23.24.25.26 300 G.W.Cert.No. 286
Twp 31N.R4E.W.M.(seasonal)
Edward Springs # I March 7. 1952 Sec. 23. 24.25.26 300 G.W.Cert.No. 1152
Twp 31N.R4E.W.M.
Edward Springs #2 March 7. 1952 Sec. 23. 24. 25. 26 500 G.W.Cert.No. 2096
Twp 3\N.R4E.W.M.
Sunnyside No. I Feb. 14. 1956 Sec. 2. Twp 29N.R5E.1,000 G.W.Cert.No. 3100
W.M.
Cedarcrest (LaJoyj No.1 May 5.1955 Sec. 26. Twp 30N.57 G.W.Cert.No. 4155
R5E.W.M.
Sunnyside NO.2 July 27. 1964 Sec. 2. Twp 29N.R5E.1.000 G.W.Cert.No. 5469
W.M.
Lake Goodwin No. I June 19. 1967 Sec. 22. Twp 31N.550 G.W.Cert.NO.6980
R4E.W.M.
Stillaguamish Juiy 14. 1970 Sec. 3. Twp 31N.R5E.2.250 GI-Q0675C
W.M.
Highway NO.9 Oct.17. 1979 Sec. 25. Twp 30N.1.000 Gi·23487C
R5E.W.M.
Edward Springs Sec. 24. Twp 31N.400 Application GI·25182
R4E.W.M.
JOA (Everett Supply 14.350
[year 2010)
\work.ing\mv\wlrrgls.doc
l
I
L--..
(;""TlFICATE HECOI\D 1\0...QIw
i,.,
"
CERTIFICATE OF w ATER RIGHT
I P'"..rl~ht~tw;'f...:,..l ImcMl'."'-111111...nl"~""""1 '"~~.no1.r,·I""mlU..}
.1"1I...·."~.h ...",-I'!'!\1...1'1"\"·'."on".. r 1'''.lllll''r ll;,lA..."n'\\·f\.JI"i,...h.n r•.,'t st t,"'n,"I,",....r.ulcUtlrlll ot tin'';\AUI
tIYdr"ullc:~ILl'lru..·r 11..••..-',.".,.)
t
I
I
i
.j
'",...
•
r..
Tltj..:1.0;to certify.tn.u
~"'u-at tb taarth
,m·:Jl OF JW!IS'lILl4_.&.=m.\."ipaJ/.•{...liIZ7J'rilla ,
01....
.i
i
I,.
>;
.,,-
.. :.;~
....__,19.>:1-,IIwt!
;
...•J!I .n.:tI.,qt till:ur.1 I.1'l £.ul of t(.:altr to
•__,.•.•.•("0 Il ..,.....~Cut)/("(!c.o 6P",-)
JIll}:..U.
./l,·n"i,.Yo .....6t56.
..:l &1,',o:cription 1//I"P'd"I"'"'''61't1iN'H,m""'il'8'J'D7i1 '.'tj,j,LPV7i'Q1i",#n;,Oi,'t 9"''',
To••,'n"hl"
....-_..-=-=-=-===--....:...'..
r"l"n,,'.0Da ....at •.'·JaN~1M.
!l"d,·r.~
.S·/fl'"lit...__r"1dsb'"gtcm.,.....
•
"
'.'
"."I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I n L .._.!.-E.,SJIt ot S~,l'dnt .«.~----
c,
I . ._--._-_.,.__.._.----_.---_._----_.-.
I
I
/
/
i
--------------------------------------------------------.
I
I
I
~I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
'"I:;~
'.'~;'~
i":'
~'~..I~f
.'..
_.I.::;'..
:''I
~:
I..J
I-dllli
..
•Iuu m4d.
1.............---
:/,;.
)
,-.:-:"':':
~J "../'I.,.'.I •••"••••~.~.~"f :o.~...~," ..
rOR rowea
I'OR nunCATlOSO
ron ortrrn vscs
f .'I
r ,
. n :ribu[cry of.--3ti.ll:lt;u~!lii.sh"3.1"./e=.-.-,
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _II r.~~'i~N In J Jl~~t:~·~l'f
.-.-------,------
!
I
.....Slt:1e of.-.-..·,'lo~h':'Uetont--,....--
lor.CAI.S\iDOI""SIO~
loF.CAt,SUHOIVISIO:-:
,')I.~.-·
nar.{t'
CERTIflCATE OF WATE.R RIGHT.
I.
MJ.CI:UP't:sr:
.,-_:.----
This is to ceTtif:'.till1rt.---.-.-..._.T.own_...o.r._j~~er~5"f,ill,..-...-..,-.-----_
="'---.,·l.ls~·7Sville-.-.-.. ,-".-rr-
"i -v -,.,~_
the u;Q.te~oJ~Zdwe=.c.~C=ee.k ---.:-...
1t.';th p<.-:nt OT points oj du-crsion t::::hin the.:--_]l!__C.:.:-~~:i::._,~.---
;n-oof to rile satisfaction.Gf tire StMC!Superrisor of HydTtlulics "j H'Il,<;hingfon.of a right to the as.:Of
Sec~2.4.-..-,.,Twp,-Jl :=07"R..mge~.l,;.E.::-.Vl.M.,!OT [i~l"purposes oj::-":''':Wlici.p.llL..su;..p11..-==._.
01 ..··..
Till~ngil:.to !11l!It=C of :izl'n-cte.'nf:J7"f':-niri ilcrr:by con1ir:nL'ri i.<::"C'.'"lM"tcC/ro tll'!IUIifls.or place of
1UC herein de.':r.:,:!w~.('.1'C'(,~:1'-"prol':cicc in Seclion.!:6 and :,Ci1i:p:n /22.Lenos 0;In9,
STATE OF"WASUrNCTON,COUNTY O~snoacai.sn ---::'.--.-:::-..~___.
C£RTIFlCATE RECORD No.,..~5 -:-:PACE N=2160..:::-
--:-~----+------:::,........=:::::::::...-_-:--__I_-
I
rtft _I":I.~Wllh Ih ..,ro\'lttlln,of Chap,.... 117.LA,,"tit W..-hu:t'!on to'HII:,Inti ''''C'/lQm.-nu U1..r"lo.and!the lUI"
IncI I"e'r\l.I.II(\J'~flf IhOl':;1':"1 Su~rv......r 01 HyojrlullC\<:~'C"C'\lnaer.'
.4.descripr:on Of rhe lamb under such right :0 1chiclt the tenter hereby confinncd is appurt07nant,
nnd :r..e place "1I1eTe surh l{~tt'r is put ro ;,cneficial tL.'\c,ir 0.<;follo~s:
under--Appr.op~i~;10:1-Permit No:-:So4 -issued by the State Superl.:isOT r'lf Hydraulics,and
that said right r»t114:~use of said u-crcrs lIas bern pcrfcctcrl in nccorda.nt:e wuh.tile lares 0;Wnshi-.:,;:011,
nnd.is hereby c:anfinrtC'rf uy rh.e Stare SlLper1'i,,,or of Hycira.u~ics Of Washington and entered of record in
{toiumc::-.:...5- ,nt .r>C(;C-21.50 -.on tltc,,~Jrd ~..day of_..-.-April---....~~.... ,19..,,5.-:-;-t1u..t
the right hereby confinm>d Jrlt'!s [rom-r --.i,rovemb.e.~l!.•.1931-.-..;£Ilat Ihe cmount of u.cter 10
tL'hirn.su.eh richt is ~ntitl(>d and hereby conjiMrteri.fOT the purposes nforc."aid,:s limited to an Qr.'Iount
actunlly bcnt!fLci3lly tL.<;cd for saici purposes,and shall not e."t"ce("d~2.J....cub1c ..f.f.et _.pe:._Z.eC.Ollo..-
--•...---"'-"....._-_..-
;
[~..~~..-_.._.~
t ,"
Il;f~:A.h:~-."!
I·····.,'"'~:,''::'':.';'..:-~
h';'"'=.-:~','
,
~,',
..:
.'.
:
'.
'.
~
i ;,
j c
...
I.;
~
i ~
1·;,,,.
or t-.",,
1 ....
e ,
~1 ,
,..1,,
I "'.'.'
;
£
3::
',;
~
'.~
.~
',:
",..-:~
.~)
';.;
1:,
'"'':'
;\"
.~:;
-~;
,
..~'.'
,..'.l
·,t";~~~::
.'-'v-,....,..
~.
.,;".
"."~
s.r.~a.nn_IO..41•.1M.!Q5I.
TWos IS TO C1MIry T1urt_..•._._._.--1.0!'!!!...Qc_JM.RXSYtLLE ..__
Certificate of Ground Water Right
luued In aeee-eaeee ,.,'ltn the pro\·jsiClns ot Ch8Pief'183.La-.n ot Was,;..~gttln tor 1(145.and lb.~''IJles and I"e'IU111Uon.•ot
the S ...t-=Sll~tvisor o~KyarauJks lhffCUnder.
of ._.._.__.__. ..__..M~_~1..1le...W.p.B.llJ.~K.~n.._.h.1.S made prc(Jf
to rh<,satisjactiur.of the StOLt"Supervisor of Hyd!"QULics oj Washington,of a 'ri.?ht t,..the use of the
-
i1.
I:'"---~::...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
..
!
--_.._._•...__._._._-_._..._...._.-._....__.._._...._-------_.._--_.-
for ."'."""",se ol_1It'¥!.1.!'J.l1.~1....•.up.P11.._..__._..._·__...
right'to th~aseof said gTClUf&d water.';has been ptTfected in cccordcace 11.-i~h ',he late:t·f Wa:hington,
nud is her.by con~r.ned by the State Supervisor 01 Hydraulics of Washin"ton and entered of record
in l'nlume-.J.__at page286.".A.;t1ur!the ";ght'heTeby con~"""d cUIt es jT07tLJNl.lllU:J_12.JIl~;
:hat tht!quantity of !T-"0und wateT'under the right herebp con(iT'mP.d for the purposes aforesaid,is
limited to an amOUnt actually bCTv'ficiaUy used ft)T said purpo-cs,Rltd shall not exceed.__.----
..:>'O;'.-&allons ._;>e r ..JlIinut e;1.6.0 8.cr.e"r,et per.s.eJ,r _--.--..-__-
i\descrLprion oj thl.lands to u:hieh such gr:>u!ld water 1-ight is appurtenant,and the pi-lee where
SU(H~unre-is put to beneficial use,is as follows:
The Town of Marysv1110,Snohou1sh County,Washlngtnn.
·",
.,
I
i,,,
[
".','
'.....•
.:~<::.,
'.'
..,..•.-..
-'::;.;.:
.,'~".
....:'"'....
.~"... .'":.~:.
'.,
.:'
I
I
".;·I"·
· r .
,
:>'
."::".
T~e righl to tJ-.e use oj the ground .ccter ejorcsctd hpreby con;'ir-,/('d is restr-icted to the tendJ or
place of use herem described.?IeCp[«s prm-ided in Sections 6 ":i".;:-.Chanter i:!=.La-cz r..~!929.I
I nj
WIT.VCSS t/:e sea.!and signa1tLT'~of .he 5~te Supercc-cr of i-!yara.ulic!t arfu:cci .~r.:..s.
,."/'-.../.,:1,-:.I
..Apr_.....,I..49.((..J>..'I ,/~r·./
.2'!1 t ,....day
,.
/,fi (,.j
J
-·-.}I•,I.I .
\::.:;.::
\,;>::~;r.'::j~'
"..
L·:·':;~~~'I'
U'.-''R,", •..,;.J'..
l '--:/;:,-;)
I:'~~:ii~;,.~~·::;:-;l;,~~~
Ii'-1.~.:.'·1
·t
;.,.1.:
I
~
~:.
"~
t;
r,:
~
1.:
l'¥.~
'~..,.f.:...
i
i,.,
"
I
I
"..
}.
_.,/
___;that the c;<:<mt\t1i at gro~nd
1152
"•••••••¥
Sun 0:''.'1 ASHINCTOl<.·:<'NTY or _1111.~~J.~.1l...------
A de"criprion of the 1.ands to which .ruch g1'ound 1D4ter right is appu.rtenant,and the plcce ,;:n.erc
iTt accord mce with the Laws 0):W'1.!hington,and is h~by confirmed by the State Su~uar of Water
tOOter umieT the 1'ight hereby ccmfirmed for the purp..::es ajoresaid,is limited eo an amo".mt Q.C'tUally
bene teially used l<>r soid JY"'1'O,es,and .haii not eeceed ~._~.".~~~_m1mlte!:120 &are-.
~.r.1f~.BJ:!,;S'Ti!iIUIJ;n'X.,~E"'!.:O'~~
rou:h ueter is put to ben~l use,is a.s foUow,:
'town at .aryav11la,,..h'ngton.
.._.._-_.....--..__..--------
The rigr.:to the v.st·jJ the ground water aforeseid hC-T'!by cOTlfinned is Tt.strictp.d to the lands or
place:oj use hl.Tel",de~~-:T:oeJ.except a"prcuided i:l Sectir.'U'6 and 7,Chautl1'122.Lau'.s of 1929.
5th
Superoist'!'oj Wa!tT'Resources and that .saiJ right to the use 0;said ground waters htu bp.en perfected.
I"'"the pur-ees 01.~ni.~.l~_·';I'P~,._.-----------------
u1wier and rubject to J1Tovi.nons Contai1!p.d iTt Ground Wa.ter :'ennie No.~~~.!-ls!'tLtd (\11 the State
._------_......__.._._-_._-_.-----.
to the !tt1risfc!:ion J.f th.:State St:.~--t';':cr.'1)(~""';;';'I!T Resources of Washington,.J!a right to the we tTj
the !,,"ound 'W ~:er"of (\J."-)..._._---•..- ..-----.------.
located u.~th:1\_.the .;,;::~i ."1t.:_~Jtf-n~_~1'.~:__~~.,....!!P.•_~.~....l!.!_~_~.~_~_.~'-'&:..:..:..::.II::.:.-----
C.rificate or Ground Water Right
I.aur.d In Il~eeenee w:I\h th~pre""~.'':'.. of ,-'"hap:.r 2t:."'r....,01 Wuhll\eton etll'lD4.:i,and amendrr.o/.aU:lb~·I.O,a.r:oJ the
Nlea ILnd resr'lA~ms of the St.ate Supe."\.so"01 ytLl.Qr Ret ~;"rn!LtIeftunder.
t·:
·:c'.j,
:·If
.-'"......
.':.....
:.'
':':::;'::";':..~''.
.~.
.'.'
.....
.~.
I,,·>~~
I:.
I "·:,'",I:,.r I •. ":.
to r.H ..",,'J"QL ""100.
CunnCAn:REcoRI>No.......5.._P.,eE No..2Q96-,I..
\
·,----l
I r
STATE OF V/ASKINCTON,CClJNTY Of'.•.. ..aac.baIr,1,1h .. .
Certificate of Ground Water Right
ruut'd In eeeereneee wl1h the "revisioN of Ch.ptt"283.L!l.WI 01 Washlnll:lOn (or IIl00S,o"\d ."'endments U:lerdo.Ind the
rulel nnd ~gu.I.tJoru ot th ..State ...uprrvlaor ot Wat."l'k'sou~s thl'~nder.I TIUS Is TO CERTIr'TMl ..._.%CIllUl!'_.JWlISVItU,._llA S!!T!I7TOlL _.__ ..__
to :he :arislaction Of the State Supervuor Of Wa:er ResouTC:cJ of Wa.shir.gton,oj d right to the we 01
the ground werers of a vell ..
I
I
II[_.._. _
IOC'l1ted within
.._.1uu made ?Tool
tJ18.~...at-.~..at-Jlec.-24.-1'>rp •.n...L.-.Rg..,.k..LV,.ll..-.-.....--.-...-. _......_
lor the purpose of..mn1n1pn1 ..~..
t4nder and subject to provisions contained in Grounci Water Per1ttir .\"0.....:?23......M issued by the Stat~'!
such water is put to benefiC:.a1 use,is as j~l101C$:
._:tM',ile quantity ~f ground
_.-.._._-_._.._--_._.-._--5
A description.oj the l.and.~to which such ground water right is appurtena.n.:,cad thl?place vlheTe
SupeTVisor 01 Wet.,.R<sour<es and tMt ,aid right (0 the use 01 said ground ",aters 1uu been perlected
in accorda.,...ce with the laW!oj Washington,and is hereby confirmed hi th!!St.'1te Supervisor oj Wate1'
Resources of Weshington and entered oj record in Volum.?.....-5_.........•at page .._.~...;
water u!l.Cier the Tight hereby confirn..ed jM the p"~rposes aforesaid,is limited to an amount actually
beneficially used far mid purposes.and 'Mil not exceed ....SOCl..eall<mo_JlAr'..lrtm1t.J,..aoa..-.wHt..
:Mt the right hOTeby confirmed dates IT017L...Korcb ..7.....:9S2..__......
I
I,
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The right to the use oj the ground wcrer aforesaid ht:rebt/confiTlTtRd is r"s::--:cted to tne lands O'T
place of use herein desmoeci,except as provided i:"l.Ser;titms 6 ar.d 7,Chitpcer 122'.Laws of 1929.
WITNESS the seal and signaturE
_,19_51..
I
I
I
I -
L
..2Bth._..day 01_......._..tw:oallar
oj the Sta;tt.'SlJp(;,vi:or of Wa~eT Rcsou~ces affixed this
--,//.....,11.-4 '///J/,,.(;f/{,.zt'(_-:_/.."/~.I,V_•..r..<;.__
SllIfr Sll,H'''\'1J(.-,.of WQfr,.nt,purr,.,.
[
~---t
'J ·1
l I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.ucs made proof
.....issued by the S.ate
7 _.'1 !'"ge J100..,~.._.__ .
The right to the use of the qTouna t'·t'~C1'aforesaid hCTeblj con.(crmcci is restrit'td to ehe Land.~0:-
place of usc herein QcscrilJed,except as proetded in S~c~:ons 6 and I,ChaptCT 12:.LI~u;s 0;1929.
....J.oth .day of_·_··!\ln··....
Certificate of Ground Water Right
r»u~In eeeereaeee wUh the :Jrovulons of Chllpter :&3.L.'\w~·of Woshlnr,t(ln for 1114:.and :lm.·nd~~nlS urere-e.and lhe
:"U.Il.llllnd r"lllJllIl:~n.or lhe Sta~e SUpc!rvL'or or Wl1ler "t!~our~~,:I't!!'t'\l~dt!r.
in acccrdeuce u..·it~the lau:s of ~Vashington.and i...J~el"Phy ccnjirmed b:-l th.e S~.lJ,te SapPT'l:tsor of WilteT
liutt tho righl herehy confirmed daleS fl'om_l:.obruary 14•..19.5.6......_:that 'he quanlity ot grotlnci
to the satisfac:~on of the S~ctc Super;L~or of werer r..c~·"t:.cc!.•of Washing:on,(.'/c riqn t TO the use o,f
the ground U;C:C'TS 0';a...!fell.
Resources nf "Nashill9ton and en:ert.·ll of record ir..Vo.ume
'<own or Marys.illa,S;.ohomioh County,·,iashinrcon.
such wateT is put to beneficial use,i.s CLS !oUIJw::
A description O.l the teeds to which sach ground u:ateT r.~-:::i.s appurtenant,and thO?place whL-re
water under the right hereby ~onfirmed Jor tile Jr.tTpo;-es a/oresaic1_.is lir,;itrn to an l.1mou.nt actually
bmefici<tlly wed !'",."..,purpM",<Inri "14l!no'exceed•..1000 ..&illlpn"per.!!!inut.e._1J,44......
M.t:!I-.(!!.~LP.~.Ly_e _.r ~."".lJl!i.~.1Pal ":!lt ~"e.1.1pp;L 7. __.__....._.__..__._..
~•...M ._'_'M_'__.'_"'_~_"_•••'_'.•_~_••...__._.~__.~_....__•...._....--~
und~and subject to proci.sior.3 contained in.Ground were-Permit ~~o.....3.9.1,.1
Superwor of WattT Rp.souTees and that said right to d-:.c usc "i said g"ollnd u:atC'TS has been perfected.
l<><aled within.J;"~._S1.....0£...Lot .J....
See_.~..__..•_.Twp.2.9.._•.]oI..IL.5 ::.'W.M.•
far lhe ""rpose oj ._..IIIU1;\.1..~.::'i1al_wa~~z:.suPP:ty....
1f----.
:.\-
;.I.i,.
,.
:.:
~..
';-
-c
:'
,~
,.
;.
'.~',.,..
;'"':.'
.'::,:
'...
'-.';-.'
.,
.-:;:;
,....
;i,!'
it":'~r'
";-'.'.:..-...
~~:~·'::.f·;·::
..';-:.'/-:..•.....~...'
...
;,r~~.~~__.......:;
~~_{·_."':l
'.,."
8.r.:t •.TJ&1~:J.J::JOI.
CERTmCAn:RECO~No._...._...2.-PACE No4155-~_
STAn:OF WASIm:CTO:<,COUNT\"or __~hoJl!i~!t:!-_
Certificate of Ground Water Right
b.ued b aeeeeeaaee w;lh lhe "l"'Ovtsions at ChaplC :5S.Laws at WuhlnC\On rot'1~45.and amendmeonts merete.and lhe
r-'vn anet l"t!'cul.Ue:-ns at the SlAw Supervisor at WalU RC'IOurC"t!'S thet't!'Uneter.
'!'ms Is 70 CERTIFY That._.._.••.....•••.1OWlI.....OJ'..JIARI.SIIT.LE ....../ASJl.IliQIC.L_-...--.....----
:I ....
~l·
'.,...:',
.::~;':..~'i
··~f.;.;\'..:
.: ..·.·.:,.1
.'.!".'_i
)?:~
.:~.~.,:'.1
~-_-___-___... _ _.,h made',.;of
to the satisfaetion of '~e Stat.Superuisor of WateT Il.,ou,ces of Washington.of a Tigh'to the use of
tne grOUM waters of a. ._..If.ill..
locat.d within__..JI!I~)llI~_....__........_.....
Sec_2~....__....._.Twp-..J!L.v ..n._L~·w.,',1 .....
far the purpose of.-..!lNDi.c;ipal~t".r supply..
an.cier ann subject to proL"isions cClT1tainet!in Grcunc Wat~Pl'rmit S"...3763 ._~i.s.sue"'.by the State
SUperoisOT of Wat.,.ResOllTC.,and that said Tight to t~.use of said 9T..~nd wat.,..ha.s bel!Tl perfected
in accordance tt.-ith the Laws oj Washir.gtl."T:..and i..'i lteTl'oy confirmed by the State SV.~-i.tOT of Water
ReSOUTC"of Washington arod en"Ted ',I record in Vclum._.._9 ,t pag._!t:l~-L---:
thaI :he -right h.,.eby confinned date.fTom_......~...:.....19.5.5 __:that the 'l""ntity of ground
water'under the right henby confirmed tOT r~t!ptl1-PO,sPS aforesaid,is limited to an QTnOUnt o1C'Nc1Uy
beneficially us eli for said p1l'1'Oses,and shall not erceeci ....57 ..gallQ.ll!l....p-e.r_~ll~.e.:.....9.],,_~.!<!:-
t.e~_.E.!.z:...!.~'r._toz:._~!.c..i~_~._.'!~_~eE ..·l1j),I'~"r.·....._.....__
__.....-----_..__.____--..----.----.-___-_._----_--_.._--
Special p7"0vis'ons TequiTed by th.SUpe1'v~'1)T 01 Weter R«ouTces:_The_to.taL-Tear1y--ld..th-
moml autllorised from all sOllI"cee held by tile Town or Io\arr~...ill..shall
no.t....AxeaatLl).44_~..~.t'...at.;.._t.he..r.equ.ir.sment....!.nr....?Opu J At ion or .6I.:.Do._peo.~e.
it description C'f ,.i.e lamb '0 which sue;"ground tL'oter right is appurtenant:
Town of Marye"ille,Snohomish County.Washington.
The right to tr.,z use of the g-round water af()Tf!said her"?by co;:finned i.!reatricred to the tends LJ'T
place of us-:he1 ei·n de!cribed,ezcept as prct-Hed in Section..s 6 anci.7,CrapteT 122,Laws of i;79.
WITN1';SS the seal ooad si1'tature oj ~he Sttlte Supert·isor of Waur Resources afJ1:rcd ~!d.J:
.:;.:~:.!
.:-:.,:'~
.':::;".';;'":
'..".
.,'c,
...........'..,
'.'".:.;.,-
.".
"...;,",
,"...'
I
issued by tluz State
...-..-.....__.._--_..._----
.......__._..._----_._--
l.·.·1
A description of Ihe lands 10 whicit =h ground tL'aleT right i.!a;;purt"""nt:
The right to the use oJ the ground u-nrcr njon.':::I::::hereby ca~fiTmed ;!rc:slncted to the lond.~'J;
ptecc of H~C il(-~C'in desC"rlcco.(':rCC'!l~s.e 0T01"idcci .u Seo:tllm.<:Ij and i.Chnp.er J22.Lela's of 192~1.
__~JIIJler ex1 tt--...1IlIU.__...._.__·_·..·...----..-------.----
Tills Is TO CI:RTtn·ThaL m!:'In.::r..\:lm..~._.._..__---------..----.-
.----_.-----._-----_.._----_.._..-____-_.._._------
Speeia!provision.<requiTed by Ihe SUpervisOT of Wa,",R ..ources: .....lhe...t.at.&.LJld.~
__t""''''''...a...ruII:LIl!llLll..~.m:-l.ll7~~~.ee.t..~"V'tempt,dln~to sMp
..STATE or WASHnlC'l'l.'''.t r ·J"'M·or S;'Lb=iJ!!_
Certificnf,~I):r Ground Water Right
._~~r:_r.""__~~_..~._._._..._.__. .
u:c:".under the righf.here!>y con~rmed fOT the PUTPoscs afOTesaid.L'Iimitt'd to an amounl aetually
:),...:fic;olly u.,ed fOT said purposes,and shall not e.:re~ed....l'm..~J,19,r_~.l...ll<"!:e';'~'";:w;
lhal Ih~rig!:1 heTt;"y con~Tmed dales fram ...zu.J.:r_Z....l9!>I.......------:lhat the quantity of ground
ander and .'robjecr fa proruio:'l$C'Dntain.~d in Ground WateT Pennit No.:/..NM,
;n a""'!'Tdonce with ti,e Ic-us of Washingwn,and is n"",by con~Tmed by Ihe Stote!:upenn.or of Wate1'
?esouTces of rYa.shiTl!/llm and enleT.d oj record III Volum<!...._.ll....__01 pag"-.~514·116y~L·----
.....~n.\...".•.\·,\l~t.~Ilf:kIl,........._...._...__..,1uL,made proof
:0 Ihe salisfae,;on of the Stale Supert'is,,,.o(Wa ..'lle:i>UTeeS 0;Wa:hinglon,of a Tiqhl to the use t1f
;.ocatC'd tDithin .~_._+J...?r_~..J._._...
See_.:l....TU1p ..?9........N.,R ...~·.!~....W.M....
of-_··...
j
i
i
--!
L .19 66 /::~>/-/-///~.,..//./I
,Iu.....•II>u'no,(I..nC'O'....In :1>"I"""UIH•.'"I ,.~.>,.l<..~:........I \\'h",n",,,,.!",:~...~...vt ,I"'".....!......\\.,nrl"'"
..".1 l~"rul ...~",:'....\lI~II..n ••,'",..Ik,.,,""'''''l ..r .:...I.....y Ir...",..,,,t..,I
CERn'h...TE RECORD Nu_...~
CERTIFICATE OF GROUND WATER RIGHT
SiAn:or W.-\sm::CTO:-:,COI.::",T\"tJI>'
l
ha.a madr proof
•well
4 !.~W.M ...\'..R..
___.__.._......IIar7"y1U•.,....w~.~.!A&-.
'i'HIS Is To CtRTlrY Thrlt
iv("Cltd ,d:hin
of
I
I
I
8276
I
I
I
do:t'':••"~'l J\mAI 19, 1967 -,'..",,,1 :)',"Illtell'".;.,.rll;/::;".••~h:l """,
I City .f l1.Ir,...rtl1••
I
I
I
I
I
"!"i.,.~,~,.JIL :r,11.V·,.:';c-e (:f(:rI:~il'ri ;l(""h:i ("'III'::,'W,!~.~.....,:,,.~,,~!:"'i:r i!lad.<:If ~'ftlC'C'I1f ''';<C'IU"I"III
d.·~.-,r:bf>ri.C.l:(·~!':r:.~:.-·"'irl··O :l!RC\',.'~,I.r.rJ:J.3~O.!In.''J ..':',,!..~llri ~':-'.!·/.O:.'''.
Thi:oo l'C'rlil'i":1tl',.f ..::-nund wnn-r rit:ht i,~prc;lir;llh'....".Il·t·t I"l"l."linqlli"hmC'nl fllr nurne-c or w:1ICT
.;I.iH:-::\.;::1 :(;S.I):~""
~kp.I:··.:~:.'r~:.,(r:l'lll,,~"
I
I
I
..-.
L :·:,:J;:nll,'rr;nt
,~4.'~.";'.--:.:
r·....'I
.-....
~'..,_.
2ud
/..,,''.<,..'r
....---'--'""-....-
1,7
I
>>»<.
:.
PUBLIC W"TEP.TO BE tlPPROPRI"TED
STATE OF \~.,\SIII'iGTO;'
IJEP,\RTMENT OF ECOLOGY
This is {()ceruf»rtuu tlte herein named appticant has made proof 10 (lit..'satisfurtion ofttu:DC'pur/11J(!/l{of Ecology
of a right to 'he Ifse of the public waters c[lite State of Washingtoll as ticrci«defined,and under and specifically
subiect tv the provisions contained ill Illl'Permit issued by tlu!Department of Ecology,and that said ri.fJllt to tlte
use of said nofl(ers has been perfecred in accordance with tile laws of 'he State!of washington,and is hereby con-
firmed by tire Department of Ecology and enteredof record as shown.
lZIP COOl:1
93270
CERTIFICAT£Nft,.,..,,,ER
GI-00675C
!!".TAr(l
Washington
iPEAMI~NVMAEn
----..l-....!0741P
JCllYI
~1ar)'sville
Ilu"ed In >lCCQI('-'"C'1!'w.lh II'I~ufov.,ions of Chillpte'117.1.01\111'of W~'""'IIJlon fot 1!l17.olud
Jlnrndmenn ln~'t!to.,1MII"'e ruin and rc~la1io",at lhlt Dl:O",tlT"'!nl at EColOljl't'.1
CERTIFICATE OF WATER RIGHT
Surface vt'1tterG
o
:'\lAM!.
CITY OF ~~\RYS\'T LLE
.AOORE~"ISTREETi
Cit)'Hall
C'nIOJ4l'rv QATE
JUl)'14.1970
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOI.lHCE
I\ell (156"diameter.50 I deep)
TlllfiU1AAv Of IlF ~UICFACE W.:.T[RSI
I
.',tAXIMU:.:CUOIC FfC :-:q !:ECONO
c.'U_NTll'f,n;>E OF cse .PtRIO;;D~D~'~v:;",,;--_.L_---------------'----~-----------
~~icipnl 5upply -continuously
I
I
I
LOCATION OF D1VERSION/WITHDRAW"L
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF OIVERSION-WITHORAwAL.
730 feet south and 730 feet "est of the northeast comer of Sec.3
LOCATED WiT ...'....,ISI.'.A ..LEST LEGAL SUODIVISIONI
Govt Lot 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ON W·~ICH WATER IS TO BE USED
I
I COT 8LOCK OF ICIVE ~IAME OF PLAT OR AODlTIONI
COUNT'\'Sn::>homish
I Area served .....-:the city of ~Iary~ville.
I
I
I
.-.."".-_.----
PROVISIONS
-.~'.
..'.
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tile right to fhe lI.re of tile water aforesaid Iltreby confirmed is restricted to rile lands or place of use herein
described.except as prodded ill RCI~90.03.380.90.03.390.and 90.44.020.
Thj~certllic.at.e ot w ater riJ:!ll is snectrlcatly subiect tc relinquishm~nl for nonuse or .....ater as provided in RC\\'
90.14.1BO.
I
I
Cl.'('11 ltllder Illy !lulld and till!seat of tlris offlee at
n!J..,y............J 9 ?~..
Department of Ecology
(\?~,.:::-,._.~J
W I · I .31 d~YasIIng10n,1 liS .
CERTIFICATE OF WATER.RIGHT .',
-.;.;..-l
::·1
:'?j
I
<;EATU'ICAT[""U,,,I0£R
Gl·234S7C
.-"
PERMit'N\JMtlEA
Gl·l3437P
STATE OF W,\SHINCTCN
DEPARDfENT OF ECOLOGY
i.4PP\.'CATIQN "''''',UIER
i Gl-234S7
o
@
PAIQR,TV QATl:
October 17, 1979
...
II
I
(c/O Sill Butler,Director of Public Ilorks)_I
:'tAo,,"
CITY 8F HOJlYSVILLE
AoallUS IS1AU:]
1409 First Street
'Cirri
flarysvillc
ISTAllJ
I~.shington
111P CODEt
9B270
I
Ttns ;S It;(,f!rtil\'ttuu I!lt IUffi"lIumrd a(lpJicolli "as nlQdc proof 10 11l~satnfacnon of IIU!Depamnent of Ecolog)'
01 Q r;cllt If},III'"Sf of the :"~tblic W!."fl'!!of ,II"StnU'of Waslti",rnn as IIe'Tci"uc/iflf"d.and under and Sf/uirica/I....·
subject /0 rl:t'provisions contained ill the,Pemnt issued by ,IIe Department 01 Een/lIg.!",and tbat said r.;ghllo ,II,
1tS~of said waters lias been 11l.:rfccuc)ill accordance with Ille la\1ls of lilt 5u:u of hjQslrillg~on.and is ;'l!rtby ('0/'-
flrm,d bJ' the Deuartment C1l £C'o'lJ,~.'·and tlJfUl!d of record as sIlO\1I11.
I
PUBLIC WATER TO BE APPROPRIATEO
OU"'tflTl.r,-(.:'.St.PE-'O:::0'"S'
~tJniCiP31 5~"?plj'.cOi!tinuouslyI
I
.........I~.r,,;.\:C ...D'C -n-?~.SECO~O IUolnzuool G.l....~ONS PER "'INuH
1,000
\~l'MU"..Cllf·'U r PHI·~'~"~':-------
1,600.0
I
r
I
I
,
•
LOCATION OF DIVERSION/WITHDRAWAL
_"AOKIMATIE ~OC"TION 0'O;VE.~ION_IT""OA"'W"'~
750 feet east and SOO feet north from the Slt corner of Sec.2S
__________..;L::f::G"",,.·DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 0:01 WHICHWATER IS TO BE USED
I
I
"'OC.AtEO wlt....l:t IS~I.lo ......E5t ~H.A~)'JflQIVI$IOI'f1
SE"Sl~
9~OCK
I
.....NGi.u ,Of!W.I w ........:..1 ....CDUNTl
5 E 7 Snohomish
OF ICIV£NAME OF PLAT OR A001TI"....'
I
Are.served by City of flarysville
I
I
I
I
I L
r.r.nT.FIr.,hTE
PROVISIONS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.",
Static _~ter levels snail be measured in the subject well at least twice monthly.Me~eT ~eadings and wat~r level measurement data'shall be made av~il~ble to tne
Department of Ecology upon request.
AA approved measuring device shall be installed and maintained in accordance _ith
ROt 90.03.360,WAC 508·64·020 through WAC S08·~4·040.r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
i,
\_~'I
\
I
\
I
RodmQRd
by ~.al ..~':::«v ~·
ROBERT K.;1COOR'IICK.Region,j :.'.mager
Deportmenl of EL:iJlo(!.y
FOR COUNTY USE ONLY
,,,
Givenunder my haud arid lilt seat of tIllS of/1ct at
ntl."",urtca..or wa'""01.'1'eeee Weall'·,uhl,cl to rellnQulshme"(0'nenes or water U .",,·Id,d I'RClf
90.14.1Sll.
.'-.~~".
.~....,,
&"CIH"E!.R~C.DATAox.:;..\i.:<··::LJ J,I ",
of NI:r.U · ·19 8.3
17..riglll 10 lilt use of rll.war"afomaid II",by con{ir",.d is r.,;r;eI.d 10 ,II.larod'or ."IJ"of use II",ill
describ.d ••xcepl as prodded ill RelY 90.0J.3eo.90.0J.390.and 90.44.020.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX K
COLIFORM MONITORING PLAN
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
AUENDIX..K
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
COLIFORM MONITORING PLAN
This plan was prepared in conformance with the Washington State Department of Health
guidance document titled "Preparation of a Coliform Monitoring Plan."The procedures described
are in accordance with the Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 246-290.
I.System Map
The attached system map details the Marysville system sources, pressure zones, storage
reservoirs, sample sites and other pertinent information.
II.Narrative
A.System Information
1.)System Name: Marysville Utilities
2.) System Identification Number: 51900C
3.) County: Snohomish
4.) Sources:
Name Source Category Location
No.
Edward Springs SOl
Spring Sec 24, Twp 31N,
Rng4E
Sunnyside Well #2 S03 Well NE1/4 NW1/4,Sec 2,
Twp 29N, Rng 5E
Stillaguamish Well S04 RanneyIInf Gal NE1I4 NE1I4, Sec 2,
Twp 31N, Rng 5E
Lake Goodwin S05 Well SE1I4, SWII4, Sec 22,
Two 31N, Rng 4E
Edward Sprgs Well S06 Well SWII4,SWl/4,Sec 24,
Twp 31N, Rng 4E
24050LfEverett S07
Purchase SW1I4, SWII4, Sec 24,
Treated Twp 29N, Rng 5E
Highway Well 9 S08
Well SW1I4, SW1I4, Sec 25,
Twp30N,Rng5E
K -1
Pressure Reducing Valves:
TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY
K-2
116th St.&Smokey Point Blvd.
116th St.&44th Ave.
12000 block on 47th Ave.
Intersection 51st Ave.&108th St.
l00th St.&Smokey Point Blvd.
l00th St. at Fred Meyer 4500 Block
9900 Block 48th Dr.
9600 Block 51st Ave.
9100 Block 55th Ave.
9100 Block 61st Dr.
9100 Block 62nd Dr.
6500 Block 100th St.
6600 Block 100th St.
88th St.&67th Ave.
7200 Block on 71st Ave.
6300 Block on 64th St.
5500 Block on 67th Ave.
6800 Block on 71st Ave.
7000 Block on 64th St.
6900 Block on 52nd St.
7400 Block on 78th St.
7200 Block on 76th Dr.
7300 Block on 52nd St.
Cedarcrest Reservoir Site
7200 Block on Grove
7500 Block on 64th St.
7100 Block on 44th St.
Everett supply to 360 reservoir
Everett supply to 360 reservoir bypass
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,II
I
Capacity
(Gallons)
6,000,000
3,500,000
1,100,000
467,000
200 000
11,267,000
Water Surface
£Em}
236.5
170.0
490.0
172.5
360.0
Inactive by-pass open
Inactive by-pass open
Inactive by-pass open
Inactive by-pass open
Inactive by-pass open
Inactive by-pass open
North 236 zone to 170 zone
North 236 zone to 170 zone
North 236 zone to 170 zone
North 236 zone to 170 zone
North 236 zone to 170 zone
North 236 zone to 170 zone
PRV from new 360 zone res.
South 236 zone to 170 zone
South 236 zone to 170 zone
South 236 zone to 170 zone
South 236 zone to 170 zone
360 zone to 236 zone
360 zone to 236 zone
360 zone to 236 zone
490 zone to 360 zone
490 zone to 360 zone
490 zone to 360 zone
360 zone to 170 zone
Everett supply to 360 zone
Everett supply to 360 zone
Everett supply to 360 zone
Everett supply to 360 zone
Everett supply to 360 zone
Year
Constructed
1975
1987
1981
1963
1958
Storage:
Facility
Edward Springs Reservoir
Cedarcrest Reservoir
Highway 9 Reservoir
Kellogg-Marsh Standpipe
Sunnyside Standpipe
6.)
5.)
--,
6. First Service Connections for Surface Water Sources:
3. Sampling Frequency:Each site is typicallysampledthree times per month.
4. Monthly Rotation Cycles: The number of samples required exceeds the
number of sites; therefore, a rotation cycle is not necessary
5. Repeat Sample Sites:If coliform presence is indicated, repeat samples are
taken from residential taps located within five service connections upstream
and downstream(tworepeat samples at each occurrence).
1996 Service
Connections
1,750
319
3,030
10,840
1996 Service
Population
4,910
892
8,480
30,340
202 172nd S1.NE
5900 Blockof 198th S1.NE
K-3
Zlml:
490
360
240
170
Zlml:
490
360
240
170
Edward Springs:
Stillaguamish Collector:
7. Treatment Plant: None
8. Total PopulationServed: 44,615
9. Number of Service Connections:15,934
10. Number of Pressure Zones: 4
11: Population per Pressure Zone:
2.Representative Samples Required: 22
1.Monthly Samples Required:50
12. Service Connections per Pressure Zone:
SamplingInformation:B.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C.Plan Preparation Information:
Plan Preparer:Gary Olsen (With assistance provided by Hammond,Collier &
Wade -Livingstone Assoc.,Inc.)
Title: Utility Maintenance/Sanitation Supervisor
City of Marysville
Telephone:(360)651-5100
Date:March 1996
Reviewed by:Richard Rodriguez,Washington Department of Health
K -4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I:
,
I
---------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample Points
1 5500 Regan Road
.2 57th Street NE and 67th Avenue NE
3 9200 block of 55th Avenue NE
4 9300 block of 51st Avenue NE
5 51st Avenue and 122nd Place NE
6 15424 51st Avenue NE
7 140th Street NE Stimson Crossing
8 169th Street NE
9 43rd Avenue and Airport
10 5906 198thStreet NE
11 202 172nd Street NE
12 151st Place NE (45Road)
13 100th Street and Old 99
14 33rd Avenue NE
15 7200 Block of 83rd Avenue
Pressure Zones
170
240
240
170
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
24.0
240
170
490
-------------------
"
)
,
1
!
........,..
0'
- ---o
~EK-1
4010 S~AY NORTH
SEATTl£.WASHfNGTOH 981o.s
(206)632-26"
JANUARY,1997
HAMMOND.COLUER '"WADE-
UIIINGSTONE ASSOCIA lES.INC.
COLFORM SAMPU«l SITES
CITY OF MARYSVIllE
A COLIFORM SAMPLE SITE
•
'--STILLAGUAMISH
RIVER (3.2 MGD)
ARLINGTON
12 _....
rc
\
:\
K ........
,"!
"I
.-
z
0:EO,'"r ...•..,..:
"
CEDAR eRE T
RESERVOIR '3.5 MG
A
5 E.
.-
,
!
,........
,,
I •
...
PECIAL'SERVICE
I LAND CROSSING
"
-
,
•I
~,......
e
JI
•,
I
"
"
"
PORT GARDNER BAY
"
or:24
f-
l
"/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX L
SEPA and DNS DOCUMENTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Po/icy Act (SEPAl.chapter 43.21 C RCW.requires cll govemmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposol before making decisions. An environmental impact statement
{EISI mustbe prepared forall proposalswith probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your
proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal. if it can be done) and to help the agency decide
whether an EIS isrequired.
Instrucfions for Appliconts:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.Governmental
agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of vour proposal are significant.
requiring preparation of an EIS.Answer the questions briefly.with the most precise information known. or give the
best description you con.
You must answer each question accurately and caretully. to the best of your knowledge.In most cases.you
should be able to answerthe questionsfrom your own observations or project plans without the need to hireexperts.
If you really do not know the answer. or if a question does not apply to your proposci.write "do not know" or "does
not apply."Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessarydelays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning.shoreline.and landmark designations.
Answerthese questions ifyou can. Ifyou have problems. the governmental agencies ccn assist you.
Thechecklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. even if you plan to do them over a period of time or
on different parcels of land.Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its
environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
A.BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project. if applicable:
CITY OF MARYSVIlle·COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLAN·1994
2. Name of applicant:
CITY OFMARYSVIlle
3.Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
KEN WINCKLER.PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
CITY OFMARYSVIlle
80 COLUMBIA AVENUE
MARYSVILlE.WA 98270
(360)651·5100
4.Date checklist prepared:
OCTOBER 1995
5.Agency requesting checklist
CITY OFMARYSVIlle
6. Proposedtiming orschedule (including phasing.if oppticoble]:
THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE SCHEDULED OVER A 6·YEAR PERIOD BEGINNING IN 1995.
7. Do you have ony plans for future additions. expansion. or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? Ifyes.exclain.
YES.ONGOING SYSTEM PLANNING Will CONTINUE IN FlITURE WATER SYSTEM PLAN UPDATES.WAC 246·290
REQUIRES PLAN UPDATES EVERY SIX YEARS.
8.Ust any environmental information you know about that has been prepared. or will be prepared.directly
related to thisproposal.
NOT APPLICABle.
,---------------------------------------------------.
SEPA Rul ••
Part E1even·Chapter 1'7.11
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental opprovals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes.explain.
NO.
10.list any government approvals or permits that will be needed foryour proposal. if known.
1)MARYSVILLJ:CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:
2)DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (DOH)APPROVAL;
3)NORTH SNOHOMISH COUNTY WATER UTIlITY COORDINATING COMMITTEE APPROVAL;
4) ADDmONAL PERMITS AND APPROVALS FOR INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS IN THE PLAN.INCLUDING APPROVALS FROM
THE CmESOF EVERETT AND ARUNGTON.SNOHOMISH CO.PUD.AND THE TULAUP TRIBES FOR PROPOSED
INTERTlES.
11.Give brief.complete description of your proposal.including the proposed uses and the size of the project and
site.There are several questions later in thischecklist that askyou to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.(Lead agencies may modify this torm to include additional
specific information on project description.)
THE WATER SYSTEM PLAN (WSP)IS A PLANNING DOCUMENT THAT REUES UPON POPULATION PROJECTIONS AND
LAND USE INFORMATION FOR THE PLANNING OF FUTURE WATER SYSTEM FACIUTlES.THE WSP INCLUDES LAND USE AND
ZONING INFORMATION.POPULATION PROJECTIONS.HISTORICAL WATER USE AND PROJECTIONS OF FUTURE WATER
DEMAND.A WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM.AND WATER QUAlITY REQUIREMENTS.ALSO INCLUDED IS AN
EVALUATION OF THE HYDRAULICS OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM AND A FIVE·YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP)FOR
UPGRADING THE WATER SYSTEM.
12.location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project.including a street address.if any.and section. township. and range. if know. If a proposal would
occur over a range of area.provide the range or boundaries of the sitets].Provide a legal description. site plan.
vicinify map.and topographic map.if reasonably available.While you should submit any plans required by the
agency.you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to
thischecklist.
MARYSVILLE'S WATER SYSTEM IS LOCATED IN NORTH SNOHOMISH COUNTY.WASHINGTON.THE CITY'S SERVICE
AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 27 SQUARE MILJ:S.THE WATER SYSTEM BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN IN FIGURE 2·2 IN THE WATER
SYSTEM PLAN.THE LOCATIONOFEACHOF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS IS SHOWN ON FIGURE 6·2 IN THE WSP.
B.ENVIRONMENTAL Eu:MENTS
1.Earth
a. General description of the site: Flat.rolling.hilly.steep slopes.mountainous. other _
FLAT.ROLUNG.HILLY.
b. What isthe steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slopel?
THE STEEPEST SLOPES WITHIN THE SERVICE AREA ARE APPROXIMATELY 35".45"SLOPES (70·10l1'70),AND ARE FOUND
ALONG THE EAST AND WEST SLOPES OFTHE MARYSVIllE TROUGH.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example.clay. sand. gravel.peat.muck)? If you know the
c!assification of agrict:'lurai soils.specify them and note any prime farmland.
WATER SYSTEM PLAN ENCOMPASSES A LARGE GEOGRAPHIC AREA WHICH INCLUDES ALL OF THE ABOVE SOIL TYPES.
PREDOMINANT SOILS ARE GLACIAL TILL AND OUTWASH OVERLYING GRAVEL AND CLAY.
d. Arethere surface indications or historyof unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so.describe.
NOT APPLICABLE.
e. Describe the purpose.type.and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.Indicate source ot
liII.
EARTH EXCAVATION AND COMPACTION WILL OCCUR IN AREAS OF FUTURE WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION OR
REPAIR.SOME EXCAVATION WILL BE NEEDED FOR LAYING THE FOUNDATIONS OF ANY FUTURE PUMP HOUSES.
RESERVOIR .•;R BUILDING FOR WATER TREATMENT FACILmES.SOURCE OF ALL NOT KNOWN ATTHIS TIME.
SEPA·Page 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II,
I
.--------------------------------------------,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SEPA Rules
Part E1even·Chapler 197·11
f.Could erosion occur as a resultof clearing.construction.or use?If so.generally described.
TEMPORARY OR SHORT-TERM INcREASES IN EROSION MAY OCCUR DUE TO CLEARING FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS.OR DUE TO EXCAVATION FOR WATER MAIN TRENCHES AND BUILDING FOUNDATIONS.
g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (forexample.
asphalt or buildings)?
WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION/REPLACEMENT:CONSTRUCTION WILL GENERALLY BE WITHIN EXISTING ROADWAYS;
THEREFORE.INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS SURFACES ISNOT ANnCIPATED.
PUMP STATIONS AND RESERVOIRS:WILL VARY WITH INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS.BUT IMPERVIOUS SURFACES WILL BE
MINIMIZED WHEREVER POSSIBLE.THE.LARGEST PROPOSAL KNOWN AT THIS TIME PROPOSES APPROXIMATELY 2.500
SQUARE FEET OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE.
h. Proposedmeasuresto reduce or control erosion.or other impacts to the earth. if any:
SPECIFIC PROJECT DESIGN PARAMETERS.TIMING OF CONSTRUCTION.AND TEMPORARY EROSION AND SILTATION
FACIUTIES.CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE AND SNOHOMISH COUNTY REQUIREMENTS.WILL MINIMIZE
IMPACTS.
2.Air
a. What fypes of emissions to the air would resultform the proposal (i.e.. dust.automobile.odors.industrial wood
smoke I during construction and when the project is completed?If any.generally describe and give approximate
quantities. if known.
CONSTRUCTION OUST AND INCREASED EXHAUST FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT MAY IMPACT THE
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.THE IMPACT WILL BE SHORT·TERM •
b. Are there any off-sitesourcesof emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so.generally describe.
NONE ANnCIPATED.
c. Proposedmeasuresto reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air.if any:
USE DUST CONTROL MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND EMISSIONS CONTROL DEVICES ON THE EQUIPMENT.
3. Water
a. Surtace:
1J Isthere any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site [including yeor-rounc and seasonal
streams.scttwcter.lakes.ponds.wetlandsl?It yes.describe type and provide names. II appropriate.state what
stream or riverit flows into.
THE SERVICE AREA IS LOCATED IN THE QUILCEDA CREEK SUB-BASIN OF THE SNOHOMISH RIVER BASIN.AREA
STREAMS IN THE SUB·BASIN ARE QUILCEDA CREEK.ALLEN CREEK.MUNSON CREEK.EBEY SLOUGH.A TIDAL ESTIJARY OF
THE SNOHOMISH RIVER.IS ATTHE SOUTHERN UMITS OF THE SERVICE AREA.ONEOF THE SYSTEM SOURCES IS LOCATED IN
THE STlLLAGUAMISH RIVER ATTHE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SYSTEM.
..
2) Will the project require any work over. in. or adjacent to (within 200 feetl the described waters? If yes.please
describe and aftach available plans.
A FEW INDIVIDUAL WATER MAIN PROJECTS MAYBE LOCATED NEAR SURFACE WATER.BUT WILL BE WITHIN EXISTING
ROADWAY CORRIDORS WHEREVER POSSIBLE.DETAILED CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.BUT
WILL BE REVIEWED BY PROPER AGENCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
31 Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed trom surface water or
wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.Indicate the source of fill material..
THE PROJECTS IN THE WATER SUPPLY PLAN DO NOT PROPOSE FIWNG OR DREDGING IN ANY KNOWN SURFACE
WATER BODIES OR WETLANDS.INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS WILL BE SUBJECT TO COUNTY.STATE.AND FEDERAL PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS.
SEPA-Page 3
SEPA Rules
Part Seven-Chapter 197-11
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?Give general description.purpose.and
approximate quantities. if known.
TWO OF THE SYSTEM SOURCES CURRENTlY USE SURFACE WATER.EDWARD SPRINGS AND THE SlILlAGUAMISH
COLLECTOR.DUE TO REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS.FILTRATION FAClllTIES MAYBE ADDED TO THESE SOURCES OR THEY
MAY BE TAKEN OFF·LINE.IN EITHER CASE.SURFACE WATER DIVERSIONS WOULD NOT BE GREATER THAN THE CURRENT
APPROVED WATER RIGHTS.
5) Doesthe proposal lie within a IOO-year floodplain? If so.note location on the site plan.
NONE ANTICIPATED.
I
I
I
I
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?If so. describe the type of I
waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
NONE ANTICIPATED.
b. Ground:
I) Will ground water be withdrawn.or will water be discharged to ground water?Give general description.
purpose.and approximate quantities. if know.
THE WSP DOES NOT PROPOSE ADDmONAL GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWAL
2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources.if any Ifor
example: Domestic sewage:industrial.containing the following chemicals:...: agricuitural:etc.l.Describe the
general size of the system. the number of such systems.the number of houses to be served (if applicable).or the
number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve.
NONE ANTICIPATED.
c. Water Runoff(inclUding storm woter]:
1)Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal.if any (include
quantities. if known). Where will this water flow?Willthis water flow into other waters?If scdescnbe.
THE SOURCE OF RUNOFF MAY BE FROM CONSTRUCilON OF WATER MAINS.WHICH TEMPORARILY ALTER THE WATER
COURSES.ESPECIAllY WHERE WATER LINES ARE INSTAlleD ALONG DRAINAGE COURSES.THIS IMPACT Will BE SHORT·
TERM.RUNOFF WILL BE PRODUCED FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURES.DETENTION OR INFILTRATION SYSTEMS
WILL BE DESIGNED TO DETAIN THIS RUNOFF.
2)Could waste materials enter ground orsurface waters?Ifso.generally describe.
REMOTE POSSIBIlITY OF AUTOMOBILE AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL OR OIL LEAKING INTO GROUND.
MEASURES Will BE TAKEN TO REDUCE THE POSSIBIlITY OFTHIS DURING CONSTRUCTION.
31 Proposedmeasuresto reduce or control surface. ground. and runoff water impacts. if any:
MEASURES Will DEPEND ON THE SCOPE OF INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS.PROCEDURES Will BE CONSISTENT WITH
SNOHOMISH COUNTY STANDARDS AND WITH THE APPLICABLE ZONING CODE CONOmONS.
4.Plants
a.Check orcircle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder.maple.aspen. other
X evergreen tree:fir.cedar.pine. other
X shrubs
X grass
X pasture
crop or grain
X wet soilplants:cattail.buttercup.bullrush.skunk cabbage.other
X water plants:water lily.eelgrass.milloil. other
X other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
NOT APPLICABLE
SEPA - Page 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;1
I
sEPA Rules
Pari E1even·Chapte,197·11
c.Ust threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NOT APPLICABLE
d.Proposed landscaping.use of native plants. or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site. if
any:
TEMPORARY IMPACTS OF THE WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION WIll BE LIMITED TO THE CORRIDOR OF UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS.AND DISTURBED AREAS Will BE REVEGETATED.
5.Animals
a.Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or'near the
site:
birds:hawk.heron.eagle.songbirds. other. HAWK.HERON.EAGLE.SONGBIRDS.OTHER
mammals:deer.bear.elk.beaver.other.DEER.BEAVER
fish: bass.salmon.trout. heRing.shellfish.other:SALMON.TROUT.HERRING.SHEllfiSH.OTHER
b.Usf any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NOTAPPLICABLE.
c. Is the site part at a migration route? If so.explain.
SOME STREAMS WITHIN THE SERVICE AREA SUPPORT COHO. CHINOOK. AND CHUM SALMON
SPAWNING/MIGRATION.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife.if any:
PROJECT Will HAVE UTILE OR NO IMPACT ON WILDLIFE.WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION Will ATTEMPT TO RESTORE
THE UTlUTY ALIGNMENT TO NATIVE CONDmONS.ATTEMPTS WILL BE MADE ALSOTO RESTORE TO NATIVE CONDmONS
THE AREA SURROUNDING ANY NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.
6.Energy and Natural Resources
a'What kinds of energy (electric.natural gas. oil.wood stove.solcr]will be used to meet the completed projecfs
energy needs?Descrtbe whether it will be used for heating.manufacturtng.etc.
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PUMP HOUSE BUILDINGS AND RESERVOIRS WILL REQUIRE ELECTRICITY FOR
PUMPING AND TELEMETRY.
b.Would your project affect the potential use at solar energy by adjacent properties?If so.generally descrtbe.
NO.
c.What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans at this proposal:List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts.if any:
A DETAILED WATER CONSERVATION PLAN ISINCLUDED IN CHAPTERS OFTHEWSP.
7.Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards.including exposure to toxic chemicals.risk of fire and explosion. spill.
or hazardous waste.that could occur as a result of this proposal?If so.describe.
MINIMAL HAZARD POTENTIAL EXISTS WITH THE CUSTOMARY OPERATION OF A WATER UTIUTY.l'Descrtbe special emergency services that might be required.
NOT APPLICABLE.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. if any:
NOT APPLICABLE.
b. Noise
I)What types at noise exist in the area which may affee!your projee!(for example:traffic.equipment.
operation.otherl?
NONE.
SEPA -Page 5
SEPA Rules
Part EJoven'Challfor 197-11
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-
term basis (for example:fraffic.construction.operation.otherl1 Indicate what hours noise would come from the
site.
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT DURING DA YLIGHT HOURS.AND LOW LEVEL NOISE fROM PUMP OPERATION.
3) Proposedmeasuresto reduce or control noise impacts. if any:
WEll PUMPS WILL BE INSTALLED INSIDE BUILDINGS.
a.Land and ShorelineUse
a. What isthe current useof the site and adjacent properties?
LAND USE VARIES fROM AGRICULTURE TO INDUSTRIAL WITHIN THE SERVICE AREA.AS SHOWN IN fiGURE 2-3 Of THE
WSP.RESIDENllALSINGLE·fAMILY LAND USE PREDOMINATES.
b.Has the site been used for agriculture?Ifso.describe.
MUCH Of THE EXISTING RESIDENllAL LAND USE WAS PREVIOUSLY AGRICULTURAL THE RURAL AREAS ARE STILL
AGRICULTURAL
c.Describe any structureson the site.
NOT APPLICABLE.
d. Willany structures be demolished1 Ifso.what?
NOTAPPLICABLE.
e. What isthe current zoning classification of the site?
ZONING VARIES fROM AGRICULTURE TO COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL AS DESCRIBED IN CHAPTER 2 Of THE WSP.
ZONING IS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2-3 OF THE WSP.
f. What isthe current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
THE PROJECT LOCATIONS HAVE VARIABLE ZONING.
g. If applicable.what isthe current shorelinemaster program designation of the site?
NOT APPLICABLE.
h.Has any part of the site been classified asan "environmentally sensitive"area?If so.specify.
YES.PORTIONS Of THE SERVICE AREA ARE SO CLASSifiED.
i.Approximately how many people would resideor work in the completed project?
NOT APPLICABLE.
j.Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
NOT APPUCABLE.
k. Proposedmeasuresto avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any:
NOT APPLICABLE.
I. Proposedmeasuresto ensurethe proposal is compatible with existingand projected land uses and plans.if any:
CHAPTER 2 Of THE WSP DISCUSSES LAND USE POLICIES AND THE WSP'S COMPATIBILITY WITH MARYSVILLE'S GROWTH
MANAGEMENT ACT PLANNING.
9. Housing
a.Approximately how many units would be provided.if any?Indicate whether high.middle.or low-income
housing.
NOT APPLICABLE.
SEPA - Page 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
SEPA Rule.
Pal!8even-Chapter 197-11
b.Approximately how many units. if any.would be eliminated?Indicate whelher high.middle.or low-income
housing.
NOTAPPLICABLE.
c. Proposed measures 10 reduce or controi housing impacts.if any:
NOT APPLICABLE.
10 Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed strucfurets]. not including antennas:what is Ihe principal exterior
building material(sl proposed?
THE TAUEST PROPOSED STRUCTURE Will MOST LIKELY BE A NEW RESERVOIR.HEIGHT TO BE DETERMINED IN
PRElIMINARY DESIGN.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD NOT ALTER OR OBSTRUCT ANY EXISTING VIEWS.
c. Proposed measures 10 reduce or control aesthetic impacts.if any:
IFAPPLICABLE,THIS Will BE ADDRESSED IN THE DESIGN AND PERMITTING PROCESS FOR EACH PROJECT.
11.Ught and Glare
a. What type of light orglare wililhe proposal produce?What lime of day would it mainly occur?
NOT APPLICABLE.
b. Could light or glare from Ihe finished project be a safety hazard or interfere wilh views?
NOT APPLICABLE.
c. What existing off-sile sourcesof light or glare may affect your proposal?
NOT APPLICABLE.
d. Proposed measures 10 reduce or controllighl and glare impacts.if any:
NOT APPLICABLE.
12.Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
NOTAPPLICABLE.
b. Would Ihe proposed project displace any existing recreotioncl uses?If so.describe.
NOTAPPLICABLE.
c. Proposed measures 10 reduce or control impacts on recreation.including recreation opportunilies to be
provided by the projecl or applicant.if any:
.NOT APPLICABLE.
13.Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for. national. state. or local preservation registers known to
be on or next to the site?Ifso.generally describe.
NOTAPPLICABLE.
b.Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic.archaeological.scientific. or cultural importance
known to be on ornext to Ihe sile.
NOTAPPLICABLE.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts.if any:
NOT APPLICABLE.
SEPA - Page 7
SEPA Rute.
Pcri ae.en-Chapter 197-11
14.Transportation
a.Identity public streets and highways servingthe site.and describe proposed access to the existing street system.
Show on siteplans. if any.
SEE FIGURE 6-2 OFTHE WSP FOR EXISTING ARTERIALS.
b. Issite currently served by public transit? If not.what isthe approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
NOT APPLICABLE.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have?How many would the project eliminate?
NOTAPPLICABLE.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets.or improvements to existing roads or streets.not including
driveways?If.so.generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
ACCESS ROADS TO WEll SITES MAY BE REQUIRED.CONSTRUCTION OF PIPELINES IN ROADWAYS WILL REQUIRE
PAVEMENT RESTORATION.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity ot)water.rail. or air transportation? If so.generally
describe.
NOTAPPLICABLE.
f.How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known.indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
NOTAPPLICABLE.
g. Proposed measuresto reduce or control transportation impacts.if any:
NOTAPPLICABLE.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project resultin an increased need for public services(for example:fire protection.police protection.
health care. schools.otherl? If so.generally describe.
THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF PUMP HOUSES AND RESERVOIRS WILL RESULT IN MINIMAL IMPACTS DUE TO THE
TYPE AND USE OF THESE BUILDINGS.
b. Proposedmeasuresto reduce or control direct impacts on public services.if any.
NOT APPLICABLE.
16.Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:electricity.natural gas.water.refuseservice.telephone.sanitary
sewer. septic system.other.
NOTAPPLICABLE.
b.Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project.the utility providing the service. and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
NOTAPPLICABLE.
C.SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best ot my knowledge.I understand that the lead agency is
relyingO~~'~)
Signatur~~~~0",
Date Submitted:a--..r /2 I L 'Z.:s=:
)
MARYSVIUE!17asEPA
SEPA-Page 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONSTRUCTION OF PIPEUNES ACROSS STREAM CAN EFFECT STREAM CONDmONS AND FISH.
NO INCREASE ANTICIPATED.
SEPA - Page 9
Proposedmeasuresto avoid or reduce suchincreasesare:
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
SENsmVE AREAS ARE NOT ANTICIPATED TO BE AFFECTED BY PROJECTS IN THE WATER SYSTEM PLAN.THIS WIU BE
CONSIDERED IN MORE DEPTH AT THE TIME OF DESIGN AND PERMITnNG OF INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS.
4. How would the proposal be likely to useor affect environmentally sensitiveareas or areas designated (or
'eligible or under sfudy)for govemmental protection:such as parks.wildemess.wild and scenic rivers.threatened or
endangered species habitat.historicorcultural sites.wetlands.floodplains. or prime farmlands?
IMPACTS DUE TO STREAM CROSSINGS WIU BE MINIMIZED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.ANDWIU BE SUBJECT TO PERMITS
FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES.
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROVISIONS.TEMPORARY EROSION AND SILTAnON CONTROL MEASURES.AND
RESTORATION OF CONSTRUCTION AREAS WIU MINIMIZE INCREASED RUNOFF AND ASSOCIATED SEDIMENTAnON
THAT CAN EFFECT FISH HABITAT.
PROPOSED BUILDINGS WIU BE LOCATED TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS WHENEVER POSSIBle.SPECIFIC SITE DESIGNS MAY
INCLUDE DETENTION OR INFILTRAnON FACIUTIES TO CONTROL RUNOFF AND SEDIMENTATION.
TEMPORARY IMPACTS TO NATIVE PLANTS FROM THE WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION IS POSSIBLE.BUT GENERALLY
LIMITED TO THE CORRIDOR OF unLITY IMPROVEMENTS.CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING STRUCTURES MAY REQUIRE
SOME CLEARING.
SPECIFIC DESIGN CONSIDERAnONS.TEMPORARY EROSION AND SILTAnON CONTROL MEASURES.RESTRICTIONS ON
HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION OPERAnON AND IMMEDIATE RESTORAnON OF CONSTRUCTION AREAS TO BEFORE
CONSTRUCTION NAnVE CONDmONS.CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND nMING WIU BE SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC
ZONING CONDmONS.
When answering these questions.be aware of the extent the proposal. or the types of activifies likelyto result
from the proposal.would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not
implemented.Respond brieRy and in general terms.
PROJECTS THAT ARE SCHEDUlED IN THE PLAN MAY SUGHTlY INCREASE RUNOFF TEMPORARILY DURING
CONSTRUCTION.BUILDING STRUCTURES FOR RESERVOIRS AND PUMP STATIONS.
Because these questionsare very general. it may be helpful to read them in conjunction wifh the listof the
elements of the environment.
3. How would the proposal be likelyto deplete energy or nafural resources?
Proposedmeasuresto protect or conserve plants.animals.fish.or marine life:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants. animals.fish.or marine life?
I. How would the proposal be likelyto increase discharge to water:emissions to air.production.storage. or
releaseof toxic or hazardoussubstances:or production of noise?
D.SUPPlEMENTAL SHffi FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use thissheet for project actions)
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANT
SEPA Rulo.
Part eo.on-chapto,197·11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SEPA Rules
Part Eleven-Chapter 197-11
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to ovoid or reduce impacts are:
DURING THE DESIGN STAGE OF EACH INDIVIDUAL PROJECT.EVERY EFFORT WIU BE MADE TO AVOID SENSmVE
AREAS.
PROJECTS IN THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WIU REQUIRE ADDmONAL PHASED REVIEW FOR CONSISTENCY WITH KING
COUNTY REQUIREMENTS AS PART OFTHE PERMITTlNG PROCESS.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shorelineuse.including whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
THE WSP WAS DEVELOPED BASED UPON ADOPTED LAND USE PLANS.AND THEREFORE IS COMPAnBLE WITH THE
MARYSVILLE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND COORDINATED WATER SYSTEM PLAN.NO IMPACT TO
SHOREUNE USE IS ANnCIPATED.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
THE INTENT AND RESULTS OF THE WSP IS TO PLAN WATER SYSTEM FAClunES COMMENSURATE WITH COUNTY AND
STATE LAND USE PLANS AND REGULAnONS.INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS WIU BE DESIGNED TO MEET THE ADOPTED
REGULAnONS.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?
PLAN IMPLEMENTAnON IS DESIGNED TO RESPOND TO EXPECTED INCREASE IN WATER DEMAND BASED UPON
PROJECTED POPULAnON GROWTH IN THE AREA.MINIMAL IMPACT TO TRANSPORTATION AND OTHER PUBUC
SERVICES IS ANnCIPATED.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demands (s)are:
MINIMAL IMPACTS ARE ANnCIPATED.
7.Identify.if possible.whether the proposal may conflict with local.state. or federal laws or requirements for the
protection of the environment.
NO CONFUCTS ANTICIPATED.
MARYSVllLE/l70SEPA
SEPA - Page 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Description of Proposal:
The proposal isto adopt the 1995 City of Marysville Comprehensive Water Plan (CWP),which is
an update to the 1989 City of Marysville Comprehensive Water Plan. The CWP is an ongoing
water system planning document based on a twenty year planning period, and is required to be
updated every six years. The 1995 CWP is intended to evaluate all aspects of system operation
and management, as well as address; I) the impacts of new surface water treatment rules;2) the
impacts of the Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP) and service to JOA participants; and 3)
Completion of the Everett-Marysville Pipeline.Also included is an evaluation of land use and
zoning information, population projections, historical water use and projections of future water
demand, a water conservation program, the hydraulics of the existing system and a six-year
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for upgradingthe water system. The plan covers an approximate
27 square mile area located in north Snohomish County, Washington. Figure 2-2 in the WSP
shows the water systems planning boundaries, while Figure 6-2 shows the location of each of the
proposed improvements.
This document will be incorporated by reference in the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
The improvements proposed by the CWP are consistent with the improvements listed in the
Capital Facilities Element of the Marysville Comprehensive Land Use Plan.Additionally,the
1995 CWP includes review and analysis of the Marysville Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB). At
the time of the adoption of the 1989 plan this boundary was not established.In consideration of
Growth Management Act limitations on providing urban services to lands outside the UGB. and
the potential for the City of Arlington to annex areas within the Marysville service area, future
modifications to the CWSP and this plan maybe required.
Proposed Water System Improvements:
The CWP outlines water system improvementsto meet future demandwhich are a direct result of
population growth, those which are maintenance based, and those which are management based
to comply with new regulations or would enhance the systems efficiency.A hydraulic analysis
was conducted to determine how the system will perform under four different source scenarios,
and what specific system improvements will be necessary for each scenario. The four source
scenarios and their associated improvements are as follows:
1.Using the Everett Pipeline to serve the entire system.
• Installation of a new pump station along the 2401170zone boundary near 100th Street NE if a
new 360 reservoir is not constructed north of 100th Street. Approximate capacity would be
2.2 MGD with a hydraulic gradelineat discharge of 255 feet.
• Construct a new 3.0 MG, 360 reservoir east of 67th Avenue NE, possibly in the vicinity of
132nd St. NE and the abandoned Burlington-Northern railroad right-of-way. This would
require extension of the Everett pipeline for filling.This reservoir would discharge into the
240 zone by way of an 18" mainalong 132nd Street, with a pressure reducing valve.
• Raising the hydraulic gradeline on 100th Street NE using the new 360 reservoir east of 67th
Ave. and 100th St., and then stepping the pressure down at 51st. and State to a hydraulic
gradient of 255.An alternative would be to increase the line along IOOth St. to a 255
pressure level using individual pressure reducing valves along 100th Street NE and
distribution mainsto the south.
• Without using the Edward Springs or the Stillaguamish sources, demand projections would
fully use Marysville's share of the Everett pipeline by the year 2010. Prior to this time
Marysville should begin planning a second pipeline, which would likely be the alignment
described inPhase II of the Coordinated Water System Plan.
2.Using a combination of the Everett Pipeline and Edward Springs.
This scenario would maintain Edward Springs if water quality meets the requirements for
avoiding filtration, and the Stillaguamish is used for industrial water and emergencies.
Because the Edward Springs service area would be isolated, The 360 reservoir describedin
Scenario I would need to be increased to 5.0 MG.
3.Using a combination of the Everett Pipeline,Edward Springs,and the StilIaguamish
Collector.
This scenario is similar to the current system condition and assumes that a filtration system
will be constructed for the Stillaguamish source, and Edward Springs will either meet the
requirements for avoiding filtration or be filtered. Either a single facility or two separate
facilities would be constructed with a capacity sufficientto fully utilize the water rights for
each source. A direct filtration process, with disinfection for the Stillaguamish source,
would be an appropriate design.
4.Using the Everett Pipeline to serve the entire system with the Stillaguamish Collector
being maintained for Industrial and Emergency Use.
The same improvements outlined in Scenario I would be necessary, plus isolation of the
Stillaguamishsource for industrial use. A new parallel mainwould be required to serve the
existing connections which utilize the Stillaguamish source.If the facility was located
outside the City's service area,following options could be considered:
Option I: Interim Service Agreement would allow Marysville to operate a utilitywithinthe
designated area of another purveyor. Requires an agreement and assumes the other
purveyor would eventually provide service.
Option 2: Service Within Transmission Pipeline Corridors would allow Marysville to serve
within another purveyors territory from its Stillaguamishtransmission main.Section 1II.4.C
of the Coordinated Water System Plan recognizes such a service connection. Requires an
DNS-CWP
1/29/96
Page2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
agreement between Marysville and the purveyor indicating that such a connection IS
acceptable.
Option 3: Service Area Adjustment/Common Service Area. Service to one area would be
by both purveyors. Marysville would provide industrial water and the other purveyor
potable water. A modificationto the CWSP would be required.
Option 4: Automatic Procedure would require a letter from the other purveyor to the
customer indicating they are unable to serve. The customer can then seek water from
Marysville.A written agreement for the service is entered into between Marysville and the
customer.
Additional Source Improvements
Although the Highway 9 well site does not meet the state standards for iron and manganese,it
could stiIl be operated for emergency purposes and as a seasonal source for irrigation needs at
Cedarcrest Golf Course.An engineering study is recommended to evaluate costs and alternatives
for necessary modificationsand pipingimprovements.
Additional Improvements
Other improvements to the storage and distribution facilities will be necessary due to growth,
maintenance and regulatory requirements. The recommendations include; 1) Additionalreservoir
construction in the 360 and 490 zones, depending on which source scenario is selected; 2)
Potential modifications to the Cedarcrest Pump Station making it more energy efficient;3)
Distribution system improvements to complete loops and replace undersized mains in the system;
4) Regulatory programs to improve planning and operation of the system including a Wellhead
Protection Program, andEdward Springs Watershed Control Program.
Plan Recommendations
The plan recommends that the City follow Scenario I, using the Everett Pipeline to serve the
entire system and should be phased in over a three year period. During this period the Edward
Springs source would be utilized for areas north of 100th Street NE, and would be extensively
monitored for a minimum of six months. Additional monitoring of coliform,turbidity,and
disinfection would determine if this source can remain an unfiltered source. The Stillaguarnish
source would be retained only for emergency backup. The first improvement, once the 360
reservoir is completed at 100th Street NE, would be a north end 360 reservoir in the vicinity of
l32nd Street NE and the abandoned BNRR right-of-way. Table 6-3 of the plan outlines an
improvement schedule for Scenario I. By the year 1999 the City should begin planning for a
second Everett pipeline, or switch to Scenario 3 and construct filtration as needed for Edward
Springs and the Stillaguamish sites. If Scenario I is maintained, further investigation of Scenario
4 is advised.
DNS-CWP
1/29/96
Page 3
Environmentally SensitiveAreas:
This DNSis issued under 197-11-340(2);the lead agency willnot act on this proposal for 15 days
from the date below.Written comments will be received until4:00 pmon February 13,1996.
Potential environmental impacts related to sensitive areas which may occur from the
implementation of this plan will be reviewed on a project by project basis prior to issuance of
individual project permits.Construction activities willbe reviewed for compliance with all local,
stateand federal requirements including full environmental review.
The issuance ofthis Determination of Non-Significance should not be interpreted as acceptance or
approval ofthe subject proposal as presented.TheCity of Marysville reserves the rightto deny
said proposal or approve said proposal subject to conditions if it is determined to be inthe best
interests ofthe City and/or necessary to the general health,safetyand welfare of the public to do
so.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cityof Marysville
80 Columbia Avenue
Marysville,WA 98270
Larry Larson,Public Works Superintendent (360)651-5100
DNS-CWP
1/29/96
Page 4
Proponent:
Contact:
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: The lead agency has determined that this proposal does
not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment.An environmental impact
statement (EIS) IS NOT required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c).This decision was made after
review bythe Cityof Marysville ofa completed environmental checklist andother information on
file withthis agency.This information is available for public reviewupon request.
Two of the system sources currently use surface water, Edwards Springs and the Stillaguamish
Collector.Due to regulatory requirements,filtration facilities maybe added to these sources or
they may be taken off-line.Ineithercase,surface water diversions would not be greater thanthe
current approved water rights.The WSP does not propose an increase in groundwater
withdrawal.
The service areais located inthe Quilceda Creek sub-basin of the Snohomish River basin.Sur'nce
water bodies located within the sub-basin include Qui1ceda Creek,Allen Creek,Munson Ck,
andEbey Slough,a tidal estuary of the Snohomish River.The Stillaguamish River,which is "ne
of the water system sources,is located in the northeast comer of the planning area. The plan
anticipates that the majority of future construction activity will be located within the existing
roadway system,thereby minimizing potential adverse environmental impacts.
DISTRIBUTION:
RESPONsmLE OFFICIAL:
POSITIONmTLE:
ADDRESS:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Gloria Hirashima
Planning Director
80 Columbia Avenue
Marysville,WA 98270
OAT"January 29,1996~FJJ/u~
Signature
For further information,contact the Marysville Planning Department at (206)651-5100
Washington State Department of Ecology
Washington State Department ofFish &Wildlife
Snohomish County Planning Department
Snohomish County Public Works Department
Tulalip Tribes
City of Arlington
CityofEverett Planning Department
Cityof Everett Public Works Department
Snohomish County PUDNo. I
Marysville Public Works Department
Marysville Globe
DNS-CWP
1129/96
Page 5
APPENDIX M
AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHING
WATER UTILITY SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I1 _
I;'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHING
WATER UTILITY SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES
PREAMBLE
This Agreement for water utility service area boundaries identifies and establishes
between the parties the external boundary of the service area for which the designated
water purveyor has assumed direct retail water service responsibility. The respon-
sibilities accepted by the water purveyor are outlined in the Snohomish County
Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), and as defined by the adopted rules and
regulations of the Department of Health (DOH).Except as specifically provided
herein, this agreement does not give new authorities or responsibilities to any water
purveyor or to Snohomish County or State regulatory agencies, but acknowledges the
geographical area for these designated service responsibilities.
The terms used within this Agreement shall be as defined in the implementing regula-
tions of Chapter 70.116RCW, except as identified below.
1.Snohomish County Critical Water Supplv Service Area Map shall inean the map
incorporated into this Agreement as Attachment A for the retail service area,
except as amended in accordance with the CWSP procedures and with the con-
currence of the affected water purveyors.
2. Retail Service Area shall mean the designated geographical area in which a
purveyor shall supply water either by direct connection, by a satellite system,or
through interim service by an adjacent utility or Satellite System Management
Agency under agreement with the designated utility.
..
3. Wholesale Service Area shall mean the designated geographical area in which a
purveyor, a group of purveyors, or another organization provides water to other
water purveyors on a wholesale basis. A wholesale water supplier shall not
provide water to individual customers in another purveyor's retail service area
except with the concurrence of the purveyor responsible for the geographical
area in question.
4. Lead Agencv for administering the Agreement For Establishing Water Utility
Service Area Boundaries shall be the Snohomish County Planning Department,
unless otherwise established by amendment to the CWSP.
The authority for this Agreement is granted by the Public Water System Coordination
Act of 1977,Chapter 70.116 RCW.
--;)
,---
TERMSOF AGREEMENT
WHEREAS,Such an Agreement is required in WAC 248-56-730,Service Area
Agreements-Requirement,of the Public Water System Coordination Act; and
WHEREAS,Designation of retail water service areas,together with the cooper-
ation of utilities,will help assure that time, effort, and money are best used by avoiding
unnecessary duplication of service; and
WHEREAS,Definite future service areas will facilitate efficient planning for,
and provision of,water system improvements within Snohomish County as growth
occurs; and
WHEREAS,Responsibility for providing water service through ownership
and/or management of water systems in a designated service area is vested in the
designated utility;and
WHEREAS,Definite.retail and wholesale service areas will help assure that
water reserved for public water supply purposes within Snohomish County will be
utilized in the future in an efficiently planned manner,
NOW,TIffiREFORE,the undersigned party, having entered into this
Agreement by signature of its authorized representative,concurs with and will abide by
the followingprovisions:
Section 1.Service Area Boundaries.The undersigned party acknowledges that the
Snohomish County Critical Water Supply Service Area Map, included as
Attachment A to this Agreement and as may be subsequently updated,identifies
the utility's future water service area.The undersigned funher acknowledges
that there are no service area conflicts with adjacent water utilities, or,where
such conflicts exist,agrees that no new water service will be extended within
disputed areas until such conflicts are resolved.
Section 2.Common'Service Area Transfer.It is understood that utilities may initially
continue existing water service within the boundaries of neighboring utilities, as
defined in Attachment A Such common service areas,if they exist, are
described in Attachment B to this agreement Also included in'Attachment B
are copies of,or a list of, all resolutions, ordinances, or agreements permitting
these uncontested overlays.The undersigned party agrees that any water line for
retail service extending outside of the retail service area boundary,as set forth in
Attachment A,shall be phased out and service transferred to the designated
adjacent utility on an economic basis or by mutual agreement
-2-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10'/-".
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,-..,
;)....."
Economic basis considerations may include,but are not limited to:
(a)A determination by the present owner of service'lines that maintenance,
repair,and/or replacement costs exceed attributable income.
(b)Planned or imminent major street improvements or major improvements
to either or both water systems which include an opportunity to transfer
service.
The terms of the transfer of service area described in this Section shall be estab-
lished in a separate agreement among the adjacent utilities whose boundaries
are affected.
Section 3.Boundarv Streets. Unless separate agreements exist with adjacent utilities
concerning water services or other utility services, this party agrees that the
water utility which is located to the north or east of boundary streets between
this party and adjacent utilities will be entitled to provide future water service on
both sides of those streets.Depth of service on boundary streets shall be limited
to one platted lot or as otherwise agreed by the utilities.Existing services on
boundary streets shall remain as connected unless transfer of service is agreed to
by both parties,as per Section 2.These provisions do not disallow the
placement of mains in the same street by adjacent utilities where geographic or
economic constraints require such placement for the hydraulic benefit of both
utilities.
Section 4.Boundarv Adjustments.If,at some time in the future it is deemed
appropriate by the undersigned party to make service area boundary
adjustments,such modifications must .receive written concurrence (which shall
.not be unreasonably withheld)of all utilities that would be directly affected by
such a boundary adjustment and the legislative authority(ies)having jurisdiction.
These written modifications must be noted and filed with the desiznated
Snohomish County lead agency and DOH.It is understood by the undersigned
party that if,as provided by RCW 70.116.040,it is unable to provide service
within its designated service area boundary it may decline to do so. But, in that
case,an applicant may be referred to other adjacent utilities,to a pre-qualified
Satellite System Management Agency (SSMA), or a new utility may be created
and the original service area boundary will be adjusted accordingly. This
provision does not apply where boundary adjustments are made as a result of
municipal annexations or incorporations,nor is it intended to modify the
provisions of state law.
Section 5. Service Extension Policies.The undersigned party agrees that prior to
expanding its water service area,other than by addition of retail customers to
existing water mains, or to serve in the capacity of a pre-qualified SSMA, it shall
-3-
Title 1/'/
Receipt Acknowledged:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
DateSnohomishCounty
Planning Department
-
Representative
1YItUj-t""'u
')
have adopted design standards and Utility Service extension policies.The design
standards shall meet or exceed the Snohomish County Minimum Design
Standards.-
Attachment B -Common Service Area Agreement -Optional -Utility may attach
copies or list such agreements if relevant..(see Section 2)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned party has executed this Agreement
as of Ah,,-J-V(1.J;y..,2)I Cj c,GoIi
This agreement by reference includes the following attachments:
Attachment A -Snohomish County Critical Water Supply Service Area Map. (see
Section 1) .
Municipalities further agree that if an individual municipality identifies a service
area outside of their existing municipal corporate boundaries,said municipality
will assume full responsibility for providing water service equivalent to
(excluding rates and charges)the level of service provided for their inside-city
customers.This will be in conformance with applicable land use policies.
Section 6_Systems Placed in Receivership_Legislation passed in the 1990 Regular
Session of the Washington State Legislature (Substitute Senate Bill (447)
provides that whenever an action is brought in superior court to place a public
water system in receivership,the petition to the court shall name candidates for
receiver who have consented to assume operation of the water system.The
undersigned party agrees to be named as receiver in such actions initiated for
systems within its designated service area.By this consent,the undersigned does
not waive its rights to appear and participate in the court proceedings to
determine acceptable conditions of receivership.
'..
8
29
5
32
32
7
8
31
;-__--..-iii;-~-T;-----·-
..--_.-.
9
13
38
7 812
SNOHOMISH Cl
~--".....-_...iAtf'llivEM
18 17
'~"
"
35
46
8
5
17
20
8
7
18
19
30
12
'3
24
25
-
\
-
28
"
14
23
28
35 \,
"_..---"---'---._---._..-------._-.-"--'------"--
C'FRYBERG lAKf
--_._--.-_.-----_...--"-O-;OSS-Z;Kf'-'---..
GNES
1~--·--·----LlJF~"
J 35~K£I 38
I 2 1
~M~'f'-lOHN~:
V SHErroN \.-/lAKEIIIlKf.-..~--_.-._-~._-_._.-------..:----_._---~.-
I
I
1-
1
1
I
1
1\,,
-.__\,.._--_._...._-._--_....--_..-...