Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1973 - Granting a utility variance for Gary D. Lamarsh for property located at 3725 93rd Place NE Marysville Wa subject to conditionsRESOLUTION No./Q73 CITY OF MARYSVILLE ..._--Marysville,Washington INCORPORATED 1191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE GRANTING A UTILITY VARIANCE FOR GARY D. LAMARSH FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3725 • 93RD PLACE NE, MARYSVILLE,WASHINGTON,SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. WHEREAS,on FEBRUARY 2,2000,GARY D.LAMARSH applied for a utility variance for WATER CONNECTION WITHOUT SEWER CONNECTION AND FROM THE PROVISIONS OF MMC 14.03.300 FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT for property located 3725 93RD PLACE NE,Marysville,Washington;and WHEREAS,on FEBRUARY 28,2000 the City Council of the City of Marysville held a public meeting concerning the variance application and made the following findings: 1.The applicant is requesting a utility variance for a water connection without sewer connection and a variance from the provisions of the frontage requirements of MMC 14.03.300. 2.The existing sanitary sewer is approximately 2000 feet from the applicant's property. 3.The applicant's property is within the City's RUSA Boundary,CWSP Boundary and Urban Growth Boundary. 4.There is an existing 8"watermain covering a portion of the applicant's property that is approximately 140'short of covering the applicant's frontage.There is an existing residence on the property east of the applicant's property.The applicant's neighbor to the south installed the existing watermain in 1993 and entered into a recovery contract at that time. 5.The applicant is requesting a single water connection for a single family residence.The applicant's request not to cover the frontage of his property is based upon his contention that there will be no development on property to the east of his own that will require public water connections in the future. The applicant also contends that to extend the line would require the current asphalt to be cut and replaced and other unreasonable expenses with no potential benefit to other property owners.The applicant also contends that the financial burden of extending an 8"watermain in excess of 100'added to the cost of paying recovery to the neighbor to the south are unreasonable. 6.Based upon the above,the City Council finds that there is a special hardship,unique circumstance and practical difficulty in requiring coverage of the applicant's frontage at this time.However,if in the future there is a need for RESOLUTION - 1 /u/wpf/gw/lamarch.var ".,'.,,;..r "• properties to the east of the applicant's property to obtain Public Water Service from the City,it is necessary and appropriate to bind the applicant to pay his proportionate share. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE,WASHINGTON AS FOLLOWS: 1.The applicant's variance for one water connection without sewer and the applicant's variance from the provisions of MMC 14.03.300 are hereby granted subject to the following conditions: a.The applicant shall sign an agreement substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A consenting to participation in the formation of a future LID or ULID and agreeing to pay a proportionate share of any private or developer extension of the watermain serving his property if in the future there is a bona fide need for public water service to properties to the east of the applicant's property. b.The applicant shall execute an annexation covenant or petition in accordance'with the requirements of MMC 14.32.040c.The applicant shall pay all other applicable fees and comply with all applicable requirements of the Marysville Municipal Code Title 14. 2.This decision shall be final and conclusive with the right of appeal by any aggrieved party to the Superior Court of Snohomish County by filing a Land Use Petition pursuant to the Land Use Petition Act within twenty-one (21)days after the passage of this resolution. L4 PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this /3~~day of MARCH,2000. CITY OF MARYSVILLE By a;luJP4 ATTEST: BYA;X~OLE" Approved as to form: By ~t:.(J--eJ) GRANT K.WEED,CITY,ATTORNEY RESOLUTION - 2 /u/wpflgw/lamarch.var