HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2225 - Stating its intention to annex and prezone certain unincorporated area, known as the Calvary Chapel Annexation, into the city and transmitting the matCITY OF MARYSVILLE
Marysville, Washington
RESOLUTION NO. ~S
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MARYVILLE STATING ITS INTENTION
TO ANNEX AND PREZONE CERTAIN UNINCORPORATED AREA, KNOWN
AS THE CALVARY CHAPEL ANNEXATION, INTO THE CITY, AND
TRANSMITTING THE MATTER TO THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY
BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR APPROVAL
WHEREAS, the City of Marysville has received a petition for annexation of cCliain
property generally located west of 48 th Drive NE and north of 98 th Street NE, said property being
contiguous to the city limits and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Marysville Planning Commission held a public hearing on September
11, 2007 to consider a prezone for the Exhibit A propeliy and recommended approval of said
prezone to High Density, Single Family R-6.5; and
WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held on said annexation petition and
prezone before the Marysville City Council on October 22,2007, and the City Council heard
testimony from staff, the applicant and the public, and was fully advised in the premises; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE,
WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS:
.Section 1. The propcrty described in Exhibit A is hereby approved for annexation into
the City of Marysville and shall be so annexed by ordinance of the City of Marysville upon
receipt of a favorable decision/repOli from the Snohomish County Boundary Review Board.
Section 2. Upon anncxation of the property described in Exhibit A, it shall be assessed
and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as other property within the City of Marysville,
including assessments or taxes for the payment of its pro rata share and all outstanding
indebtedness of the City contracted or incurred prior to or existing on the effective date of the
annexation.
Section 3. Upon annexation of the property described in Exhibit A, the Zoning
designation of High Density, Single Family R-6.5 shall apply to said property.
Section 4. The Community Development Director is hereby authorized to transmit a
County Assessor's map, or other appropriate map, and all files on this annexation proceeding to
the Snohomish County Boundary Review Board for consideration and review.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor thisc1ll'.(Q day of
_Dck"o1e'1/ ,2007.
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
,CITY CLERK
Approved as to fonn:
By: ./:;,\il\-('>-._.f(~ Cy-,,<IJ
dJRANT K. WEED, CITY ATTORNEY
J;«\.
Snohomish County
Assessor's Office
Cindy Portmann
County Assessor
linda Hjelle
Chief Deputy
MIS #510
3000 Rockefeller Ave.
Everett. WA 98201-4046
(425) 388-3433
FAX (425) 388-3961
CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY
I, Darlene Joseph, Snohomish County Deputy Assessor, in accordance
with the requirements of RCW 35A.01.040, hereby certify that the petition for the
City of Marysville, Calvary Chapel Annexation submitted to the Assessor on July
31 s t, 2007, is signed by the owners of 100% of the value for which the annexation
is petitioned, according to the records of the Snohomish County Assessor. The
determination of sufficiency was begun on August 22,2007.
Dated this 22nd of August, 2007.
By.L..Y.~:::...Ld.~~~~::::::;t'~~~~
Deputy Assessor
Ernail.county.assessor@co.snohornish.wa.us
Web. wwwl.cosnohomish.wa.us/Departrnents/Assessor
1-0
Calvalry Chapel
o
4-020
4-045
4-011
5
4-041
•••••
Feot
400
13
10
4-003
14if)
4 ~----_._._..__ .
01 ~ 15
.--_.... ~~---.__.
Annexation
Cl<\-'· b ,.,. c..
3
··0····0 1:. ""g"21 02
: 01 i
9 R.SP
• •• • ••••• 6
12 ••• Ii' ~
4-069 \t 7/
. ''-, 6 ~
5
11 4-068
'4~67' ,
4 <~~. b/~<J i <§>
/ 3 1'1 2
%n:nrz; k _
81 02••••......
04 I i'-'" ..~ 03101
. II .
200
~~ Calvary Chapel Annexalion
, • • • .". C~y Limits
100o
1
-0
2
(5385)
PALMER TRACTS
w z
w 108TH Sl NE
w z
w > <t
I
I.....
'"
4-023
rAnnexation l
I Area = 1.27 acresL r
CITIES & TOWNS
F ACTORS AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION
1. General background of the reasons for seeking the proposed action.
The Calvary Annexation is generally located at the northwestt corner of the intersection
of 96 th St NE and 48 th Drive NE, Section 16, Township 30N, Range 5E, WM. The
annexation comprises approximately 1.27 acres and is proposed by properties
representing 100% of the gross valuation of the annexation. The annexation is
contiguous to the City along its north and west boundaries.
In accordance with the State Growth Management Act, Snohomish County established an
Urban Growth Area for the Marysville area on July 22, 1995. The proposed annexation is
within the UGA boundary. It is an area already planned for residential development. The
Growth Management legislation requires cities and counties to plan for increased urban
densities in areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient
marmer and to prevent conversion of critical areas and resource lands into low density
development. Snohomish County's General Policy Plan designates the area as Urban
Low Density Residential within this area. The City of Marysville's Comprehensive Plan
designates this area as High Density, Single-Family (5-7 du/net ac). It is the City'S
intention to prezone the property at the time of annexation to be consistent with the city's
comprehensive plan designation. The annexation is located within the City of
Matysville's Rural Utility Service Area (RUSA).
2. Review of the factors to be considered by the Boundary Review Board as they effect
this proposed action (RCW 36.93.170).
A. Population & Territory:
No persons reside within the annexation area. The current population IS 36,210
for the City of Marysville. This would increase the population by 0 percent.
The almexation would involve approximately 1.27 acres.
B. Land area and land uses (existing):
According to Snohomish County Assessor's records the property supports a church.
C. Comprehensive Use Plans and Zoning (include attachments):
The site is zoned R-7,200. The 2006 City of Marysville Comprehensive Plan Map
designates the property as High Density, Single-Family (5-7 du/net ac), which has an
implementing zone of R-6.5. The annexation proposal includes the prezoning of the
---------------------~-------------------------
property consistent with the implementing zone of R-6.5. Snohomish County's
General Policy Plan designates the area as Urban Low Density Residential.
D. Assessed Valuation:
The current assessed valuation for the annexation area is $329,900.00.
E. Topography, rural boundaries and drainage basins:
The topography is flat. The proposed annexation is located within the Quilceda Creek
drainage basin.
F. Proximity to other population areas:
The City of Marysville is located along the west and north sides of the proposed
annexation boundary.
G. Likelihood of significant growth in the area and in adjacent incorporated and unin
corporated areas in the near future:
Population forecasts within the City's UGA is projected to increase by 61 % between
the years 2004 and 2025. The City of Marysville is committed to providing and
coordinating urban level facilities in this area.
It is anticipated that growth will be located first in areas already characterized by
urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to serve new
developments. Growth will be concentrated near urban centers where urban ser
vices can be provided.
H. Location of existing and future location of community facilities:
Municipal and community services relevant to this community would be garbage,
sewer, water, electricity, police, fire protection, medical facilities, parks and recrea
tion, schools, public transit and telephone.
3. Services
A. Municipal Services existing now to area:
The City of Marysville has police coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The City
employs 41 commissioned police officers and includes a detective squad and narcotics
officer. At least five officers are on duty at all times.
2
The Marysville Fire District now has 54 full-time fire fighters and approximately 75
part-time fire fighters. Stations #61, #62, #63 and #65 are fully manned stations. A
joint operating committee composed of three fire commissioners and three council
members administer the department.
The site is currently serviced by Marysville Fire District and would continue to be
serviced by this District after annexation.
The proposed annexation is currently served by public water and sanitary sewer. An
8" water main is located in 48 th Dr NE & 96th St NE fronting the annexation boundary.
And a 10" sewer main is located in 96th St NE and an 8" sewer main is located within
48 th Dr NE, both front the annexation.
B. Municipal Services to be provided:
The primary source of water for this area is Everett Pipeline No.3.
The City'S sewage treatment facility currently has adequate capacity to service the
annexation area.
C. Effects of ordinance. government codes, regulation on existing uses:
If the property is annexed to the City of Marysville, the City will be responsible for
enforcement of all municipal codes including, but not limited to City zoning, building
requirements, fire code and criminal code.
D. Costs of adequate governmental services and controls in the area:
City expenditures would include police, streets, library, enforcement of munici
pal codes including zoning and building requirements and other general govem
mental services.
E. Prospects of govemmental services from other sources:
None.
F. Need for such services from other sources:
None.
G. Effect of finances, debt structure and contractual obligations and rights of all
affected govemmental units:
H. Effect of proposal on adjacent areas, on social services, and local govemmental
structure of the county:
3
The 2007 taxes \vhich would no longer be collected should the property be annex
ed to Marysvillc include the county road tax and Fire District # 12 tax, as well as 1.1 %
of the state sales tax collected for commercial properties.
4. The effect of this proposed annexation:
A. Preservation of natural neighborhoods:
The proposed annexation currently supports one church. This area will become a
natural extension to the City of Marysville and will not adversely impact surrounding
neighborhoods.
B. Physical boundaries (including land contours):
The property is bounded by the current City limits to the west and north.
C. Creation and preservation of local service areas:
The Marysville Police Department currently services the surrounding area. The
Marysville Fire District currently services the area and will continue to service the area
upon annexation to the City of Marysville.
D. Abnormally irregular boundaries:
The annexation as proposed does not create any abnonnal boundaries.
E. Special Purpose Districts if any:
None.
F. Urbanization:
The area is currently urban in character and is designated for development at single
family residential densities (5-7 du/net ac).
4
-------------
CURRENT BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
18. Strawberry Festival Master Permit/Agreement and 2007 Festival
Proposal.
Parks and Recreation Director Jim Ballew commented that this is a substantial
agreement. He reviewed highlights and changes from previous agreements. He said
they would be asking the applicant to provide the finance office with a list of vendors.
Council member Seibert remarked that it was nice to see the wide variety of events
planned.
19. Thorsteinson Lot 6; 152nd Street Building Site Plan (BSP)
Amendment.
Community Development Director Hirashima explained that the owner was asking
for modification to the condition of road construction and deviation of the road
standard due to the fact that they were unable to obtain enough right-of-way to
construct their half of the road. Staff is in agreement with this.
20. 10% Notice of Intent to Annex; Calvary Annexation; PA 07031.
Ms. Hirashima explained that this was submitted by Calvary Chapel who is hoping to
purchase the adjacent property that is in city limits. Staff is recommending
acceptance of the 10% Notice of Intent and establishment of an annexation area for
circulation of the 60% petition.
21. 10% Notice of Intent to Annex; Estabrook Annexation; PA 07017.
Ms. Hirashima explained that this request is in Future Annexation Area #7 and
incorporates 47.1 acres. She commented that having larger annexations would allow
the city the greatest benefit from Senate Bill 6686.
MalY Swenson commented that they might bring something back later this year for
annexation consideration in 2009. They are in the process of analyzing the full
impacts of a large annexation.
Public Works Director Paul Roberts agreed that this would require careful analysis of
impacts to finance, utilities (including rates), and RTID.
Marysville City Council
May 7, 2007 Work Session Minutes
Page 5 of 12
Subject to End of the Year Progress Updates from the Marysville
School District.
12. Authorize the Mayor to Sign Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish
County in the Amount $369,556.00 for 51st Avenue/122nd Place NE
Intersection Improvements Project.
13. Authorize Mayor to Sign Professional Services Agreement in the
Amount of $250,000 with HDR Engineering; Updating Water
Comprehensive Plan.
14. Authorize Mayor to Sign Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc. to
Prepare Phase 1 of the 1-5 to City Center Access Study for Estimated
Cost of #361 ,090.54 Including 5% Management Reserve.
15. Approval of Department of Corrections Community Work Crew
Contract Renewal.
19. Thorsteinson Lot 6; 152nd Street Building Site Plan (BSP)
Amendment.
Motion passed unanimously (6-0)
20. 10% Notice of Intent to Annex; Calvary Annexation; PA 07031.
Public Comment:
Dave Woodyard, 9610 48 th Drive, spoke in support of the annexation.
Motion made by Councilmember Nehring, seconded by Councilmember Vaughan,
to approve Consent Agenda item 20. Motion passed unanimously (6-0)
5. Approval of May 9, 2007 Claims.
Council member Rasmussen referred to the payment to Clean Cut to down
dangerous trees. She wondered if this addressed the citizen's concerns they had
received at a prior meeting about dangerous trees hanging over the roadway. Mr.
Ballew indicated that it was possible but he wasn't sure.
Motion made by Councilmember Rasmussen, seconded by Councilmember Seibert
to approve Consent Agenda item 5. Motion passed unanimously (6-0)
Marysville City Council
May 14, 2007 Meeting Minutes
Page 5 of 13
RCW 36.93.170: Factors to be considered by board --Incorporation proceedings exempt ... Page 1 of 1
In reaching a decision on a proposal or an alternative, the board shall consider the factors affecting such proposal, which
shall include, but not be limited to the following:
(1) Population and territory; population density; land area and land uses; comprehensive plans and zoning, as
adopted under chapter 35.63, 35A.63, or 36.70 RCW; cornprehensive plans and development regulations adopted under
chapter 36.70A RCW; applicable service agreements entered into under chapter 36.115 or 39.34 RCW; applicable
interlocal annexation agreernents between a county and its cities; per capita assessed valuation; topography, natural
boundaries and drainage basins, proximity to other populated areas; the existence and preservation of prirne agricultural
soils and productive agricultural uses; the likelihood of significant growth in the area and in adjacent incorporated and
unincorporated areas during the next ten years; location and most desirable future location of community facilities;
(2) Municipal services; need for municipal services; effect of ordinances, governmental codes, regulations and
resolutions on existing uses; present cost and adequacy of governmental services and controls in area; prospects of
governmental services from other sources; probable future needs for such services and controls; probable effect of
proposal or alternative on cost and adequacy of services and controls in area and adjacent area; the effect on the
finances, debt structure, and contractual obligations and rights of all affected governmental units; and
(3) The effect of the proposal or alternative on adjacent areas, on mutual economic and social interests, and on the
local governmental structure of the county.
The provisions of chapter 43.21 C RCW, State Environmental Policy, shall not apply to incorporation proceedings
covered by chapter 35.02 RCW.
[1997 c 429 § 39; 1989 c 84 § 5; 1986 c 234 § 33; 1982 c 220 § 2; 1979 exs. C 142 § 1; 1967 C 189 § 17.]
l.:i)!:e,,;.,
Severability --1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.320 1.
Severability --1982 c 220: See note following RCW 36.93.100.
Incorporation proceedings exempt from state environmental policy act: RCW 43.21 C.220.
10/05/2007http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/dcfault.aspx?cite=36.93.170
RCW 36.93.180: Objectives of boundary review board. Page 1 of 1
1 .!
·l
The decisions of the boundary review board shall attempt to achieve the following objectives:
(1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities;
(2) Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours;
(3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas;
(4) Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries;
(5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess of
ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas;
(6) Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts;
(7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries;
(8) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in
character; and
(9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource
use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority.
[1989 c 84 § 15; 1981 c 332 § 10; 1979 exs c 142 § 2; 1967 c 189 § 18]
Notes:
Severability --1981 c 332: See note following RCW 35.13.165.
10/05/2007http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/dcfault.aspx?cite=36.93.180
£~·I\:.;t A
Calvary Chapel Annexation Legal Description
Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 5; Plat of Palmer Tracts, According to the Plat thereof,
recorded in Volume 14 of Plats, Page 94, inclusive, in Snohomish County, Washington; thence
North along the west line of said lot to the north line of the south 20 of said lot; thence East
along said north line to the east line of said Lot 5; thence South along the east lines of Lots 5
and 6 said plat to the north line of the south 30 feet of said Lot 6; thence West along said north
line to the west line of said Lot 6; thence North along the west lines of Lots 6 and 5 to the point
of beginning.
Together with abutting 48th Drive NE right-of-way.
---------------
CITY OF MARYSVILLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE· October 22 2007
,
iGENDA ITEM: PA 07031-Calvary Chapel Annexation IAGENDA SECTION:
Public Hearing Public Hearing -10/22/07
PREPARED BY: AGENDA NUMBER:
Cheryl Dungan, Senior Planner
IATTACHMENTS: IApPROVED BY: It1. Certificate of Sufficiency
2_ Annexation Boundary tIap
3_ Notice of Intention
4. City Council Minutes 05/07/07; 05/14/07
5. Annexation Criteria-Titles 36.93.170 & 36.93.180 RCW
I
6. Resolurion
1--------~AYOR leAo
BUDGET CODE: iAMOUNT:
The Calvary Chapel Annexation is generally located west of 48th Drive NE and north of 98 th St NE.
The Snohomish County Assessor's Office certified the petitions for the annexation represent 100
percent of the total assessed ,"alue of the annexation. The annexation comprises approximately 1.27
acres. The annexation is contiguous to the City limits along the annexations north and west
boundaries.
The City of Marysville 2005 Comprehensive Plan map designates the property as High Density,
Single-Family 6.5 (R-6-5). The property will be concurrently prezoned consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan land use designation as adopted.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
is ta ff recommends approving the attached Resolution for annexation and prezone, and authorization
to transmit the Calvary Chapel annexation to the Snohomish County Boundary ReviC\.v Board for
eV1CW.
COUNCIL ACTION: