HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2240 - Acknowledge the City of Marysville's compliance with Washington State's growth management requirements pursuant to RCW 36.70A.215, "Buildable Lands"CITY OF MARYSVILLE
Marysville,Washington
RESOLUTION NO.J..J-t/O
A RESOLUTION TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE'S
COMPLIANCE WITH WASHINGTON STATE'S GROWTH
MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO RCW 36.70A.215,
"BUILDABLE LANDS".
WHEREAS,RCW 36.70A.215,also known as the "buildable lands
statute," requires certain counties, including Snohomish County, and the cities
within them, including the City of Marysville, to determine whether there is
sufficient suitable land to accommodate the countywide population projection and
subsequent population allocations between the county and the cities,consistent
with the countywide planning policies and whether urban densities are being
achieved and to develop a report every five years; and
WHEREAS,the City of Marysville ("the City") has participated with other
cities and Snohomish County through the Snohomish County Tomorrow process
in a buildable lands program to meet the requirements of RCW 36.70A.215,
including review and evaluation of development activities and the development of
a report on current and future capacity; and
WHEREAS,the City's Comprehensive Plan identifies population and
employment targets consistent with the Snohomish County Countywide Policies;
and
WHEREAS,the proposed Snohomish county Tomorrow 2007 Buildable
Lands Report, to which the City has contributed data, has been developed
consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A.215; and
WHEREAS,the Buildable Lands Report approved by the Snohomish
County Tomorrow Steering Committee finds that urban densities are being
achieved within urban growth areas overall and that, using the countywide
methodology,Marysville has sufficient capacity to meet its adopted population
and employment targets; and
WHEREAS,the Marysville City Council has determined that the City's
development activities and capacity are occurring consistent with its
Comprehensive Plan and that the City does not need to take any measures to
achieve greater consistency pursuant to RCW 36.70A.215(4).
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MARYSVILLE,WASHINGTON AS FOLLOWS:
Item 18-2
Section 1. The City acknowledges its requirement under RCW 36.70A.215 to
review and evaluate its development activities in relationship to its
comprehensive plan and the countywide planning policies.
Section 2. During the last five-year period, the City has participated with other
cities and the county in the Snohomish County Tomorrow process to meet the
requirements of RCW 36.70A.215.
Section 3. The City is achieving urban densities within its corporate boundaries,
meeting its population and employment targets as adopted in the Snohomish
County Countywide Planning Policies, and otherwise providing for development
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Section 4. The City adopts the 2007 Snohomish County Tomorrow Buildable
Lands Report as it applies to Marysville.
Section 5. The City finds that it has met the requirements of RCW 36.70A.215
and is in compliance with the Growth Management Act.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this /i.p.J.,day of
-AprWS 2008.
C0=~~
MAYOR
Approved as to Form:
~{rJJ)
City Attorney
Imv/res/gma.buildable lands
Item 18-3
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County
2007 Buildable Lands Report
for Snohomish County
Adopted by the Snohomish County Council
on October 31,2007
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
The 2007 Buildable Lands Report> responds to the review and evaluation requirements of the
Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)in RCW 36.70A.215,commonly referred to
as the "buildable lands"statute,The repon was prepared by staff from the county and the cities
using the Snohomish County Tomorrow (SCT)process.
This is the second buildable lands review and evaluation report completed by Snohomish County
and its cities.It is based on the methods and approaches first developed and used by the county
and cities for the Snohomish County Tomorrow 2002 Buildable Lands Report,which evaluated
UGA capacity for accommodating growth to the year 2012. The current report evaluates
whether urban densities are being achieved and whether there is sufficient suitable land within
the Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) to accommodate the forecasted residential,commercial and
industrial growth anticipated through the end of the 20-year GMA planning period,currently
2025. The GMA requires that the buildable lands review and evaluation occur at least every 5
years.
If the results of the 5-year review and evaluation reveal that planned densities are not being
achieved or that deficiencies in buildable land supply exist within UGAs,cities and counties are
required to adopt and implement measures,other than adjusting urban growth areas, that are
reasonably likely to ensure sufficient buildable lands throughout the remaining portion of the 20-
year GMA planning period.
Methodology
Using geographic information systems (GIS)technology,the present analysis began with a
spring 2006 extract of all Assessor parcel records within incorporated and unincorporated
portions of the Snohomish County urban growth area (UGA), Parcels with additional
development potential were classified into one of four categories:
, The 2007BuildableLandsReportisalsoavailableon theCounty's websiteby goingto www.snoco.org.
To accessthe report,youcanusethekeywordsearchbox foundon any pageof the website. Searchfor
thekeywords"buildablelands"andclickthefirst linkto go to the2007BuildableLandsProjectpage.
Pg.J
Item 18-4
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County Executive Summary
Vacant-parcels without structures.
Partially-used -parcels where existing structures use a portion of the site and where additional
development is possible without demolition,
Redevelopable -parcels with existing structures that are expected to be demolished and replaced
with new and more intensive uses,
Pending -parcels with pending applications for new construction.
April I, 2006 represents the date at which additional capacity estimates for population and
jobs were calculated.All structures existing as of April 1,2006 were considered developed,
while everything proposed,built or occupied after that date was counted as future capacity
for 2007 report.
Future land use information was then transferred to individual parcels using zoning
classifications for most cities and plan designations for most pareels within unincorporated urban
areas.There were some exeeptions to this general rule.espeeially in areas where cities eontrol
utility extensions in unincorporated UGAs through a requirement to annex, in which case city
pre-zoning (or plan designations)for unincorporated areas was used.
Unbuildable land area in developable parcels was then removed from the buildable lands
inventory for parcels affected by:critical areas and buffers (steep slopes,wetlands,streams and
lakes,ehinook salmon and bull trout habitat,frequently flooded areas);major utility easements;
future arterial rights-of-way and land needed for other capital facilities (schools,parks, etc.),
The unbuildable land estimate within parcels was further increased by 5% to account for
umnapped critical/unbuildable areas.
Observed development densities (represented as housing units and/or jobs per buildable acre),
derived from an analysis of actual residential,commercial and industrial development activity
within both city and county plan and/or zone designations.were then applied to the parcel-level
estimates of buildable acres. This resulted in an estimate of additional housing units and
employment capacity by parcel.
The resulting additional eapacity estimates were then reduced to account for development
uncertainties,These reductions pertained to uncertainties regarding:ability to obtain necessary
capital facilities and services to support urban development over the next 20 years; removal of
land for miscellaneous public/institutional uses (churches,sehools,municipal purposes, etc.); and
market availability (property that is held out for development over the next 20 years).
Onee these adjustments for uncertainties were made, the additional residential and employment
capacities were aggregated from parcels to the city, UGA and Municipal UGA (MUGA)level in
order to compare with the adopted 2025 population and employment targets,contained in
Appendix B ofthe Countywide Planning Policies for Snohomish County.
The following flowchart depicts the major steps in conducting the buildable lands analysis:
Pg.2
Item 18-5
2007 Buildable Lands Report fur Snohomish County Executive Summary
Results
The PAC's action to transmit the report to the Steering Committee was accompanied by an
acknowledgement that a wide range of options exist to resolve the estimated capacity shortfalls
documented in the BLR (identified below), some of which involve land use changes and some do
not. Options to consider include the list of reasonable measures shown in Appendix C of the
Countywide Planning Policies. Other reasonable responses could include monitoring the
capacity estimates over time or revisiting the growth targets.
Below are the key findings of the 2007 SCT Buildable Lands Report,recommended by the PAC
on August 9, 2007.
Overall, at the countywide UGA level:
o urban densities are being achieved consistent with GMA comprehensive plans, and
o there is adequate land capacity to accommodate the adopted 2025 total UGA population
and employment growth targets.
!!!Eulation-_._-
2006'Reconciled CPP 2006-2025 2025 Total Additional Pop Capacity
Estimated 2025 Population Numeric Population 2006-2025 Surplus vs.
Population Targets Change Capacity Pop Capacity Shortfall (in
parentheses)
-UC:A Total 553.145 759.919 206.774 789.619 236,474 29,700
Pg.3
Item 18-6
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County Executive Summary
Emp Capacity
Surplusvs.
Shortfall(in
arentheses
..~..2~.,!,~
-'202STolal 'j Additional
Employment I 2006-2025
Capacity :Emp
.._."_,_,,__J.Capa.c:i':--+-"""","~YI
372.387 ~_138,2§9.
At the individualUGA level, there appears to be a 2025 population growth target/capacity
inconsistency within the Monroe UGA:
··Reco·nCiled-CPP·_·'-"r"--2006-~:2025'·'··
2025 Population Numeric
Targets , Change
Also, at the individual UGA level, there appears to be a 2025 employment growth target/capacity
inconsistency within the Lake Stevens UGA:
E I tmtnovmen -c--.-..---.7~
2006 ReconciledCPP i 2006-2025 2025 Total I Additional EmpCapacity
Estimated 2025 Numeric Employment 2006-2025 Surplus vs.
Employment Employment Change Capacity 1 Emp Shortfall (in
Tarcets Caoacitv l)arenthe~~
LakeStevens UGA 4.695 6.615 1..920 6,351 i 1.656 264)._._---,---_..
Within the SWUGA, which has enough overall capacity to accommodate projected 2025 growth,
there appear to be 2025.population growth target/capacity inconsistencies within the cities of
Bothell, Brier and Lynnwood:
Pooulatiopuauon
2006 Reconciled CPP 2006-2025 2025Total ,Additional Pop Capacity
Estimated 2025 Population i Numeric Population i 2006·2025 Surplus YS.
Population Targets Change Capacity PopCapacity Shortfall (in
-~]otl~"j"C;ty"("pa'it'j·'··...-.._,..•.•.,...._.•._.,.•....•..-......._...._....•-.-.....-...""-_..,,_.-_.----,..._---,.,,,,.•,.,,._...,..,,.•.-....P.i1r.tl~.!.~..~~~~L
15,090 22.000 ,6,910 21.117 6,027 (883)
f-,--!l_rier C.i!L __6,480 7,790 ,1,310 7,280 -I-800 --f~~~:--Lvnnwood City 35,230 43,782 !8,552 43,094 i "-"""7864 --
For all other UGAs and cities not shown above, the BLR determined that there is adequate
capacity for accommodating the adopted 2025 population and employment growth targets. [See
attached Tables 1 through 4 of the Results Section for more detailed 2025 growth target vs.
capacity comparisons at the individualUGA,MUGA and city levels.]
Long Term Monitoring
The methodological assumptions used in this report should be monitored over time to identify
issues and potential revisions. Such issues include the following,but are not limited to:
..g.4
Item18-7
2007 Buildable Lands Report fer Snohomish County F...xecutive Summary
• The effect of new critical area regulations and stormwater regulations on achieved
densities
• The cumulative effect of temporary local restrictions on development due to
transportation concurrency,sewer capacity,and other infrastructure and services
constraints
• The amount of land needed for public/institutional purposes and its effect on buildable
land supply.
Pg.5
Item18-8
2007 BuildabJe Lands Report for Snohomish County
Interpretation of Tables 1 -4:
Interpretation ofResults Tables
Tables I through 4 summarize the estimates ofadditional population and employment capacity at
the city,UGA and MUGA levels, and compare them with the adopted 2025 population and
employment growth targets.City boundaries as of April 2002 are used for these target/capacity
comparisons since city boundaries as of that date were used for development of the adopted
growth targets.
For all 4 tables,the first column shows estimated population or employment as of April 2006
(for city and unincorporated urban areas represented by 2002 city boundaries).'The next
column contains the adopted 2025 population or employment targets.The growth targets are
from the Appendix B of the Countywide Planning Policies for Snohomish County,adopted in
December 2006 by the County Council following the Snohomish County Tomorrow target
reconciliation process.The next column shows the anticipated change in population or
employment from 2006 through 2025.
The next column denotes total population or employment capacity as of2025,derived by adding
the additional population or employment capacity estimates as of April 2006 (shown in the next
column)to the 2006 estimated population or employment.The additional capacity estimates are
from the detailed UGA and MUGA additional population and capacity estimates which follow in
later sections of the report.
The final column oftables I through 4 compares the target and capacity estimates for each city,
UGA or MUGA.Areas where there is adequate capacity for accommodating the adopted growth
targets have positive values shown in this column,whereas areas which are deficient in capacity
have negative values (shown in parentheses).
The unincorporated UGA capacity estimates are calculated by subtracting the capacity estimates
for cities as of2002 from the total UGA estimates.Note that in UGAs that have experienced
significant annexation by cities since 2002,these unincorporated additional capacity estimates
will not be current since city zoning now applies in these annexed areas.Refer to the "Results by
UGA"section on page 51 for more current information on unincorporated UGA additional
capacity based on January 2007 city boundaries.For additional capacity information in cities
using January 2007 city boundaries,refer to Appendix E on page 227.
Tables 2 and 4 focus solely on the target/capacity comparisons at the MUGAlevel within the
SWUGA.Note that there are several areas identified at the bottom of the table which are .
indicated as either an overlap (more than one city has identified this area for future annexation)
or gap area (no city has identified these areas for future annexation).
• The 2006 populationestimatesarc basedonthe StateOfficeof FinancialManagement (OFM)annual
estimates;2006 employmentestimatesarc basedon State EmploymentSecurityDepartment(ESD)
covered employmentestimates, geocodedto employerlocationsby the PugetSound RegionalCouncil
(PSRC).
Pg.33
ltem18-9
2007 Buildable LandsReportfor Snohomish County
Table 1
Population Targets and Capacities
2025 UGA Population Targets and Capacities
(All estimates,targets and capacity com arisons below are based on 2002 city boundaries)
Non.oS.W.County UGA 146,860 226,794 79,934 243,999 97,139 17,205
Arlington UGA 16,591 27,000 10;433 27,511 10,944 511
Arlington City 15,217 18.150 a,933 18,864 3.647 714
Unincorporated 1,350 8,850 7,500 8,647 7,297 (203)
Darrington UGA 1,593 2,125 532 2,751 1,158 626
Darrington Town 1,465 1,910 445 2,175 710 265
Unincorporated 128 215 87 576 448 361
Gold Bar UGA
2,883 3,500 617 3,437 554 163)
Gold Bar City 2,125 2.497 372 2,543 418 46
Unincorporated 758 1.003 246 894 136 1"0)
Granite Falls UGA 3,242 6,970 3,728 9,451 6,209 2,481
Granite Falls City 3,095 4,770 1,675 5,828 2,733 1,058
Unincorporated 147 2,200 2,053 3,623 3,476 1,423
Index UGA (incorporated)155 190 35 210 55 20
Lake Stevens UGA 29,174 46,125 16,951 49,250 20,076 3,125
lake Stevens City 7,176 8,360 1,184 8,481 1,305 121
Unincorporated 21,998 37,765 15,767 40,769 18,771 3,004
Maltby UGA (unincorporated)NA NA NA 22 NA
Marysville UGA 55,034 79,800 24,766 88,032 32,998 8,232
Marysville City 29,562 36,737 7;175 39,136 9,574 2,399
Unincorporated 25,472 43,063 17,591 48,896 23,424 5,833
Monroe UGA 17,751 26,590 8,839 24,071 6,320 (2,519)
Monroe City 16;170 20,540 4,370 19;680 3,510 (860)
Unincorporated 1,581 6,050 4,469 4,391 2,810 (1,659)
Snohomish UGA 10,193 14,535 4,342 15..190 4,997 655
Snohomish City
8,597 9;981 1,384 10;447 1,850 466
Unincorporated 1,596 4,554 2,958 4,743 3,147 189
Stanwood UGA 5,483 8,840 3,357 12,419 6,936 3,579
Stanwood City 4,628 5,650 1,022 6,486 1,858 836
Unincorporated 855 3,190 2,335 5,933 5,078 2,743
Sultan UGA 4,785 11,119 6,334 11,655 6,870 536
Sultan City 4,440 8,190 3,750 9,167 4,727 977
Unincorporated 345 2,929 2,584 2,488 2,143 (441) .
S.W.County UGA 4,06,285 533,125 126,840 545,620 139,335 12,495
Incorporated S.W.
252,951 303,227 50.276 303,592 50,641 365
Bothell City (part)15,090 22,000 6,910 21,117 6.027 (883)
Brier City 6,480 7,790 1,310 7,280 800 (510)
Edmonds City 40,360 44,880 4,520 45,570 5,210 690
Everett City 99,467 123,060 23,593 124,696 25,229 1,636
lynnwood City 35,230 43,782 8,552 43,094 7,864 (688)
Mill Creek City 14,783 16,089 1,306 16.069 1,286 120)
MUakeTerrace City·20,756 22,456 1,700 22,463 1,707 7
Mukilteo City 19,620 22,000 2,380 22,000 2,380
Woodway Town
1,165 1,170 5 1,303 13B 133
Unincorporated S.W.153,334 229,898 76,564 242,028 88,694 12,130
UGA Total 553,145 759;919 206,774 789,619 236,474 29,700
City Total 345,581 420,202 74,621 426,609 81,028 6,407
untocc rated UGA Total
207,564 339717 132154 363010 155,446 23,292
UGA Safety Factor as of 2006 = .14.4%(Percentwtuch Additional 2006·2025 PoPCapaclty exceeds 2006·2025 Numeric Change)
•NOTE:Mountlake Terrace 2006 population estimate includes a correction made by OFM In2007 to account for for additional population
mistakenly excluded In post~2000 city population estimates.
Pg,35
Item 18 M 10
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County
Table 2
Population Targets and Capacities
S.W.County UGA Total 406,285 533,125 126,840 545,620 139,335 12,495
Incorporated S.W. Total 252,951 303,227 50,276 303,592 50,641 365
Unincorporated S.W. Total 153,334 229,898 76,564 242,028 88,694 12,130
Bothell MUGA 32,515 51,565 19,050 52,048 19,533 483
Bothell City (part)15,090 22,000 6,910 21,117 6,027 (883
Unincorporated 17,425 29,565 12,140 30,931 13,506 1,366
Brier MUGA 8,782 11,085 2,303 10,721 1,939 (364)
Brier City 6,480 7,790 1,310 7,280 800 (510)
Unincorporated 2,302 3,295 993 3,441 1,139 146
Edmonds MUGA 43,920 49,346 5,426 49,877 5,957 531
Edmonds City 40,360 44,880 4,520 45,570 5,210 690
Unincorporated 3,560 4,466 906 4,307 747 (159)
Everett MUGA 139,105 173,270 34,165 176,789 37,684 3,519
Everett City 99,467 123,060 23,593 124,696 25,229 1,636
Unincorporated 39,638 50,210 10,572 52,093 12,455 1,883
Lynnwood MUGA 56,172 78,117 21,945 80,313 24,141 2,196
Lynnwood City 35,230 43,782 8,552 43,094 7,864 (688)
Unincorporated 20,942 34,335 13,393 37,219 16,277 2,884
MillCreekMUGA 49,568 72,321 22,753 75,417 25,849
3,096
Mill Creek City
14,783 16,089 1,306 16,069
1,286 (20)
Unincorporated 34,785 56,232 21,447 59,348 24,563 3,116
Mountlake TerraceMUGA 20,848 22,561 1,713 22,595 1.747 34
Mountlake Terrace City -20,756 22,456 1,700 22,463
1,707 7
Unincorporated 92 105 13 132 40 27
Mukilteo MUGA 30,845 36,910 6,065 38,094 7,249 1,184
Mukilteo City 19,620 22,000 2,380 22,000 2,380
Unincorporated 11,225 14,910 3,685 16,094 4,869 1,184
Woodway MUGA 1,165 1,340 175 1,422 257 82
Woodway Town 1.165 1,170 5 1,303 138 133
Unincorporated 170 170 119 119 (51)
Paine FieldArea
324 (324)
Larch Way Overlap 2,489 4,390 1,901 5,168 2,679 778
Lake Stickney Gap 5.063 10,820 5,757 10,811 5,748 (9)
Norma Beach Gap 2,855 3,320 465 3,933 1,078 613
Silver Firs Gap 13,008 18,080 5,072 18,482 5,474 402
..NOTE:Mountlake Terrace2006 population estimate includes a correction made by OFMin2007 to account forfor additional population
mistakenly excluded in post~2000 city population estimates.
Pg,36
Item 18 ~11
2007 Buildable LandsReport for Snohomish County Population Targets and Capacities
Figure 3 below depicts the relationship between the population growth targets and additional
capacity at the UGA level. For the UGA as a whole, as we11 as for the SW County UGA and the
non-SW County UGAs combined, there is adequate additional population capacity to
accommodate the projected population growth to the year 2025.
-------------------_._._-_.__._.__.__.__._.-
236474
UGATotalswCounty
139335
Figure 3: UGA Pop TargeUCapacity Comparison
97139
Non-SW County
150000
0"--
200000
f 50000
_~..J!"2006-25 Pop Growth _ 2006-25 Addtnl Pop Cap l _
!100000
,
1250000)
The population target and capacity comparisons are shown in Figure 4 below for individual non-
SW County UGAs. In the Gold Bar and the Monroe UGAs,additional population capacity is
less tban the projected population growth to the year 2025.
._--_---_-_.._.._----_._-----._----_._---------_._,
Figure 4:Non·SW UGAPop TargeUCapacity Comparison
40000
135000 f
!30000 1
I\25000 '
!20000
I
115000·
i10000
iI 5000
o
532 1156 617 554
32998
".",.<0'.
",.v~r·-··---,······--··------------,
11!l2006-25 Pop Growth _ 2006-25 Add!nl Pop Cap'
---_._.__..._.__._--
I'g.37
Item18-12
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County Population Targets and Capacities
The population target and capacity comparisons are shown in Figure 5 below for individual
MUGAs (and MUGA gaps and overlaps)within the SW County UGA. This graph combines
both the city and unincorporated MUGA results.In the Brier MUGA and the Lake Stickney gap
area, additional population capacity is less than the projected population growth to the year 2025.
:40000 .,
:35000
!30000 .
i 25000 .
!20000
i 15000
i10000
5000
o
Figure 5: MUGA Pop T argel/Capacily._C_o_m-,p_a_r~is_o_n ~
31684
!III 2006-25Pop Growth _2006-25 Addlnl PopCap I.._L _..__..__.______.__,_._._
The population target and capacity comparisons are shown in Figure 6 below for individual cities
(using 2002 city boundaries). In the cities of Bothell, Brier,Lynnwood,Mill Creek and Monroe,
additional population capacity is less than the projected population growth to 2025.
30000
25000
120000
!15000
I
10000
,
L.....
Figure 6: City (2002 Bdys)Pop Target/Capacity Comparison-_..__._-._......_..-----·-1
I
I
I
I
I
Item 18 -13
Pg.38
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County Population Targets and Capacities
The following figures show the breakdown of additional population capacity by housing type
(single family,multi-family vs. senior apartments)and land status (pending, vacant,partially-
used vs.redevelopable).The figures are shown first for the non-SW County UGAs combined,
the SW County UGA, and finally the Total UGA.
Non-SW County UGAs:
,£jgure 8 ......•
Additional Pop Capacity by Land StatusAdditionalPop Capacity by Housing Type
"Fig!J.re 7:
I
Addtol MF Pop
Cop
22%
Addtnl SA Pop
CPp
1%
SW County UGA:
Pending
46%
Additional Pop Capaclly by Land Status
Figure 10:
AddlnlSF Pop
Cop
55%
AddtnlSAPop
C.p
3%
Additional Pop Capacity by Housing Type
AddlnlMFPop
Cop
4<%
Figure 9
I
I
vacant
ID%
...._.._..........•.._.._-_•.._--_•.................••....•.....•._---
Pg.39
Item18-14
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County
Total County UGA:
Figure 11:
Additional Pop Capacity by Housing Type
Population Targets and Capacities
12:
Additional Pop Capacity by Land Status
AddtnlSA Pop
Cop
2%
Atldllli M F Pop
Cop
33%
---------
Addlfll SF Pop
Cop
65%
Item18 w15
Pending
41%
VllC~1
0%
Pg.40
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County
Table 3
Employment Targets and Capacities
2025 UGA Employment Targets and Capacities
(All estimates,targets and capacity comparisons below are based on 2002 city boundaries
Non..s,W.County UGA 52,174 80,628 28,454 98,625 46,451 17,997
Arlington UGA 10,200 16,360 6,160 21,647 11,447 6,287
Arlington City 9,988 14,350 4.362 19,002 9,014 4,652
Unincorporated 212 1,010 798 2,645 2,433 1,635
Darrington UGA 686 535 (151) 4,184 3,498 3,649
DarringtonTown 686 415 (271) 2,661 1,975 2.246
Unincorporaled 115 115 1,523 1,523 1,408
Gold BarUGA 223 210 (13)529 306 319
Gold Bar City 221 -210 (11)527 306 317
Unincorporated 2 (2)2 2
Granite Falls UGA 1,030 2,200 1,170 2.273 1,243 73
Granite Falls City 1,029 2,109 1,080 2.241 1,212 132
Unincorporated 1 91 90 32 31 (59)
Index UGA (incorporated)23 70 47 23 (47)
Lake Stevens UGA 4,695 6,615 1.920 6.351 1,656 (26')
Lake Stevens City 1,296 1,805 509 2.092 796 287
Unincorporated 3,399 4,810 1,411 4,259 860 (551)
Maltby UGA (unincorporated)3,811 4,960 1,149 7,506 3,695 2,546
Marysville UGA 11,821 24,008 12,187 27,520 15,699 3,512
Marysville City 10,074 16,851 6,7n 17,060 6,986 209
Unincorporated 1,747 7,157 5,410 10,460 6,713 3,303
Monroe UGA 9,633 12,390 2,757 13,508 3,875 1,118
Monroe City 9,214 11,800 2,586 12,853 3,639 1,053
Unincorporated 419 590 171 655 236 65
Snohomish UGA 5,442 6,730 1,288 7,143 1,701 413
Snohomish City 4,431 4,900 469 4,933 502 33
Unincorporated 1,011 1,830 819 2;210 1',199 380
StanwoodUGA 3,600 5,550 1,950 5,848 2,248 298
Stanwood City 3,366 4,790 1,422 5,036 1,668 246
Unincorporated 232 760 526 612 580 52
Sullan UGA 1,010 2,000 990 2,093 1,083 93
Sultan City 1.009 1,970 961 2,092 1,083 122
Unincorporated 1 30 29 1 (29)
S.W.County UGA 181,924 259,577 77.653 273.762 91,838 14,185
Incorporated S.w.158.714 219,473 60,759 231,306 72,592 11,833
Bothell City (part)14,862 15,840 978 18,085 3,223 2,245
Brier City 310 430 120 359 49 (71
Edmonds City 11,648 12,190 542 14,862 3,214 2,672
Everett City 85,340 130,340 45.000 133,453 48,113 3,113
Lynnwood City 27,336 38,550 11,214 39,679 12,343 1,129
Mill Creek City
3,834 4,544 710 5,448 1,614 90'
MUakeTerrace City
7,712 6,039 327 9,099 1.387 1,060
Mukilteo City 7,608 9,450 1,842 10,257 2.649 B07
Woodway Town 64 90 26 64 (26)
Unincorporated S.W.23,210 40,104 16,694 42,456 19,246 2,352
UGATotal 234,098 340,205 106,107 372,387 13B,289 32,182
City Total
200,053 278,743 78,690 299,826 99,773 21,083
Unincor orated UGA Total 34,045 61,462 27,417 72,561 38516 11,099
Pg,41
Item18-16
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County
Table 4
Employment Targets and Capacities
S.W. County UGA 181,924 259,577 77,653 273,762 91,838 14,185
Incorporated S.W. Total 158,714 219,473 60,759 231,306 72,592 11,833
Unincorporated S.W. Total 23,210 40,104 16,894 42,456 19.246 2,352
Bothell MUGA 15,995 17,380 1,3B5 19,459 3,464 2,079
Bothell City (part)14,862 15,840 978 18,085 3,223 2,245
Unincorporated 1,133 1,540 407 1,374 241 (166)
Brier MUGA 431 564 133 480 49 (B4)
BrierCity 310 430 120 359 49 (71)
Unincorporated 121 134 13 121 (13)
!;dmonds MUGA 11,811 12,604 793 15,047 3,236
2,443
EdmondsCity 11,64B 12,190 542 14,B62 3,214 2,672
Unincorporated 163 414 251 185 22 (229)
EverettMUGA 91,737 136,860 45,123 141,103 49,366 4,243
EverettCity 85,340 130,340 45,000 133,453 48,113 3,113
Unincorporated 6,397 6,520 123 7,650 1,253 1,130
Lynnwood MUGA 29,926 43,950 14,024 46,164 16,238 2,214
Lynnwood City 27,336 38,550 11,214 39,679 12,343
1,129
Unincorporated 2,590 5,400 2,810 6,485 3,895 1,085
Mill CreekMUGA 7,090 8,919 1,829 11,093 4,003 2,174
Mill CreekCity 3,834 4,544 710 5,448 1,614 904
Unincorporated 3,256 4,375 1,119 5,645 2,389 1,270
MountlakeTerrace MUGA 7,728 8,059 331 9,191 1,463 1,132
Mountlake Terrace City 7,712 8,039 327 9,099 1,387 1,060
Unincorporated 16 20 4 92 76 72
MukilteoMUGA 10,831 14,530 3,699 15,904 5,073 .1,374
Mukilteo City 7,60B 9,450 1,842 10,257 2,649 B07
Unincorporated 3,223 5,080 I,B57 5,647 2,424 567
Woodway MUGA 76 710 634 76 (634)
WoodwayTown 64 90 26 64 (26)
Unincorporated 12 620 608 12 (608)
PaineFieldArea 3,556 8,847 5,291 9,088 5,532 241
Larch Way Overlap 1,741 1,955 214 2,179 438 224
Lake Stickney Gap 220 660 440 386 166 (274)
NormaBeachGap 93 90 (3)93 3
Silver Firs Gap 676 3,424 2,748 3,486 2,810 62
Pg.42
Item 18-17
2007 Buildable Lands Reporl for Snohomish County Employment Targets and Capacities
Figure 13 below depicts the relationship between the employment growth targets and additional
capacity at the UGA level. For the UGA as a whole, as well as for the SW County UGA and the
non-SW County UGAs combined,there is adequate additional employment capacity to
accommodate the projected employment growth to the year 2025.
_._._----
80000
40000 .
,----_._----_.._--_._--_....•..•..._ _.•.._..,
Figure 13: UGAEmp TargetfCapacity Comparison i
i-----".-.------.-----.----------.----"-~-~------.-.-••--.••1
138289 I i
i i
Ii
II
91838 I !
I
60000
20000
0-1---
46451
I
i
1140000
1,20000
i,00000
Non-SW County SW County UGA Total
J II Emp Growth II Addlnl Emp Cap I______..._.-=.=_L .__
The employment target and capacity comparisons are shown in Figure 14 below for individual
non-SW County UGAs. In the Index and the Lake Stevens UGAs,additional employment
capacity is less than the projected employment growth to the year 2025.
I-
i
l50000
I
40000
30000
Figure 14:Non-SW UGAEmp Target/Capacity Comparison
"'''
l
-~'
I
I
I
i10000
i o
1~47
1TTQ 1243 ".eee "'''.'"""".."I I
I
Pg.43
Item18 M18
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County Employment Targets and Capacities
The employment target and capacity comparisons are shown in Figure 15 below for individual
MUGAs (and MUGA gaps and overlaps) within the SW County UGA. This graph combines
both the city and unincorporated MUGA results. In the Brier and Woodway MUGAs,and in the
Lake Stickney gap area, additional employment capacity is less than the projected employment
growth to the year 2025.1'--"'-"-.~._-
Figure 15: MUGAEmp TargetlCapacity Comparison
------,I:
Ii
I'I'
I II,
!I
I
I
150000
1,0000 .
130000
I
I
]20000
10000
--_._--_._-------------
49366
214 438 440 166 .a 0
2148 281:1
The employment target and capacity comparisons are shown in Figure 16 below for individual
cities (using 2002 city boundaries). In the cities of Brier, Index and Woodway,additional
employment capacity is less than the projected employment growth to 2025.
--_.____._..•..._..•...._•.....___-..•..._..__.._----_.._-
....-----r
I
I
!I
Figure 16: City (2002 Sdys)Emp Target/Capacity Comparison
10000
o
20000
i 40000
.30000
I
150000 ~------_..-.-----_.
._.....•_•._---.___-__•._-_..__•.......•...•___._-_••.._.•.•-
Pg.44
Item 18 -19
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County Employment Targets and Capacities
Additional Em P Capac.ity by Land Status
The following figures show the breakdown of additional employment capacity by land status
categories (pending,vacant,partially-used vs.rcdevelopable).The figures are shown first for the
non-SW County UGAs combined, the SW County UGA, and finally the Total UGA.
Non-SW County DGAs:
..Fjgwre 17~._
•
•
Pending
10%
Vacanl
36%
Ejgure 18:
Ii......_...__.__._.__._..._..-._.--
SW County DGA:
--··_·_---_·_--_·_-_··_..--·..---1
Additional Emp Capacity by Land Status
Rooev
38%
---__---Part-Used
38%
Pg.45
Item 18 ~20
2007 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County
Total County UGA:
,figure 1~.
I Additional Em p Capacity by Land Status
Employment Targets and Capacities
Roo"
37%
Part-Used
31%
Item 18-21
Pg.46
N
0
0
Marysville UGA --J
to
Table 37:Development History E.
0:
~
Within City Zones:cr
"t""
'""Q.
~
'".g
0
Ingle Family M (R 4.5)::\
Single Family units . 150,43 100%658 4.37 4.37 0'~
Ingle Family H (R 6.5)
g>
Single Family units 109,47 100%488 4.46 4.46 0e-
C
ingle Family H~SL (R 8)
§
Single Family units 0.00 0%NoDataAvailable 8.00 (Eslimate)~e-
o
Iti·Family low (R 12)
0
Single Family units 24,98 76%186 5.62 5,62 c"Multi.Family units a.09 24%131 3,96 3.96 .:<
Total 33.07 100%317 9.58 9.58
Multi.Family Mad.(R 1.8)
Single Family units 33.84 71%1 296
6.
17
1
6.17
Multi-Family units 14,13 29%246 5.13 5.13
Total 47.97 100%542 11.30 11.30
iMulti·Family High (R 28)
MuJU-Family units 4.69 100%1 107 22.791 22.79
laenerer Commercial ~New &Redev
Multi-Family units 1.47
7%1
28 132
1
2.17MixedUse1.32 6%18 0,85 I 5,570 0.10 14 10.61
Non-Residential New 18.42 87%NfA NfA 248,913 0.31 304 16.50
Total 21.21 100%46 2.17 2.17 254,483 0.28 318 14.991 14.99
IGeneral Commercial ·lnfiU
Non·Residenliallnfill 3.69 100%1 NfA NfAI 1 27.570 0.17 47 12.651 12.65
Downtown Commercial.New &Redev
Mixed Use 1.35 47%1 11
3.
81
1
3.81
1
12,002 0.20 31 23.13
Non-Residential New 1.54 53%NfA NfA 23,476 0.35 62 40.54
Tota!2.89 100%11 3.81 3.81
35,478 0.28 93 32.40 I 32.40
Downtown Commercial - Inml
Noa-Residantiallnfill 4.05 100%NfA NfA 55,345 0.32 86 21.31 21,31
iCommunny Bustness - New &Redev ~Mixed Use 0.61 1%2 0.04 0.04 8.071 0.30 21 34.43
Non-Residential New 49.40 99%NfA NfA 453,985 0.21 907 16.36 ~
Total 50.Q1 100%2 0.04 0.04
462,056 0.21 '"928 18.56 18.56 E:
ICommunity Buslness - Infill
~
c::Non·Resldential Infili 2.95 100%NfA NfA 50,762 0.40 88 30.05 30.32 (See Note 1)~
-e ::p
'!"-g,
'I>'"s
Item 18-22
Marysville UGA cent,
Multi.Family units 4.39 59%80 10.83
17.14 [s~e No,"2 1
1
Mixed Use 0.59 8%11 1.49 7,169 0.28 13
Non-Residential 2.41 33%NIA NIA 23,493 0.22 55
Total 7.39 100%91 12.31 17.14 (See Note2)30,662 0.10 68
INeighborhoodBusiness- New &Redev
Non-Residential New 0.00 0%NIA NIA I No DataAvailable
NeighborhoodBusiness- Infil!
0%1Non-Residentiallnfill 0.00 NIA NIAI I No Data Availablo
lUgh!Industrial ~New &Redev
Non-Residential New 50.94 100%NIA NIA 447,711 0.20 652
IUght Industrial -Jnfill
Non-Residentiallnfil1 6.51 100%NIA NIA 51,530 0.18 102
Gener...,llnduslrlal
Non-Residential 2.47 100%NIA N/A 31,717 0.29 63
Within UnincorporatedDesignations;
N
0
0
-.J
0:>e.
0:
"sr,,-
r<
§
0-
~
22.0 31
0.00 [See Note 2)I :00
22.82 .g
9.20 0
::l
0'~
lB.56 (Estimate)n t/>
"0cr-
30.33(Estimate)n S
~.
".
12.791 12.79 U
o
0c
".:<
15.631 15.63
25.25 25.23 (See Note 1)
Notes:1 •Some differences between development history end density assumed occur because of rounding.
2 - The forecasted residential density is higher than the development history to counterbalance the assumption of no new employment in this zone.
3 -Densities follow unincorporated Lake Stevens densities due to a small number of actual projects in the Marysville UGA.
4 -Densities follow Maltby densities due to a small number of actual projects in Marysville UGA.
"tl
0)'
'"'"
~UlDR (2000-2005 Sample)
Single Family units
UMDR
Single Family units
Multi-Family units
Total
UHOR
Single Family units
MuW-Family units
Senior Apartment units
Total
Urban Industrial
Non-Residential
73.20 100%327 4.47 4.47
17.54 100%101 5.76 3.82 (See Note 3)
0.00 0%No Data Available 6.47 (See Note 3)
17.54 100%101 5~76 10.29 (See Note 3)
0.00 0%NoDataAvailable 4.50 (Estimate)
0.00 0%No Data Availebfe 11.50 (Estimate)
0.00 0%NoData Avai/abTe 0.56 (Estimate)
0.00 0%NoData Available 16.56 (Estimate)
46.40 100%1 NIA NlA I 193,506 0.10 401 a...I 16.90 (See Note 4)
~
1
c:~
~.g,
iii'
Item 18 -23
IV
c>c>
'-'
~c::
'"0-
iCITY02 (1}PENDING Marys_GC 27.71 6.8!!20.90 0.00 12.25 D,OO 0.00 12.25 256 0 0 256 256 0 0 256 m 0 0 tra "MafYS_MU 1.08 0.00 1.08 0.00 -0.93 11.15 0.00 10.22 -1 12 0 11 -,12 0 11 -3 22 0 ra r-
Mal)'li_R18MFM 41.52 3.82 37.71 0.00 8.43 0.00 0.00 8A3 "8 0 0 "8 "8 0 0 318 885 0 0 885
g;
Marys_R28MFH 0.67 0,00 0.67 0.00 .1.50 26.49 0.00 26.99 -1 ta 0 te -,ts 0 re -3 35 0 32 0-
Marys_R4.5SFM 109.40 34,47 74.93 0.00 6.02 0.00 0.59 6.61 4"0 44 495 4"0 44 495 1256 0 sa 1307 ~
Marys_R6.5SFH 32.14 8.15 23.99 0.00 6.88 0.00 0.00 6.86 165 0 0 165 '"0 0 165 459 0 0 459 :gMa s RSSFH-SL
0.36 0.00 0.38 0.00 7.98 0,00 0.00 7.98 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 8 0 0 8
Sum 212.95 53.31 159.64 0.00 7.46 0.19 0.28 7.93 1191 "44 1256 1191 ar 44 1266 3316 57 sa 3425 a
i2lVACANT Marys_DC 2.16 0.00 2.16 0.00 0.48 3.25 0.00 3.71 t 7 0 8
1 6 0 s 2 10 0 ta 0'
Msrys.:.GC 10829 23.09 85.20 0.00 OM 2.07 0.00 2.07 0 178 0 176 0 142 0 142 0 262 0 262 ~
MafYS_MU 15.13 0.81 14.32 CLOO 0.00 16.97 0.00 16.97 0 243 0 243 0 196 0 196 0 36'0 36'en"Marys_R12MFL 0.95 0.00 0.95 {l.OO 5.25 3.15 0.00 8.40 5 3 0 8 4 2 0 6 11 4 0 18 C
Marys_R18MFM 33.92 13.07 20.85 0.00 6.04 4.99 0.00 11.03 '"104 0 230 102 84 0 ,,,.283 155 0 438 :0-
Marys_R28MFH 0.93 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.00 21.62 0.00 21.62 0 20 0 20 0 te 0 re 0 30 0 30 C
Marys_R4.5SFM 36.46 21.11 15.35 0.00 4.30 0.00 0.00 4.30 66 0 0 66 53 0 0 53 '"0 0 '"~.
Marys R£.5SFH 14.84 3.05 11 ,78 0.00 4.41 0.00 0.00 4.<11 52 0 0 52 42 0 0 42 m 0 0 '17 :0-
MarYs-R8SFH-Sl 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.00 4.89 0.00 0.00 4'.89 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2
,0 0 4 oSom213.07 61.12 151.95 0.00 1.66 3.64 0.00 5.30 252 553 0 805 203 '"0 550 567 822 0 1386 C
(J)PARTUSE Marys_GC 2.57 0.00 2.57 2.01 0.00 1.99 0.00 1.99 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 s
Marys_MU 10.92 0,48 10.44 8.65 0.00
16.87 0.00 16.87 0 "6 0 146 0 97 0 97 0 '"0 179 C;;
Marys_R12MFL 1.53 0,00 '.53 0.74 4.08 1.36 0.00 5.<14 3 -t 0 ,2 t 0 3 6 ,0 7
MaryS_R111MFM 7.96 1.89 607 4.04 5.44 3.46 0.00 8.90 22 14 0 36 15 9 0 24 41 17 0 55
Marys_R211MFH 2.24 0.00 224 0.65 0.00 17.05 0.00 17.05 0 t t 0 -rt 0 7 0 2 0 ta 0 "IMarys_R<l.SSFM 182.37 59.28 123.09 102.87 43::0 000 0.00 4.00 41'0 0 4"273 0 0 273 761 0 0 761'
Marys':'R6.5SFH 76.73 9.29 67.44 53.57 3.99 0.00 0.00 3.99 214 0 0 214 142 0 0 142 396 0 0 396
Marvs R8SFH-5l 2.78 0.00 2.78 1.28 5.49 0.00 0.00 5.49 7 0 0 7 5 0 0 5 ta 0 0 13
Sum 287.11 70.94 216.17 173.80 3.76 1.01 0.00
4~79 657 176 0 833 437 m -0 554 1216 215 0 1432
(4) REDEV Marys_DC 13.26 0.00 13.28 0.00 0.00 3.09 0.00 3.09 0 41 0 41 0 27 0 27 0 50 0 50
Marys_GC 97.11 14.18 82.99 0.00 -0,08 1.95 0.00 1,87 -7 '82 0 155 -5 '08 0 103 -""8 0 '85
MaIYS_MU 113.52 29.91 83.61 0.00
-1.44 16.02 0.00
14,58 -'20 "39 0 1219 -80 890 0 '"-222 1638 0 1416
Marys_R12MFl 10.79 0.00 10.79 0.00 3.71 2.78 0.00 6.019 40 30 0 70 27 20 0 42 74 37 0 '"Marys R18MFM 25.22 0.08
25.1-4 0.00 3.06 4.34 000 7.40 77 '09 0 ,,,.51 72 0 124 "3 133 0 276
MarYs:m!8MFH 17.08 0.32 16.77 0.00 -2.92 21.23 0.00 16,31 ~9 356 0 307 ~3 zaz 0 204 -st 436 0 345
Marys_R4.5SFM 103.16 35.90 67.26 0,00 3.76 0.00 0.00 3.76 253 0 0 253 ,..0 0 156 456 0 0 4681
Marys_R6:SSFH 85.71 24.18 61.53 0.00 3.84 0.00 0.00 3.84 236
0 0 236 157 0 0
157 '"0 0 437
M,R8SFH-5l 520 0.00 5.20 0.00 4.23 0.00 0.00 4.23 22 0 0 22 is 0 0 15 41 '0 0 41
.,m 471.11 104.56 366.55 0.00 1.23 5.56 0.00 6.79 .452 2037 0 2489 aor 1355 0 1655 837 2492 0 3329
Clty'02 Sum 1184.24 289.93 894.31 173.80 3.00 3.28 0.05 6.33 2552 2797 44 5393 2132
1949 44 4125 5935 3587 52 9574
lTY01 (1)PENDING Marys_R12Mf1.0.64 0.34 0.30 0.00 23.26 0.00 0.00 23.26 7 0
0 2 7 0 0 7 19 0 0 19
Marys_R18MFM 0.82 0.00 0.82 0.00 11.03 0.00 0:00 11.03 9 0 0 9 9 0 0 9 25 0 0 25
Maf)'S_R4.5SFM 43.04 1,94 41.10 0.00 "3 0.00 0.00 4,33 178 0 0 178 178 0 0 178 496 0 n 496
Marvs R6.6SFH 332.00 121.13 210.93 0.00 6.0 0.00 0.00 6.50 1372 0 0
1372 1312 •0 1372 3820 0 0 3820
S<1m 376.55 123.41 253.15 0.00 6.19 0.00 0.00 6.19 1566 0 0 '566 '556 0 0 1566 4360 0 0 4360
{2jVACANT Marys_GC
29.21 9.86 19.33 0.00 0.00 2.07 0.00 2.07 0 40 0 40 0 32 0 32 0 59 0 59
MaIYS_MU 12.57 3.33 9.24 0.00 0.00 16.71 0.00 16.77 0 155 0 155 0 '25 0 125 0 ""0 230
Marys_R12MFl 143.81 33.13 110.68 0.00 5.S7 3.90 0.00 9.117 616 432 0 1048 491 349 0 646 1385 842 0 ~~;!MaIYS_R4.SSFM 13.63 1.39 12.45 0.00
4.10 0.00 0.00
4.10 51 0 0 51 41 0 0 41 115 0 0
Marys_R6.5SFH 78.91 32.37 46.54 0.00 4.21 0.00 0.00 4.21 196 0 0 198 "8 0 0 158 441 0 0 441 ~Marvs-RBSFH·Sl 10.98 000 10.98 0.00 7.83 0.00 0.00 7.83
86 0 0 86 69 0 0 69 193 0 0 '93
Sum 269.31 60.09 209.22 0.00 4.84 3.00 0.00 7.53 949 527 0 1576 256 506 0 1273 2133 932 0 3085 ~
(3)PARTtJSE.Marys_MU 65.50 12.30 53.20
47.11 0.00 16.81 0.00 16.61 0 292 0 792 0 522 0 527 0 969 0 969 s.
MaIYS_R12MFl 60.76 3.26 77.50 68.55 5.31 3.68 0.00
6.99 364 252 0 616 242 168 0 410 674 306 0 962 iii'
Marys_R18MFM 6.1:3 0.70 5.43 4.93 5.68 4.67 0.00 10.35 28 23 0 st ts 15 0 34 sa 28 0 80
Marys_R4.5SFM 227.34 7893 148.41 131.67 4.04 0.00 0.00 4.04 532 0 0 532 354 0 0 354 965 0 0 965 c::
Marys_R6.5SFH 364.35 74,69 289.66 259.45 4.20 0.00 0.00
4.20 1000 0 0 '090 125 0 0 725 2018 0 0 2018 ~Ma s R6SFH-Sl 63.52 4.36 79.16 73.13 7.82 0.00 0.00 7.82 572 0 0 572 380 0 0 380 1059 0 0 '''59...sum 627.62 174.25 553.37 564.84 4.42 1.82 0.00 6.25
2586 '067 0 3853 1720 no 0 2429 4788 1306 0 6093 ~
(0 -g,
'"-J ,,-
Item 18 - 24
N
0
0->
toc
§::SIr MF sc
60.82 6,19 0,00 -0.15 2.09 o.oo 1,94 114 or
(4)REOEV Marys_GC 5<1,63 -e 0 106 -s 76 0 "-15 139 0 125 ;,-
Mmys."MU 80.49 1.66 12.83 000 ~2S lfL98 0,00 16.72 -19 1237 0 1218 -13 823 0 810 -35 15'\4 0 1478 r-MarlS_R12MFL 63.86 0.46 63.40 0.00 5.17 3.65 0.00 9.02 328 '44 0 512 21'162 0 360 607 299 C '"§Mal)'$_R16Mf'M 29.80 6.05 23.75 0.00 5.39 4.811 0.00 10.27 12'116 0 2401 85 17 0 162 aar 142 0 379
MafYS•.R4.5SFM 72.23 23.77 48.46 0.00 3.86 0.00 0.00 3,86 167 0 0
167 124 0 0 124 346 0 0 '"0..
~
Marys_R6.5SFH i08.76 25.91 82.8<:0.00 38'0.00 0.00 3,86 320 0 0 320 213 0 0 213 '82 0 0 '"~M'R8SFH-SL 102.94 16.73 85.21 0.00 7,f6 000 0.00 7.76 06'0 0 ."445 0 0 44'1239 0 0 1.239 "Som 518.90 86.77 432.13 000 3.71 3,96 0.00 7.67 1605 1711 0 3316 1007 1136 0 '76'2971 "9'0 5055 -o0
"City ;hrsu;n-----2012.38 454.51 1541.87 SS4.84 4.53 2.30 0.00 6.113 "00 '40'0 10111 5119 2354 0 7473 14252 4331 0 18583 0'
~
UNlNC (l)PENOING Un;nc._Marys.•UHOR 0131 0.00 0.81 0.00 12.41 0,00 0.00 12.41 10 0 0 10 10 0 0 10 ae 0 0 ae '"Ul'linc.".Marys ...ULOR 162.46 31.69 130.18 ODD 5.20 0.00 0.00 5.20 .80 0 0 .80 680 0 0 .80 1893 0 0 1893 "0UnincMalUMOR4.85 2,93 1.92 0.00 26.00 0.00 0.00 26.00 50 0 0 50 50 0 0 50 139 0 0 13'e-
Som 168.11 34.61 133.50 0.00 5.54 0_00 0.00 '54 740 0 0 140 140 0 0 7"'050 0 0 '060 §
(2J VACANT Uninc_Marys_ULOR 16.42 26.96 49.'16 0.00 4.35 000 0.00 4.35 '15 0 0 '15 114 0 0 114 OS,0 0 483 ~UnlflC Ms UMOR 0.24 0.00 024 0.00 0.00 4.18 0_00 4.18 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Sum 16.66 26.96 49.10 0.00 4.33 0.02 000 4.35 715 1 0 '16 114 1 0 114 OS,1 0 485 o
0
'"(3}PARTUSE Uninc~Marys_UHDR 14.03 0.00 14.03 9.11 3.18 '99 0.11 13.26 as 91 1 '21 16 61 1 00 54 111 1 156 "Uninc_Msrys._ULOR 278.28 52:62 225.66 171.15 3.88 000 0.00 3.88 564 0 0 .64 ."0 0 44'1229 0 0 1129 .:z
Unlnc Ma UMOR 16.13 1.06 15.06 12.49 3.36 6.01 000 9.37 "75 0 m aa 50 0 78 78 sa 0 170
Som 308.43 53,68 254.75 ~92.74 3.81 0.86 0.01 4"735 166 1 '"469 110 ,'00 136'20J 1 156'
(4)REOEV Uninc_Marys.__UHDR 7.48 0.00 7.48 0.00
1.87 10.02 0.00 11.89 14 75 0 59 e 50 0 59 ae 82 0 1161
Urtinc_Ma'YS_ULOR 99.71 23.44 76.27 0.00 3.46 0.00 0.00 3.46 '64 0 0 '64 170 0 0
176 '69 0 0 '"Uninc Ma UMDR 10.10 1.33 9.38 0.00 3.09 6.19 0.00 9,28 ae se 0 et 19 39 0 56 54 71 0 ':IS
Som 117.90 aa.rr 93.13 000 3.30 1.43 0.00 4.12 307 133 0 '"7Q4 56 0 293 '68 te 0 '"U!liric"Suii1 -671.10 140.02 531.08 192.14 4.26 0.64 0.80 4.90 """0 1 ,,9&1<07 200 1 1801 44"367 1 4841
UGA!':.um
-_......_--
3aG7.11 894.46 2913.25 951_38 4.02 2.32 0,02 6,36 11255 ""45 118<t2 8856 4503 "13405 24660 ,,.,"32991i
-e...
'"00
Item 18 - 25
~~s,
"""~
~
'§,
~.
100,000
90.000
80,QOD
70.000
60,000
eo
ji1 50.(l{)Q
40,000
30.000
Snohomish County Tomorrow 2007 Buildable Lands Report
Figure 32. MarysvUle UGA Population
."0
0
"to
S.
0:.,
0--1 p
t"'.,
"0-v.
:;0
""0
0
;l
0'
~
'""g.
0
:3g:
()
0c
"Q
20,000
I10.000
I
~--.,.-_.
§8 N g ;\8 0
N N N N N ~~~~~o
~~
N
~
M
~
~s ~
~
w
~
N
~
w
~
~
~~
~~~M
II ~~
II
-Tola12025 ccpulauoo Capaclly
.. ..'2005 Population Estimate
-.-Annual Populalion Estimlltes
"50% 012005·2025Add!nl Popcapacity
--2002~2025 PopGrowlh TargetProjecton
Tabie 39. MarysvUle UGA Population Statistics
;f
'C
'C
Marysyille UGA 47,424 49,847 50,828 52,089 52,978 53,926
Item 18 - 26
79,800 25,874 88,032 34,106
~
~
S~
~
:;0.g,
n;'
t~
0
0->
tIl
§.:
Cot-
O
426
r-
CITY02 (1) PENDING Marys_CB 22.90 1.21 21.69 0.00 19.64 426 ""Marys_GC 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 NIA 3 3 &;-
Marys_U 1.14 0.00
1.14 0.00 43.71 50 50 '""Marvs MU 0.51 0.00 0.51 0.00 -e37.18 19 19 0-a
Sum 24.79 1.44 23.35 0.00 21.33 498 498 0:
~
V)
(2) VACANT Marys_CB 1.77 0.00 1.77 0.00 18.09 32 26 "0
Marys_DC 2.16 0.00 2.16 0.00 32.00 69 56 go
3Marys_GC 109.98 23.09 86.89 0.00 14.92 1296 1047 ~.
Marys_GI 0.80 0.04 0.76 0.00 23.65 18 15 e-
o
Marys_U 212.44 46.49 165.96 0.00 12.82 2127 1718 0c
Marvs NB 5.60 2.66
2.95 0.00 18.66 55 44 ='.-e
Sum 332.75 72.27 260.48 0.00 13.81 3597 2905
1
(3) PARTUSE Marys_CB 21.39 0.94 20.44 11.23 30.46 342 227
Marys_DC 9.22 1.95
7.27 2.35 20.88 49 33i
Marys_GC 19.74 0.90 18.84 13.37 12.64 169 112
Marvs U 94.21 13.88
80.34 33.82 15.52 525 349
Sum 144.56 17.67 126.89 60.76 17.86 1085 722
(4) REDEV Marys_CB 65.60 2.13
63.47 0.00 17.20 1092 726
Marys_DC 20.34 0.00 20.34 0.00 21.14 430 286
Marys_GC 99.32 12.13
87.20 0.00 11.65 1016 676
Marys_GI 2.65 1.72 0.93 0.00 18.32 17 11
Marys_U 196.11 37.03 159.08 0.00 10.94 1741 115~11Marvs NB 0.46 0.00
0.46 0.00 17.39 8
Sum 384.47 53.00
331.47 0.00 12.98 4304 2862 11
City 2002 Subtotal 886.57 144.38 742.19 60.76 14.03 9484 6986
CITY07 (1) PENDING Marys GC 26.67 2.28
24.39 0.00 16.97 414 41411
Sum 26.67 2.28 24.39 0.00 16.97 414 41411 ~-:J
(2) VACANT Marys_CB 43.20 15.77 27.43 0.00 18.48 507 409 ~
Marvs GC
29.21 9.88 19.33 0.00 15.10 292 236 ~
Sum 72.41 25.65 46.76 0.00 17.09 799 645 c:
§?
;J -e
d-'§;'"'"'"
Item 18-27
"0...-Q-
N
0
0
--'
t!:!s.
ii-cr
"(3) PARTUSE Marys_CB 33.04 8.71 24.32 21.35 30.35 648 431 '""Marys_GC 1.11 0.00 1.11 0.09 22.22 2 1 0-
~
Marys_L1 3.53 3.25 0.27 0.27 11.28 3 2 '"o
Marvs NB 0.42 0.00 0.42 0.04 24.39 1 1 -e
0
Sum 38.10 11.97 26.13 21.75 30.07 654 435 :1
0'~
Marys_CB 39.05 10.59 28.46 0.00
rn
(4) REDEV
18.55 528 351 "
Marvs GC 60.82 6.19 54.63
0.00 15.05 822 547 g-
Sum 99.87 16.77 83.09 0.00 16.25 1350 898 2.
~cr-
City 2007 Subtotal I 237.05 56.67 180.38 21.75 1 18.28 1 3217 2392 11
oo
§
28.85 16.891
q
UNINC (2)VACANT Uninc Marys UI 199.67 170.83 0.00 2885 2330
Sum 199.67 28.85 170.83 0.00 16.891 2885 2330
(3) PARTUSE
Uninc Marys UI 322.65 78.35 244.30 243.61 16.891 4115 2736
Sum 322.65 78.35 244.30 243.61 16.891 4115 2736
I
(4) REDEV
Uninc Marys UI 146.86 35.19 111.68 0.00 16.90 1887 1255
Sum 146.86 35.19 111.68 0.00 16.90 1887 1255
Unincorporated Subtotal 669.19 142.39 526.80 243.61 16.89 8887 6321
UGA Total 1792.81 343.44 1449.37 326.12 15.66 21588 15699
;l;:
~.:;]
":5.;:
~
:?.g,;;;.
Item 18 -28
Snohomish County Tomorrow 2007 Buildable Lands Report
----_._------:r -"~.":.~~""."""'~"';;;;-t __.-.._.."."..""."..-_-_--.-..--=-11
zo_ooo~·'i______________________i.--.-----115,000 ~
~L:--or --.,-••==:::.•----------. -----. -----. ---..--..--_.--. -------. -.-
10,000
N<>
S
toc
~
"0-n
~
0-
~
~
1
2
~
'"'"c
5a
~
oos
'<
--_.__._._-----------------
--Total 2025 Employment Capacity
~~2005 Employment Estimate
__SIC Annual Employment Estimates'
----_._---._---:-::-:-::-
-_iJ~~~~g~gg.g.g~g"gNggog~ig"g
'ao:L_·.
§-N§<!O
...~~N R ~
I _
Table 41.Marysville UGA Employment Statistics
;;
<>N
Mary.wUlo UGA
• The Stale of Washlrigton Employment Socurity Oeparlmenl now uses the NAleS system Of classifying jobs to prepare Us data.changing tho way some Jobs are categorized and msutling In slightly dlfforent UGA
employment esumates than under tho old SIC system.Data for 2002 is shoOVn using both systems.In addition,begInning with the 2002 NAICS esurrete.tempOfary workers neve been incorporated tnto lhe estimates.
.. 2002 Employment in UnincofPoraled Mary~vi1le UGA has been revised down .....-ard and City of Arlington revised cpeard duo to errors in the locadons of some employers used ror estsnates pUblished prev iously,
""l:!"
':;1
'"'~
~
~
::.0.g,
~.
Item 18 -29
Map1 portraysthe firstinput,the Buildable Lands
Inventory,This Aprt12006 inventory depicts how
the modeltreatseach parcel's potential for
Change by categorizing it by "Land Stalus".Land
status isa representation ofwhetherornot the
model expeetsthe landuseto change by 2025.
Final BLR 10.31.07
Marysville North UGA
land statue as of April 2006
fII1.C/lllf~h:School:S~~dal
t;jl Constant:Rllplacemenl
tiP Intompl.>!OPond
ttj3 P~fljaUy Us<l{l
tJ!J'Pen<l'ng
",R"ditv"lflllal11"""'.,
Other Legend Items
C'l'/
t:}UGA
•"'~."••or ;>a,~","a.ema.ce 025 0.5 075
"_5.!'~~?-~h~~.~~.'f."
P1d"""9and Ow.'oomanlServo...
~O"g R""I1"1'IO""'"Q
:lOOO~""""'e<~.l'.e'eu.WMIl'1i"fllOfl
S"O~.'I'li.~CO~f\lydi>"'o;ml anywatre"ly 01morc:hlnllb,11Iy
."wlI1<a"ly or~lne ••ol1lu,mop !of ROy Oi.'''ruo'P",~",.
.,1Ilti,,,,"p<oU"'""pl,Ool I••,oo'",""taloo""''''0''''''11 '"
"'.""oono.m'"il 100.0"".cV.cu",,"q,""""".,e,,,0'Q"ol~y
",dalOoep"'tod .,..,I"'."'.p My ",.r 011"","'.p ""'",.11
'.~PflM'~,"!y !of ,,'"'M,,,,,t .M 'OM","9'.~'\""..~
SUO"",,",lh<;O"<ily n"""'""~o"'."o ago'"'1 ."1 'J'lf"'9~
1"$0,",I,.~~~6f\Sln ~om a"u,.~I In..mop
Item 18-30,
Legend
City UGABoundary
Zone or FLU Designation Labels
Commercial
11II CommunityBusiness(CB)
CJ DownlownCommercial (DC)
11II General CommerCial (GG)
&:Neighborhood Business (NB)
ResidentIal
45 Single-Family unilsfAcre (R4.55FM)
6.5 Single-Family units/Acre (R6.5SFH)
8 Single-Family unils/Acre (R8SFH·Slj
12 Multi.Family unilsJAcre (R12MFL)
18 Multi-Family units/Acre (R18MFMl
28 Multi-Family units/Acre (R28MFH)
Urban Low Density Res (ULDR)
Urban Med Density Res (UMDR)
Urban High Density Res (UHDRj
Mixed Use
..Mixed Use(MU)
Industrial
..Generallnduslrial {Gil
• Light Industrial (ll)o Urban Industrial (UI)
Other
II gecreaucnet (REG)
II Publicllnstilutional (PI s Pil)
CJ Open Space (OPEN)
• Noll'Ihlll <iQhl5-of-wayand open SP.100traet.~
",~re nolllS~I\lnod zon,ng Of FI.U deSI\ltlali<)n lor
the anai>jsis.T~erell1re.l~ey are blank all tnis map.
Map 2 represents the second input,Zoningor
Plan Designation as modeled.Inmost cities,the
best predictorof future development is zoning,In
unincorporated areas,It is usuallythe county's
plan designation Of city pre~zoning,dependklg
on location,
s"",,,,mi ,,,,,"tv ..._""'1"'..'...."0 _"'"'I;ry
¢',.""••""o"~."o"t,,~""...~r ""V pO"",,,I.,..""""".
.,0,•."0"""0'..."",....Nt>"0''''"'"",,"'""""~o"'.m.';""on<''''''Q'''••"""".ov """'''''1,C~"."'''''''I',,;,'Y
"""'0 """,01<'<1 "",",.0'00 An~OM'oll"iu".o ....."'•••,
.•""""'"~.,"roo ,""" "r .,,-.:l ~,tl~..."'•••'0""'"""""O"'''''C''''"ty'''''''om."I1.,J...,'''."1".m.~.
Ql "<>l>\""""~"'"•"""'1111>'m.
Final BLR 10.31.07w+,
s
Item 18 - 31
Marysville UGA • North
Snohomi-"County
Pl~"o<;g':;~<i"(j;;;;Oi'~;;:;;.';ISe-,,"•••
t,,"_f1tf!90 P't""'"Q
,1000~O,"orOI'.'Aw.
E,...n,Wnl>0ll'0l>
j
•1
.!
,
1
I
Map3 depicts the locationfor potential new housingunits.Housi
unitpotentialis a combination of land status fromMap1,zoningor
plan designation from Map2, criticalareas,buffers and easements
asshownonthismap,as well as observed residential densities for
the relevantzoneor plan designation.
Marysville UGA•North
,
I
!
".,.,,-'."'''''Y-..''''''.......''''''......-:;:,:';:.;~.~~~.:,-::::.;;::.J.~';;~=
"""",''"'.~.~'''••'''''''''',''''',<''''''''',.,-'"''''"''''
"",,>.""",.,o""",~"Y ....."'....,~....."."~,,.·..""'.""',"_....t<f""'·,,,..".,.......'.~M
.::::"':'.;;.~"',;=~w.:::.;,~,''''''''",,"'"
Final BLR 10.31.07
Additional Capacity As of April, 2006
Legend
--Major Roads
City
UGA
CriticalAreas,Buffersand Easements
AdditionalHousingUnitCapacityperParcel
Do
01-5
iG]J 6·10
WI 11·50.51.
Item 18 ~32
RRSl'
,,,
Map 4 depicts the locationfor potential new employment.
Employment potential is a combination of land status from Map 1,
zoningorplan designation fromMap2, critical areas,buffel'$and
easements asshownon this map,ae wea as observed emelovment
densities for the relevant zoneor andes! nation.
Marysville UGA •North
,
I
!
SnohomWI County
...-.."_~'''''''r__
"'....,......"'"......,"'"....."......."...,,---"..-..,'_~""_-~..._-""--""""',""',•.,.....-~...._"""""'"-..,.....
,_,.._.-...cI.•"""''''''""""""'.......,...,-,..~.,.,_.""-"",..,....,.,,,,,,,,04 0';;
Final BLR 10,31,07
Additional Capacity As of April, 2006
Legend
-'-Major Roads
City
UGA
Critical Areas.Buffers and Easements
Additional Employment Capacity per Parcel
Clo
!!i!I ""•26·100
II 101·500
.501+
Item 18 - 33
Map 1 portrays the first input.the 8uildableLands
Inventory.This April 2006 inventory depictshow
themodeltreatseach parcel's potential for
change by categorizing it by "Land Status", Land
status Is a representation of whether or not the
model expects the land use to change by 2025.
Final BLR 10.3107
Marysville South UGA
Land Status as of April 2006
",.ChurCll;SehilQ):S~al
(;[p Coosta.l.R~p!aCllm,ml
ll8J Incomplele Pen<:!
•PartiallyUGed
lIP PCfldinll
•R~8VelOfl'lbl"
Va""nl
Other Legend Items
cav
Q UGAIe1\s:16»O'PMcel.lt~oI04,oe 0,25
s
0,5 075
Snohomillh County
AO""'"9 o!>dDov"i"""''''l So"';"""
lo"9 R"~ll"P100"'09
=R~'''''~,
"....eII,WWOn
SMJ\omi$>lCQlJfllfdi~.;i,".any WIl"""f 01"'"'d1ontablllt)lW...".nty of!~n=O!It..mop t",.""Qll'l<Cul.,""",,,,n
<l'll\«>""'JIl."'""">l.t"No '""'""nI'~"""'""'''"''W''"",d"""rl"~!ll"!I~.""u,aC)'.'.•,,"noy.<.mpj.l"n or qo.,oiilY
or <lO1.<!@Jl'Ctl'd00 tn~map Anf '''0'"I In,'""0 ,,",oS.1
'<>Opc>Mll>l,tyj",""01"'''001,••<lfurl.,.'.~,.....'"no'O
Snol>c>.""""Cll<lotyh.,ml...rwm ••d '~"!Il.OV 4a"',.~
I",.,'"n....1 ,On"!,Oft!"Of 01.11'••",.p
Item 18-34
Legend
City W .UGA Boundary
Zone or FLU DeslgnaUon Labels
M.ryovll1._EUZOntOl .._
Commerdal
B ComlTltJllitv Business (CB)o Downtown Commefcial (DC)
II1II Gooeral Commercial (GC)
ill NeighbomO«l Buslnen (NS)
Re$ldentlal •Gefleralln<l\.lstrl81 (Gil
~::J 45 Single-Family unlts/Acre (R4 ~FM)•L1ghllndutltrial (LI)
:-]65 Single-Family units/Acre (R6.5SfH)flliill VrblMllndustrtal {UI}
U 8 SII1!iJIe-FamiIy urnl$lAcre (ResFH-Sl}Other
Ii.!12 Multi-Family unitslAcre (R1ZMFL)m Recreational (REGl
CJ 18 Multi-Family unIlsJAcre (R18MFM)g Publiclln$Utulionai (PI e,Pill
III 28 Multi-Family units/Acre (RZ8MFH)[21 Open Space (OPEN)
Map2 represents the second input,Zoningor
Plan Designation as modeled.Inmost clUes,the
best predictor of future development is zoning.In
unincorporated areas,Itis usually the county's
plan designation or city pre--zoning,depending
on location.
Marysville UGA •South
"
"loll!thaI r'!Jhls-<:>r'-wily and open space tral'b
ere not 8$sign<ld lOMing OrA.U da&lgniltiMlor
e analysis,Tnerei'ol'lI,they are lJlankonth,smap.
"""0/I'i$Il O<lntt ",,,,,,,,",w,,,,...ty01 "'.'o!lOOI Ily""""","1>or ~"'''"of Ito",,...~fO'$ny o..l"vl .. ·OVW"'.•.".,..g'",'",o'IfIlcc.><0 '.p'•••n141>00 ($w""n>;.,
m_f.Qnf,.'"'"Q 1M 1lC""""'.y."urr_v."""",,.tono,"'"~""ly
of 01>1.~lo<l ""1hI.......Any,...,.r m••""0 '''''"It'<>.;oI1
,..OOl'..l>!,lyl"'''··...·r.to1,.r><Il.'jj,.,.\T.''''to ..Of<j
5"""om""Coun\V~..m1•••~o'""".""••nlll ony ~.
1_($bd,........fI'om....lIS<lolm""'M
Final BLR 10.31.07,+,
,
Item 18 - 35
Snohomish County
PlO"OIng OMD<ele<Oprnom S."""".
tons R""Q<'.P1.o","Q
.l()W111>1:""1.,,.,Av...
E••,.1l.'I'/!.",n!<lOO
l
Map3 depicts the locationfor potential new housingunits.Housing',
unitpotentialisa combination of land status from Map 1,zoning or
plan designation from Map 2.critical ereee.buffers and easements
asshownon thismap,as well as ob$ervedresldential densitieS for
the re~vant zone or plan designatlon.
Marysville UGA •South
Final BLR 10.31.07
Additional Capacity As of April, 2006
Legend
--Major Roads
City
UGA
CriticalAreas,Buffersand Easements
Additional Housing Unit Capacity per Parcel
00
01-5
lliilll 6-10
g 11·50
.51"oa
s
0.4 06
Snohomish County
PI."",ng .....d GO'vOlOP"'Onl ~''''OII'
1.,mgAo!'>gl>PI""""9
.WOO R<>C"",,'''';",AoI••
!;vo'.n.waot>"
"""",,,,,,,,,,,~,,,,.....,,..,........",....-
"'~"'_"~'_''"'''''''''"''''''<O_'''_"',..''','''...'"-''"'.""~'''''''.,''''''''~._"'..,.,.,~".."'.....".""',"""_"'.......,."...,...""""".,.....'""',"".".....,,..,.._...."',"'"'"'''''-''OW'P'''''''''..........'''''"",''''''...........'"""'-
.,..<'"..""""'<,,~'"
Item 18 - 36
,
I
!
Map 4 depicts the location for potential new employment.
Employment potential is a combination oflandstatusfromMap1.
zoning orplandeSignation fromMap2,critical areas,buffers and
easements as shownon this map,as well as observed employment
denSities forthe relevant zoneor an d nation.
Marysville UGA -South
S!1Ohomi$h County
l'!",",,'g .~a D""e'Qpmet>l SO"',_
I.o.,g R.c"!JI'PI"nmog
3000 R",,'.'.'"/We.
<:,,6t.Il~,,"Il'O"
~...,..."--",;..",...~",.,,,,,,,,,,,..
~""''''''''''''-'''-'''''''''''''''''''''''''''';><..,......"..."',-..,~"""..~,,'_.........."""'-"""'~-""""'_."''>."".."""'._...""..,.....,""""'...,...,"",•.._""~"""'''''-,,,....,"""".....,""'..."".."...."''''l''.....~'''''';''"''-"'.."""~""'"",,,,,,...,,,,,,'2
Final BLR 10.31.07
Additional Capacity As of April, 2006
Legend
--Major Roads
City
UGA
Critical Areas. Butters and Easements
Additional Employment Capacity per Parcel
CJ 0
ffi1 1-25
•26-100
11101-500
.501 ..
Item 18 - 37